Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

SHRI UMIYA CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ON BEHALF OF FIRM MITESHKUMAR YOGESH PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

Holding

A complainant‑victim may appeal an acquittal under Section 138 NI Act to the Sessions Court under the proviso of Section 372 CrPC and Section 413 BNSS, necessitating transfer of the appeal.

Summary

The appellant, Shri Umia Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referencing its own recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal Misc. Applications Nos. 12753/2019 & 12908/2019) and Supreme Court precedents, held that a complainant‑victim has a specific right to appeal under the proviso of Section 372 of the Code and Section 413 of the BNSS to the Sessions Court. Consequently, the Court declined to consider the merits and ordered the appeal to be transferred to the appropriate Sessions Court. The transfer direction also mandated the forwarding of the complete case record for further adjudication.

Issues considered

  • The correct forum for an appeal against an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
  • Whether the complainant‑victim has a statutory right to appeal under the proviso of Section 372 CrPC / Section 413 BNSS.

Legislation cited

Subjects

Acquittal appealSection 138 NI ActTransfer of appealSessions Court jurisdictionProviso appealCriminal procedureBNSS

Judgment

      R/CR.A/151/2023                                   ORDER DATED: 16/04/2026




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

      R/CRIMINAL APPEAL (AGAINST ACQUITTAL) NO. 151 of 2023

==========================================================
SHRI UMIYA CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ON BEHALF OF
              FIRM MITESHKUMAR YOGESH PATEL
                           Versus
                  STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR NAUMAN S QURESHI(10669) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR SHAKEEL A QURESHI(1077) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
BAILABLE WARRANT SERVED for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
MR YUVRAJ BRAHMBHATT, APP for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 1
RULE SERVED for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                               Date : 16/04/2026

                                ORAL ORDER


1.              This is an acquittal appeal filed under Section 378

of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred

to as `the Code’ for short) / under Section 419 of the

Bharatiya         Nagrik     Suraksha        Sanhita,     2023       (hereinafter

referred to as ‘BNSS’ for short) by the complainant against

the judgment and order impugned passed by the learned trial

Court, whereby the learned trial Court had acquitted the

respondent/s/accused of the charge under Section 138 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as

the `NI Act’ for short).



2.              Heard learned advocate for the parties. Learned

APP     has      submitted    that    this     matter   is   required       to    be



                                     Page 1 of 3
     R/CR.A/151/2023                                         ORDER DATED: 16/04/2026




transferred in view of the recent decision of this Court

passed in Criminal Misc. Application No.12753 of 2019 with

Criminal Misc. Application No.12908 of 2019.



3.               Before entering into the merits of this case, this

Court deems it proper to refer to the latest decision rendered

by this Court in the case of Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki V/s

State      of    Gujarat        &    Anr.       being    Criminal      Miscellaneous
Application Nos. 12753 of 2019 with 12908 of 2019 on
23.12.2025, wherein, after considering the various judgments
of   the        Hon’ble       Supreme          Court,   more     particularly,         the

judgment         in    the     matter     of     M/s    Celestium     Financial        V/s
A.Gyanasekaran               etc.   reported       in   2025    INSC        804,       has

observed and held that the Complainant, in a complaint

under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, being a Victim, has a
specific right to appeal under proviso of Section 372 of the

Code / Section 413 of the BNSS to the Court which is

immediately superior in hierarchy i.e., the Sessions Court.

Therefore, the applications for leave to appeal/appeal(s) which

are pending before this Court can be disposed of with a

direction       to     transfer     the    said     application/appeal(s)       to     the

concerned Sessions Court.


4.               In view of the above, learned advocate for the

petitioner requested to transfer the appeal to the concerned



                                          Page 2 of 3
        R/CR.A/151/2023                                                               ORDER DATED: 16/04/2026




Sessions Court.


5.                    In      view         of      the        said        request,            this        appeal           is

disposed of with a direction to the Registry to transfer the

appeal           to        the       concerned               Sessions             Court.            After         it       is

transferred to the concerned Sessions Court, it has to be

treated as an Appeal under the proviso under Section 372 of

the Code / Section 413 of BNSS and numbered accordingly

and issue notice to the parties. The Registry is directed to

transfer the entire record of the case, including the certified

copies of the order impugned and record & proceedings, if

lying with this Court, to the concerned lower Appellate Court,

forthwith.


6.                    Considering that the matter has been pending for

considerable               time,         the        learned           lower          Appellate             Court           is
required to make endeavour to dispose of the matter as

expeditiously as possible. It is clarified that this Court has

not gone into the merits of the matter at this stage.



                                                                                    (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
M.H. DAVE/124

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MAHESHKUMAR HASMUKHLAL DAVE(HC00193), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 16/04/2026 15:21:18




                                                        Page 3 of 3


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "Acquittal appeal"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.