Created byFuzzy Cloud| Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
76 judgments delivered by benches including this judge.
Petitioner Shri Ashwinbhai Jethabhai Kangad filed a special civil application seeking permission to withdraw his petition against the State of Gujarat and others. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Gaurav A. Gogia, requested the court to allow the withdrawal. The court considered the request and, finding no objection,…
Petitioners Hitesh Dilipkumar Batra and another filed Special Civil Application No. 7741 of 2024 before the High Court of Gujarat seeking permission to withdraw their petition. The petitioners, through counsel Mr. Vaibhav A. Vyas, requested the Court to allow the withdrawal. The Court examined the request and found no …
The petitioner, Meetaben Dhulabhai Patel, filed a Special Civil Application before the High Court of Gujarat seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Gaurav Chudasama, moved the court for such permission. The respondents, the State of Gujarat and others, were represented by Assistant G…
The petitioner, Jitubhai Ramsangji Jadeja, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Gujarat and other respondents to examine his case in accordance with the Supreme Court’s decision in Workmen of American Express vs Management of American…
Aniruddhsinh Mulubha Jadeja filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Gujarat and other respondents to examine his case, grant specific service benefits, and act on a communication dated 30‑09‑2025. The respondents argued that a proposal had already been se…
The petitioners, government employees, sought modification of their appointment orders and entitlement to arrears after the State of Gujarat delayed granting regular pay‑scale. The respondents contested the claim, arguing that the delay should bar full relief. The Court referred to a Division Bench decision in Letters …
Hiraben Mohanbhai Solanki filed a Special Civil Application before the High Court of Gujarat against the Municipal Commissioner, Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. H.J. Acharya, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court examined whether it could exercise its inh…
Petitioner Patel Smitaben Khodidas filed Special Civil Application No.1383 of 2024 against the State of Gujarat and others. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Gaurav Chudasama, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court examined the request and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. Acc…
The petitioner, Digvijaysinh Ajitsinh Vala, filed a Special Civil Application seeking regularisation of a period from 1 March 2013 to 5 July 2018, presumably relating to a school appointment. The respondents, the State of Gujarat and others, through the Assistant Government Pleader, assured that the school’s proposal f…
The petitioner, Hitesh Kumar Sukhbai Patel, filed a Special Civil Application before the High Court of Gujarat seeking permission to withdraw the petition and to pursue an alternative remedy. The petitioner was represented by Ms. Mamta R. Vyas, while the respondents, the Office of Commissioner of Schools and others, we…
The petitioners, represented by the late Shri Parmar’s widow and others, filed a special civil application seeking the benefits of the 6th Pay Commission, a 50 % merger of Dearness Allowance into basic salary, leave encashment, and the benefits of the 7th Pay Commission. The Court examined earlier directives – para 11(…
Petitioner Rajesh Odhavjibhai Fefar filed two special civil applications before the High Court of Gujarat seeking permission to withdraw the proceedings. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. V.H. Desai, submitted written instructions requesting the court's leave to withdraw the petitions. The court examined the request …
Petitioner Rajesh Odhavjibhai Fefar filed two special civil applications before the High Court of Gujarat seeking permission to withdraw the proceedings. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. V.H. Desai, submitted written instructions requesting the court's leave to withdraw the petitions. The court examined the request …
The petitioner, Renish Mukeshbhai Lalakiya, filed a special civil application before the High Court of Gujarat. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. V.H. Desai, submitted a written instruction seeking the court's permission to withdraw the pending petition. The respondent, District Primary Education Officer, was represe…
The petitioners, aspirants for Class‑I posts, challenged their disqualification in the preliminary examination conducted by the Gujarat Public Service Commission (GPSC), alleging that many questions were cancelled or revised. They sought permission to file application forms for the main examination scheduled for 20‑28 …
The petitioner filed a Special Civil Application seeking to amend the prayer to direct the respondent to decide representations dated 21-03-2025 and 09-09-2025 in accordance with the ratio of LPA No.213 of 2019 and a Supreme Court decision reported in 2015 14 SCC 427. The Court examined whether the amendment was permis…
The petitioners sought a further six‑month extension of the sole arbitrator’s mandate in an arbitration governed by the Gujarat Arbitration Centre Rules, 2021, invoking Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The respondents contended that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Jagdeep Chowgul…
The petitioner, a government employee, challenged the denial of regular pay‑scale benefits and arrears, arguing that the delay in filing the writ petition should not bar relief because the claim arises from a continuing wrong. Both parties agreed that the issue was governed by the Division Bench decision in Letters Pat…
The petitioners sought a further six‑month extension of the sole arbitrator’s mandate in an arbitration governed by the Gujarat Arbitration Centre Rules, 2021, invoking Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The respondents contended that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Jagdeep Chowgul…
The petitioners, appointed as peons before 2006, were placed on a lower pay scale than their juniors after the implementation of the Sixth Central Pay Commission. They sought a direction under Article 226 to have their pay stepped up to Rs.7730 in Pay Band 1, with arrears from 01-01-2006, arguing a violation of Article…
The petitioners sought a further six‑month extension of the sole arbitrator’s mandate in an arbitration governed by the Gujarat Arbitration Centre Rules, 2021, invoking Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The respondents contended that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Jagdeep Chowgul…
Vinubhai Rathod filed a Special Civil Application against the Union of India seeking relief from a railway transfer. The respondents, represented by Ms. Archana Amin, offered that the petitioner could file a representation within one week and that the railway authority would decide it within 21 days, during which the p…
Petitioner Begadiya Punamben Ishvarbhai challenged the termination of his services by the respondent authority, which was based on the cancellation of his caste certificate. The termination order dated 8 June 2026 was issued despite a prior order of this Court in Special Civil Application No. 7672 of 2026 (dated 2 June…
The appellant, Nathubhai Surabhai, filed an application for regular bail under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, in connection with FIR No.11204045260116 alleging offences under the Bombay Narcotic Substances Act and several provisions of the SC/ST Act. He…
The petitioner, Shri Swastik Enterprise, filed a special civil application before the High Court of Gujarat. The petition was not pressed at the hearing stage, as indicated by the petitioner’s counsel. Consequently, the Court disposed of the petition on the ground that it was not pressed. No substantive factual or lega…
Petitioner Abhishek Rajendra Mutha, appearing in person, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to Authority 02 and 03 to consider and decide his application for renewal of a plot validation certificate, and also requested liberty to challenge any adverse order. Respondent counsel for the authoriti…
The applicant, M.V. Laila Prospera, filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking restoration of OJ Civil Application No.1 of 2025. The respondent, United Asia Bunkering and Trading Pte. Ltd., opposed the restoration. The learned counsel for the applicant argued that the matter should be reinstated in the original fi…
The case involved an application for restoration of OJ Civil Application No.2 of 2025 filed by M.V. Laila Prospera against United Asia Bunkering and Trading Pte. Ltd. The applicant sought to have the matter reinstated in the court’s register after it had been struck out or closed. The respondent opposed the restoration…
The petitioner, Vinit Rameshbhai Parikh, filed Special Civil Application No. 4776 of 2019 before the Gujarat High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Jenil M Shah, sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court examined whether it could grant such permission under procedural law. The judge held that the petit…
The petitioner, Nrupesh Narendrabhai Talati, challenged an order passed by the State of Gujarat authorities, alleging that the order was never communicated to him. The respondent corporation contended that the lack of communication violated the principles of natural justice and sought permission for the authorities to…
In a Special Civil Application No. 9832 of 2025 before the High Court of Gujarat, the petitioner Juni Market Vepari Association, through counsel Mr. Krutarth K. Desai, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The respondent, the Chief Officer and another, were represented by Mr. Deepak P. Sancela. The ma…
Petitioner Indrajit Gopaldas Bhatia filed a special civil application seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Umar Farooqui and Mr. Zamir Z Shaikh. The respondents, the State of Gujarat and others, were represented by Ms. Suman J. Mota and Mr. Manan Maheta. The Hon'ble Justice…
The petitioner, a social worker, sought a writ under Article 226 directing the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation to reconsider and re‑issue a commercial tax bill, claiming the premises is residential. He had paid a 2013 commercial tax bill and later received a 2021 bill, alleging the authorities acted arbitrarily without…
The petitioner, Royal Row House, filed a special civil application before the Gujarat High Court seeking relief. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Dilip L. Kanojiya and Mr. Kartikey Kanojiya, requested permission to withdraw the petition and instead approach the Town Planning Officer within ten days for a ventilation…
The plaintiff, Five Element Industry Limited, filed an admiralty suit against the vessel MV Honcho seeking enforcement of an arrest order dated 06.03.2026. The plaintiff’s counsel submitted a withdrawal petition on 17.03.2026, stating that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and that the suit no longer require…
The petitioners, members of the Vaswani family, entered into an agreement with the respondent (Chief Manager and authorized officer) to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) for relief concerning a disputed property by 20 March 2026, with the DRT to decide by 1 April 2026. In return, the respondent agreed not to ta…
The petitioner challenged the Gujarat State’s rejection of his application for regularisation of a commercial building on Plot No.233, arguing that the municipal authority and appellate authority decided the matter without granting him a hearing and relied solely on a panel advocate’s opinion. The land had a complex ti…
The petitioner challenged the Gujarat State’s rejection of his application for regularisation of a commercial building on Plot No.233, arguing that the municipal authority and appellate authority decided the matter without granting him a hearing and relied solely on a panel advocate’s opinion. The land had a complex ti…
The petitioner challenged the Gujarat State’s rejection of his application for regularisation of a commercial building on Plot No.233, arguing that the municipal authority and appellate authority decided the matter without granting him a hearing and relied solely on a panel advocate’s opinion. The land had a complex ti…
The petitioner challenged the Gujarat State’s rejection of his application for regularisation of a commercial building on Plot No.233, arguing that the municipal authority and appellate authority decided the matter without granting him a hearing and relied solely on a panel advocate’s opinion. The land had a complex ti…
The petitioner challenged the Gujarat State’s rejection of his application for regularisation of a commercial building on Plot No.233, arguing that the municipal authority and appellate authority decided the matter without granting him a hearing and relied solely on a panel advocate’s opinion. The land had a complex ti…
The petitioner challenged the Gujarat State’s rejection of his application for regularisation of a commercial building on Plot No.233, arguing that the municipal authority and appellate authority decided the matter without granting him a hearing and relied solely on a panel advocate’s opinion. The land had a complex ti…
The petitioner challenged the Gujarat State’s rejection of his application for regularisation of a commercial building on Plot No.233, arguing that the municipal authority and appellate authority decided the matter without granting him a hearing and relied solely on a panel advocate’s opinion. The land had a complex ti…
The petitioner sought regularisation of a commercial building on Plot No.233 in Rajkot under the Gujarat Regularisation of Unauthorized Development Act, 2022, after the municipal corporation rejected his application on the basis of a panel advocate’s opinion without granting a hearing. The land had a complex title hist…
The petitioner challenged the Gujarat State’s rejection of his application for regularisation of a commercial building on Plot No.233, arguing that the municipal authority and appellate authority decided the matter without granting him a hearing and relied solely on a panel advocate’s opinion. The land had a complex ti…
The petitioner challenged the Gujarat State’s rejection of his application for regularisation of a commercial building on Plot No.233, arguing that the municipal authority and appellate authority decided the matter without granting him a hearing and relied solely on a panel advocate’s opinion. The land had a complex ti…
The petitioner challenged the Gujarat State’s rejection of his application for regularisation of a commercial building on Plot No.233, arguing that the municipal authority and appellate authority decided the matter without granting him a hearing and relied solely on a panel advocate’s opinion. The land had a complex ti…
The petitioner, Chandrapalsinh Bhupendrasinhji Chauhan, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 227 seeking to quash an order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) that authorized possession of his flat. He argued that the DRT's notice to take physical possession, dated 14 March 2026, would leave him remediless b…
The petitioners, Loh Raghubhai Savsabhai & Ors., filed a Special Civil Application seeking to approach the concerned authority with a representation. The respondent State of Gujarat, through its Advocate General, indicated that similarly situated persons had already approached the authority. The Court observed that the…
Aryann Chemical Trading Pvt. Ltd. filed an admiralty suit against the vessel MT Helen and another defendant, seeking the arrest of the vessel. The plaintiff later submitted a purshis indicating that the parties had reached a settlement on 11 March 2026 and requested the withdrawal of the proceedings. The court accepted…
Petitioners Thakor Amuji Jhoraji and another filed a Special Civil Application before the High Court of Gujarat against the State of Gujarat and others. During the proceedings, the petitioners sought to add Davda Gram Panchayat as an additional respondent. The counsel for the Gram Panchayat indicated that appropriate a…
The petitioner sought to amend the special civil application to join a new respondent and to direct the Surat Municipal Corporation to change the name of a temple in the assessment register. The court allowed the amendment, permitting the addition of the new respondent. It directed the corporation to mutate the temple'…
In an admiralty suit (R/ADMIRALTY SUIT NO. 18 of 2026) filed by HMS BERGBAU DUBAI FZCO against MV HONCHO, the plaintiff obtained an arrest order on 27.02.2026 against the defendant vessel. The plaintiff later settled the dispute and, through counsel Mr. Manav A Mehta, filed a withdrawal purshish on 06.03.2026 seeking t…
The petitioners, Ray Banquet and Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a special civil application under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the Gujarat State Human Rights Commission’s proceedings (HRC/2026/ADC/06/LEGAL-3). They alleged that the Commission failed to follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines laid down…
The applicant filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application seeking restoration of Admiralty Suit No. 10 of 2025 and a copy of the SWIFT message relating to a court‑ordered remittance. The court was informed that the foreign bank could not process the remittance because of incorrect account details and compliance issues, and…
Petitioner Sarigam Industrial Products, through counsel Mr. Zubin F. Bharda, filed a special civil application seeking permission to withdraw the pending petition against Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation and another party. The Hon'ble Justice Niral R. Mehta considered the request and found no objection to the…
Petitioner Sakir Khan filed a representation on 28 April 2025 following a court order dated 25 February 2025 in Special Civil Application No.14480 of 2023. The High Court directed the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, as respondent No.4, to decide the representation within three months of receipt of the order and to do …
Alphard Maritime Ltd. filed an admiralty suit against Ocean Opal and other defendants. The parties later executed a Resolution Agreement on 5 February 2026 settling all disputes. The plaintiff sought a consent decree in accordance with that agreement and asked the court to declare a number of pending civil applications…
Alphard Maritime Ltd. filed an admiralty suit against Ocean Opal and other defendants. The parties later executed a Resolution Agreement on 5 February 2026 settling all disputes. The plaintiff sought a consent decree based on that agreement and asked the court to declare various pending OJCA applications infructuous, v…
The parties to Admiralty Suit No.5 of 2019 entered into a Settlement Agreement dated 12 July 2025, which the court had earlier ordered to be implemented on 18 July 2025. On 13 February 2026 the parties filed a joint purshish confirming the settlement and requesting withdrawal of the suit. The court accepted the settlem…
The plaintiff, ZHESHANG ZHONGTUO (Beijing) International Supply Chain Management Co. Ltd., filed an admiralty suit against the vessel MV HAI JIN JIANG SH. The plaintiff later submitted a withdrawal petition, stating that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and requested the court to vacate the arrest order dat…
The parties to Admiralty Suit No. 51 of 2018 submitted a joint purshish on 13 February 2026 indicating that they had resolved their dispute through a Settlement Agreement dated 12 July 2025. The Court had earlier, on 18 July 2025, ordered the Registry to disburse amounts in accordance with that settlement. Upon taking …
The parties to Admiralty Suit No. 54 of 2018 entered into a Settlement Agreement dated 12 July 2025, which the court had earlier ordered to be implemented on 18 July 2025. On 13 February 2026, both sides filed a joint purshish confirming the settlement and requesting the suit be withdrawn. The court accepted the purshi…
Petitioner Pathan Sadamhusen Sajimahmad filed a special civil application seeking permission to appear before an authority as per a notice dated 7 October 2024. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Vicky B. Mehta, requested the court's permission to file a reply and submit necessary documents. The court examined the peti…
Petitioner I. Subbai Sattarbhai Pinjara, through counsel, indicated that he does not wish to press the Special Civil Application at this stage and was directed to approach the concerned authority as per law. The High Court, noting the petitioner's election, disposed of the petition accordingly.…
The petitioners, Ramanand Jokhanprasad Nirankari & others, filed Special Civil Application No. 9028 of 2017 before the High Court of Gujarat. They later moved the court seeking permission to withdraw the petition at the stage of the proceedings. The court examined the application to determine whether any legal impedime…
The petitioner, M/s. DBM Geotechnics and Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 29‑A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking a ten‑month extension, from 1 January 2026, to conclude ongoing arbitration proceedings before a sole arbitrator. The arbitration had commenced in 2018 and had pr…
The petitioner, M/s. DBM Geotechnics and Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 29‑A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking a ten‑month extension, from 1 January 2026, to conclude ongoing arbitration proceedings before a sole arbitrator. The arbitration had commenced in 2018 and had pr…
The petitioner, Hajibhai Kasam Sad, filed a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court seeking relief against the State of Gujarat and others. The respondent No.2, through counsel, requested that the notice dated 19 January 2026 be withdrawn and that fresh proceedings be initiated under Section 478 of the …
The plaintiff PT Trans Indo Pratama filed an admiralty suit against the vessel M/V Triumph Ocean and others, seeking enforcement of an arrest order dated 18 January 2026. The plaintiff's counsel submitted a withdrawal petition on 20 January 2026, stating that the parties had amicably settled the dispute outside court. …
The appellants, a real‑estate company and its directors, alleged that the State Bank of India obtained a mortgage over their property without a valid board resolution and colluded with a relative to remove title documents. The bank, having classified the loan as an NPA, invoked the SARFAESI Act, issued a notice under S…
A Special Civil Application was filed by the heir of the late Kalyan Mavji Halai against the legal heirs of the late Bhupendrasinh Joravarsinh Rathod. The petitioner, through counsel, informed the Court that he would not press the petition. The Court noted that the petition was therefore withdrawn and ordered its dispo…
The petitioner filed Special Civil Application No. 15707 of 2015 challenging an order dated 18 June 2015 (Exhibit 29) passed in Regular Civil Suit No. 179 of 2006. The trial court had already disposed of the suit by a judgment on the same date. The High Court held that since the suit was already disposed, the special c…
The applicant, Dakshaben Naranbhai Vaghela, filed a miscellaneous civil application for transfer before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Nimesh M. Patel, indicated that the applicant does not wish to press the application at this stage. The Court noted the lack of pressing and consequently disposed …
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
