Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6253 judgments · newest first · showing 5801–6000
The father of a 17‑year‑old minor filed a special criminal application for a writ of habeas corpus, seeking the minor's release from his custody. The minor expressed a desire not to live with her father and requested placement in a shelter home. The State informed the relevant police station, and …
The applicant filed Special Criminal Application No.673/2026 seeking parole leave. Counsel for the applicant requested permission to withdraw the application. The Hon’ble Court granted the request and ordered the application to be disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the parole request …
The applicant, Patel Danabhai Kanabhai, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The Hon'ble Justice Utkarsht Thakorbhai Desai granted the request to withdraw. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, JYOTENDRABHAI MADHUSUDAN JOSHI, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave for 30 days. The respondent State of Gujarat waived service of the rule. The High Court, after considering the grounds and circumstances, exercised its discretion in favour of the petitioner. …
The petitioner, Sanjaybhai Bhanubhai Chudasama, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave for 30 days. The court considered the grounds presented and the circumstances of the case, and exercised its discretion in favor of the applicant. It partially allowed the application, granting …
The petitioner, Hareshbhai Chaudhary, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 30 days. The respondent State waived service of the rule. The court examined the grounds and circumstances and exercised its discretion in favor of the petitioner. It partially allowed the …
The applicants filed a criminal revision application before the High Court of Gujarat challenging an order of a subordinate court. During the hearing, the applicants, through counsel Mr. D.M. Devnani, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the revision application. The Court considered the …
The petitioner, Sanjaybhai Ghanshyambhai Vasava, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 30 days. The respondent State of Gujarat waived service of the rule. After considering the applicant's grounds and the case circumstances, the court exercised its discretion in favor of the …
The petitioner, Jagdishbhai Vallabhbhai Chauhan, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the Gujarat High Court seeking parole. The applicant's learned counsel, Ms. Gayatriba B. Jadeja, subsequently moved the Court for permission to withdraw the application. The Court, exercising …
The petitioner, Kanabhai Bhikhabhai Charoliya, filed a special criminal application seeking a 30‑day parole leave. The State, represented by counsel, waived service of the rule. After considering the applicant’s grounds and the case circumstances, the court exercised its discretion in favour of the …
The applicant filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) seeking parole. The applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. Justice Utkarsh Thakorbhai Desai granted the request. The court ordered the application to stand disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits …
The petitioner, Pushpendra Birendrasing Shrivasa, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 30 days. The court considered the grounds and circumstances of the case and exercised its discretion in favor of the applicant. The application was partially allowed, granting parole for …
The petitioner, Naresh @Bhuriyo Jayantibai Boghabhai, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave from the Gujarat jail. The application pleaded that the grounds mentioned warranted the court's discretion to grant temporary release. The court, after noting the waiver of service …
The petitioner, Nilesh @ Mohit Khimjibhai Parmar, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 45 days. The court considered the grounds presented and the circumstances of the case, exercising its discretion in favor of the applicant. It partially allowed the application, granting …
Narshibhai Nathubhai Solanki filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The court examined the jail records and noted that the applicant had already been released on parole from 12 August 2025 to 18 August 2025 for a period of seven days. Considering the recent grant of parole, the …
The petitioner, Yogendrasinh Chandubha Zala, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 30 days on medical grounds. The respondent State of Gujarat, represented by Mr. Hardik Soni, waived service of the rule. After considering the applicant's grounds and the case circumstances, …
The applicant, Chamanaji Chaheraji Thakor, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the Gujarat High Court seeking parole. The applicant’s counsel, Ms. Ritixa P. Zala, requested permission to withdraw the application. Justice Utkarsh Thakor granted the request, allowing the …
The applicant, Joravarkhan Rahemtkhan Jatmalek, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Avanidhar M. Thakore, subsequently requested permission to withdraw the application. The Hon’ble Justice Utkarsh Thakorbhai Desai granted the request, allowing the …
The applicant, Godil Mahamad Tahir Munir, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking consent quashing. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Rahul R. Dholakia, requested permission to withdraw the application. The Hon'ble Justice Vimal K. Vyas granted the request, ordering that the …
Shabbir @ Gadbo Abdanbhai Arab filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The applicant had previously been granted furlough leave from 17 October 2025 to 30 October 2025 for a period of fourteen days. The High Court examined the jail remarks and noted the recent furlough. …
The petitioner, Laghdhirbai @ Gadi Lakhmanbhai Gohil, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for a period of 30 days. The respondent State of Gujarat opposed the application, and the respondent’s counsel, Mr. Hardik Soni, appeared for the State. The court examined the grounds …
The petitioner, Dilipbhai Parmar, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 30 days. The court considered the grounds and circumstances of the case and exercised its discretion in favor of the petitioner. The application was partially allowed, granting parole for 21 days upon …
The petitioner, Prakashbhai Dalabhai Ranva, applied to the Gujarat High Court for parole leave. The court examined the jail records and noted that the petitioner had already been granted parole for the same reason for a period of seven days. Considering the prior parole, the court found no …
The petitioner, Rangatsinh Jalamsinh Vaghela, filed an application under Section 483(3) of the BNSS, 2023 seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to Ganpatbhai Dahyabhai Desai in a misappropriation case. The coordinating bench had earlier released Desai on anticipatory bail conditioned on …
The Divisional Controller appealed against an order of the Tribunal concerning a road‑accident claim against Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. The insurer had offered to pay Rs. 3,69,500, which the appellant considered insufficient. The High Court observed that the quantum of the claim was …
The insurance company New India Assurance Co. Ltd. appealed against a lower court order involving a claim of Rs.4,46,900. The sole ground raised for the appeal was the alleged merit of the claim. The High Court examined whether an appeal should be entertained when the amount in dispute is relatively …
The appellant, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., filed a first appeal (No.1908 of 2015) against a decision involving a claim of Rs.3,26,500, together with two civil applications for stay and direction. The High Court noted that the quantum of the dispute was very small and, in the interest of judicial …
The National Insurance Company Ltd. appealed against a decision involving a claim of Rs.3,35,000 against Niruben Shaileshbhai Solanki and others. The appellant argued that the lower court’s order should be set aside. The High Court observed that the amount in dispute was modest and, consistent with …
The appellant, Ajitbhai Raidh... (the victim) and the vehicle owner reached a settlement concerning the dispute that gave rise to the appeal. The appellant’s counsel informed the Court that the matter had been resolved between the parties and therefore no longer required adjudication. The Court …
Ajitbhai Raidhanbhai Kuvadiya appealed against ICICI Lombard Insurance & Ors. The appellant's counsel informed the court that the dispute had been settled between the victim and the vehicle owner, rendering the appeal moot. The court accepted this submission and held that there was no longer any …
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Ltd appealed a lower court decision involving a claim of Rs.4,65,500 against Hamidabi WD/O Yusuf Shafi Shaikh and others. The appellant sought relief, but the High Court of Gujarat considered only the quantum of the claim. The Court held that it would not …
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Ltd appealed a trial court decision concerning a claim of Rs.4,65,500 against Shahinbi Yusuf Sakil Shaikh and others. The sole ground raised by the insurer was that the amount involved was small. The High Court of Gujarat held that it would not entertain an …
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed a first appeal (No. 1903 of 2016) against Jadiben Merabhai Bharvad (Lamka) and others, seeking relief in a dispute involving Rs.5,00,000. The appellant argued that the lower court erred, but the High Court noted that the quantum involved was modest. The Court held …
Kepler Resources Private Limited, a new industrial undertaking manufacturing ferro‑vanadium, applied for exemption from electricity duty under Section 3(2)(vii) of the Gujarat Electricity Duty Act, 1958. The company began production on 29‑Nov‑2023 and was required to submit Form‑E within 90 days, …
The accident occurred on 21 October 2015 when a car (RJ‑27‑CD‑4506) collided with a tractor, resulting in the death of Jasvantsinh Zala. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held the car's owner, Meghvilal N. Sharma, liable and awarded Rs.4,74,844 in compensation. Sharma appealed under Section 173 of …
The Designated Special Judge had earlier ordered that the trial in the criminal matter be completed within six months, but the trial remained pending due to repeated delays. The applicant filed a criminal revision seeking direction to expedite the trial. The High Court examined the delay and noted …
Kedar Rathod was convicted for kidnapping (IPC s.363), assault (s.365) and rape (s.376) of a girl aged about four years. The trial court relied primarily on the child’s testimony, supported by medical findings of genital injuries, and sentenced him to seven years for kidnapping and assault and life …
Petitioner Mehulpbai Dineshbhai Chauhan filed a Special Civil Application seeking redress of a grievance. After the respondents issued an administrative order addressing the grievance, the petitioner moved to withdraw the petition, requesting that Respondent No.3 be directed to implement the order. …
The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) filed a complaint alleging a gold‑smuggling conspiracy involving several accused, including Mahmed Rizvanbhai Aiyubbhai Limbada, under IPC sections 174 and 175 read with Customs Act section 108. The accused were intercepted with large quantities of gold …
The applicant, Rajubhai Trilokram Chaudhary, filed a criminal revision application under the Negotiable Instruments Act challenging his conviction. He later instructed his counsel, Mr. Daksh Solanki, to seek the court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, …
Ashrafbhai Jumabhai Khafi challenged an order of externment issued by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Jamnagar under Section 56(a) of the Gujarat Police Act, 1951, which barred him from the district for six months. The order, upheld by the appellate authority, was based on two FIRs (2023 and 2024) …
The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash and set aside FIR/Order No. 19957 of 2025. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The Hon'ble Court granted the request, disposing of the application as withdrawn and …
The applicant, Akshay Pareshkumar Jain, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashing and setting aside of FIR/Order No. 18535 of 2023. He later moved the court for permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel, Mr. Kunal S. Shah, represented the applicant and requested …
A large group of special civil applications were filed by various candidates challenging the Gujarat Public Service Commission’s recruitment process. The Court ordered the Commission to produce the examination results in a sealed cover, which revealed that many petitioners either failed, did not …
The petitioner, Mamta Shishupalsingh Rathour, filed a special civil application seeking relief after an administrative order dated 15 January 2026 directed a lump‑sum compensation of Rs.4,00,000 in lieu of a compassionate appointment. The respondent, the Administrative Officer of Nagar Prathmik …
The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash and set aside FIR/Order No. 22115 of 2025. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Hon'ble Court granted the permission to withdraw and disposed of the application as withdrawn. …
The applicant, Satyanarayan Tarachand Jaju, filed a revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 challenging the trial court’s refusal to discharge him in a PMLA case alleging his involvement in a bank‑fraud and money‑laundering scheme. The prosecution case …
The petitioners, appointed as peons before 2006, were placed on a fixed salary that, after the 6th Pay Commission and a 2009 government resolution, resulted in a lower basic pay (Rs.7100) than their juniors who were appointed after 01‑01‑2006 and placed in a higher pay band. Invoking Article 226, …
The applicant, Jakir Hussain Manjurhussain Sheikh, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The applicant later moved the court for permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, State of Gujarat, was represented but did not oppose the withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice …
The petitioner, Ajaybhai Jadavbhai Makvana, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the Gujarat High Court seeking parole. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after considering the request, granted permission …
The husband, Pankajkumar Rameshbhai Sundesha, filed a special criminal application for a writ of habeas corpus seeking the production of his wife, who had left his residence and chosen to stay at her parental home. The police produced the wife and a report, confirming her desire not to live with the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application (No. 39188 of 2025) which was dismissed by the trial court on the ground that the required office objections had not been removed. The petitioners subsequently filed a restoration application (R/Cr. Misc. Application No. 26947 of 2025) …
Mahendrakumar challenged his detention as a "bootlegger" under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, arguing that the Police Commissioner had no material to show a disturbance of public order. The State contended that he was a habitual offender and his activities threatened …
Kevalbhai Kishorbhai Sondarva was preventively detained on 15‑12‑2025 by the Commissioner of Police, Rajkot, under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his mother, arguing that no …
Mahendrasinh Rajput challenged a preventive detention order dated 19‑Nov‑2025 issued by the Director General of Police under Section 2(e) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988. The petitioner argued that no material showed his activities …
The petitioner Yagnesh @ Lalo Dilipbhai Pandit filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) seeking parole. The applicant's learned counsel, Mr. Maulik Baseri, subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The Hon'ble Justice Utkarsh Thakorbhai Desai considered the …
Mohan @ Nano Gurumukhdas Chandlani, detained as a "bootlegger" under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, challenged the detention order dated 16‑12‑2025 via Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The detaining authority relied on five criminal cases under the Prohibition …
The petitioner, Sunil @Sadho Nautamdas Nachnani, filed a Special Criminal Application challenging an order passed against him by the State of Gujarat. During the pendency of the application, the authority that had issued the impugned order revoked it. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the …
Naresh Mahendrabhai Pruthviraj Meena was preventively detained on 12‑12‑2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his relative, arguing that no material showed any disturbance …
Mohammedfaizan @ Valaa Mohammedaiyub Shaikh challenged a preventive detention order dated 04‑12‑2025 issued by the Ahmedabad Police Commissioner under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, alleging he was a "dangerous person". The petitioner argued that no …
The petitioner, Vineshbhai Patil, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a detention order dated 16‑12‑2025 issued by the Surat Police Commissioner under Section 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The order detained him as a …
Narendra @ Golu Kiran Mistri was detained on 15‑12‑2025 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the detention was mechanical. The State contended that …
Dipakbhai Lalabhai Premabhai Parmar was preventively detained on 11‑12‑2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his relative, arguing that no material showed any disturbance …
Mosin, detained as a "dangerous person" under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, challenged the preventive detention order dated 12‑12‑2025. The petitioner argued that no material showed any disturbance to public order, health, or tranquility, and that the order was passed …
Vishal @ Bhushan Patil was preventively detained on 13‑12‑2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the order through a petition filed by his brother, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order …
Sunny Shivrambhai Nagjibhai Barot was preventively detained on 11‑12‑2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the order through a petition filed by his mother, arguing that no material showed his conduct threatened …
Mayur Ishvarbhai Nanjibhai Bhat (Barot) was preventively detained on 11‑12‑2025 by the Ahmedabad Police Commissioner as a ‘dangerous person’ under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The detainee, through his mother, challenged the order alleging no material …
The Gujarat High Court examined a petition filed by Sanjay Dahyabhai Rajput challenging his preventive detention under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, which labeled him a "bootlegger." The petitioner argued that no material was placed before the detaining …
Ayaan @ Manru @ Mandu Imtiyazbhai Ansari was preventively detained on 10 November 2025 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the order through a petition filed by his father, arguing that no material was placed before the detaining …
Rakesh Shinde was preventively detained on 15‑12‑2025 by the Surat Police Commissioner as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the order through a petition filed by his brother, arguing that no material was placed before …
The petitioner, Rameshbhai Joliya, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a detention order dated 15‑12‑2025 issued by the District Magistrate under Section 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The order detained him as a …
Mahendra Sukhlal Bhanji Kharadi (Meena) was preventively detained on 04‑12‑2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘dangerous person’. He filed a petition challenging the detention, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public health, …
Arvindbhai Rupabhai Dihora, through his son, challenged a detention order dated 15‑12‑2025 that labeled him a "bootlegger" under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The petitioner argued that no material was placed before the detaining authority to show that his alleged …
Mohamad Sikandar Abdul Karim Bhadbhuja was detained on 17‑12‑2025 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". His wife filed a petition challenging the detention, arguing no material showed a threat to public order. The State argued the detainee was a …
Rahul @ Golden was preventively detained on 13‑12‑2025 by the Surat Police Commissioner under Section 2(ha) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, on the ground that he was a "sexual offender" and his conduct threatened public order. He filed a petition challenging the …
Guruprasad Kanojiya challenged a detention order dated 17‑12‑2025 that labeled him a "bootlegger" under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He argued that no material showed his activities disturbed public health, order or tranquility, and that the order was …
Danishbhai Hanifbhai Kandiya (Majodi), through his brother Umar, challenged a preventive detention order dated 06‑12‑2025 issued by the Director General of Police under Section 2(e) of the Prevention of Illicit Trafficking in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988. The petitioner …
Dipakbhai Chandubhai Dabhi filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a detention order dated 15‑12‑2025 issued by the District Magistrate under Section 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The order was based on a single criminal case …
Santoshbhai Natubhai Solanki was preventively detained by the District Magistrate of Bhavnagar under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘dangerous person’. He filed a special criminal application challenging the detention, arguing that no material was …
Nilesh Rameshbhai Naik was preventively detained on 14‑12‑2025 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "sexual offender". He challenged the order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the detention was mechanical. The State contended …
Brijesh @ Bhindi Baliram Kushwah was preventively detained on 24‑11‑2025 by the Ahmedabad Police Commissioner under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person." He challenged the order through a petition filed by his father. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Mohammad Soheb Abdul Vahid Shaikh, filed a Special Criminal Application before the Gujarat High Court challenging an order passed by the Police Commissioner. While the petition was pending, the authority that had issued the impugned order revoked it. The petitioner’s counsel …
Aadityakumar Dantani was detained on 9 June 2025 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the order through a petition filed by his mother, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the order was passed …
Bhaveshbhai Sambhubhai Rabari was preventively detained on 10‑12‑2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘dangerous person’. He challenged the order through a petition filed by his mother, Valiben Rabari, arguing that no material showed any …
Deepsing @ Dipu was preventively detained on 4 December 2025 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the order through a petition filed by his wife, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public health, order or tranquility …
Rahulkumar Jerambhai Solanki challenged a detention order dated 15‑12‑2025 passed by the District Magistrate under Section 2 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, alleging that he was a "bootlegger" and that his activities threatened public order. The petitioner argued that …
Amit @ Raes Premjibhai Rathod was preventively detained on 26‑Nov‑2025 by the Police Commissioner of Ahmedabad as a ‘dangerous person’ under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The detainee, through his mother, challenged the order, arguing that no material …
Samirkhan Pathan was preventively detained on 15‑12‑2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his wife, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and …
Ajay @Ajju @Chor Hiranand Nanakram Raghani was preventively detained on 20‑12‑2025 as a ‘dangerous person’ under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the order through a petition filed by his brother, arguing that no material was placed before the …
Dipaben @Body Vishalbhai Chunara was preventively detained on 29‑10‑2025 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. The detainee, through her mother, challenged the detention order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public …
The High Court of Gujarat considered a petition filed by Rajubhai Vasurbhai Vaghoshi, through his nephew, challenging his preventive detention under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The petitioner argued that no material was placed before the detaining …
The petitioner, Sahezad Pathan, challenged his preventive detention order dated 08‑12‑2025 issued by the Police Commissioner under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, on the ground that no material was placed before the authority to show a disturbance to …
Dineshkumar, detained as a "bootlegger" under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, challenged the preventive detention order dated 18‑12‑2025. He argued that the detaining authority had no material showing his activities disturbed public health, order or tranquility, and that …
Likhama Ram, a bootlegger, was preventively detained on 18‑12‑2025 by the Ahmedabad Police Commissioner under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention through a petition, arguing that no material showed his activities disturbed public …
Rakesh was preventively detained on 28‑11‑2025 as a “sexual offender” under Section 2(ha) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the detention was mechanical. The State contended …
Sachin @ Salang Dahyabhai Parmar was preventively detained on 21‑12‑2025 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his wife, arguing that no material showed his activities disturbed public …
Badalbhai Vankarbhai Vasava was preventively detained on 19‑12‑2025 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". His wife filed a petition challenging the detention, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public health, order or …
Sampat Mohanlal Dhobi was preventively detained on 12‑12‑2025 by the Police Commissioner of Ahmedabad under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘dangerous person’. The detainee, through his sister, challenged the order, arguing that no material was placed …
The applicant, Damor Ranjanben Surpalbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the proceedings, the applicant's learned counsel, Mr. Manan V. Patel, sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. …
Twinkle was preventively detained on 20‑12‑2025 as a ‘dangerous person’ under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the order was passed mechanically. The State …
Imran Mudi was preventively detained on 22 December 2025 as a ‘dangerous person’ under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the order through a petition filed by his brother, arguing that no material was placed before the detaining authority to …
Adnan @R.C., detained as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, challenged the preventive detention order dated 17‑12‑2025. The petitioner argued that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the order was passed …
Mohammad Javed filed an application seeking condonation of a 78‑day delay in filing Criminal Appeal No. 1008 of 2026 before the High Court of Gujarat. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of the rule. The Court examined the explanations offered for the delay and …
The petitioner, Sumit Jivrajbhai Vadhel, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor. The court …
The petitioner, a lawful occupier of land in Talala Taluka, challenged the sealing of his premises by revenue officers on 11‑December‑2025. The sealing was carried out after a status‑quo order dated 31‑July‑2024 was not extended, despite a pending demolition order dated 26‑April‑2021 under Section …
The petitioner, Jigar Mukeshbhai Brahmbhatt, filed an application seeking condonation of a 104‑day delay in preferring Criminal Appeal No. 1177 of 2026 against the State of Gujarat. The Additional Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the State, waived service of the rule. Both parties appeared before …
The applicant, Kantibhai @ BhuriYo Ratilal Panchal, filed an application seeking condonation of a 24‑day delay in filing Criminal Appeal No. 1425 of 2026 against the State of Gujarat. The respondent, the State, waived service of the rule. The sole issue was whether the court could condone the delay. …
The petitioners, Ketan Mansukhlal Jasani and others, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking consent quashing. During the hearing, their counsel, Mr. Nimesh M. Patel, requested permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Manan …
The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Gujarat Police Act. The applicant, a 24‑year‑old woman, was alleged to …
The petitioners, Jagmalbhai Minabhai Sindhva and others, approached the Gujarat High Court alleging that the State authorities were proceeding with demolition of their premises without any legal notice. The petitioners sought relief, invoking the Supreme Court's mandate in Writ Petition (Civil) 295 …
The petitioners alleged that the State authorities were proceeding to demolish premises in their possession without issuing any statutory notice. The petitioners sought relief to restrain the demolition and to compel the authorities to act in accordance with the Supreme Court's mandate in Writ …
The petitioners alleged that the State authorities were proceeding to demolish premises in their possession without issuing any statutory notice. The petitioners sought relief, invoking the Supreme Court's mandate in Writ Petition (Civil) 295 of 2022 and the principles of natural justice. The …
The petitioners alleged that the State authorities were proceeding to demolish premises in their possession without issuing any statutory notice. The petitioners sought relief, invoking the Supreme Court's mandate in Writ Petition (Civil) 295 of 2022 and the principles of natural justice. The …
The petitioners alleged that the State authorities were proceeding to demolish premises in their possession without issuing any statutory notice. The petitioners sought relief to restrain the demolition and to compel the authorities to act in accordance with the Supreme Court's mandate in Writ …
The petitioners alleged that the State authorities were proceeding to demolish premises in their possession without issuing any statutory notice. The petitioners sought relief to restrain the demolition and to compel the authorities to act in accordance with the Supreme Court's mandate in Writ …
The petitioners alleged that the State authorities were proceeding to demolish premises in their possession without issuing any statutory notice. The petitioners sought relief to restrain the demolition and to compel the authorities to act in accordance with the Supreme Court's mandate in Writ …
The petitioners alleged that the State authorities were proceeding to demolish premises in their possession without issuing any statutory notice. The petitioners sought relief to restrain the demolition and to compel the authorities to act in accordance with the Supreme Court's mandate in Writ …
The petitioners alleged that the State authorities were proceeding to demolish premises in their possession without issuing any statutory notice. The petitioners sought relief to restrain the demolition and to compel the authorities to act in accordance with the Supreme Court's mandate in Writ …
The petitioners alleged that the State authorities were proceeding to demolish premises in their possession without issuing any statutory notice. The petitioners sought relief, invoking the Supreme Court's mandate in Writ Petition (Civil) 295 of 2022 and the principles of natural justice. The …
The petitioners alleged that the State authorities were proceeding to demolish premises in their possession without issuing any statutory notice. The petitioners sought relief to restrain the demolition and to compel the authorities to act in accordance with the Supreme Court's mandate in Writ …
The petitioners alleged that the State authorities were proceeding to demolish premises in their possession without issuing any statutory notice. The petitioners sought relief to restrain the demolition and to compel the authorities to act in accordance with the Supreme Court's mandate in Writ …
The petitioners alleged that the State authorities were proceeding to demolish premises in their possession without issuing any statutory notice. The petitioners sought relief to restrain the demolition and to compel the authorities to act in accordance with the Supreme Court's mandate in Writ …
The petitioners alleged that the State authorities were proceeding to demolish premises in their possession without issuing any statutory notice. The petitioners sought relief, invoking the Supreme Court's mandate in Writ Petition (Civil) 295 of 2022 and the principles of natural justice. The …
The petitioners alleged that the State authorities were proceeding to demolish premises in their possession without issuing any statutory notice. The petitioners sought relief to restrain the demolition and to compel the authorities to act in accordance with the Supreme Court's mandate in Writ …
The petitioners alleged that the State authorities were proceeding to demolish premises in their possession without issuing any statutory notice. The petitioners sought relief, invoking the Supreme Court's mandate in Writ Petition (Civil) 295 of 2022 and the principles of natural justice. The …
The petitioners alleged that the State authorities were proceeding to demolish premises in their possession without issuing any statutory notice. The petitioners sought relief, invoking the Supreme Court's mandate in Writ Petition (Civil) 295 of 2022 and the principles of natural justice. The …
The appellants, relatives of Jashubhai Laljibhai Chauhan who died in a road accident involving a tanker on 19-11-2021, appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. They contended that the Tribunal erred in assessing the deceased's income, failed …
The petitioner filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 14, 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order dated 27.09.2024 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi.), Surat in MACMA No.24 of 2024. The petitioner also sought permission to withdraw his …
The High Court of Gujarat dismissed a special civil application filed by Gondal Nagarpalika after it had earlier been dismissed for want of prosecution. The petitioner subsequently filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking restoration, which the court allowed on the condition that the …
The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant later sought to withdraw the application, relying on a recent Gujarat High Court …
The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant later sought to withdraw the application, relying on a recent Gujarat High Court …
The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant’s counsel requested to withdraw the application in view of a recent Gujarat High Court decision …
The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant’s counsel requested to withdraw the application in view of a recent Gujarat High Court decision …
The applicant, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd., filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 131‑day delay in filing its first appeal. The respondents did not appear before the court. The learned counsel for the applicant argued that the delay was due …
The applicant filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 58‑day delay in filing a First Appeal. Although respondents No.3, 4 and 5 were served, they did not appear before the Court. The applicant argued that sufficient cause existed for the delay, while the …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 126‑day delay in filing their first appeal. They contended that the delay was caused by reasons set out in the application and was not deliberate. The respondents opposed the application, arguing that …
Patel Rasikbhai Ganpatbhai filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal against respondents Vihol Amarsinh Rajuji Jivanji and another. The matter was listed before the High Court of Gujarat, but neither the petitioner nor his counsel appeared even on the second call, and no …
Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Ltd (GETCO) challenged an ex‑parte award dated 26 May 2023 passed by the Labour Court, Bhavnagar, which ordered reinstatement of two workmen with 20% back wages. The workmen had raised an industrial dispute over alleged oral terminations in 2013 and 2014, …
The Deputy Engineer and others appealed against the order of a tribunal concerning a road accident claim where an insurance company challenged a payment of Rs.4,12,500. The High Court observed that the amount was small and there was no dispute about the accident itself. Consequently, the Court …
Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Ltd (GETCO) challenged an ex‑parte award dated 26 May 2023 passed by the Labour Court, Bhavnagar, which ordered reinstatement of two workmen with 20% back wages. The workmen had raised an industrial dispute over alleged oral terminations in 2013 and 2014, …
The appellants Bhupendrabhai Mahyavanshi and Prakash were convicted for the murder of Manish under Sections 302, 120‑B and 201 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment and five years respectively. The prosecution’s case was based solely on circumstantial evidence – alleged motive (a love‑affair), a …
The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal. No party appeared before the court even on the second call, and no request for adjournment was made. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. No substantive issues were addressed, and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 211‑day delay in filing a first appeal. Respondent No.4 did not appear before the court. The applicant’s counsel argued that the delay was due to genuine reasons and not deliberate, while the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 53‑day delay in filing a first appeal. The applicant argued that the delay was due to genuine reasons and not a result of mala‑fide or dilatory tactics. The respondents opposed the condonation. The …
The petitioner filed a second special civil application concerning the same cause as a prior petition. The petitioner, represented by counsel, chose not to press the present petition. Consequently, the Court disposed of the petition as not pressed and discharged the rule. Any interim relief that may …
The applicant sought condonation of a 609‑day delay in filing a restoration application for a Second Appeal that had been dismissed for want of prosecution. The Second Appeal pertained to a specific‑performance suit filed in 1989, which after a series of trials and a First Appeal, was allowed in …
The applicants filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 149‑day delay in filing their First Appeal. Although respondents No.2 and No.4 were served, they did not appear before the Court. The applicants argued that they had sufficient cause for the delay and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 334‑day delay in filing their First Appeal. The respondents opposed the application, arguing against condonation. The Court examined the submissions and emphasized that limitation rules should not …
The applicants filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 66‑day delay in filing their First Appeal. Respondents 1, 2, 4 and 5 did not appear, while respondents 3 and 6 were represented. The court examined the reasons given for the delay and emphasized that …
The petitioners sought condonation of a 769‑day delay in filing a first appeal, invoking Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Respondents No. 1 and 4 did not appear, while counsel for the petitioners argued that the delay was caused by genuine reasons and not by mala‑fide intent. The Court examined the …
The petitioners sought permission to approach certain respondents via a written representation concerning the non‑release of their legitimate dues by the liquidator of Sami Taluka Nagrik Sahakari Bank Limited. The Court granted the permission, directing the petitioners to file the representation …
The applicants filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 326‑day delay in filing their First Appeal. The respondents did not appear before the Court. The learned counsel for the applicants argued that the delay was caused by genuine reasons and not by any …
The petitioner sought restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 48113 of 2024, which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution due to failure to remove office objections. The court heard arguments from the petitioner’s counsel and the State of Gujarat’s counsel. It held that the application …
The High Court considered a successive bail application filed by Jivanbhai Chaturbhai Solanki, accused No.3 in a murder case (Sections 302, 323, 506(2), 294B, 114 IPC and Section 135(1) Gujarat Police Act). He had been in custody since his arrest on 1 Oct 2017 and the trial remained pending. The …
Jafar Ali Pirakhan Shaikh filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of his earlier application (No.20800 of 2022) that had been dismissed for non‑prosecution. The applicant argued that the dismissal was premature and requested the court to revive the proceedings. The State of …
The High Court of Gujarat issued an order directing that any objections, if any, must be removed within two weeks; failure to do so will result in automatic dismissal of the matters without further reference to the Court.
The petitioners filed several Special Criminal Applications that had been dismissed for non‑prosecution. They sought restoration of these applications. The State of Gujarat opposed the restoration. After hearing both sides, the Court held that the dismissed applications could be restored, provided …
The petitioners filed several Special Criminal Applications that had been dismissed for non‑prosecution. They sought restoration of these applications. The State of Gujarat opposed the restoration. After hearing both sides, the Court held that the dismissed applications could be restored, provided …
The petitioners filed several Special Criminal Applications that had been dismissed for non‑prosecution. They sought restoration of these applications. The State of Gujarat opposed the restoration. After hearing both sides, the Court held that the dismissed applications could be restored, provided …
The petitioners filed several Special Criminal Applications that had been dismissed for non‑prosecution. They sought restoration of these applications. The State of Gujarat opposed the restoration. After hearing both sides, the Court held that the dismissed applications could be restored, provided …
The petitioners, a husband and wife, applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case where a charge‑sheet had been filed for offences under Sections 8(c), 22(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 involving 4.534 kg …
The petitioners, Groww Invest Tech Private Limited through Sanjeet Vikram Singh, filed a criminal revision application against the State of Gujarat and others. The revision was filed ten days after the prescribed limitation period. They sought condonation of the delay under Section 5 of the …
Madhusudan Sitaram Vyas filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 53‑day delay in filing a restoration application (SCR.A No.10910/2025). The applicant argued that the delay was due to genuine reasons and not deliberate. The State …
Sapna, the wife of Jayprakash Vishambhardayal Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of the main criminal matter against the State of Gujarat. The application challenged the order dated 05-12-2025 which had apparently dismissed or closed the main case. The learned …
The petitioner, Sangeetaben, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. She later sought the court’s permission to withdraw the application, indicating an intention to pursue other legal remedies. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted a request for withdrawal. …
The petitioner, Dhanjibhai Kishorbhai Parmar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of CR.MA No.8305/2020 but delayed filing by 87 days. The petition was filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, requesting condonation of the delay. The respondent opposed the condonation, …
The applicant, Tapu @ Rameshbhai Jikabhai Baraiya, filed an application seeking condonation of a 336‑day delay in preferring Criminal Appeal No. 911 of 2026 before the High Court of Gujarat. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of the rule. The court examined …
Mer Vishalbhai Mukeshbhai filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that his live‑in partner, 19‑year‑old Jadav Rinaben Kanubhai, had been illegally detained by her parents. The petitioner asserted that both parties, being adults, have a constitutional right to cohabit voluntarily. The corpus …
The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittals of Dalsinh Dhanabhai Bariya and co‑accused in two interrelated land‑dispute cases arising from incidents on 7‑8‑1994, where the accused were charged under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention …
The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittals of Dalsinh Dhanabhai Bariya and co‑accused in two interrelated land‑dispute cases arising from incidents on 7‑8‑1994, where the accused were charged under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention …
The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittal of two accused, Mahmad alias Batuk Karim Mir and GaCar alias Nazir Valibhai Ghanchi, for the murder of Ganeshnath Mohannath. The prosecution alleged that the accused, acting in concert, stabbed the deceased with a knife over a loan dispute, but the only …
Priti, daughter of Parshuram Prajapati, filed a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court seeking permission to file an appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984. The petitioner was represented by Ms. Akshita Mohnot. The counsel indicated that the petition would not be …
The applicant filed a petition seeking condonation of a 61‑day delay in filing a Miscellaneous Civil Application for the restoration of a first appeal that had been dismissed for want of prosecution on 9 July 2025. The court heard arguments from counsel and examined the explanation provided in the …
Dipakbhai Dhirubhai Rathod filed a regular bail application after the filing of a chargesheet. Counsel for the applicant, Ms. Naynavati S. Jethva, appeared before the court but did not press the application. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Mr. Niraj Sharma, represented the State of Gujarat. The …
The applicant filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application seeking recall of the order dated 09‑10‑2025 in First Appeal No. 2728 of 2005, restoration as respondent No. 6, deletion of respondent No. 10 and addition of a new respondent, and a stay of execution. The applicant alleged that the respondent No. …
The petitioner sought the High Court's permission to convert a pending criminal petition into a Criminal Miscellaneous Application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after cognizance of the offence had already been taken. The Court initially allowed this conversion on …
The petitioner, Umarji Ismail Musa, sought permission to withdraw his civil revision petition, which contained only an innocuous relief, in order to expedite the pending trial. The High Court considered the request and granted permission for the withdrawal, disposing the petition as withdrawn. The …
The State of Gujarat filed a criminal revision against the order dated 07‑10‑2024 in which the Additional Special Judge, Gondal, marked a Pen Drive and an audio transcript as Mark‑A to be kept with the victim's deposition in a POCSO case. The State contended that the trial court failed to follow the …
The petitioners, Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd, filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application seeking condonation of delay in preferring the application. The respondent, Mokadiya Ajaiben Ramabhai, was served notice. The sole issue before the court was whether the delay in filing the application could be …
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat-1 appealed against Ms. Jashuben Rameshbhai Patel in multiple tax appeal matters. The appellants' senior standing counsel, Mr. Karan Sanghani, argued that the tax effect in each appeal was less than Rs.2 crores, invoking Circular No. 9 of 2024 which …
The appellant Insurance Company appealed the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of Rs.6,25,600 in a claim arising from a 2016 road accident that killed Pappubhai. The High Court held that the Tribunal erred by using the deceased's actual monthly earnings of Rs.6,000 instead of the statutory …
The appellant Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. appealed against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award that held it liable to pay compensation to the deceased's heirs after a 2016 road accident involving a motorcycle and a Bolero. The insurer argued that the driver of the offending vehicle did not …
The Gujarat High Court heard appeals challenging the conviction and death sentence of three accused for gang rape and murder of a married woman. The trial court had sentenced them to death, imprisonment and fines under IPC sections 302, 201, 366 and 376(d). The appellants argued that the …
The Gujarat High Court heard appeals challenging the conviction and death sentence of three accused for gang rape and murder of a married woman. The trial court had sentenced them to death, imprisonment and fines under IPC sections 302, 201, 366 and 376(d). The appellants argued that the …
The Central Bureau of Investigation, through Ashok Nana Ghuge, filed a revision application but delayed filing it by 237 days. The applicant sought condonation of this delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court examined the memorandum and noted that the applicant was not indolent, had …
The appellants, Lalitabeni Hasmukhbhai Rana & others, filed a second appeal before the Gujarat High Court. Their counsel, Mr. Rutul P. Desai, claimed he had not received any instructions from the appellants despite attempts to contact them. Consequently, the court noted a lack of prosecution of the …
The appellant, Dilavarsinh Bavarjiraj Gohil (deceased) through his representative, filed a second appeal against the respondents. No advocate appeared for the appellant when the matter was called for hearing, and an advocate notice was served. The court noted the appellant's non‑prosecution and …
Solace Engineers (Marketing) Pvt. Ltd. filed a Special Civil Application and a Civil Application for Direction before the Gujarat High Court. The court noted that the advocate notice for the petitioner remained unserved because the company had been closed for a long time, as reported by the bailiff. …
The National Insurance Co. Ltd claimed Rs. 4,84,500 in a road‑accident claim, with no dispute over the accident itself. The appellant filed a first appeal against the tribunal’s order. The High Court observed that the amount was small and that entertaining the appeal would cause unnecessary hardship …
The National Insurance Co. Ltd filed a first appeal (C/FA/1408/2015) seeking Rs. 4,60,500 in respect of a road accident claim. The court observed that there was no dispute regarding the accident and noted that the amount claimed was relatively small. Consequently, the judge held that the appeal did …
The case arose from a dispute between a shop‑owner and his landlord that culminated in the stabbing death of a scrap‑seller on 22 March 2006. The appellant‑accused Sunil @ Kaliya Bharatbhai Gupta was convicted of murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and a provision of the Bombay Police Act, while co‑accused were …
The petitioner, a part‑time sweeper appointed in 1991, claimed that he satisfied the criteria of the Government Resolution dated 1 May 2007 for conversion to a permanent employee, having worked more than six hours a day since 1994‑95. The State had dismissed him in March 2007 and rejected his claim, …
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat-1 appealed against SMT. Jashuben Rameshbhai Patel in multiple tax appeal matters. The appellants' Senior Standing Counsel, Mr. Karan Sanghani, argued that the tax effect in each appeal was less than Rs. 2 crores, invoking Circular No. 9 of 2024 which …
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat-1 appealed against SMT. Jashuben Rameshbhai Patel in multiple tax appeal matters. The appellants' Senior Standing Counsel, Mr. Karan Sanghani, argued that the tax effect in each appeal was less than Rs. 2 crores, invoking Circular No. 9 of 2024 which …
The appellant Sunil @ Kaliya Bharatbhai Gupta was convicted of murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and a provision of the Bombay Police Act, while the original complainant Devendrakumar Shankarlal Oswal secured acquittals for co‑accused in related cases. Both the prosecution and defence presented extensive oral …
The case arose from a dispute between a shop‑owner and his landlord that culminated in the stabbing death of a scrap‑seller on 22 March 2006. The appellant‑accused Sunil @ Kaliya Bharatbhai Gupta was convicted of murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and a provision of the Bombay Police Act, while co‑accused were …
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat-1 appealed against SMT. Jashuben Rameshbhai Patel in multiple tax appeal matters. The appellants' Senior Standing Counsel, Mr. Karan Sanghani, argued that the tax effect in each appeal was less than Rs. 2 crores, invoking Circular No. 9 of 2024 which …
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat-1 appealed against SMT. Jashuben Rameshbhai Patel in multiple tax appeal matters. The appellants' Senior Standing Counsel, Mr. Karan Sanghani, argued that the tax effect in each appeal was less than Rs. 2 crores, invoking Circular No. 9 of 2024 which …
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat-1 appealed against Ms. Jashuben Rameshbhai Patel in multiple tax appeal matters. The appellants' senior standing counsel, Mr. Karan Sanghani, argued that the tax effect in each appeal was less than Rs.2 crores, invoking Circular No. 9 of 2024 which …
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat-1 appealed against Ms. Jashuben Rameshbhai Patel in multiple tax appeal matters. The appellants' senior standing counsel, Mr. Karan Sanghani, argued that the tax effect in each appeal was less than Rs.2 crores, invoking Circular No. 9 of 2024 which …
