High Court of Gujarat
LAKHMANBHAI RAYMALBHAIversusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
- Decided
- Disposal
- 26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
Holding
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay. The matter was listed for hearing, but the appellant's counsel failed to appear even after a second call. The court held that the failure to prosecute the application warranted dismissal. No order as to costs was made. The rule was discharged.
Issues considered
- Whether the application for condonation of delay should be entertained despite the appellant's counsel's non-appearance
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- civil procedure
- want of prosecution
- dismissal
Judgment
C/CA/2417/2020 ORDER DATED: 25/08/2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 2417 of
2020
In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 10762 of 2020
==========================================================
LAKHMANBHAI RAYMALBHAI
Versus
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR GM AMIN(124) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS DEVANSHI PATEL, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
RULE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN M. DESAI
Date : 25/08/2025
ORAL ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned
advocate for the appellant / applicant remained absent even in
second call. Hence, the matter stands dismissed for want of
prosecution. No order as to costs. Rule is discharged.
(D. M. DESAI,J)
vk
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: VATSAL KOTECHA(HC00352), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 25/08/2025 14:40:07
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.