Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

M/S. DBM GEOTECHNICS AND CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.versusDEENDAYAL PORT TRUST (ERSTWHILE KANDLA PORT TRUST)

Disposal
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The Court allowed the petition and granted a ten‑month extension of time to conclude the arbitration proceedings.

Summary

The petitioner, M/s. DBM Geotechnics and Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 29‑A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking a ten‑month extension, from 1 January 2026, to conclude ongoing arbitration proceedings before a sole arbitrator. The arbitration had commenced in 2018 and had previously been granted extensions, but the parties were still at the final‑argument stage. Both parties’ counsel jointly submitted that further time was required and that they consented to an extension. The Court examined whether the statutory provision permits such an extension when the parties agree. Finding that the Act allows the court to extend the period and that the parties’ consent satisfies the requirement, the Court allowed the petition and granted the requested ten‑month extension. The order was signed by Justice Niral R. Mehta and digitally authenticated on 3 February 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court can grant a time‑extension for arbitration proceedings under Section 29‑A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when both parties consent.

Legislation cited

Subjects

ArbitrationExtension of timeSection 29-AArbitration and Conciliation Act 1996High Court of GujaratConsent of parties

Judgment

      C/ARBI.P/19/2026                               ORDER DATED: 30/01/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

             R/PETN. UNDER ARBITRATION ACT NO. 19 of 2026

==========================================================
       M/S. DBM GEOTECHNICS AND CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.
                            Versus
     DEENDAYAL PORT TRUST (ERSTWHILE KANDLA PORT TRUST)
==========================================================
Appearance:
NYC LEGAL(14337) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR MK VAKHARIA(1483) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRAL R. MEHTA

                            Date : 30/01/2026

                               ORAL ORDER


1.              By way of this Petition under Section
29-A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
1996, the petitioner is seeking extension for a
period of 10 months from 01st January, 2026 to
conclude the Arbitration Proceedings in respect
of     ongoing           arbitration       proceedings       before            the
sole Arbitrator Hon'ble Mr.Justice Bankim Mehta
(Retd.) Judge of this Court.

2.              Learned Advocates for both the parties
jointly submit that the arbitration proceedings
commenced in the year 2018 and from time-to-time,
extension was granted to conclude the arbitration
proceedings. However, the same could not be over
and       at       this     stage     final       arguments         of         one

                                    Page 1 of 2
         C/ARBI.P/19/2026                                                         ORDER DATED: 30/01/2026




 Arbitration have been concluded, and the other
 cognate Arbitration is at the advanced stage of
 Final Arguments.

 3.                  Since            learned              advocates                 from          both         the
 sides           are         in       agreement                 that          the        time          may         be
 extended,                 the        present              petition               stands            allowed.
 Time           to       conclude                 the         arbitration                    proceedings
 between the parties stands extended for a further
 period of 10 months from 01st January, 2026.


                                                                            (NIRAL R. MEHTA,J)
 ANUP
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: ANUP VYOMESH PARIKH(HC00956), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 03/02/2026 10:43:25




                                                      Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "Arbitration"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.