Created by Fuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

MAYURSINH HARISINH KIRVATSINH RAULJIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Decided
Disposal
58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

Holding

The FIR and all related proceedings are quashed and set aside as their continuation would be an abuse of process.

Summary

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashment of FIR No.11204021220111 (2022) registered at Dakor police station for offences under IPC Sections 467, 468, 471 and 114. The original complainant, who is also the victim, submitted an affidavit stating that the dispute has been amicably settled and he has no objection to the FIR being set aside. The State, represented by counsel, waived service of notice. The High Court, relying on Supreme Court precedents and the inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, held that continuation of the criminal proceedings would amount to harassment and an abuse of process. Consequently, the Court quashed and set aside the FIR and all consequential proceedings against the petitioners. The order was made absolute with permission for direct service.

Issues considered

  • Whether an FIR can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC when the parties have reached an amicable settlement and the complainant consents.
  • Whether continuation of criminal proceedings in such circumstances would constitute an abuse of process of law.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • quashment
  • FIR
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • abuse of process
  • amicable settlement
  • criminal procedure
  • fraud
  • forgery
  • false evidence

Judgment

     R/CR.MA/10800/2026                          ORDER DATED: 06/05/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING & SET ASIDE
                   FIR/ORDER) NO. 10800 of 2026

==========================================================
             MAYURSINH HARISINH KIRVATSINH RAULJI & ORS.
                               Versus
                      STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR AMIT N CHAUDHARY(5599) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3
RONAK RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER

                           Date : 06/05/2026

                            ORAL ORDER


1.      Rule. Learned APP Mr. Raval for the State and learned

advocate Mr. B. J. Patel waive service of notice of rule on behalf

of the respective respondents.

2.      The present application is filed for quashment of the FIR

No.11204021220111 of 2022 registered with Dakor police

station, Kheda for the offences punishable under Sections 467,

468, 471 and 114 of the IPC.

3.      It is submitted by the learned advocate Mr. Chaudhary that

dispute has been resolved between the parties and complainant

has consent for quashment of the FIR.

4.      Learned advocate Mr. Bhavesh J. Patel appearing for the



                               Page 1 of 5
     R/CR.MA/10800/2026                                ORDER DATED: 06/05/2026




respondent No.2 has supported the above submissions and

drawn the attention of this Court with regard to the afÏdavit

which if filed at page 18.

5.      This Court has referred to the afÏdavit, which is reproduced

hereinbelow;

      “1. I say and submits that the applicants have filed present
      criminal Misc application for quashing & setting aside F.I.R no
      11204021220111       of    2022,      offence   registered     u/s
      467,468,471 & 114 of I.P.C lodged at Dakor police station on
      07/03/2022 as well as other consequential of proceeding of
      the Fir against the applicants.
      2. I have gone through the content of present Criminal Misc
      application, I have seen the prayer made in above application
      and I am competent to understand the present criminal misc
      application and its prayer for quashing the F.I.R and other
      consequence proceeding including charge sheet filed in
      above FIR and Criminal case no 418 of 2022 pending before
      the J.M.F.C, Dakor, Dist -Kheda against the applicants.
      3. I say and submits that I am original victim and complainant
      of F.I.R no 11204021220111 of 2022, offence alleged u/s
      467,468,471 & 114 of I.P.C against the applicants/petitioners
      at Dakor police station on 07/03/2022. I am shown as
      complainant in above Fir. I say and submits that there is
      amicable settlement has been arrived between the party. I
      say and submits that I have no any objection if above FIR &
      other consequence proceeding including charge sheet filed in
      above FIR and Criminal case no 418 of 2022 pending before



                                   Page 2 of 5
     R/CR.MA/10800/2026                                 ORDER DATED: 06/05/2026




      the J.M.F.C, Dakor, Dist - Kheda against the applicants to be
      quash and set aside by this honorable high court in interest
      of justice.
      4. I say and submits that I am complainant and I have no any
      grievance against applicants as settlement has been arrived
      and I have no any objection if present Fir is quashed and set
      aside by mercy of this honorable high court.
      5) I say and submits that I am willing agree and not under the
      impression of intoxication, coercion and there is no any
      pressure for filing present afÏdavit.
      6) I am competent to depose that what is stated hereinabove
      is true to the best of my knowledge information and belief
      and I believe the same to be true and correct.”

6.      Having considered the nature of the dispute and the

allegations made in the FIR against the present applicants,

coupled with the fact that the dispute has been resolved

between the parties and the decisions rendered by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the cases of ‘Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab &

Anr.’, reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303, ‘Madan Mohan Abbot Vs.

State of Punjab’, reported in (2008) 4 SCC 582, ‘Nikhil Merchant

Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.’, reported in 2009

(1) GLH 31, ‘Manoj Sharma Vs. State & Ors.’, reported in 2009 (1)

GLH 190 and ‘Narinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Anr.’,

reported in 2014 (2) Crime 67 (SC), it appears that further


                                   Page 3 of 5
     R/CR.MA/10800/2026                        ORDER DATED: 06/05/2026




continuation of criminal proceedings in relation to the impugned

FIR against the applicant would be unnecessary harassment to

the applicant. I have also considered the latest decision of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of ‘Parbatbhai Aahir @

Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others v. State of

Gujarat’, Criminal Appeal No.1723 of 2017, dated 4.10.2017 and

the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the said

decision, particularly Paragraph-15, thereof. Considering the

nature of disputes between the parties which are all private in

nature, I am of the opinion that the matter requires

consideration. It appears that the trial would be futile and further

continuance of the proceedings pursuant to the impugned FIR

would amount to abuse of process of law and hence, to secure

the ends of justice, the impugned FIR is required to be quashed

and set aside in exercise of powers conferred under Section 482

of the Code.

7.      Resultantly, this application is allowed and the impugned

F.I.R., bearing No. No.11204021220111 of 2022 registered with

Dakor police station, Kheda, is hereby quashed and set aside qua

the applicants only. Consequently, all other proceedings arising



                              Page 4 of 5
           R/CR.MA/10800/2026                                                    ORDER DATED: 06/05/2026




     out of the aforesaid F.I.R. are also quashed and set aside qua the

     applicants. Accordingly, Rule is made absolute. Direct service is

     permitted.


                                                                                     (M. K. THAKKER,J)
     Vikramsinh Amarsinh




Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: VIKRAM SINGH(HCW0055), English Steno Grade II, at High Court of Gujarat on 08/05/2026 11:30:20




                                                     Page 5 of 5


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.