Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
34 judgments · newest first · showing 1–34
The petitioner, Sandipbhai Shamikbhai Mehta, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking consent quashing against the State of Gujarat. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Johnsey P. Macwan, later sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The Court examined whether it could …
Bhumiben, daughter of Maheshbhai Chhaganbhai Solanki, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quash of an FIR and set aside of an order. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Kishan H. Daia, later sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after granting permission, clarified that …
The applicant, Ganpatsinh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashing and setting aside of FIR/Order No. 24324 of 2025. The applicant later moved the Court for permission to withdraw the application at the interim stage. The learned counsel for the applicant, Dineshkumar D. Gautam, …
Nexus Pharma Chem Pvt. Ltd., through its counsel, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quash of an FIR. The parties subsequently reached a settlement, and the applicant’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The Hon’ble Court examined the request and, …
Ankita Vinodkumar Nagvadia filed a petition under Section 447 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking transfer of Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. J‑416 of 2022 from the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Valsad to a Magistrate Court in Ahmedabad, citing the ill health of a minor …
The accused filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashment of FIR No. 1-11206050260279 (2026) registered at Nandasan Police Station for multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Gujarat Police Act. The original …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashing and setting aside of FIR/Order No. 14027 of 2026. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Vishal B. Mehta, requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after noting that it had not examined the …
The petitioner, Mehul Maheshchandra Kadecha, filed a criminal miscellaneous application alleging domestic violence. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. N. D. Buch, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application at this stage, requesting liberty to pursue any appropriate remedy later. The Court …
Gopalbhai applied for temporary bail on the ground of needing medical treatment. The State, through its counsel, waived service of notice. The court noted that Gopalbhai had previously been released on temporary bail for ten days but subsequently absconded for 1,291 days before being re‑apprehended …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashment of FIR No.11204021220111 (2022) registered at Dakor police station for offences under IPC Sections 467, 468, 471 and 114. The original complainant, who is also the victim, submitted an affidavit stating that the dispute has …
The applicants filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashing and setting aside of FIR/Order No. 7670 of 2026. They later approached the court requesting permission to withdraw that application in order to file a discharge application. The learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. Sachin …
The applicant, Ishwarsinh Tejshinh Ravat, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quash of an FIR and later moved the court for permission to withdraw the same. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Kishan H. Daiya, requested that the court allow the withdrawal so that an appropriate remedy could …
The petitioners filed a large number of Special Criminal Applications and Criminal Miscellaneous Applications seeking the quash of proceedings against them. The Court observed that office objections were still pending against these applications. The central issue was whether the applications could …
The petitioners, Dipakbhai Govindbhai Basiya, filed several criminal miscellaneous applications seeking quashing and setting aside of FIRs and orders. The High Court noted that the petitioners had not complied with the requirement to remove the office objections raised by the court. The court …
The petitioners, Dipakbhai Govindbhai Basiya, filed several criminal miscellaneous applications seeking quashing and setting aside of FIRs and orders. The High Court noted that the petitioners had not complied with the requirement to remove the office objections raised by the court. The court …
The petitioner, Yashinsah Monishah Fakir, filed a series of criminal miscellaneous and special applications seeking quashing of the FIR, setting aside of orders, and vacating interim reliefs. The High Court noted the pending office objections to these applications. The court directed that the office …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashment of FIR CR No.11191038220675/2022 registered at Vatva Police Station for offences under sections 498(a), 323, 294(b), 506(2), 114 of the IPC and sections 3 and 7 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached a …
The petitioners, Dilip @ Diliprao Baliram Khandaare & others, filed a series of special criminal applications seeking quash of proceedings. The court observed that the petitioners had failed to remove the office objections raised by the court despite being directed to do so. Consequently, the court …
The petitioner, Dharmapal @ Guruji Ramdas Tiwari, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking the quash and set‑aside of FIR No. 27774 of 2017. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Vishal K. Anandjiwala, subsequently moved the court for permission to withdraw the application. The court examined …
The petitioners, Dharmendrasinh B. Jadeja, filed a series of Special Criminal Applications and Criminal Miscellaneous Applications against the State of Gujarat. The High Court, after hearing the matter, directed the petitioners to remove the office objections raised in the applications on or before …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashment of FIR No.11195010210119 registered at Palanpur West Police Station under IPC sections 465, 467, 468, 471 and 114. The parties disclosed that the dispute was a private family matter that had been settled, and the …
The applicant filed multiple criminal miscellaneous applications seeking quashing and setting aside of FIR/order. The court directed that any office objections must be removed by 1 May 2025, otherwise the matters will be dismissed for default without further reference to the court. No substantive …
The petitioners, Vishal Enterprise (proprietor Anilbhai Gopalji Umarigar & Anr), filed a series of special criminal applications seeking quashing of proceedings and interim relief against the State of Gujarat. The Court noted that the primary issue was the existence of office objections that the …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of FIR No. 11821003210014 (2021) registered at Mahila Police Station, Dahod, which alleged offences under IPC sections 492(A), 504, 506(2), 114 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. A …
The petitioner, Mohansinh Chibabhai Parmar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quash of FIR/Order No. 14459 of 2022. The trial in the underlying case was reported to be at the final stage of completion. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the application was no longer pressed. …
The applicant, Rajabali Gulamhusenbhai Ratnani, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashment and setting aside of an FIR/order, and a subsequent application for a stay. The court observed that the applicant's counsel, Mr. Vanrajsinh M. Damore, did not press the petition, indicating …
The petitioner, Sanjaygiri Bhabhutgiri Goswami, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking consent quashing. The petitioner later moved the court for permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel, Mr. Chirag Aydi, pleaded for such permission. The Hon'ble Justice M. K. Thakker …
Shital Parsh Soni filed a first appeal (No. 31373 of 2023) which was dismissed by the High Court for failure to remove an office objection. The applicant then moved a miscellaneous civil application seeking restoration of that appeal. The learned counsel, Mr. Mohit R. Balani, assured the Court that …
The petitioner, Abhesinh Amrbhai Taviad, filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking restoration of the proceedings. The applicant argued that if the application is allowed, all office objections would be removed within a week. The respondents, the State of Gujarat and others, opposed the …
Mangaldas Dhirubhai Desai filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking restoration of his matter to the original file. The Special Land Acquisition Officer and another respondent had raised office objections, causing the matter to be removed from the file. The applicant, through counsel Mr. …
Priti, daughter of Parshuram Prajapati, filed a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court seeking permission to file an appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984. The petitioner was represented by Ms. Akshita Mohnot. The counsel indicated that the petition would not be …
The applicant filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay. The matter was listed for hearing, but the appellant's counsel failed to appear even after a second call. The court held that the failure to prosecute the application warranted dismissal. No order as to costs was made. The rule …
The applicants, represented by Mr. Ankit B. Pandya, filed multiple criminal miscellaneous applications seeking to quash FIRs and orders. The High Court observed that the applicants had not complied with the court's earlier directions to remove office objections, particularly regarding the …
The petitioners, Dilip @ Diliprao Baliram Khandaare & others, filed a series of special criminal applications seeking quash of proceedings. The court observed that the petitioners had failed to remove the office objections raised by the court despite being directed to do so. Consequently, the court …
