High Court of Gujarat

HARIBHAI CHAGANBHAI SANGANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal: 37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
Bench: SANJEEV THAKERUTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI

Holding

The application for cancellation of bail was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed criminal miscellaneous applications seeking cancellation of bail. Neither the petitioner nor his counsel appeared when the matter was called, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the application. The Court observed the applicant's absence and concluded that the application could not be proceeded with. Consequently, the Court dismissed the applications for want of prosecution. No merits were examined as the proceedings were terminated due to the petitioner's non‑appearance.

Issues considered

Whether an application for cancellation of bail may be dismissed for want of prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear?

Subjects

bailcancellation of bailwant of prosecutioncriminal miscellaneous application

Judgment

    R/CR.MA/8921/2019                                                          ORDER DATED: 19/02/2026




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

 R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CANCELLATION OF BAIL) NO.
                         8921 of 2019

                                  With
               R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 8975 of 2019
                                  With
               R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 11764 of 2019
==========================================================
                             HARIBHAI CHAGANBHAI SANGANI
                                        Versus
                               STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR K S CHANDRANI(6674) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR PAWAN A BAROT(6455) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR. TIRTHRAJ PANDYA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
        DESAI

                                           Date : 19/02/2026

                                             ORAL ORDER


        Neither the applicant nor the learned advocate for the
applicant is present, when the matter was called out. It
appears that the applicant is not interested in pursuing the
matter.       Hence          the       application            is     dismissed for want                         of
prosecution.


                                                          (UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J)
PARMAR CHIRAG




   Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
   Digitally signed by: PARMAR CHIRAG KANUBHAI(HC02371), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 24/02/2026 10:32:36




                                                  Page 1 of 1

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "bail"Sign in to search