Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6253 judgments · newest first · showing 5601–5800
Khushalbhai Savjibhai Maniya was preventively detained on 31‑12‑2025 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his brother. The State argued that his habitual bootlegging threatened …
Jigneshbhai Savjibhai Maniya was preventively detained on 31‑12‑2025 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his brother, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public …
Jilanbhai Bipinbhai Parekh was preventively detained on 31‑12‑2025 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his father, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public health, …
Navghan Jashabhai Balasara was preventively detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a “dangerous person” pursuant to a district magistrate’s order dated 04‑12‑2025. He challenged the order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that …
The petitioner, Kantibhai @ Raju Thuthiyo Lilaji Somaji Dabhi, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a detention order dated 30‑12‑2025 issued by the Police Commissioner under Section 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The …
Shirinbi Shaikh, detained under a preventive detention order dated 30‑12‑2025 issued by the Surat Police Commissioner under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, challenged the order through a petition. The petitioner argued that no material was placed before …
The petitioner, Paras Bhupatray Trivedi, applied for voluntary retirement which was approved by the District Collector of Rajkot on 21‑01‑2026. He subsequently filed Special Civil Application No.585 of 2026 in the Gujarat High Court. After the approval, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to …
The petitioners filed applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 seeking condonation of delays of 183 and 179 days in filing revision applications. The respondents, including the original complainant, appeared and indicated that the matter had been amicably settled. The petitioner’s …
The applicant, Parmar Shilpaben Hirabhai, filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application seeking restoration of Special Civil Application No. 25467 of 2025, which had been dismissed for failure to remove office objections within the time fixed by the coordinate bench. The High Court heard arguments from …
The petitioner filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 28‑day delay in filing a restoration application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by the Assistant Government Pleader who waived service of the rule. The court examined whether the delay was satisfactorily …
The petitioner, Dhaval Bhikhubhai Chavda, challenged the State of Gujarat for not verifying his caste certificate, which delayed his appointment as a Lokrakshak Police Constable, Class‑III. He relied on a prior order of a Co‑ordinate Bench (Special Civil Application No. 1858 of 2021) and its …
The petitioner, Bhikhulal Punjabhai Makwana, challenged the State of Gujarat for failing to verify his caste certificate, which prevented his appointment as a Lokrakshak Police Constable, Class‑III. He relied on a prior order of the Co‑ordinate Bench dated 26‑July‑2021, upheld by a Division Bench on …
The petitioner, Bhavesh Virabhai Mori, challenged the State of Gujarat for not verifying his caste certificate, which delayed his appointment as a Lokrakshak Police Constable, Class‑III. He relied on a prior order of a coordinate bench dated 26‑July‑2021, affirmed by a division bench on 25‑Nov‑2021, …
The petitioner, Bhavesh Kumar Popatlal Khatana, challenged the State of Gujarat for failing to verify his caste certificate, which prevented his appointment as a Lokrakshak Police Constable. He relied on a prior order of a Co‑ordinate Bench dated 26 July 2021, upheld by a Division Bench on 25 …
The petitioner, Mahesh Bhimabhai Karamata, challenged the State of Gujarat for not verifying his caste certificate, which delayed his appointment as a Lokrakshak Police Constable, Class‑III. He relied on a prior order of the Co‑ordinate Bench dated 26‑July‑2021, affirmed by a Division Bench on …
The petitioner, Vishal Kodiyatar, challenged the State of Gujarat for failing to verify his caste certificate, which prevented his appointment as a Lokrakshak Police Constable. He relied on a prior order of a Co‑ordinate Bench (Special Civil Application No.1858 of 2021) that directed provisional …
The petitioner, Samatkumar Makwana, challenged the State of Gujarat for failing to verify his caste certificate, which prevented his appointment as a Lokrakshak Police Constable, Class‑III. He relied on a prior order of the Co‑ordinate Bench dated 26‑July‑2021, affirmed by a Division Bench on …
The petitioner, Vishal Karmabhai Khatana, challenged the State of Gujarat for not verifying his caste certificate, which delayed his appointment as a Lokrakshak Police Constable. He relied on a prior coordinate‑bench order (26‑07‑2021) and its affirmation by a Division Bench (25‑11‑2021) that …
The petitioner, Ajay Lakhmanbhai Vanda, filed a special civil application challenging the State’s failure to verify his caste certificate, which prevented his provisional appointment as Lokrakshak Jail Sepoy, Class‑III. He relied on a prior order of a Co‑ordinate Bench dated 26‑07‑2021, affirmed by …
The petitioner, Kanabhai Laxmanbhai Karamta, challenged the State of Gujarat for failing to verify his caste certificate, which prevented his appointment as Lokrakshak Jail Sepoy, Class III. He relied on a prior order of a Co‑ordinate Bench dated 26 July 2021, affirmed by a Division Bench on 25 …
The petitioner, Vira Sajanbhai Katara, challenged the State of Gujarat for not verifying his caste certificate, which prevented his appointment as Lokrakshak Police Constable, Class‑III. He relied on a prior order of a Co‑ordinate Bench (Special Civil Application No. 1858 of 2021) and its …
The petitioner, Dayabhai Mehurabhai Karamata, challenged the State of Gujarat for not verifying his caste certificate, which delayed his appointment as a Lokrakshak Police Constable, Class‑III. He relied on a prior order of the Co‑ordinate Bench dated 26 July 2021, affirmed by a Division Bench on 25 …
The petitioner, Karan Najabhai Chavda, challenged the State's failure to verify his caste certificate, which prevented his appointment as a Lokrakshak Police Constable, Class III. He relied on a prior order of the Co‑ordinate Bench (Special Civil Application No.1858 of 2021) and its affirmation by a …
The petitioner, Rahul Lakhabhai Ulava, challenged the State of Gujarat for not verifying his caste certificate, which prevented his appointment as a Lokrakshak Police Constable, Class‑III. He relied on a prior order of a coordinate bench dated 26‑07‑2021, affirmed by a division bench on 25‑11‑2021, …
The petitioners, Karan Harshbai Chavada & others, challenged the State of Gujarat for failing to verify their caste certificate, which prevented their appointment as Lokrakshak Police Constables. They relied on a prior order of a coordinate bench dated 26 July 2021, affirmed by a Division Bench on …
The petitioners filed applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 seeking condonation of delays of 183 and 179 days in filing revision applications. The applicant’s counsel highlighted that the dispute had been amicably settled, a fact conceded by the respondent’s counsel. The court …
The petitioners, Chauhan Dineshbhai Vastabhai & ors., filed a miscellaneous civil application for recall (No.168 of 2026) seeking to withdraw the pending special civil application No.1777/2025 filed against the State of Gujarat & ors. They approached the High Court of Gujarat, Ahmedabad, through …
Bonus Enterprises Limited filed a Special Civil Application (No. 802 of 2026) and two Tax Appeals (Nos. 772 and 801 of 2026) before the High Court of Gujarat, Ahmedabad. The matter was heard by Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pranav Trivedi. The court issued an oral order …
Dr. Piyush Chauhan filed a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court against Bhavnagar University and others. The petitioner, through Senior Advocate Dhaval D. Vyas and Advocate Vishwas K. Shah, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition so that a representation could be …
The petitioner, Naren Chaudhary, filed a Special Civil Application seeking permission to withdraw the petition in order to make a representation to the competent authority. Senior Advocate Dhaval D. Vyas, appearing with Advocate Vishwas K. Shah, prayed for such permission. The Hon'ble Justice Nirzar …
Tai King Enterprises Co. filed a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court against the Additional Commissioner of Customs, Surat. The Court, comprising Justices A.S. Supehia and Pranav Trivedi, issued an oral order directing that any objections raised in the proceedings be withdrawn on …
Mahendra @ Madi filed a special criminal application seeking restoration of a matter before the Gujarat High Court. The Court noted that there were pending office objections to the application. Justice M.R. Mengdey directed that these objections be removed within two weeks from the date of the …
Tulsi Dayabhai Bhaskar filed a special criminal application (habeas corpus) seeking the release of a married woman who was allegedly being confined by her husband. The court allowed the applicant to join the husband as a party and admitted the police report. Upon hearing the woman, she expressed …
The petitioner, Milan Kaklotar, sought permission to withdraw his special civil application against Bhavnagar University and others. Senior Advocate Dhaval D. Vyas, appearing with Advocate Vishwas K. Shah, requested the court’s leave to withdraw so that a representation could be made to the …
The petitioner, Nileshkumaar Hasmukhbhai Adeshra (Soni), filed a special criminal application seeking the court's permission to withdraw the petition. Counsel for the petitioner requested the withdrawal, and the court considered the request. The judges granted the permission to withdraw. …
The petitioner, Vijayji, applied to the Gujarat High Court for an extension of parole leave, contending that he had been granted temporary bail in a separate criminal appeal but had not availed it due to another pending offence. The State opposed the application. The Court examined the applicant's …
The appellants filed a motor accident claim after the death of Narendrasinh Prabhatsinh Chauhan, who was struck by a tractor on 5 March 2019. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation but assessed the deceased’s monthly income at Rs 3,500, ignoring the prevailing minimum wage and the …
The appellant, a conductor in an Eicher truck, suffered grievous injuries to both legs in a 2016 road accident caused by the negligent driver of the truck. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded him Rs 11,59,100 as compensation, which the appellant challenged on the grounds that the quantum was …
The appellant, injured in a road accident on 4 October 2019, appealed the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, alleging errors in income assessment, omission of future prospective earnings, and inadequate compensation for pain, shock and …
The petitioners, Kuldeepsinh Bhagwanbhai Parmar and others, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking consent quashing. They later moved the court, through counsel Mr. Anvesh V. Vyas, to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Ms. Asmita Patel. The …
The State of Gujarat filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging the award of the Industrial Court, Rajkot dated 8 March 2022, which had ordered payment of certain benefits to the heirs of a deceased part‑time worker. The worker had been reinstated in 2013 as a …
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd filed a first appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs.3,56,500 to the road accident victim. The High Court examined the judgment and noted that the amount involved was small and meagre. It held …
The deceased was killed in a motor accident caused by a negligent trailer driver, and the claimants filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs.10,90,000, including Rs.2,50,000 for loss of love and affection and …
The appellant, Bhikhabhai Mahadevbhai Rabari, filed a second appeal and a civil application for stay against the Defense Estate Officer and another respondent. The court observed that the respondents had not filed the required DS affidavit since the matter was initiated in 2021. The judge directed …
The National Insurance Company Limited appealed under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs.3,67,116 to the victims of a road accident. The appeal challenged the judgment and award dated 23 February 2022. The High Court examined the appeal …
United India Insurance Co. Ltd appealed two first appeals (Nos. 782/2013 and 781/2013) filed by the legal heirs of the deceased Sardaben Ganesbhai Patel, challenging compensation awards of Rs.2,50,000 and Rs.1,80,000 respectively. The respondents argued that the quantum of the amounts was too small …
The applicant Bhadreshbhai Patel filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail. The State had earlier filed an application (Criminal Misc. Application No. 390 of 2025) which the Additional Sessions Judge at Gandhinagar‑Kalol allowed, thereby cancelling the …
The deceased Pratapsinh Harwarilal Dalal, a veterinary doctor and assistant professor at Junagadh Agricultural University, died in a road accident on 3.5.2016. Original petitioner No.1 Ranjanben claimed to be his legally wedded wife, married in 1993, with two children, and was recorded as nominee in …
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs.3,15,720 to the road‑accident victim. The High Court examined the appeal and noted that the quantum of compensation was modest. Relying …
The Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise filed a tax appeal against M/s Jalaaram Steel Furniture Pvt. Ltd. The appellant argued that the tax effect in the appeal was less than Rs.2 crores. The respondent contended that the appeal should be maintainable. The Court examined Circular No.9 of 2024 …
The State of Gujarat appealed under Section 377 of the CrPC seeking enhancement of the sentence imposed on Ketanbhai Ramanbhai Parmar, who was convicted of raping a five‑year‑old girl and sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.5,000. The State argued that the punishment …
The father‑son applicants were charged under Sections 406, 409, 420, 120B and 34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Gujarat Protection of Interest of Depositors Act for allegedly cheating investors of about Rs 2.48 crore. They contended that they had already repaid Rs 1.69 crore to 984 investors and …
The father‑son applicants were charged under Sections 406, 409, 420, 120B and 34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Gujarat Protection of Interest of Depositors Act for allegedly cheating investors of about Rs 2.48 crore. They contended that they had already repaid Rs 1.69 crore to 984 investors and …
The State appealed the acquittal of Jivanbhai Solanki and others for attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC, as the trial court had instead convicted them under Section 324 IPC and released them on probation. The High Court examined the oral and documentary evidence, noting that the injuries …
The State of Gujarat filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging the award of the Industrial Court, Rajkot dated 8 March 2022, which had ordered payment of certain benefits to the heirs of a deceased part‑time worker. The worker had been reinstated in 2013 as a …
The applicant, Mohammed Samirbhai Hussainbhai Chudgar, filed a criminal revision application 145 days after the prescribed period, seeking condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The respondent State of Gujarat did not appear, though notice was served, and the Additional Public …
The applicant, Afzalbhai Aamadbhai Mahida, filed a criminal revision application but delayed filing it by two days. He sought condonation of this delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The respondent State of Gujarat did not appear, and the Additional Public Prosecutor waived service. The …
The petitioner, Sheth Vinodchandra Mafatlal, filed an application for condonation of delay in preferring the main matter of a second appeal. The High Court considered the averments made in the application. The court found the reasons satisfactory and allowed the application. Consequently, the delay …
The High Court of Gujarat considered an application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by Nawaz @ Bapu Farukhkhan Bukhari seeking regular bail after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. …
The father‑son applicants were charged under Sections 406, 409, 420, 120B and 34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Gujarat Protection of Interest of Depositors Act for allegedly cheating investors of about Rs 2.48 crore. They contended that they had already repaid Rs 1.69 crore to 984 investors and …
The father‑son applicants were charged under Sections 406, 409, 420, 120B and 34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Gujarat Protection of Interest of Depositors Act for allegedly cheating investors of about Rs 2.48 crore. They contended that they had already repaid Rs 1.69 crore to 984 investors and …
The petitioner, Jethabhai Rambhai Baraiya, filed a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court against the Public Information Officer. The petitioner later sought to withdraw the application, indicating an intention to pursue relief under the Right to Information Act, 2005 before the …
The petitioner, Ramanlal Mohanlal Parmar, filed a special civil application seeking relief against the State of Gujarat and others. The grievance of the petitioner was subsequently redressed, and the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition. The court granted the request, …
The applicant, Fuliben Kantibhai Senama, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking consent quashing. The applicant subsequently approached the court requesting permission to withdraw the pending application. The State of Gujarat, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, opposed the …
Mohammad Rizvan alias Ajju filed a Special Criminal Application before the Gujarat High Court challenging an order. The State of Gujarat and others were respondents. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned order had been revoked by the authority, rendering the …
Mohammad Munaf filed a Special Criminal Application challenging his detention. The petitioner argued that the detention order had been revoked by the authority, rendering the petition infructuous. The court considered whether the revocation of the detention order made the writ petition unnecessary. …
Dharmeshbhai Ashokbhai Ratnotar was preventively detained on 22‑12‑2025 by the District Magistrate, Bhavnagar, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". The detainee, through his brother, challenged the detention order, arguing that no material was placed …
The petitioner, Laxmiben Manubhai Parmar, filed multiple criminal miscellaneous applications seeking condonation of delay. The High Court of Gujarat, after hearing, directed that any office objections to the applications be removed within two weeks from the order date. The court warned that failure …
Guddu Khatri was preventively detained on 27‑12‑2025 by the Surat Police Commissioner under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his friend Payal Guddu Pandey. The petitioner argued that no …
Nurbanu, a self‑identified sexual offender, was preventively detained on 13‑12‑2025 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. She challenged the detention order, arguing that no material showed her conduct disturbed public order. The State argued that her habitual offences …
Yash Joshi, through his father, challenged his preventive detention order dated 26‑12‑2025 issued by the Director General of Police under Section 2(e) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988. The petitioner argued that the detaining authority had …
Baldev @ Boby @ Bhuriyo Rameshbhai Vaniya was detained on 22‑12‑2025 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a “dangerous person”. He challenged the order, arguing that no material showed his conduct disturbed public health, order or tranquility. The State contended that …
Amaratbhai Thakor was preventively detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 on the ground that he was a "dangerous person" as defined in Section 2(c). He challenged the detention order, arguing that no material was placed before the authority to show that his conduct …
Vishal @ Vikash Jagdishbhai Dantani, detained as a "dangerous person" under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, challenged the preventive detention order dated 18‑12‑2025. The petitioner argued that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the order was …
The petitioners Merubhai Hamirbhai Gadhvi and another applied for successive regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 after a charge‑sheet was filed in FIR C.R. No.11200049251533/2025 alleging extortion of money related to a water‑pollution complaint. The State …
The petitioner, Dhansukhbhai Jerambhai Hirpara, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking consent quashing against the State of Gujarat and another party. The applicant, through counsel Mr. Munjal V. Acharya, later instructed the court to withdraw the application. The sole issue before the …
The applicants, a driver and a cleaner, were implicated in a contraband liquor seizure under several provisions of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. They filed an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, before the charge-sheet was filed. The State …
Padra Municipality filed petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Labour Court award that ordered reinstatement of several workmen and payment of back wages. The workmen had been engaged intermittently as casual daily‑wage labourers for drainage sweeping, not on any …
Padra Municipality filed petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Labour Court award that ordered reinstatement of several workmen and payment of back wages. The workmen had been engaged intermittently as casual daily‑wage labourers for drainage sweeping, not on any …
The petitioner, Salim Rahimbhai Shaikh, challenged an order dated 06.01.2026 issued by the City Survey Superintendent under Section 61 of the Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879, which directed removal of an alleged encroachment within one week. He contended that a notice under Section 202 of the same …
The petitioner, Salim Rahimbhai Shaikh, challenged an order dated 06.01.2026 issued by the City Survey Superintendent under Section 61 of the Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879, which directed removal of an alleged encroachment within one week. He contended that a notice under Section 202 of the same …
The petitioner, Wajidkhan Sarafatkhan Pathan, filed a petition to quash an order dated 06.01.2026 issued under Section 61 of the Land Revenue Code, 1879, which directed removal of an encroachment within a week. He contended that a notice under Section 202 of the same Code had been issued on …
Naderali Rajjabhai Usisawla filed a petition seeking to quash an order dated 06‑01‑2026 issued by the City Survey Superintendent, Vadodara under Section 61 of the Land Revenue Code, 1879, which directed removal of an encroachment within a week. The petitioner contended that a notice under Section …
Naderali Rajjabhai Usisawla filed a petition seeking to quash an order dated 06‑01‑2026 issued by the City Survey Superintendent, Vadodara under Section 61 of the Land Revenue Code, 1879, which directed removal of an encroachment within a week. The petitioner contended that a notice under Section …
Naderali Rajjabhai Usisawla filed a petition seeking to quash an order dated 06‑01‑2026 issued by the City Survey Superintendent, Vadodara under Section 61 of the Land Revenue Code, 1879, which directed removal of an encroachment within a week. The petitioner contended that a notice under Section …
The petitioner, Salim Rahimbhai Shaikh, challenged an order dated 06.01.2026 issued by the City Survey Superintendent under Section 61 of the Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879, which directed removal of an alleged encroachment within one week. He contended that a notice under Section 202 of the same …
Naderali Rajjabhai Usisawla filed a petition seeking to quash an order dated 06‑01‑2026 issued by the City Survey Superintendent, Vadodara under Section 61 of the Land Revenue Code, 1879, which directed removal of an encroachment within a week. The petitioner contended that a notice under Section …
The petitioner, Wajidkhan Sarafatkhan Pathan, filed a petition to quash an order dated 06.01.2026 issued under Section 61 of the Land Revenue Code, 1879, which directed removal of an encroachment within a week. He contended that a notice under Section 202 of the same Code had been issued on …
The petitioner, Imtyajali Memoodali Diwan, filed a special civil application seeking to quash an order dated 06.01.2026 issued under Section 61 of the Gujarat Land Revenue Code directing removal of an encroachment, and a prior notice dated 06.12.2025 issued under Section 202 of the same Code. The …
The petitioner, Rahimbhai Tinwala, challenged an order dated 06‑01‑2026 issued by the City Survey Superintendent under Section 61 of the Land Revenue Code, 1879 directing removal of an alleged encroachment within one week. He contended that a notice under Section 202 of the same Code had been issued …
The petitioner, Wajidkhan Sarafatkhan Pathan, filed a petition to quash an order dated 06.01.2026 issued under Section 61 of the Land Revenue Code, 1879, which directed removal of an encroachment within a week. He contended that a notice under Section 202 of the same Code had been issued on …
The petitioner, Wajidkhan Sarafatkhan Pathan, filed a petition to quash an order dated 06.01.2026 issued under Section 61 of the Land Revenue Code, 1879, which directed removal of an encroachment within a week. He contended that a notice under Section 202 of the same Code had been issued on …
The petitioner, Wajidkhan Sarafatkhan Pathan, filed a petition to quash an order dated 06.01.2026 issued under Section 61 of the Land Revenue Code, 1879, which directed removal of an encroachment within a week. He contended that a notice under Section 202 of the same Code had been issued on …
The petitioner, Salim Rahimbhai Shaikh, challenged an order dated 06.01.2026 issued by the City Survey Superintendent under Section 61 of the Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879, which directed removal of an alleged encroachment within one week. He contended that a notice under Section 202 of the same …
The petitioners challenged a notice dated 19‑January‑2026 issued by the Mamlatdar and Executive Magistrate ordering the removal of alleged illegal construction within two days, alleging it was issued without prior intimation and without citing any legal provision. The notice claimed the construction …
The plaintiff, Chandrakant J. Patel, sought a possession warrant against his relative Pradipkumar G. Patel under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Court Act, 1882, claiming that the permission to occupy the disputed premises had been withdrawn. The Small Cause Court issued the warrant under …
The National Insurance Company Ltd appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs.7,86,788 granted to Shatishbhai Jayantibhai Chhag, alleging the Tribunal erred by holding the car driver solely negligent, ignoring contributory negligence, and by improperly assessing the claimant's income. The …
The State appealed the acquittal of Yusufbhai Hasanbhai Qureshi and others by the Sessions Judge, who had found insufficient evidence to prove charges of murder, dowry death, and cruelty. The deceased, Nurjaha, and her infant daughter died from burns allegedly caused by kerosene, with the …
The petitioners failed to appear before the High Court of Gujarat despite the matter being called out. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition for non‑prosecution and discharged the rule. Any interim relief previously granted was vacated. No substantive merits of the petition were …
The Commissioner of Income Tax-II appealed against E Infochips Ltd concerning a tax liability. The appellant argued that the tax effect in the appeal was less than Rs.2 crore. The appellant relied on Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17 September 2024, which stipulates that appeals with a tax effect below …
Vinodchandra Ramanlal Modi appealed against Dawoodbhai Mohmadbhai Malek and another in Criminal Appeal No. 1312 of 2008 before the Gujarat High Court. The appellant's counsel informed the court that the dispute had been settled between the parties and sought permission to withdraw the appeal. …
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd appealed a decision involving a claim of Rs.4,10,000. The High Court considered whether the appeal could be entertained despite the modest quantum involved. The Court held that the amount was too small to warrant a full hearing and dismissed the appeal on that ground alone, …
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited appealed against a decision involving a claim of Rs. 3,88,500 against Jamalbhai Ramchandra Raval and others. The High Court, after hearing counsel, held that the amount in dispute was too small to warrant a full appeal. Consequently, the Court dismissed the …
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited filed a first appeal before the Gujarat High Court against a decision involving a claim of Rs. 3,88,500. The appellant sought relief, but the court considered the quantum of the claim to be small. The bench, after hearing counsel, held that the amount was …
The appellant filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC against the trial court's order acquitting the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referring to its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal …
The complainant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal …
The plaintiff, Sujatha Chandrasekhar Pillai, sought a compassionate appointment after her mother, a staff nurse, died in service while Sujatha was a minor. The trial court dismissed her suit, holding she was maintained by her father (a government employee) and family pension, and that the applicable …
The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of fourteen accused in a murder case involving Premjibhai Alabhai, a Scheduled Caste victim. The trial court had found the prosecution’s evidence insufficient, noting that key eye‑witnesses turned hostile and police officers lacked personal …
The K.M. Education Trust filed a Special Civil Application seeking an amount from the District Education Officer and others. The petitioner claimed that the amount was due to them. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the amount had already been received. The court …
In a Special Civil Application, L.P. Mandarwal, Director, sought relief against the Information Commissioner. The Central Information Commission had ordered the petitioner to pay Rs.5,000 as compensation to the complainant on 02.07.2007. The petitioner, through counsel, submitted that the …
The petitioners, Chaudhary Madevabhai Karsanbhai and others, filed a special civil application before the Gujarat High Court seeking relief against the State of Gujarat and another party. The petition was pending for an extended period. Counsel for the petitioners, Ms. Mamta R. Vyas, submitted that …
The Gujarat Rajya Police ASI/Head Constables Association filed a special civil application seeking recognition of an association for Assistant Sub‑Inspectors, Head Constables and Constables, after an earlier application for the same was rejected by the Director General of Police on 12 September …
The petitioner, Mulubhai Vastabhai Vakat ar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashment and set-aside of FIR/Order No. 22103 of 2025. The petitioner’s counsel failed to appear at each scheduled hearing, including the hearing on 7 January 2026 and the subsequent date of 21 January …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash and set aside an FIR/order. They failed to appear at any of the hearings despite multiple adjournments. The court observed that the applicant appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. The issue before the court was …
Shahir Ibrahimbhai Pathan filed a special criminal application (habeas corpus) seeking to compel his wife, the corpus, to return to the matrimonial home. The wife had left the home and was residing in Akola, Maharashtra. The police retrieved her and submitted a report, after which she expressed her …
Hardik Jashvantbhai Devani filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash and set aside FIR/Order No. 27654 of 2025. The applicant later moved the court for permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Kishan H. Daiya, requested the withdrawal at …
Vajid @Bhura Ikram Kureshi, arrested on 20‑Dec‑2023, was charged under multiple IPC offences, the Arms Act and the Gujarat Police Act for an alleged armed robbery and assault. He applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, claiming false implication and …
The petitioners sought enforcement of orders dated 08.01.2026 and 17.01.2026, which granted them full pay scale after the District Primary Education Officer's earlier orders were quashed. The State argued that the earlier show‑cause notice dated 29.11.2021 became redundant in view of the later …
Mahammedaji @ Pala Mahammedshafi Shaikh appealed against the State of Gujarat. The Registrar (Judicial) examined an office note dated 15.01.2026 and observed that the office objections had not been removed within the prescribed time. Consequently, the Registrar ordered that the office objections be …
Mavani Manjula Dhanjibhai and another filed Special Civil Application No.12959 of 2019 against the State of Gujarat, which had earlier been dismissed. They subsequently moved a Miscellaneous Civil Application (No.174 of 2026) seeking restoration of the dismissed petition. The learned counsel for the …
The plaintiff PT Trans Indo Pratama filed an admiralty suit against the vessel M/V Triumph Ocean and others, seeking enforcement of an arrest order dated 18 January 2026. The plaintiff's counsel submitted a withdrawal petition on 20 January 2026, stating that the parties had amicably settled the …
Leena P. Raval filed a special civil application seeking restoration of Special Civil Application No.11599 of 2020 against the State of Gujarat and others. The applicant, through Ms. Mamta R. Vyas, requested that the court be given one opportunity to present the matter and assured that the case …
The petitioners, Jagdish Manjibhai Chauhan and others, filed a Special Civil Application No.13815 of 2018 against the State of Gujarat, which was subsequently closed. They later moved a Miscellaneous Civil Application No.176 of 2026 seeking restoration of the earlier application. Counsel for the …
Kalpesh Kantibhai Katheriya filed a Special Criminal Application seeking detention under the Prevention of Anti-Social Activities (PASA) Act. The police from Udhana Police Station submitted an instruction stating that there was no proposal to detain the applicant under PASA. The court noted that, in …
These two appeals were filed by Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the common judgment and awards dated 27.12.2021 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special), Rajkot in MACP Nos. 1630/2015 and 1631/2015. The accident occurred on …
These two appeals were filed by Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's awards dated 27.12.2021 in MACP Nos. 1630/2015 and 1631/2015. The claims arose from an accident on 10.09.2015 in which a dumper fell …
The appellant, Parulben Mahendrabhai Godani, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Surat, for murder, grievous hurt, robbery, and criminal conspiracy based on Sections 302, 326, 394, 201, 120(B) IPC and Section 135 Gujarat Police Act. She appealed under Section 374 CrPC, contending that …
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 72‑day delay in filing its first appeal. The respondents, Vajshibhai Aalabhai Godhaniya & Ors., did not appear. The applicant argued that the delay was due to genuine reasons and …
The petitioners sought permission to withdraw their civil revision application and the accompanying stay application, requesting that the trial proceed expeditiously. The High Court granted the withdrawal, vacated the interim relief previously ordered, and directed the trial court to conclude the …
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 5,29,782 to the claimants and ordered United India Insurance Co. Ltd. to pay the amount and later recover it from the driver/owner of the offending truck. The insurer appealed, arguing that the driver had no licence and that the insurance policy was …
The applicant, Rajendra Krishnalal Sandhu, proprietor of Bharat Marine Traders, filed an application seeking condonation of delay in preferring the main matter of a second appeal. The respondent, Batukbhai Balabhai Patel, proprietor of Shree Ram Steel Industries Unit-2, opposed the application. The …
The petitioner, Khushbuben Somabhai Patel, filed a special civil application and, through counsel, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The Hon’ble Justice N. S. Desai considered the request and granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as …
The petitioner, Girishkumar Shantilal Patel, filed Special Civil Application No. 10811 of 2022 before the High Court of Gujarat. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered its inherent jurisdiction to allow withdrawal …
The petitioners, Messrs Jayraj Group of Companies, filed a civil revision application before the High Court of Gujarat. Subsequently, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing, granted permission to withdraw, disposing the petition as withdrawn and …
The appellant, Baldevbhai Keshavlal Suthar (deceased) and five other co‑appellants, filed a second appeal against Kantilal Ambalal Suthar and another respondent. Notice of appearance was issued to the appellants, but appellant No.1 had died and appellants No.2‑6, although served, did not appear or …
The National Insurance Co. Ltd filed a first appeal seeking recovery of Rs.4,36,500 arising from a road accident. The respondents did not appear before the High Court of Gujarat. The Court observed that the amount claimed was small and that there was no dispute over the accident, and therefore …
Asian B.C.A. College filed a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court against Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University and others. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition in order to pursue an alternative remedy. The Court considered …
The applicant, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 523‑day delay in filing its first appeal. The respondents did not appear. The court examined the applicant’s explanation, finding it bona fide and free of …
The petitioners, Dineshsing Bhavarsing Shekawat, filed an application before the Gujarat High Court seeking condonation of delay in preferring the main civil matter. The respondents, Jitendrakumar Bansilal Sharma and another, were served with the application. The court considered the averments made …
The petitioners, Ong Mazdoor Sangh, sought relief in a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel indicated that the petition had become infructuous. The Court, noting the petition's futility, disposed of the petition without addressing its …
Jitendrakumar Gandabhai Mori filed Special Civil Application No. 11611 of 2025 against the State of Gujarat and others. The petitioner later joined the case at the transferred place, rendering the petition infructuous. He sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel …
The applicant, Kalpeshbhai Nanabhai Baria, filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 267‑day delay in filing a first appeal. No respondents appeared despite being served. The applicant argued that the delay was due to genuine reasons and not a dilatory …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 195‑day delay in filing their First Appeal. The respondents did not appear. The court examined the petitioners' explanation, finding it bona fide and free of mala fide or dilatory intent. Emphasising …
The applicant Axita Dhirajbhai Vasani filed a petition seeking condonation of a seven‑day delay in filing a Civil Revision Application. The respondent, Smark Jayantibhai Dobariya, was served notice but did not appear before the Court. The applicant’s counsel argued that the delay was inadvertent and …
Ganga R.K. Industries Pvt. Ltd. filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Labour Court award dated 28‑04‑2025 that ordered the reinstatement of a workman with 50% back wages. The workman, originally employed as a temporary clerk‑cum‑supervisor …
This is a civil application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of 298 days' delay in filing the accompanying First Appeal. The applicants are Deviben Vasanbhai Sonara & Ors., and the respondents are Mahdeva Hirabhai Sonara & Ors. Though respondent Nos. 1 and 2 were …
The appellants, heirs of Jorsingbhai Harsingbhai Damor who died in a motor accident on 15‑10‑2016, appealed the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s award of Rs 9,77,200 under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, alleging errors in assessing the deceased’s income, loss of consortium, loss of …
The petitioners sought enforcement of orders dated 08.01.2026 and 17.01.2026, which granted them full pay scale after the District Primary Education Officer's earlier orders were quashed. The State argued that the earlier show‑cause notice dated 29.11.2021 became redundant in view of the later …
The petitioners sought enforcement of orders dated 08.01.2026 and 17.01.2026, which granted them full pay scale after the District Primary Education Officer's earlier orders were quashed. The State argued that the earlier show‑cause notice dated 29.11.2021 became redundant in view of the later …
The petitioners sought enforcement of orders dated 08.01.2026 and 17.01.2026, which granted them full pay scale after the District Primary Education Officer's earlier orders were quashed. The State argued that the earlier show‑cause notice dated 29.11.2021 became redundant in view of the later …
The petitioners sought enforcement of orders dated 08.01.2026 and 17.01.2026, which granted them full pay scale after the District Primary Education Officer's earlier orders were quashed. The State argued that the earlier show‑cause notice dated 29.11.2021 became redundant in view of the later …
The petitioners sought enforcement of orders dated 08.01.2026 and 17.01.2026, which granted them full pay scale after the District Primary Education Officer's earlier orders were quashed. The State argued that the earlier show‑cause notice dated 29.11.2021 became redundant in view of the later …
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of an 88‑day delay in filing its First Appeal. The respondents did not appear as notice was not received. The court examined whether the delay was justified and whether it warranted …
The petitioner, the heir of a deceased work‑charge watchman, filed a petition under Articles 14, 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging an award of the Industrial Court that dismissed his claim for a compassionate appointment and imposed exemplary costs of Rs 25,000. The dispute arose from a …
In a Special Civil Application, petitioner Habibbhai Yusufbhai Varsola claimed that the respondent (the Collector) owed an outstanding amount to his workman. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the respondent had already paid the amount, and the workman had received it, leaving no grievance. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 67‑day delay in filing a first appeal. Respondents No.1 and No.2 did not appear, while Respondent No.3 was represented. The court examined the applicant’s explanation and found it to be genuine and not …
Chandrikaben Ranchhodbhai Vasava filed a Special Civil Application against the Collector and another respondent seeking recovery of an outstanding amount owed to her workman. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the grievance remained unresolved. The respondents contended that the amount had already …
The applicant‑accused Karanbhai sought to quash FIR No.11193034240308 filed under Section 107 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging abetment of suicide of his girlfriend. The deceased had left a suicide note indicating distress over family opposition, with no allegation of direct …
On 17 December 2017 a minor cyclist was killed when a dumper, driven at excessive speed, collided with his bicycle. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation to the deceased's family and held the insurer, National Insurance Company Ltd., liable under the Motor Vehicles Act. The insurer …
The petitioner, Shivabhai Govabhai Dayma, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in filing the main criminal matter. The application was presented before the High Court of Gujarat, Ahmedabad, with Mr. M R Saiyed appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Chintan Dave, …
The petitioners, Brijeshbhai Mahendrabhai Amin & Anr., filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration. They later requested permission to withdraw the petition, seeking liberty to file a fresh application if a discharge application is decided against them. The Court, after hearing …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No.11191004250822 alleging that applicant No.3 had slapped the victim. Applicants No.1 and 2 withdrew their applications, leaving the court to consider only applicant …
Mrs. Meenaben Paulbhai Khristi filed several special civil applications seeking a higher pay scale. The State Government approved the higher pay scale for each petitioner, and the approval order was placed on record. The petitioner's counsel, Mr. V.K. Joshi, requested that the petitions be withdrawn …
The petitioners, represented by Mr. Hardeep L. Mahida, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw their criminal miscellaneous application and requested liberty to file a fresh quashing petition. The Respondents, represented by Addl. Public Prosecutor Mr. Chintan Dave, opposed the withdrawal. …
The petitioners Khemabhai Dalabhai Gamod & Anr filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 790‑day delay in filing their first appeal. The respondents did not appear. The court examined the petitioner's claim of sufficient cause, emphasizing that limitation …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 290‑day delay in filing their first appeal. No respondents appeared despite service of notice. The petitioners argued that the delay was not deliberate and cited genuine reasons. The court, …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 290‑day delay in filing their First Appeal. The respondents did not appear despite being served. The court examined the petitioner's claim of sufficient cause, emphasizing that limitation rules should …
The petitioners sought condonation of a 96‑day delay in filing a first appeal, invoking Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The respondents did not appear. The court examined the petitioner's explanation, finding it bona fide and not dilatory, and emphasized that limitation provisions should be …
The petitioner, Surpalsinh Arjunbhai Malivad, challenged the State of Gujarat for not verifying his caste certificate, which prevented his appointment as a Livestock Inspector (Class‑III) after selection. He relied on a prior order of a coordinate bench (Special Civil Application No.1858 of 2021) …
The applicant, Rakesh Kumar Bhagwan Ram, filed a successive regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging offences under Sections 178(1), 179, 180, 61 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 relating to counterfeit …
Piru Said Shaikh was preventively detained on 29 November 2025 by the Surat Police Commissioner as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The detainee, through his mother‑in‑law, challenged the detention order, arguing that no material …
Vinodkumar Becharbhai Vaghri filed a Special Criminal Application (Habeas Corpus) before the Gujarat High Court against the State of Gujarat and others. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Anvesh V. Vyas, informed the court that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the present …
Suraj @ Ravi Ashram Divakar, through his wife, filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a detention order dated 19‑12‑2025 that labelled him a "bootlegger" under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The petitioner was detained …
The petitioner, Deepkumar, filed Special Criminal Application No. 17475 of 2025 before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the pending application. The Court examined the request and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. …
Sandeep Laljibhai Parmar filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging his detention as a "bootlegger" under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He contended that the detaining authority had no material to show that his alleged offences disturbed …
Dilipbhai Jayantibhai Rathva, through his brother-in-law, filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a detention order dated 22‑12‑2025 that labeled him a "bootlegger" under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The order, issued …
The applicant, Sunitaben Nareshbhai Parmar, filed a Special Criminal Application and later sought the court's permission to withdraw it. The learned counsel for the applicant requested withdrawal, and the court granted the permission. Consequently, the matter was disposed of as withdrawn. No …
Chiragbhai Ramanbhai Barot, through his nephew, filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a detention order dated 22‑12‑2025 issued by the Vadodara Police Commissioner under Section 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The order was based …
Sachitanand @ Raj was preventively detained on 27 October 2025 by the Surat Police Commissioner as a ‘dangerous person’ under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his brother, arguing that no material was …
Savanbhai Vaghela was preventively detained on 15‑12‑2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the order through a petition filed by his mother, arguing that there was no material showing any disturbance to public …
The petitioner, Anilbhai Raadadiya, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a detention order dated 25‑12‑2025 issued by the Surat Police Commissioner under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The order was based on …
Gopalbhai Chauhan was detained as a "bootlegger" under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 by a District Magistrate on 22‑12‑2025. He challenged the detention through a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The petitioner argued that no material was placed …
Vishalbhai @ D Bharatbhai Chauhan was preventively detained on 22‑12‑2025 by the District Magistrate, Bhavnagar under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his mother, arguing that …
The petitioners Bhagirath @ Banti Bhikhabhai Swamiji Prajapati challenged a detention order dated 25‑12‑2025 issued by the Commissioner of Police under Section 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, alleging they were a "bootlegger". The petition argued that no material was …
Sanjanbhai was preventively detained on 15‑12‑2025 by the District Magistrate of Bhavnagar under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the order through a petition filed by his cousin, arguing that no material showed any …
The applicant, Natubhai Babubhai Makwana (through Shantibhai Oghadbha) sought the court’s permission to withdraw a Special Criminal Application filed before the Gujarat High Court. The learned counsel for the applicant, Ms. Drasthy N. Budhani, made the request. The court considered whether such a …
The petitioner, Bhaveshbhai Kotar, was preventively detained on 22‑12‑2025 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". He challenged the detention order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public health, order or tranquility and …
Kamleshbhai Shanabhai Chavda was preventively detained on 22 December 2025 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. His wife filed a petition challenging the detention, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public health, order or …
The petitioner, Ambikaben Rahulbhai Kumhar, filed a Special Criminal Application (R/SCR.A/17538/2025) before the Gujarat High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The issue before the Court was whether it should grant …
Vijaybhai Bhupatbhai Parmar, through his uncle, challenged a detention order dated 22‑12‑2025 issued by the District Magistrate, Bhavnagar, labeling him a "bootlegger" under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The petitioner argued that no material was placed …
Noorjaha, detained under a preventive detention order dated 22‑12‑2025 pursuant to Section 2(bbb) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘cruel person’, challenged the order through a petition filed by her brother. The petitioner argued that no material was placed before …
Jigneshkumar @ Amit was preventively detained on 29 December 2025 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘bootlegger’. His wife filed a petition challenging the detention, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the …
The petitioner, Nayak Kamleshbhai Budhabhai, filed a special criminal application for a writ of habeas corpus seeking the production of a woman (the corpus) who was allegedly being confined by the respondents. The corpus and petitioner were in a live-in relationship, and her statement to the Devgadh …
Vashrambhai Shankarbhai Patel (Solanki) filed a Special Civil Application before the High Court of Gujarat against the Deputy Director and others. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Rishin R. Patel, sought permission to withdraw the petition after the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner were …
The applicant, Dilipji Varsangji Thakor (Chauhan), filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Ms. Ritixa P. Zala, requested and was granted permission to withdraw the application. The Court ordered the application to stand disposed of as …
The petitioner, Faiz Ahmed, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking an extension of parole leave. The State opposed the application but waived service of the rule. The court examined the jail remarks and the grounds presented by the petitioner. Exercising its discretion, the court found merit …
The petitioner, Champubhai Babubhai Vinchhiya, filed Special Criminal Application No. 644 of 2026 seeking parole leave. The applicant's counsel, Ms. Gayatriba B. Jadeja, subsequently moved the court for permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by …
The applicant, Pritesh Girishbhai Thakkar, filed a special criminal application seeking an extension of parole leave for 30 days. The respondent State of Gujarat waived service of the rule. The High Court, after considering the applicant's grounds and the case circumstances, exercised its discretion …
The applicant, Javedkhan @Baba @Jallati, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 30 days. The respondent State of Gujarat, represented by counsel, waived service of the rule. The High Court, after considering the applicant's grounds and case circumstances, exercised its …
