Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

SANJEEV THAKER

1,200 judgments delivered by benches including this judge — showing 1–200.

HARIBHAI CHAGANBHAI SANGANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION

The petitioner filed criminal miscellaneous applications seeking cancellation of bail. Neither the petitioner nor his counsel appeared when the matter was called, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the application. The Court observed the applicant's absence and concluded that the application could not be proceed

HARIBHAI CHAGANBHAI SANGANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION

The petitioner filed criminal miscellaneous applications seeking cancellation of bail. Neither the petitioner nor his counsel appeared when the matter was called, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the application. The Court observed the applicant's absence and concluded that the application could not be proceed

AMRUTLAL ARJUNLAL KOLIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Amrutlal Arjunlal Koli, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted. It held that the applicant may be allowed to withdraw t

PAVANKUMAR DIPAKBHAI BAROTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Pavankumar Dipakbhai Barot filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Pratik B. Barot, subsequently moved the court seeking permission to withdraw the application. The issue before the court was whether it could allow the withdrawal of an anticipatory bail applica

GANESHBHAI BALUBHAI GHODIYA PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Ganesbhai Balubhai Ghodia Patel filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground of agricultural purpose. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. After hearing the parties and considering the petitioner's averments and jail remarks, the Court exercised its discreti

DHIRUBHAI LAXMANBHAI CHUDASAMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Dhirubhai Laxmanbhai Chudasama, filed an application for temporary bail on the ground of needing medical treatment while in custody. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State, allowing the application to proceed. The Court examined the applicant's averments and the

BABUBHAI DEVABHAI BAMBHVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Babubhai Devabhai Bambhva, filed a special criminal application seeking furlough leave while in jail. The court examined the jail’s remarks and noted the petitioner’s poor conduct, including a 527‑day period of absconding after being released on temporary bail. The authority also expressed a risk that t

GOPALBHAI BHUPATBHAI BALDHIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Gopalbhai Bhupatbai Baldhiya, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave while incarcerated. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The High Court, after considering the petition and jail remarks, exercised its discretion in favor of the petiti

LAXMANSINH GOVINDBHAI RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Laxmansinh Govindbhai Rathod, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 65(a), 65(e) and 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The State opposed the

MALEK SAHAD RAFIKBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Malek Sahad Rafikbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented but did not oppose the withdrawal. The learned judge cons

RAGHUVEER YOGESH GARASIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Raghuveer Yogesh Garasiya, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and, after hearing the parties, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the

MALVENDRA RUDRASINH VASAVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Malvendra Rudrasinh Vasava, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11823026260715, 2025) alleging violations of Sections 65(a), 65(e), 98(2) and 116‑B of the Prohibitio

PARMAR JAIMIN GAUTAMBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The complainant sought cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the accused under Section 483(3) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in a case involving alleged abetment of suicide linked to a family property dispute. The trial court had earlier granted bail despite the prosecution's reliance on a suicide note

PARMAR JAIMIN GAUTAMBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The complainant sought cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the accused under Section 483(3) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in a case involving alleged abetment of suicide linked to a family property dispute. The trial court had earlier granted bail despite the prosecution's reliance on a suicide note

PARMAR JAIMIN GAUTAMBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The complainant sought cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the accused in a case involving alleged abetment of suicide linked to a property dispute, invoking Section 483(3) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The trial court had earlier granted bail despite the prosecution's reliance on a suicide note an

GOHIL SURSANGBHAI GORDHANBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Gohil Sursangbhai Gordhanbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application (Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.17939 of 2026) before the Gujarat High Court. Subsequently, the applicant sought to withdraw the application, contending that he was already protected by a separate quashing petition (Criminal Mis

SHUBHAM SANJAY DUBEYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Shubham Sanjay Dubey, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 31695) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the alleged offences. The Cou

AJAY KISHORBHAI AGRAVATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Ajay Kishorbhai Agravat, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted at its discretion. No substantive discussion on merit

ABHISHEK INDRAVADAN GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Abhishek Indravadan Goswami, had filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. Counsel for the applicant, Ms. Namrata C. Shah, appearing virtually, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Ms. Shruti Pathak

RUPESH VITTHALBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Rupesh Vitthalbhai Patel, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail in a case against the State of Gujarat and others. The applicant's counsel, after arguing, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, represented by Ms. Shruti Pathak, was present befo

LAXMIBEN ABHUBHAI DESAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 108 and 54 of the same Act. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The Court examined the standard bail fact

KAMLESHBHAI NANUBHAI DATANIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Kamleshbhai Nanubhai Dataniya filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Dinesh Kumar J. Prajapati, requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court examined the procedural rule that an application may be withdrawn

JAYESHBHAI NAVINBHAI RANCHHODBHAI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Jayeshbhai Navinbhai Ranchhodbhai Thakor, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, after arguing, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The court considered the request and, noting that the applicant was

JAGDISHBHAI RATIBHAI BABARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Jagdishbhai Ratibhai Babariya, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Mehul B. Dhonde, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Ms. Shruti Pathak. Justice Sa

JAYNTIBHAI DALUBHAI BOKAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Jayntibhai Dalubhai Boka, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he has filed an appeal against his conviction. The State of Gujarat, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The High Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, exa

KARSHANBHAI BHIMABHAI KODIYATARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Karshanbhai Bhimabhai Kodiatar, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave from prison. The State, represented by Ms. Shruti Pathak, waived service of notice. The court considered the petitioner's request and the jail's remarks, and exercised its discretion in favor of the petitioner. T

PATEL PARESHBHAI BHAGVANJIBHAI BHOJANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Petitioner Patel Pareshbhai Bhagvanjibhai Bhojani filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the parties, exercised its discretion in favour of the petitioner and gr

SARTAJSINGH @ SATRAJSINGH RASPALSINGH JAAT- SIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, SartaJsingh @ SatraJsingh RaspalSingh Jaat‑Sikh, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court examined the petitioner's averments

AABIDBHAI GULABBHAI MANSURIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Aabidbhai Gulabbhai Mansuri, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave and later moved the court for permission to withdraw that application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel. The Hon’ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered the request and granted permissi

SANJAY S/O RATILAL SOLANKI (THAKOR) THRO SAHIL RATILAL THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Sanjay S/o Ratilal Solanki, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave to enable him to file an appeal. The petitioner had already been released on 5 March 2026 for a period of 21 days for the purpose of filing the appeal. No additional or justifiable reasons for further parole were provi

SHABBIR ALIAS SHOYEB OF JUMMABHAI RANGREJversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Shabbir alias Shoyeb, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he has filed an appeal against his conviction. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. After hearing both parties, the court considered the petitioner's reques

MEGHABHAI NARUBHAI MUNIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Meghabhai Narubhai Muniya filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave from the High Court of Gujarat. The court examined the jail records which showed that the petitioner had absconded for 375 days after being released on furlough leave. No justifiable reason for the absconding was provided by the petitio

CHAMARBHAI SAVLIYABHAI KAKADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Chamarbhai Savliybhai Kakad, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. During the proceedings, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether it has the discretion to allow such a withdrawal. Relying on established procedur

LALJIBHAI @ LATIYABHAI NATIYABHAI RATHVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Laljibhai @ Latiyabhai Natiyabhai Rathva, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The State of Gujarat, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The High Court considered the petitioner'

JISAN JAHIRUDDIN SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Jisan Jahiruddin Shaikh filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent's counsel was present. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker granted the request to withdraw. Consequently, the matter was dispo

HARIPRASAD @ HARISH @ KABO FATESINH ZALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Hariprasad @ Harish @ Kabo Fatesinh Zala, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave from custody. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court considered the petition and the jail's remarks, and exercised its discretion in favor of the

HIMMATBHAI RATNABHAI BADHIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Himmatbhai Ratnabhai Badhiya, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The State, represented by Ms. Shruti Pathak, waived service of notice of rule. The court examined the petition, focusing on the ground of appeal and t

RAHUL ALIAS GOLU KAMLESHBHAI GAUDversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Rahul alias Golu Kamleshbhai Gaud applied for temporary bail, citing financial assistance as the ground. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the application and, exercising its discretion, granted temporary bail for seven days upon the applicant furnishin

AJAY @VICHHI SURESHBHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Ajay @Vichhi Sureshbhai Parmar, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice of rule on behalf of the State. The Gujarat High Court, after considering the application

RAJESHBHAI CAPTAIN KESHVANPILLAI JOHNversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The original complainant filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 483(3) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita seeking cancellation of regular bail granted to the accused in a case involving alleged preparation of false rent bills and misappropriation of Rs.3.60 crore. The trial court had granted bai

VIJAYBHAI @VIKRAMTHAKOR S/O JINABHAI BOGHABHAI CHUDASAMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Vijaybhai @Vikramthakor, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel Ms. Sonalben C. Chavda, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Vinay Vishen. The Ho

MONIKA W/O LALIT PRAKASH SHROTIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Monika, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Ankit V. Dixit, later requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether such withdrawal required its permission. The judge held that the applicant may be allowed to withdra

VANDANABEN JIGARBHAI PANCHALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Vandanaben Jigarbhai Panchal, filed a temporary bail application and later sought the court's permission to withdraw it. The learned advocate for the applicant requested the withdrawal. The court, after hearing the request, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the matter was disp

MOHAMMAD RIZWAN MOHAMMAD ILIYAS ANSARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail and subsequently requested permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. S. R. Zanzarukiya and Ms. Manjula R. Chauhan, moved the court for such permission. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered whether th

RAMESHBHAI BHIKHABHAI LAFA (BRAHMAN)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Rameshbhai Bhikhabhai Lafa, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) fearing arrest in connection with FIR C.R. No.11996006260600 for offences under Sections 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) and 351(3) of the BNSS. The State opposed the b

JIGNESH @JIGO MAYABHAI SINDHAVversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Jignesh @Jigo Mayabhai Sindhav, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted under procedural law. The learned judge g

MUKESHBHAI NARSHIBHAI MAMAIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

MUKESHBHAI NARSHIBAI MAMAIYA applied for temporary bail, citing his wife's medical treatment as a ground. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the application and considering jail remarks, exercised its discretion in favor of the applicant. It grante

RASHIKBHAI DEVABHAI CHAROLIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Rashikbhai Devabhai Charoliya applied for temporary bail, citing his daughter's engagement as a ground. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court, after hearing the application and considering jail remarks, exercised its discretion in favor of the applicant. The applica

JITU KISHANBHAI RAJPUTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Jitu Kishanbhai Rajput, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground of filing an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. After hearing the parties, the court considered the petitioner's averments and jail remarks and exercised its discr

MOHAMMAD AKRAM @ RAJA RIYAZUDDIN ALIMUDDIN QURESHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Mohammad Akram, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The learned judge considered the request and, finding no impediment, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the application was

DHARMENDRABHAI JESINGBHAI CHAUHAN KOLI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Dharmendrabhai Jesingbhai Chauhan Koli Patel, applied for temporary bail through jail. The court noted that he had previously been released on 11 June 2025 for a seven‑day period but absconded for 31 days before surrendering, and earlier, after a 2022 release, he surrendered 21 days late. His jail condu

AJAYKUMARSINH RAJBAKSHSING RAJPUTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Ajaykumar Singh Rajbaksing Rajput, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The court noted that the petitioner had been released earlier by an order dated 09-12-2025 for the period 23-12-2025 to 31-12-2025. The jail report indicated that the petitioner’s conduct while in custo

SANJAY ALIAS THUTHIO RANCHHODBHAI CHAVADAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Sanjay alias Thuthio Ranchhodbhai Chavada, applied for temporary bail through jail. The court noted that the petitioner had previously been released on a temporary bail order dated 09‑12‑2025 for the period 22‑12‑2025 to 02‑01‑2026. The jail report indicated poor conduct by the petitioner and the applic

MOHAMMAD FESAL ALIAS FEZAN ALIAS LALU CHANDMIYA BELIMversusSTATE OF GUJRAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Mohammad Fesal alias Fezan alias Lalu Chandmiya Belim, filed a temporary bail application through jail. He had previously been released on a short order dated 15-12-2025 for the period 22-12-2025 to 30-12-2025. The court examined the jail's remarks, noting that the applicant's conduct in jail was poor an

VISHALBHAI S/O SURESHBHAI TABIYADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Vishalbhai S/o Sureshbhai Tabiyad filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The State of Gujarat, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of the petition. The court examined the petitioner's averments, particularly

MAHAMMADFARUQ @ HARUN MAHAMMADKARIM @ ABDULKARIM MANDALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Mahammadfaruq, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of the petition. After hearing both parties, the Court exercised its discretion in favor o

SAGAR MILAN MANDALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Sagar Milan Mandal, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of the petition. The court considered the petitioner's averments, the ground for paro

VISAJI (PINTU) NATUJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Visaji (Pintu) Natuji Thakor, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground of filing an appeal. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service. After hearing both parties, the court considered the petitioner's averments and jail remarks and exercise

KALUBHAI LAXMANBHAI PATANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Kalubhai Laxmanbhai Patani filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave under section 125(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, arguing that he needed to settle a matrimonial dispute. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The High Court, after hearing counsel

KALUBHAI LAXMANBHAI PATANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Kalubhai Laxmanbhai Patani, convicted under Section 125(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to settle a matrimonial dispute. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service. The High Court, after hearing the parties, exercised its di

KALUBHAI LAXMANBHAI PATANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Kalubhai Laxmanbhai Patani, convicted under section 125(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to settle a matrimonial dispute. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. After hearing the parties, the Court exercised its discretion i

KALUBHAI LAXMANBHAI PATANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Kalubhai Laxmanbhai Patani, convicted under section 125(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to settle a matrimonial dispute. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The Gujarat High Court, after hearing counsel, ex

KALUBHAI LAXMANBHAI PATANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Kalubhai Laxmanbhai Patani, convicted under Section 125(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for default in maintenance, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to settle a matrimonial dispute. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. After hearing the parties, the Court

KALUBHAI LAXMANBHAI PATANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Kalubhai Laxmanbhai Patani, convicted under Section 125(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to settle a matrimonial dispute. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. After hearing both parties, the High Court exerci

KALAJI JETHAJI MAKVANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Kalaji Jethaji Makvana, filed a special criminal application for parole leave. The applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The High Court considered the request and, after hearing, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the application was disposed of as withdrawn. No su

MANOJBHAI @ MANIYO @ BISLERI PRAVINBHAI MAKWANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Manojbhai, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground that he needs to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant's averments and considering the jail remark

KALABHAI MADHABHAI ZALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Kalabhai Madhabhai Zala, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the Gujarat High Court seeking parole. After the application was listed, the petitioner’s counsel, Ms. Manjula R. Chauhan, moved the court for permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat,

SATYENDRAKUMAR DHARMDEVRAMversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Satyendrakumar Dharmdevram, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave while incarcerated. The State of Gujarat, represented by an Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court considered the petitioner's request along with remarks from the jail authorities. Exercisi

IRFAN @ GABBAR YUNUSHBHAI SHEKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Irfan @ Gabbar Yunushbhai Shekh, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had deposited the amount imposed by the District Magistrate, Rajkot. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The High Court, after considering the pe

RAMDEVBHAI @ RAMU RAJUBHAI CHAVDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Ramdevbhai @ Ramu Rajubhai Chavda, a convicted prisoner, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Gujarat High Court, after considering the application

ANKITKUMAR TEJPALSINHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Ankitkumar Tejpalsinh, convicted under the State of Gujarat, filed a special criminal application for parole leave, citing that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The High Court, after considering the application and the jail'

BHARATBHAI NANABHAI HUDADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Bharatbai Nanabhai Hudad, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he needs to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State of Gujarat. The Court examined the petitioner's request and the

JAYANTIBHAI NANJIBHAI RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, incarcerated and represented through the jail, applied for parole leave citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court considered the petitioner's grounds and jail remarks, and exercised its discr

ZAKIR RAFIQBHAI REHMANBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Zakir Rafiqbhai Rehmanbhai, filed a temporary bail application from jail, citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's grounds and the jail remarks, and exercised its di

BHUPATBHAI BHIKHABHAI RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Bhupatbhai Bhikhabhai Rathod filed a special criminal application seeking furlough leave. The jail records indicated that he had previously been released on parole in 2023, subsequently absconded for 185 days, and was later re‑arrested, reflecting poor conduct. The court examined whether the petitioner’s past misconduc

ABHISHEK ALIAS KADU ALIAS FEKLA AMBESHKUMAR PITAMBAR CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Abhishek alias Kadu alias Fekla Ambeshkumar Pitambar Chauhan, filed a temporary bail application through jail. The court noted that the petitioner had been released on 27 June 2025 for a brief period (2-10 July 2025) and subsequently absconded for 124 days before being re‑arrested. The jail report highl

IMRAN ALIAS IMU MO ISMAIL SHEKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Imran alias Imu Mo Ismail Shekh, filed a temporary bail application from jail, citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The High Court, after considering the humanitarian ground and jail remarks, exer

JUGALBHAI ALIAS JUBAL KUMARBHAI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Jugalbai alias Jubal Kumarbhai Thakor, filed a temporary bail application through jail, seeking release on the ground that he needs to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court considered the applicant's ground

HITESHBHAI BALABHAI VALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Hiteshbhai Balabhai Vala, an inmate, filed a special criminal application seeking furlough leave. The public prosecutor waived service of notice, and the jail provided remarks supporting the request. The court exercised its discretion, noting the applicant's circumstances and the jail's recommendation, and decided to g

SUMITRABEN KIRANBHAI KATARAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Sumitraben Kiranbhai Katara applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR C.R. No.11821030260024 alleging offences under Sections 108, 85 and 54 of the same Act. The State opposed the bail on the ground of the seriousness of the offences. The Cou

JAYNTIBHAI DALUBHAI BOKAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Jayntibhai Dalubhai Boka, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he intends to file an appeal against his conviction. The State of Gujarat, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court considered the petitioner's averments, th

DINESHBHAI RATNABHAI BAVALIA (DINESH RATNABHAI BAVALIYA)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Dineshbhai Ratnabhai Bavalia, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. M.M. Barejiya, appearing on behalf of Mr. Sajid Y. Kariyaniya, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented

SONALBEN SANJAYBHAI VAGHELAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 308(6), 308(2), 126(2), 3(5), 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 135 of the G.P. Act. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of

SAGARSINH BABUJI GOHILversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Sagar Singh Babuji Gohil, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The High Court, after hearing the parties and considering the jail r

JAYNTIBHAI DALUBHAI BOKAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Jayntibhai Dalubhai Boka, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The Court examined the petitioner's averments and the jail remarks,

VISHAL @ VISHNUBHAI MANSUKHBHAI MANSHABHAI HIRABHAI SARLAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Vishal @ Vishnubhai Mansukhbhai Manshabhai Hirabhai Sarla filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave on the ground that he has filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Gujarat High Court, after considering the applicatio

ASHOKBHAI RAVATBHAI KHUMANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Ashokbhai Ravatbhai Khuman, a convicted prisoner, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for agricultural purposes. The State, represented by counsel, waived service of notice. The court examined the applicant's ground and jail remarks and exercised its discretion in his favor. It ordered the petitio

BHIKHABHAI BACHUBHAI LADHERversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Bhikhabhai Bachubhai Ladher, an inmate, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after considering the application and jail remarks, exercised its discretion in favor of the petitioner. The petition was allo

HANSARAJBHAI SANDHABHAI PAGIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Hansarabhai Sandhabbhai Pagi filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave to challenge a 2013 order before the Apex Court. The jail records showed that the petitioner had been released multiple times and, after a release on 5 July 2016, absconded for 2,409 days. No justifiable reason for the parole was pro

KALPESHBHAI KANAKSINH GOHILversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION

The applicant, Kalpeshbhai Kanakshinh Gohil, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel failed to appear on several scheduled dates (16.06.2026, 24.06.2026, 01.07.2026, 22.07.2026) and made no request for adjournment, indicating a loss of interest in pursuing the matte

PUSHPABEN BHARATBHAI BANTYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 61(2) and 55 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State and the original complainant opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The Court exam

PRATIKKUMAR MAHENDRABHAI PRAJAPATIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Pratik Kumar Mahendrabhai Prajapati, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 336(2), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The com

JAIMINBHAI PRAHLADBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Jaiminbhai Prahladbhaï Patel, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether a party may be allowed to withdraw an anticipatory bail petition. It held that, sub

GOPALBHAI RATANLAL BHAGIRATHJI SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Gopalbhai Ratanlal Bhagirathji Sharma, filed a temporary bail application on the ground that he requires orthopedic surgery. The court considered a medical opinion from Dr. Aman Khanna, confirming the need for implant removal, bone grafting, and plating, and indicating that the procedure could be perfor

KANANI UMANGBHAI RAMESHBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Kanani Umangbhai Rameshbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. After filing, the applicant was arrested, prompting him to seek permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted post‑arrest. Relyi

VINODBHAI TULSIDAS DAWANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Vinodbhai Tulsidas Dawani applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11196042260140) alleging offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. The applicant argued that the matter stemmed from a civil dispute

ANILBHAI BALDEVBHAI KANZARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Anilbhai Baldevbhai Kanzariya, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The sole issue before the court was whether it could grant such permission. The court exercised its inhe

RAHUL KADIDAS PRAJAPATIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Rahul Kadidas Prajapati applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11191048260598) alleging offences under Sections 108 and 54 of the BNSS (corresponding to Sections 306 and 114 of the IPC). The applicant argued that custodial int

SAGAR S/O RAJESH SABHAJIT SINGHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Sagar, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Dhruvin U Mehta, sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent’s counsel, Mr. Kanva Antani, was present. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker granted the request to withdraw. Consequently, the

MAHENDRABHAI @ MUNNO RAMKUBHAI VALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Mahendrabhai @ Munno Ramkui Vala, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR charging him with multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Gujarat Police Act. T

BHUPATBHAI GABHRUBHAI VALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Bhupatbhai Gabhrubhai Vala, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiy Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Gujarat Police Act. The a

RAYDHAN GOVINDBHAI DANGAR THRO. DANGAR KAJALBEN RAYDHANBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Raydhan Govindbhai Dangar, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The court examined the jail remarks and noted that the petitioner had already been released for a short period from 29 March 2026 to 11 April 2026. No justifiable reasons for further parole were provided in the applica

GOSWAMI MAHENDRAGIRI CHIMANGIRIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Goswami Mahendragi Chimangiri, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Kunal S. Shah, sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after hearing the counsel, granted the request to withdraw. Consequently, the an

MAHENDRASINH @MORIYO NATUBHA JADEJA (MORLO)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Mahendrasinh @MoriYo Natubha Jadeja (MORLO) filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave from the State of Gujarat. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the respondent. After hearing the petition and considering the jail remarks, the High Court exercised its discretion in

NOTIYAR MAMAD MUSTAKSIDHIKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION

The petitioner, Notiyar Mamad Mustaksidhik, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court against the State of Gujarat. The petitioner’s counsel, Ms. Ketki P. Jha, withdrew her appearance, prompting the Registrar to issue a notice to the applicant. Despite multiple notices dated 16‑06‑2026, 23‑06

JETSINHBHAI KALUBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Jetsinhbhai Kalubhai Patel, a bank manager, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(2), 336(3), 340 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness

FARUK ABDUL RAZAK SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Faruk Abdul Razak Shaikh filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel did not press the application and subsequently sought permission to withdraw it. The Court considered whether the withdrawal could be permitted at the applicant's request. Finding no impediment, the Co

JAYDEEPKUMAR ASHOKBHAI THAKKAR (JAYDIP @JAYESH THAKKAR)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Jaydeepkumar Ashokbhai Thakkar in connection with FIR C.R. No.11201018260025 alleging offences under Sections 318(4), 61(2), 317(4) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and Section

ASHRAFKHAN MANVARKHAN MALEKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Ashrafkhan Manvarkhan Malek filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant, through counsel, later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The State, represented by counsel, opposed the withdrawal. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered whether the Court could permi

BHANUBEN URFE BHARTIBEN MUKESHBHAI CHAVDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioners, Bhanuben Urfe Bhartiben Mukeshbhai Chavda & others, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners, through their counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel submitted a request for withdrawal, citing

BABUBHAI CHAGANBHAI CHAVDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioners Babubhai Chaganbhai Chavda & others filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners, through their counsel, sought permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel submitted a request for withdrawal, citing the petitioners' instruction

ANILBHAI LAKHABHAI VAGHELAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioners, Anilbhai Lakhabhai Vaghela and another, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. Their counsel, Kartik H. Bhatt, after arguing, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The respondent State, represented by Mr. Yuvraj Brahmbhatt, opposed the withdrawal. Jus

KETAN ASHOKBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Ketan Ashokbhai Patel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking protection from arrest in connection with a cyber‑crime FIR alleging offences under various BNSS sections and Sections 66(c) and 66(d) of the IT Act. The State opposed

RITIN @ BOBY S/O. DILIPBHAI VENARSEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Ritin @ Boby, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(5) and 54 of the BNS. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the alleged offences. The Court examined the natu

HARESH @ MITHIYO MAHESHBHAI DHARSIBHAI VAGHELAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Haresha @ Mithiyo Maheshbhai Dharsibhai Vaghela, filed a temporary bail application claiming the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's averments and jail remarks, and exercis

VASANTBHAI MANUBHAI MAKWANA (BAROT)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Vasantbhai Manubhai Makwana, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with an FIR alleging violations of Sections 65(a), 65(e), 116-B, 81 and 98(2) of the Prohibition Act. The State opposed the b

ALPESH HARSHADBHAI CHOKSIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Alpesh Harshadbhaai Choksi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No. 11210068260293 filed at Vesu Police Station, Surat, alleging offences under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The allegation stems from a dispute over

BHURAJI LEMBAJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Bhuraji Lemba... Thakor, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel indicated that the applicant would not pursue the bail and sought the court’s permission to withdraw the application. The respondent’s counsel was present but di

PATEL ROHANKUMAR HITESHBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Petitioner Patel Rohankumar Hiteshbhai filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant’s counsel later indicated that the applicant would not pursue the relief and sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether a party may withdraw an anticipa

BHEMABHAI MEVABHAI KHATANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Bhemabhai Mevabhai Khatana and another filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. Their counsel, Mr. AV Prajapati, did not press the application and sought the Court's permission to withdraw it. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Yuvraj Brahmbhatt. The Court consider

NARANBHAI VELABHAI KHATANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Naranbhai Velabhai Khatana, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner’s counsel indicated that the applicant would not pursue the bail and sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether it could allow the w

KULDIP BRAJESH SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Kuldip Brijesh Sharma, an Assistant Production Manager at Waaree Power Private Limited, was implicated in alleged misappropriation of company funds transferred to his wife's account, leading to an FIR under Sections 316(4) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482

JEMISH DINESHBHAI SAVANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, JEMISH DINESHBHAI SAVANI, filed an anticipatory bail application and later sought the court's permission to withdraw it, invoking the principle laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, opposed the withdrawal. The sole issue was whether the court could allow the a

MOHAMADIMRAN @ BODO MOHAMMEDUMAR SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Mohadimran @ Bodo Mohammedumar Shaikh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail in a case pending before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel indicated that the applicant does not wish to pursue the bail application and requested permission to withdraw it. The court n

MOHAMAD IMRAN @BODO MOHAMMEDUMAR SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Mohamad Imran @Bodo Mohammedumar Shaikh applied for temporary bail before the Gujarat High Court, citing his serious health condition of cancer. The applicant’s counsel chose not to press the bail application and formally requested permission to withdraw it. The Court considered the request and, noting the applicant’s

FOSI ASHVINBHAI SHANKARBHAI @ RAJU BHAPversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Fosi Ashvinbhai Shankarbhai @ Raju Bhap, filed an anticipatory bail application (R/CR.MA/18951/2026) before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Dharm K. Raval, after arguing, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented

HAMID HUSENBHAI HINGORAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Hamid Husenbai Hingora filed a special criminal application seeking furlough leave from jail. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court considered the petitioner's averments and the jail's remarks and exercised its discretion in his favour. It ordered the petitioner to

MILAN KISHORBHAI MEWADAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) by Milan Kishorbhai Mewada in connection with an FIR alleging violations of Sections 65(a), 65(e) and 81 of the Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that custodial interrogati

JANGUBHAI KHUMSINGBHAI RATHVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Jangubhai Khumsingbhai Rathva filed a special criminal application seeking furlough leave while in custody. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court considered the petitioner's averments and jail remarks and exercised its discretion in his favor. It ordered the petitio

RAJU URFE RAJPAL BABULAL YADAVversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Raju Urfe Rajpal Babulal Yadav, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The court noted that he had previously been granted parole on 23 March 2015 for a 14‑day period and subsequently absconded, remaining at large for 3,341 days before being arrested on 5 June 2024. The court observe

DHAVALBHAI JIVANBHAI PUNJABHAI RATHODversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Dhavalbhai Jivanbhai Punjabbhai Rathod, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The court noted that the applicant had already been released on bail for the period 18 October 2025 to 29 October 2025 by an order dated 14 October 2025. Since there was no new or justifiable reason

XXXXXXX (AMENDED AS PER ORDER DATED 17/08/2026)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The State of Gujarat filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Gujarat High Court seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the accused by the Sessions Court. The applicant's counsel later requested permission to withdraw this application and instead file a suitable application for bail cancellat

TURK TANJIL ASGARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging multiple serious offences under the BNSS and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail, citing the gravity of the charges. The Court ex

MOHAMMAD RAFIK LALMOHAMMAD BARAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Mohammad Rafik Lalmohammad Bara, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several IPC sections including cheating, criminal breach of trust, extortion, and for

SAMARATH RASIKBHAI CHHATROTIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Samarath Rasikbhai Chhatrotiya, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted under procedural law. The learned Judge grante

PATHAN ASIFKHAN VAJIRKHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Pathan Asifkhan Vajirkhan filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The court examined the request and considered that a party may withdraw an anticipatory bail application with the court's leave. No

BRIJRAJSINH S/O KISHORDAN GADHVIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Brijrajsinh, had already surrendered, rendering his temporary bail application moot. On instructions from his advocate, Ms. Tithi Thakkar, he sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted. It held that, given the surrender, th

CHANDRASHEKHAR SOHANLAL BISHNOIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar Sohanlal Bishnoi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with FIR C.R. No. 5143 of 2018 alleging violations of Sections 65(e), 117B, 83 and 98(2) of the Prohibition Act. The app

AJAY @ AJJU RATANLAL PARIKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Ajay @ Ajju Ratanlal Parik, filed a special criminal application seeking regularisation of the period of his late surrender. He pleaded that he could not surrender on time because his mother was ill. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the relief. The Court examined the applicant’s explanation, note

HARESHBHAI BHARATBHAI BHALIYA THRO RAHUL BHARATBHAI BHALIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Hareshbai Bharatbai Bhalia, filed a special criminal application seeking furlough leave while incarcerated. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court considered the petitioner's averments and the jail's remarks, exercising its discretion in favor of the

MAHENDRABHAI @ DASHRATH @ HACHO RAMESHBHAI CHHAGANBHAI SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground of financial assistance. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant's averments and considering the jail remarks, the court exercised its discretion in favor o

KUSUM RAKESH RADHESHYAM MALIWALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under sections 316(2), 318(2) and 54 of the BNSS, which the court perceived to arise from a commercial dispute rather than a genuine criminal matter. The State opposed ba

PRAVINBHAI GOVINDBHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Pravinbhai Govindbhai Parmar filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. After hearing the parties, the Court exercised its discretion and partially allowed the petitio

HASMUKHBHAI BHURABHAI VASAVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, convicted in Criminal Appeal No. 816 of 2001 dated 25.03.2026, applied for parole leave on the ground that he intends to file appropriate proceedings before the Supreme Court. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The High Court, after hearing the parties, considered th

THAKOR CHOTHABHAI AKA BABUBHAI RAMCHANDJI CHATURJIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Thakor Chothabhai, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. After the authority granted furlough leave, the petitioner moved the High Court to withdraw the pending application. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. D.J. Prajapati, requested permission for withdrawal. The respondent, the State

LAKSHMANBHAI VARIYABHAI RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Lakshmanbhai Variyabhai Rathod filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the parties, the Court exercised its discretion in favor of the petit

DUJANA MAHEBUBBHAI SELIYA (MUSLIM)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Dujana Mahebubbhai Seliya, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The High Court, after hearing the parties and considering the petitioner's averme

RAMILABEN MANUBHAI GOHELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Ramilaben Manubhai Gohel, filed an anticipatory bail application and later sought the court's permission to withdraw it. The learned counsel for the applicant moved that the application be withdrawn. The court considered whether the applicant could be allowed to withdraw the anticipatory bail application

LALABHAI GALABHAI BHABHORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Lalabhai Galabhai Bhabhor, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave and later requested permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered the request and granted permission to withdra

DINESH KESHRIMAL THAKKARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Dinesh Keshri­mal Thakkar, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave and later requested permission to withdraw the application. The respondent State of Gujarat opposed the withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequ

DEVENDRA @BUNTY KRISHANA MURARI MISHRAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Devendra @Bunty Krishana Murari Mishra, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground that he needed to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the applicant’s

RAFIKBHAI ASHRAFBHAI SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner applied for parole leave on the ground of settlement, seeking release from custody. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were represented by counsel. The Court examined the petitioner's averments, the grounds for parole, and the jail remarks, and exerci

RAMESHBHAI TALABHAI THAKOR THROUGH THAKOR MAHESHBHAI ZENABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Rameshbhai Talabhai Thakor, through his counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw his special criminal application for parole leave. The respondent’s counsel was present. The Hon’ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the applicatio

MAHAVEERBHAI JAGUBHAI PATGIRversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Mahaveerbhai Jagubhai Patgir filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. During the proceedings, the applicant sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The sole issue before the court was whether the applicant could be allowed to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition. The c

DHRUVKUMAR NAGIN HALPATIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11200010260664 of 2026) alleging violations of Sections 65(a), 65(e), 98(2) and 81 of the Prohibition Act. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail, citing the gravity of th

NILESHBHAI BALDEVBHAI DESAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Nileshbhai Baldevbhai Desai, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. After hearing the parties, the Gujarat High Court exercised its discretion in f

JASMINBHAI BHARATBHAI KOTHARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Jasminbhai Bharatbhai Kothari filed a special criminal application seeking parole to attend his wife's surgery scheduled for 18‑08‑2026, requiring funds of Rs.1,50,000. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service for the State. The petitioner, through counsel, voluntarily offered to deposit Rs.2,00,000 as security.

WAHIDABEN D/O MAHAMMEDKHAN KHASHABKHAN PATHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Wahidaben d/o Mahammedkhan Khashabkhan Pathan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking cancellation of bail. The applicant later requested to withdraw the application because the FIR against her had been quashed. The court considered whether the withdrawal could be permitted after the FIR was

VALLABHBHAI MITABHAI VAJELIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE

Vallabhbhai Mitabhai Vajeliya challenged a six‑month externment order dated 01‑03‑2026, issued under the Gujarat Police Act, 1951, on the basis of two FIRs under Section 65(a)(a) of the Prohibition Act. More than five months of the externment had already elapsed, and the petitioner sought modification of the order to r

RAILWAY AUTHORITY THROUGH KAMLESHWAR SINGHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The Railway Authority filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in filing a restoration application against the State of Gujarat and others. The High Court heard arguments from counsel for both parties. The court examined the applicant's explanation for the delay and found it satisfactory.

RAILWAY AUTHORITY THROUGH KAMLESHWAR SINGHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The Railway Authority filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of a matter that had been previously closed. The issue before the High Court was whether the application for restoration should be granted. The court examined the submissions made by the applicant's counsel and considered the averments

VAJID @ CHIYA AYUB MALEKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Vajib @ Chiya Ayub Malek, applied for temporary bail on the ground that he needed to arrange funds for his father's illness. The petitioner’s original counsel, Mr. Amit D. Shah, was absent, and a substitute counsel, Ms. J.C. Bhatt, had not filed a vakalatnama despite claiming to represent the petitioner

RIYAZ AHMED ROAB ALI KHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Riyaz Ahmed Roab Ali Khan, filed an anticipatory bail application (R/Cr.MA/14989/2026) before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel argued that the applicant no longer required bail. The Court examined whethe

MOHD. TAUSIF @ TAUSIF KOKO S/O. MOHD. RAFIK SHAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Mohd. Tausif applied for temporary bail on the ground of his mother's illness. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Chirag M. Mevawala, was absent and a substitute advocate, Ms. J.C. Bhatt, had not filed a vakalatnama. The court noted that the applicant had previously absconded for 8 and 10 days while on temporary release in 2

RAMBHAI LAKHABHAI BARAIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Rambhai Lakhabhai Baraiya filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging violations of Sections 65(a), 65(e), 81, 83, 98(2) and 116(B) of the Prohibition Act. The State opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of the offences.

SAHIL RAJUBHAI VISHWAKARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Sahil Rajubhai Vishwakarma, filed a temporary bail application on the ground that he needed to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's averments and the jail remarks, and exercised its

PAPPU GHANSHYAMBHAI NIMAVATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Pappu Ghanshyambhai Nimavat, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after hearing the counsel, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail applicati

PAPPU GHANSHYAMBHAI NIMAVATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Pappu Ghanshyambhai Nimavat, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether it could grant such permission without prejudice to the parties. Relying on its i

ADITYA SACHIN VYASversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Aditya Sachin Vyas, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging criminal breach of trust under Section 406 of the IPC. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offence. The Court examined t

AMRUTBHAI @ AMRATBHAI TRIBHUVANBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Amrutbhai Patel applied for temporary bail to obtain medical treatment. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's grounds and the jail's remarks, and exercised its discretion in his favour. It ordered his release on temporary bail for ten days u

JAYANTIBHAI RATNABHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Jayantibhai Ratnabhai Patel, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground that his wife required medical treatment. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the applicant's averments and considering the

SAMIR SIKANDARBHAI MAKWANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Samir Sikandarbhai Makwana, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Hardik Y. Kothari, moved the court for permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Ms. Jirga Jhavari. The Hon

NARESHKUMAR ALIAS NARSINH BHAVAJI MARVADIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Nare​shkumar alias Narsinh Bhavaji Marvadi, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The jail records indicated that the petitioner had already been granted parole from 17‑10‑2025 to 23‑10‑2025 for seven days. The application for further parole did not state any justifiable reasons for

SUNIL ALIAS SUNIYO ALIAS CHUNILAL MATHURBHAI VADIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Sunil alias SuniYo alias Chunilal Mathurbhai Vadi, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave while incarcerated. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The High Court, after considering the petition and jail remarks, exercised its discretion i

KIRIT RAMESH HALPATIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Kirit Ramesh Halpati filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant, through counsel Mr. Shadkhan Z. Pathan, later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent State, represented by Ms. Jirga Jhaveri, opposed the withdrawal. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker con

VIKI RAMBHAI TARETIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Viki R. Taretiya applied for temporary bail on the ground of financial assistance. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the applicant's averments and considering jail remarks, exercised its discretion in favor of the applicant. The application was pa

ALPESHBHAI @LALU VINUBHAI BHABANIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Alpeshbhai @ Lalu Vinubhai Bhabaniya filed a temporary bail application on the ground of financial assistance. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court considered the applicant's averments, the jail remarks, and exercised its discretion in favor of the applicant. It gr

MOHAMMAD AZAZ @ BADA KHANJRI HANIF SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Mohammad Azaz, applied for temporary bail on the ground that he needed funds to arrange medical treatment for his mother. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the application and considering the jail remarks, exercised its discretion

PATEL DANABHAI KANABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Mr. A.M. Thakore, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. During the hearing, the applicant, through his counsel, requested permission to withdraw the application. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the application was disp

PARASHKUMAR HARGOVANBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Parashkumar Hargovanhbai Patel, a jaggery shopkeeper, was implicated in an FIR alleging supply of rotten jaggery and offences under the Prohibition Act and sections 111(3) and 111(4) of the Bharatiya Nayay Sanhita. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Sura

FAISAL AMJID RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was disposed of as withdrawn. No substanti

ASHOK ISHWARBHAI RAVALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Ashok Ishwarbhai Raval, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel argued that the applicant no longer required bail. The Court, exercising its inherent jurisdiction

AALOK SATISHBHAI MAKWANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Aalok Satishbhai Makwana, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Ms. Alpa J. Dave, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Ms. Jirga Jhaveri. The Court examined

RAHULBHAI RUPSINGBHAI BHABHORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Rahulbhai Rupsingbhai Bhabhor, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel, M.S. Padaliya, later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by M.S. Jirga Jhaveri. Justice Sanjeev J. Th

HASMUKHBHAI @MUNNO TOWER MITHABHAI VANALIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Hasmukhbhai @Munno Tower Mithabhai Vanaliya, filed a temporary bail application through jail, citing the need to manage his family's finances. The court noted that the applicant had recently been released on a short bail order from 08.01.2026 to 25.01.2026 and had surrendered late. The applicant's jail c

PRAKASHKUMAR NATVARLAL MALIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Prakashkumar Natvarlal Mali, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR alleging violations of Sections 65(a), 65(e), 81 and 116‑B of the Prohibition Act. The State opposed the bail,

CHAGANBHAI DEVSIBHAI CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking cancellation of the regular bail granted to respondent No.2 on the ground that the bail conditions, particularly Condition 8(i) requiring the respondent to vacate any part of the complainant's land, were breached. The applicant later sought permission to

RATHVA VINUBHAI KADVABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Rathva Vinubhai Kadvabhai, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant later sought the court's permission to withdraw the pending application. Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Samir Khan S. Pathan and Mr. Minhaj M. Shaikh, made the request, while Ms. Jirga Jhaver

RAVINDRASINGH MUNNASINGH RAJPUTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Ravindrasingh Munnasinh Rajput, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether the applicant could be allowed to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition. The Court held that the appl

MITHUN PRABHUDAS KHALASIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Mithun Prabhudas Khalasi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11215012200047 of 2020) alleging multiple IPC offences and a violation of the Gujarat Police Act. The A

MODI JAIMIN DINESHKUMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Modi Jaimin Dineshkumar, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of th

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search