Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

SANJEEV THAKER

1,200 judgments delivered by benches including this judge — showing 401–600.

REHMAT @ SUNERABEN SAMEERSHA SHAHMDAARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Rehmat @ Suneraben Sameersha Shahmdaar, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The applicant’s counsel subsequently sought permission to withdraw the application. The Hon’ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. As a result, the matter was disposed o

ARJUNSINH BALDEVSINH POPATBHA CHUDASAMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Arjunsinh Baldevsin​h Popatbha Chudasama, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant’s counsel subsequently moved the court for permission to withdraw the bail application. The court examined whether any legal impediment or objection

VINAY SHIVSHANKAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Vinay Shivshankar Pandey, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. He later approached the court through his counsel seeking permission to withdraw the application. The State of Gujarat, as the respondent, was represented by counsel. The court considered the request and found

SAMEER AHMAD SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Sameer Ahmad Shaikh, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the grounds of having filed an appeal and needing financial assistance for his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were heard. The Court examined the petitioner'

BHAGABHAI @ BHAGO BABUBHAI KHADERA (GARODA) BRAHMANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Bhagabhai @ Bhago Babubhai Khadera filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave on the ground that an appeal has been filed against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State of Gujarat. After hearing counsel for both sides, the High Court exercised its discretio

SANJAY @JAGO JIVANBHAI BHUSADIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Sanjay @Jago Jivanbhai Bhusadiya, filed a temporary bail application citing the need for financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the applicant and considering jail remarks, exercised its discretion in f

JORAVARKHAN RAHEMATKHAN JATMALEKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Joravarkhan Rahemtkhan Jatmalek, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the High Court of Gujarat seeking parole. Subsequently, the petitioner’s counsel applied for permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted at its discre

AJAYBHAI HARSHADBHAI VAGHELAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Ajaybhai Harshadbhaai Vaghela, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground of financial assistance for his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the applicant's averments and considering the j

BHUPENDRA ALIAS GORU BHANUPRASAD RAMANARAYAN YADAVversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Bhupendra alias Goru Bhanuprasad Ramanarayan Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The court noted that the applicant had previously been granted temporary bail by the Sessions Court but subsequently absconded for 426 days before being re‑arrested. The applicant’s cond

JAYESH ALIAS JACKY RAMESHBHAI ZALAversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Jayesh alias Jacky Rameshbhai Zala, was arrested on 10 July 2025 and filed a temporary bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. The application was made through jail and no substantive justification for bail was presented. The court examined the jail remarks and found that the applicant had no

CHETANSINH ALIAS MAHENDRASINH ALIAS BHANO RANJITSINH ZALAversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Chetansinh alias Mahendrasinh alias Bhanо Ranjitsinh Zala, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The court noted that the petitioner had been released from custody between 02‑02‑2026 and 10‑02‑2026 and that the bail application did not provide any justifiable reasons for fur

MOSIMUDDIN ALIAS MOHSIN MAIYUDDIN SHEKHversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Mosimuddin alias Mohsin Maiyuddin Shekh, filed a temporary bail application in the Gujarat High Court. The court noted that the case was at the initial stage of evidence and that the jail remarks indicated poor conduct of the jail. Considering these factors, the court found that no case was made out for

MOHANBHAI NAGAJIBHAI PARAGHIversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Mohanbhai Nagajibhai Paraghi, filed a temporary bail application after being arrested on 4 October 2025. The application was made through jail representation and no substantive justification for bail was provided. The court examined the jail remarks and found that the applicant had not made a case for r

HEMANT MAHESHBHAI RANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Hemant Maheshbhai Rana, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he needed to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were heard. After considering the petitioner's averments

YUVRAJBHAI MANOJBHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Yuvrajbhai Manojbhai Parmar was arrested on 22 July 2025 and filed a temporary bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The application was presented through a jail representative. The court examined the jail remarks and noted that the applicant's conduct in jail was unsatisfactory and that the application did n

NARANBHAI BHOTHABHAI CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Naranbhai Bhothabhai Chauhan, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave from the State of Gujarat. The jail records showed that the petitioner had already been released for a brief period from 24 May 2026 to 6 June 2026. The application did not provide any justifiable reasons for grantin

MANISH VITTHALBHAI SHAKRABHAI PATANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Manish Vitthalbhai Shakrabhai Patani, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking regularization of his late surrender. The application was presented through the jail authorities. The court examined the averments made in the application and found that no justifiable reasons for the delay were prov

MITESH KANTUBHAI ROHITversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Mitesh Kantubhai Rohit, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. During the proceedings, the applicant's counsel, Mr. D.U. Mehta, sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after hearing the request, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipator

VIPUL JAGDISH SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Vipul Jagdish Sharma applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with FIR No. 11191023260205 alleging offences under Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, arising from a suicide case where he was accused of threatening the deceased to grant a divor

VANJA MAHENDRAKUMAR SURESHKUMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Vanja Mahendrakumar Sureshkumar, filed an anticipatory bail application (R/Cr.MA/10457/2026) before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant, through counsel Mr. A.V. Matani, sought permission to withdraw the pending application. The court considered the request and, after hearing, granted permission to wit

SANJAY @ KALU DHARAMPAL YADAVversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Sanjay @ Kalu Dharampal Yadav, filed a special criminal application seeking regularization of a 26‑day period of late surrender, citing ill health as the reason for the delay. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the request. The court examined the applicant’s submission and the circumstances of his

MATINMIYA @KHALU S/O MEHBUBMIYA @KHALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Matinmiya, filed a temporary bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. Subsequently, the applicant sought the court’s permission to withdraw that application. The respondent’s position on the withdrawal was not contested in the record. The court examined whether a party may be allowed to withdra

KARAN @ KANCHO DARBAR S/O RANJITSINH HARISIH SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Karan @ Kancho Darbar, filed a temporary bail application in the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Ms. Aarti R. Mistry, subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent's counsel, Ms. Krina Calla, was present. The court considered whether it could grant

HARSHADBHAI MAIYABHAI DEKAVADIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Harshadbhai Maiyabhai Dekavadiya filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted. No substantive arguments on merits were required as the request was pro

MOHAMMED JAVED BISMILLAH KHAN THAKOREversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant filed a Special Criminal Application seeking regularization of a period of late surrender. The Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the State of Gujarat, waived service. Both sides were heard before the Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker. The court found that the application did not disclose any just

GOPALSINH NAVUSINH BIHOLAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, GOPALSINH NAVUSINH BIHOLA, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Ankitkumar B. Patel, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Ms. Krina Calla. The Hon'ble

GAURI JAYENDRA NAVALEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application (R/CR.MA/16481/2026) before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. H.D. Rajput, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether a party may be allowed to withdraw an anticipatory bail petition. It held that the ap

CHHOGARAM BABURAM JAT(BENIVAL)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Chhogaram Baburam Jat, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the proceedings, the applicant's counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel but did not oppose the withdrawal. Th

GANESHBHAI RANCHHODBHAI VEKARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Ganesbhai Ranchhodbhai Vekariya, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground of financial assistance. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court considered the petitioner's request and the jail remarks, and exercised its discre

PRATIK PRAFULCHANDRA DESAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Pratik Prafulchandra Desai, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11200010260986 of 2026) alleging offences under IPC Sections 409, 465, 468 and 471. The FIR related to alleged fraud and forgery concerning a power of

MANISHKUMAR MISARILAL MOURYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Manishkumar Misarilal Mourya, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Ms. Akshitaba Solanki, requested permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, State of Gujarat, was represented by Ms. Krina Calla. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker co

DEEPAK NAYAK S/O VIJAY NAYAK THROUGH MENAKA DIGAL DEEPAK NAYAKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Deepak Nayak, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) seeking permission to withdraw the pending application. The applicant was represented by Ms. Akshitaba Solanki, while the State of Gujarat was represented by Ms. Krina Calla. The sole question before the Court was whether the applicant cou

VIJAY @ BAKARO KANTIBHAI CHUNARAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Vijay @ Bakaro Kantibhai Chunara filed a Special Criminal Application seeking regularisation of a period of late surrender, claiming he missed the bus and could not surrender on time. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the request. The applicant’s counsel argued that the applicant had eventually surrendered befor

MAHEMOODMIYA @SALIM ABDULRASHID ANSARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Mahmoodmiya @ Salim Abdulrashid Ansari, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground that he needed to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the applicant's

SHAUKAT ABDULLA MOLVI ISMAIL BADAM THRO. RAZIYABANU SHAUKAT BADAMversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Shaukat Abdulla Molvi Ismail Badam, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. After hearing the parties, the court examined the petitioner's averments and jail remarks. Exercising its discretion, the court found mer

ABDULBHAI ALJIBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Abdulbhai Aljibhai Patel, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. After hearing the parties, the Court considered the petitioner's grounds and jail remarks and exercis

BRIJESH DEVENDRAKUMAR RAMIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Brijesh Devendrakumar Rami, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he intends to file an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The court heard arguments from both sides and, after considering the petitioner's averments and j

KISHOR SHIVAJIBHAI DABHI THROUGH MOTIBEN SHIVABHAI DABHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Kishor Shivajibhai Dabhi, through his counsel Ms. M.S. Rajput, sought the court’s permission to withdraw his pending Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) No. 10213 of 2026. The respondent State of Gujarat was represented by Ms. Krina Calla. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered the request and foun

JAYESH AMARAJI THAKOR DHULAJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Jayesh AmaraJi Thakor Dhulaji Thakor, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The State of Gujarat, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The High Court considered the petitioner's re

ANIRUDDHSINH SHIVUBHA ZALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Aniruddhsinh Shivubha Zala applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 318(4), 61(2) and 3(5) of the BNSS. The applicant argued that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, he would cooperate with the invest

SALIM @ SALIYO MANSURALIBHAI SAMNANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Salim @ Saliyo Mansuralibhai Samnani, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The court heard arguments from both sides and, after considering the p

SHABBIR ABDUL RAZAK SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Shabbir Abdul Razak Shaikh filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court against the State of Gujarat. The applicant, through counsel, later sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether a pending anticipatory bail application could be withdrawn at the applicant’s re

MOHAMAD SHAKIL @ ALU ABDUL RAFIK SHEKHversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Mohamad Shakil @ Alu Abdul Rafik Shekh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The court noted that the petitioner had already been released from custody between 28 October 2025 and 5 November 2025. On that basis, the court found that there was no substantive ground to grant

SANJAYBHAI KISHANJI BHILversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Sanjaybhai Kishanji Bhil, filed a criminal miscellaneous application for temporary bail on the ground of financial assistance while in jail. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's claim and the jail's remarks, and exercised it

GANESHBHAI RANCHHODBHAI VEKARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Ganesbhai Ranchhodbhai Vekariya, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to arrange money for paying a fine. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court considered the ground raised and the jail remarks, and exercised its discretion in fa

VISHVAPALSINH PRITAMSINH BHATIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Vishvapalsinh Pritamsinh Bhati filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. After some hearing, the applicant, through his counsel, sought permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel argued for the withdrawal. The Court, after considering the request, granted permission to wi

JAGDISHBHAI CHIMANBHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Jagdishbhai Chimanbhai Parmar filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The court examined the petitioner's averments and the jail remarks, and, exercising its discretion, decided in favor of the petitioner. The petition was partly

MAHENDRA @ MANU JIVRAM SONIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Mahendra @ Manu Jivram Soni filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The court heard arguments from both sides and, after considering the petitioner's averments and jail remarks, exerc

BUDELA ARTH SUNILBHAI (NAME AS PER ORDER OF LD. SESSIONS COURT)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, BudeLA Arth Sunilbhai, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking anticipatory bail before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, A S Timbalia, later moved the court for permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented b

PATEL JAIMIN BIPINBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Patel Jaimin Bipinbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. Subsequently, the applicant’s counsel, Mr. M.K. Poojara, sought the court’s permission to withdraw the application. The court examined whether it could grant such permission and found no legal impediment to a

BIPIN SANTOSHKUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Bipin Santoshkumar Pandey, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel later sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel. The Court considered the request for withdrawal of the anticipat

KIRITBHAI BABUBHAI MOLIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Kiritbhai Babubhai Moliya filed an application seeking cancellation of bail. After the quashing petition resulted in the complaint being quashed, the applicant’s counsel, Mr. Pratik Y. Jasani, requested permission to withdraw the bail‑cancellation application. No opposition was filed by the State. The Court, after noti

BHAVUBEN BHOPABHAI PARALIYA W/O JAGDISHBHAI BARAIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Bhavuben Bhopabhai Paraliya, was arrested after a chargesheet was filed and filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking successive anticipatory bail. While the application was pending, the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the same. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

SURESHBHAI @ DHEGABHAI HARSENGBHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Sureshbhai @ Dhegabhai Harsengbhai Parmar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The applicant later approached the court requesting permission to withdraw that bail application. The applicant also sought liberty to re‑file the same application after a period of three months.

PRADIPBHAI ANAKBHAI KARPADAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Pradipbhai Anakbhai Karpada, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Jigar L. Patel, subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw the pending application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Yuvraj Bramabhatt

HADOLE SAINATH SAMBHAJIRAOversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Hadole Sainath Sambhajirao, filed a temporary bail application citing the need for medical treatment of his father. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court considered the applicant's claim and the jail remarks, and exercised its discretion in his favor.

DASHRATH SINGH S/OF KHUMAN SINGH RAJPUTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Dashrath Singh, the applicant, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the Gujarat High Court seeking parole. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application because a separate parole application was already pending before the appropriate authority. The Court ex

SHABBIR ALIAS SALA DADABHAI CHOPDAversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Shabbir alias Sala Dadabhai Chopda filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The High Court, on 15 July 2026, allowed the applicant to withdraw the bail application. The applicant subsequently withdrew the application but did not provide any justifiable reasons for the withdrawal. The Court obs

SALIMBHAI ADAMBHAI KAKALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Salimbhai Adambhai Kakal filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The High Court, after hearing the parties and considering the petitioner's averments and

VISHALBHAI RAMESHBHAI NANDESHRIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Vishalbhai Rameshbhai Nandeshriya applied for temporary bail, citing the need for financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's averments and jail remarks, and exercised its discretion in his favour. It granted te

DARJI UMANG KARUBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Darji Umang Karubhai, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether the applicant could be allowed to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition. No substantiv

BAROT VIJAYKUMAR SUBJIBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Barot Vijaykumar Subjibhai, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground that he has an examination scheduled from 18 July to 28 July 2026. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's claim and th

KALUBHAI LAXMANBHAI PATANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Kalubhai Laxmanbhai Patani, filed multiple Special Criminal Applications seeking parole leave, which were pending before the concerned authority. The petitioner subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw these applications. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented in opposition.

KALUBHAI LAXMANBHAI PATANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Kalubhai Laxmanbhai Patani, filed multiple Special Criminal Applications seeking parole leave, which were pending before the concerned authority. The petitioner subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw these applications. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented in opposition.

KALUBHAI LAXMANBHAI PATANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Kalubhai Laxmanbhai Patani, filed multiple Special Criminal Applications seeking parole leave, which were pending before the concerned authority. The petitioner subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw these applications. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented in opposition.

KALUBHAI LAXMANBHAI PATANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Kalubhai Laxmanbhai Patani, filed multiple Special Criminal Applications seeking parole leave, which were pending before the concerned authority. The petitioner subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw these applications. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented in opposition.

KALUBHAI LAXMANBHAI PATANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Kalubhai Laxmanbhai Patani, filed multiple Special Criminal Applications seeking parole leave, which were pending before the concerned authority. The petitioner subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw these applications. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented in opposition.

KALUBHAI LAXMANBHAI PATANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Kalubhai Laxmanbhai Patani, filed multiple Special Criminal Applications seeking parole leave, which were pending before the concerned authority. The petitioner subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw these applications. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented in opposition.

KALUBHAI LAXMANBHAI PATANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Kalubhai Laxmanbhai Patani, filed multiple Special Criminal Applications seeking parole leave, which were pending before the concerned authority. The petitioner subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw these applications. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented in opposition.

ARBAZ @ KALU BHIKAN KHATIKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Arbaz @ Kalu Bikan Khatik, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted. It held that the applicant was entitled to withdraw

ARUNKUMAR RAMESHKUMAR RAVAT THRO SITAPATI W/OF RAMESHKUMAR RAVATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Arunkumar Rameshkumaar Ravat, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of the petition on behalf of the State of Gujarat. The High Court, after hearing counsel for both part

URMILABEN PRAVINSINH SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants, Urmilaben Pravinsinh Solanki and others, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita Act and the Gujarat Police Ac

LALABHAI LAXMANJI THAKOREversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Lalabhai Laxmanji Thakore, filed an anticipatory bail application (R/Cr.MA/16348/2026) before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Premdeep V. Jadeja and Mr. Kishore Prajapati, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gu

AJAY ISHVARBHAI RAVJIBHAI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Ajay Ishvarbhai Ravjibhai Thakor, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the Gujarat High Court. He was arrested on 21 October 2025 and the application did not provide any justifiable reasons for release. The court examined the jail remarks and noted the lack of substant

HARSH @GANIYO RAMESHBHAI DAMUBHAI MOREversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Harsh @Ganiyo Rameshbhai Damubhai More, filed a temporary bail application from jail, citing the need for financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's ground and jail remarks and exercised its dis

ANIL KALYAN UDHREJversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant filed a temporary bail application after being released on 22 May 2024 and subsequently absconding for 476 days before being re‑arrested. The jail record indicated poor conduct during the period of release. The court examined whether the applicant’s conduct justified granting bail. Considering the long pe

KALPESH ASHOKBHAI RAVJIBHAI VAGHELA (BHIL)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Kalpesh Ashokbhai Ravjibhai Vaghela, filed a temporary bail application after being arrested on 13 August 2025. The trial is ongoing, and the application did not provide any justifiable reasons for bail. The court examined the jail remarks and found that the applicant had been recently detained and no su

KARAN ANILBHAI MOHANJI RANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Karan Anilbhai Mohanji Rana, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail after being arrested on 11 October 2025. The court examined the jail's remarks and found that the applicant had not provided any justifiable reasons for release. Consequently, the court held that no case was ma

RAKESHBHAI MOHANBHAI ABHIMANYU SUTHAR (SHARMA)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered a temporary bail application filed by Rakeshbhai Mohanbhai Abhimanyu Suthar (Sharma) through jail, seeking release on the ground of financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice of rule on behalf of the State. After examining the appli

IKBAL HAJI CHAVDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, represented by the jail, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The court noted that the parole application was still pending before the appropriate authority. Since the matter was already before the authority, the court found no ground to entertain the petition. Consequently, the pe

YOGESHBHAI KISHANBHAI DHODIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Yogeshbhai Kishanbhai Dhodi, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Jaydeep H. Sindhi, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Yuvraj Brahmbhatt.

MITHABHAI @MITHALAL POKHRAJBHAI DAVEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several BNS sections and the Gujarat Money Lenders Act. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The Court examined factors such as the natur

VINODBHAI MITHALAL DAVEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several BNS sections and the Gujarat Money Lenders Act. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The Court examined factors such as the natur

DEVENDRASINH SANJAYSINH CHUDASAMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Devendrasinh Sanjaysinh Chudasama, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking anticipatory bail before the High Court of Gujarat. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel applied for permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The respondent’s counsel opposed the withdrawal

RAHI RAMESHBHAI LAVADIAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Rahi Rameshbai Lavadia applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging violations of Sections 65(a), 65(e) and 116‑B of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The applicant’s counsel argued that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, the applic

JAYANTIBHAI PARSOTTAMBHAI BABARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several BNS sections and the Gujarat Money Lenders Act. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The Court examined factors such as the natur

REMESHBHAI BHANABHAI VAGHELAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Remeshbhai Bhanabhai Vaghela, filed a Special Criminal Application for parole leave, citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the petition, focusing on the financial assistance grou

AAMIRKHAN ASIFKHAN PATHANversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Aamir Khan Asifkhan Pathan, who was in jail, filed a temporary bail application on the ground that his family needed financial assistance. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court considered the applicant’s claim and the jail remarks, and exercised its discretion in hi

RAMDEV NIMBARAM GURJARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Ramdev Nimbaram Gurjar, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Mr. M.V. Patel, subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw the pending application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Yuvraj Bramabhatt. The cou

HARSHADKUMAR S/O DALSUKHBHAI BHURABHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Harshadkumar filed three criminal miscellaneous applications seeking cancellation of bail. The State (respondent No.2) informed the court that no chargesheet had been filed against the accused and, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the applications. The applicant’s counsel sought the court’s permission

HARSHADKUMAR S/O DALSUKHBHAI BHURABHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Harshadkumar filed three criminal miscellaneous applications seeking cancellation of bail. The State (respondent No.2) informed the court that no chargesheet had been filed against the accused and, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the applications. The applicant’s counsel sought the court’s permission

HARSHADKUMAR S/O DALSUKHBHAI BHURABHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Harshadkumar filed three criminal miscellaneous applications seeking cancellation of bail. The State (respondent No.2) informed the court that no chargesheet had been filed against the accused and, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the applications. The applicant’s counsel sought the court’s permission

ASHOKSINH JORUBHA VAGHELAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Ashoksinh Jorubha Vaghela, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel moved the court for permission to withdraw the application. The issue before the court was whether it could grant such permission to withdraw a pending parole application. The court

LALJIBHAI @LALO JINABHAI KHERversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Laljibhai @Lalo Jinabhai Kher, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the Gujarat High Court. Subsequently, the applicant’s counsel, Mr. P.D. Gohil, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The sole question before the Court was whether it could allow the withdrawal

JAYDEEP @ BABU S/O LALSINH PYARELAL DIVAKARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Jaydeep @ Babu, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail in a case pending before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Mr. M. Nisar Vaidhya and Mr. Shadkhan Z. Pathan, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The learned judge cons

ROHIT RAJ S/O SHASHI BHUSHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Rohit Raj, filed an anticipatory bail application (R/CR.MA/16096/2026) before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Rauhan R. Gogda, after arguing, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Rohan A. Shah. The

MALDE GIGABHAI ODEDARAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Malde Gigabhai Odedara, filed a temporary bail application citing the need for self‑treatment and to perform the final rites of his mother‑in‑law. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant’s grounds and the jail’s remarks, and exerc

MAHIPATBHAI VIRJIBHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Mahipatbhai Virjibhai Parmar, filed an anticipatory bail application in the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel, Arshad Y. Dalal and Umarfaruk M. Kharadi, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted. It held that the a

GANESH @ DADU RAJENDRA JAGNNATH SURYAVANSHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Ganesh @ Dadu Rajendra Jagnnath Suryavanshi, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground that he needed to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant's averme

RAHUL RAJUBHAI KHEDEKAR THRU PAYAL RAHUL KHEDEKARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Rahul Rajubhai Khedekar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, S.D. Mansuri, later moved the court for permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Rohan A.

SUMIT @ BILADI VINODBHAI PATANI THRO. PATANI ASHABEN VINODBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Sumit @ Biladi Vinodbhai Patani, filed a temporary bail application after being arrested on 11 July 2025. The court examined the jail remarks and noted that the applicant’s conduct in custody was poor. No justifiable reasons for granting bail were presented in the application. Considering the recent arre

VIVEK S/O RAM BAHADUR PARAMSUKH CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Vivek, filed a temporary bail application claiming the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the submissions and considering the jail remarks, the Court exercised its discretion in favor of the a

SURESHBHAI DALSINGBHAI BHURIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Sureshbhai Dalsingbhai Bhuriya, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Ms. Ritixa P. Zala, later moved the court for permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by

LALCHAND ALIAS BODIYO KALUJIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Lalchand alias BodiYo Kaluji filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice for the State. The court examined the applicant's grounds and jail remarks and decided to exercise its discretion in his favor.

ABDUL GANI GAJI MORIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Abdul Gani Gaji Moriya, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The jail’s remarks indicated that the petitioner had recently been released and the application lacked any justifiable reasons. The Court examined the absence of sufficient grounds for parole. Finding no case made out, th

DANISH @ D. K. @ DOLAR MOHASINHKHAN PATHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Danish Pathan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The applicant later requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The learned counsel, Mr. H.B. Raval, appeared on behalf of the applicant and sought the court's leave to withdraw. The court considered whether it c

PREMNARAYAN GANESHBHAI MINAversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The accused, Premnarayan Ganesbhai Mina, applied for temporary bail through jail, citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court examined the applicant's grounds and jail remarks, and exercised its discretion in

SUNIL HOMSING PALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Sunil Homsing Pal, filed a special criminal application for parole leave while in jail, citing the filing of an appeal as the ground. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The High Court, after considering the petition and jail remarks, exercised its discretio

RAJNIKANT KARSANBHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Rajnikant Karsanbhai Parmar, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he needed to provide financial assistance to his family. The State of Gujarat, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court considered the petitioner's averme

MUNESH @MUNNO BHURABHAI DEVIPUJAKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Munesh Bhurabhai Devipujak, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. He later requested permission to withdraw this application because a separate parole application was pending before the authority. The court considered whether the applicant could be allowed to withdraw the pending app

MALEK IRFAN @ GIRI SALIMBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Malek Irfan @ Giri Salimbhai, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The High Court, after hearing counsel, considered the petitioner's r

DOLANI RAUF @RAFALO ABDULRASIDversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Dolani Rauf, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the grounds of having filed an appeal and needing financial assistance for his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were heard. The Court examined the petitioner's averme

RAJNIKANT KARSANBHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Petitioner Rajnikant Karsanbhai Parmar filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The High Court considered the petition, the grounds raised, and the jail remarks, and exercised its disc

MANOJGAR MUKNAGAR GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Manojgar Muknag ar Goswami, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State of Gujarat. The High Court, after hearing the parties and considering t

PARESHKUMAR BHARATKUMAR THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Parshkumar Bharatkumar Thakor filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the parties, the Court exercised its discretion in favour of the petit

UMANGBHAI LALITBHAI THAKKARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Umang Lalitbhai Thakkar filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground of financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The court examined the petition, the grounds raised, and the jail remarks. Exercising its discretion, the court f

MAHENDRA @ DAHYABHAI BHOGILAL TADVIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Mahendra @ Dahyabhai Bhogilal Tadvi filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. No representative appeared for the petitioner when the matter was called. The court noted jail records showing the petitioner had been released from 12‑12‑2025 to 01‑01‑2026 and observed that the petition did not state any ju

HAJA LAXMANBHAI ODEDRAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered a temporary bail application filed by Haja Laxmanbhai Odedra, who sought release on the ground of needing financial assistance for his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant’s averments and reviewing jail

AFJAL HAJIBHAI SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Afjal Hajibhai Shaikh applied for temporary bail, citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant's averments and considering jail remarks, the Court exercised its discretion in his favour. The C

ANKUL SHIVBHARAN PALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Ankul Shivbharan Pal, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the Gujarat High Court. The application was presented by Advocate Ms. Manjula R. Chauhan. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the

SHAKIL @ KALU SUPDU MALEKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Shakil @ Kalu Supdu Malek, filed a temporary bail application citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the submissions and considering the jail remarks, the Court exercised its discretion

RAJESHBHAI MANJIBHAI MERversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Rajeshbhai Manjibhai Mer, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground of financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant's averments and considering the jail remarks, the

BHAGIRATHBHAI @BHAGWATSINH VARDHAJI BAROTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Bhagirathbai Barot, filed a temporary bail application claiming the need to appear for examinations. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court examined the applicant's averments and the jail remarks, and exercised its discretion in favor of the applicant

THAKOR GOPALJI RAMANJIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Thakor Gopalji Ramanji, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11216025260070) alleging violations of Sections 65(A), 65(E) and 81 of the Prohibition Act. The State opp

PRAVINBHAI @ KANUBHAI VALJIBHAI DAFDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Pravinbhai @ Kanubhai Valjibhai Dafda, filed a Special Criminal Application for parole leave while in jail, citing that he had filed an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Gujarat High Court, after considering the petition and the jail's remarks,

GANESHBHAI RANCHHODBHAI VEKARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Ganesbhai Ranchhodbhai Vekariya, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The jail records indicated that the petitioner had been released in June 2026 and the petition did not provide any justifiable reasons for granting parole. The court examined the lack of substantive grounds in th

CHETANBHAI DHIRUBHAI MAKAWANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Chetanbhai Dhirubhai Makawana, who is incarcerated, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the petitioner’s ground and the jail’s remarks and decided to

KAMLESH MURALIDHAR KUSHWAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, mother‑in‑law of a deceased, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 108, 85 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prose

AVANISH ASHVINBHAI SAKHARELIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Avanish Ashvinbhai Sakhareliya, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 316(4), 318(2) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The prosecuti

MANSI D/O RATIBHAI VIROLIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Mansi d/o Ratibhai Viroliya, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 316(4), 318(2) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State oppos

VIRMA RAM S/O VABHUTA RAMversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Virma Ram, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the proceedings, the applicant's counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel but did not oppose the withdrawal. The court cons

RUSHIKESH GANPATISWAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Rushikesh Ganpatiswai, filed a temporary bail application seeking release to provide financial assistance to his wife. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice of rule on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant’s averments, the grounds cited, and the jail’s remarks, and exe

KIRANBHAI CHANDUBHAI SALATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Kiranbhai Chandubhai Salat filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The police submitted a closure report of the underlying complaint on 14 July 2026. The applicant’s counsel then sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, seeking liberty to file a fresh application if

SHAILESHKUMAR RATILAL KHANTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Shaileshkumaar Ratilal Khant, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the proceedings, the applicant's counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether it could grant such permission. No substantive discussion on merit

ROASHAN @ROSHAN BHAIYA UMESHBHAI THAKURversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Roashan @Roshan Bhaiya Umeshbhai Thakur, was arrested on 15 April 2026 and applied for temporary bail on the ground that his mother required medical treatment. The applicant's counsel submitted a doctor's statement indicating that the mother's medical reports were normal. The court examined the grounds

RAMESH @ SUNNY LAXMANBHAI DESAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Ramesh @ Sunny Laxmanbhai Desai, filed a temporary bail application in the Gujarat High Court seeking release to undergo cancer treatment. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court examined the applicant’s medical certificate from the Patan Sub-Jail indi

DUNIYA @ KUMAR RASMIKANT GANDHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Duniya @ Kumar Rasmikan​t Gandhi, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the High Court of Gujarat seeking parole. The applicant's counsel later moved the court for permission to withdraw the application. The sole issue before the court was whether the petitioner could be allowed to

MAHENDRABHAI ASHOKBHAI SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Mahendrabhai Ashokbhai Shah, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) and, through counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered the request and granted permission to withdr

MOHMAD TOHID S/O MOHAMAD ARIF SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Mohmad Tohid filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to enable him to file an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State of Gujarat. After hearing the parties, the High Court exercised its discretion in favour of the petitioner and p

VIJAYBHAI @ VIJAYSINH MAGANBHAI @ MAGANSINH RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Vijaybhai Rathod, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The applicant’s counsel later requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted. The Court granted the request, allowing the application to be withdrawn. Consequent

JAGDISH BHURIYA S/O KANA BHURIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Jagdish Bhuriya filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to enable him to file an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The High Court, after hearing counsel, exercised its discretion in favour of the petitioner and partly allowed the pet

RAMSAJIVAN @ RAJU RAMSABAD SUDAMA VISHWAKARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

An application for parole leave (Special Criminal Application No. 9824 of 2026) was filed by the petitioner, RamSajivan @ Raju Ramsabad Sudama Vishwakarma, against the State of Gujarat. The petitioner’s counsel, after arguing for some time, sought the court’s permission to withdraw the application. The Hon’ble Justice

VISHALKUMAR RAJESH PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Vishalkumar Rajesh Patel filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. Subsequently, the applicant sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the applicant, Krunal S. Mehta and Mr. Fehad A. Memon, requested the withdrawal, while the respondent's counsel, M

SHIKLIKAR CHARANSING SORANSINHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Shiklikar Charansing Soransinh, filed an anticipatory bail application and later sought the court's permission to withdraw it. The applicant was represented by Mr. Gajendra P. Baghel and Mr. Shambhukumar. The respondent, State of Gujarat, was represented by Ms. Asmita Patel. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker gra

SACHIN DINESH PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Sachin Dinesh Patel, filed a Special Criminal Application (Transit Bail) before the High Court of Gujarat. The parties subsequently entered into a settlement agreement dated 10 July 2026. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Abhishek S. Sadhwani, sought the court’s permission to withdraw the application on the b

MOHANSING ARJUNSING BAVARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Mohansing Arjunsing Bavari, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant's averments and considering the jail remarks, the cour

DHARMESH HIMATBHAI KUKADIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Dharmesh Himatbai Kukadiya, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. After the application was listed, the petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel but did not oppose the withd

ISHMILE @ PINTU IBRAHIM KHOKHAR THRO. KHOKHAR NILOFAR ISMAILversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Ishmile @ Pintu Ibrahim Khokhar, sought temporary bail to obtain financial assistance for his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court considered the applicant's averments, the grounds cited, and jail remarks, and exercised its discretion in his

ISHMILE @ PINTU IBRAHIM KHOKHAR THRO KHOKHAR NILOFAR ISMAILversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Ishmile @ Pintu Ibrahim Khokhar, sought temporary bail to obtain financial assistance for his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court considered the applicant's averments, the grounds cited, and jail remarks, and exercised its discretion in his

PRATIK ARVINDBHAI VAGHANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail to attend the final rites of his father‑in‑law. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant's averments and considering the jail remarks, the court exercised its discretion i

KARAN BADALBHAI DABAGARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Karan Badalbhais Dabaghar, applied for temporary bail on the ground that he needed financial assistance for his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the application and considering the jail remarks, exercised its discretion in

JITENDRASINH @ JEKIBHAI S/O MANGALSINH RAJAWAT RAJPUTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant filed a special criminal application for parole leave, which was pending before the concerned authority. The applicant, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the application and requested the court to direct the authority to decide the pending parole request promptly. The court considered the req

BHAGIRATHSINH VANRAJSINH VAGHELAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Piush D. Gohil, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail in a case pending before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Sameer M. Mansuri, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The learned judge considered the request and e

MALDE GIGABHAI ODEDARAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Malde Gigabhai Odedara, filed a temporary bail application seeking release for self‑treatment and to perform the final rites of his mother‑in‑law. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant’s averments and considering the jail remarks, th

AJAYKUMAR @ PRAKASHJI @ PAKO RANJITJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Ajaykumar @ Prakashji @ Pako Ranjitji Thakor filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant, through counsel Jucky Lucky Chan, later sought the court's permission to withdraw that application. The court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted. It granted the reque

AABIDKHAN S/O AIYUBKHAN MUSTUFAKHAN PATHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Aabidkhan Pathan, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the grounds of needing financial assistance for his family and to file an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were heard. The Court examined the petitioner's averme

HARSH @ KHAGO @ LALU ASHWINBHAI NATHABHAI GAMITversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Harsh @ Khago @ Lalu Ashwinbhai Nathabhai Gamit, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail to provide financial assistance. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant's averments and considering the jail remarks, t

KIRANKUMAR S/O AMARCHAND NEGI (RAJPUT)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Kirankumar S/o Amarchand Negi (Rajput) filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave, citing the pending appeal against his conviction and the need for financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing counsel and reviewing t

RASIKBHAI BHARATBHAI BHALIYA THROUGH DIPALI RASIKBHAI BHALIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Rasikbhai Bharatbhai Bhaliya filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave to raise funds for advocate fees required to file an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The High Court considered the petitioner's claim and the jail remarks, exercising its discretion in

HARESHBHAI JIVABHAI SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Hareshbai Jivabhai Solanki, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to manage funds for payment of advocate fees to file an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were represented by counsel. The Court examined the petitioner's

PRUTHVI MAHESHBHAI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Petitioner Pruthvi Maheshbhai Thakor filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to manage funds for advocate fees to file an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The Court examined the petitioner's claim and the jail remarks, and exercised its discretion in favo

NANDISH RAJENDRABHAI SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Nandish Rajendrabhai Shah, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the grounds that he has filed an appeal and requires financial assistance for his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were heard before the Hon'ble Justice

JAYPALSINH DIPAKSINH @ DIPUBHA @ GINUBHA JADEJAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Jaypalsinh Dipaksinh Jadeja, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging violations of several provisions of the Prohibition Act. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. The court examined factors s

SANJAY @ KALU DHARMAPAL YADAV THROUGH KOMALBEN SANJAYBHAI YADAVversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Sanjay @ Kalu Dharmapal Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The learned counsel for the respondent, Ms. Asmita Patel, was present. The Court examined whether the applic

SADDAMSHA DILIPSHA DIWANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Saddamsha Dilipsha Diwan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking cancellation of bail. The application was filed after the trial in the underlying case had already commenced. The applicant, through counsel Mr. Tushar Chaudhary, requested permission to withdraw the application on the ground th

SADDAMSHA DILIPSHA DIWANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Saddamsha Dilipsa Diwan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking cancellation of bail. Before the hearing, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application, citing that the trial had already commenced. The court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted at

PRUTHVIRAJSINH ABHESINH THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Pruthvirajsingh Abhesinh Thakor, filed a Special Criminal Application (Transit Bail) before the Gujarat High Court. He later sought the Court’s permission to withdraw that application and to file a fresh, appropriate application before the concerned court. The petitioner was represented by Mr. B.M. Mang

TARUN KUMAR S/O. DEDA RAMversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Tarun Kumar, filed a Special Criminal Application (Transit Bail) before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant, through counsel MR BM Mangukiya, sought the court's permission to withdraw the pending application and requested liberty to file a suitable application later. The court considered whether it

KRUNAL MANOHARSINH VANSADIAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Krunal Manoharsinh Vansadia, filed a Special Criminal Application (Transit Bail) before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant sought the court's permission to withdraw the pending application and requested liberty to file a suitable application later. The respondent State of Gujarat and other parties

PRAKASH MOHANLAL LOLversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Prakash Mohanlal Lol, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.11189002260120 alleging offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The FIR does not name the applicant; it implicates his brother as th

VIJAY PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Vijay Parmar filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant’s counsel, after arguing, sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request for withdrawal. The judge granted the permission as prayed. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was di

ANUJ ANIL BHATTIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Anuj Anil Bhatti, filed an anticipatory bail application but informed the court that no FIR had been lodged against him. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application, requesting liberty to file a suitable application later if needed. The respondent's counsel opposed the withdrawa

PARESHBHAI CHAMANBHAI CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Parshabhai Chamanbhai Chauhan, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel submitted a request for withdrawal, and the court considered whether such a withdraw

DEEPAKBHAI NATVARLAL SONIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Deepakbhai Natvarlal Soni applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.11215037260411 alleging offences under Sections 75(1), 351(2), 351(3), 352 and 54 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. The applicant claimed he would cooperate wit

SHUBHAM RAJESHBHAI SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Shubham Rajeshbai Sharma, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) to pre‑empt arrest in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11210062250053) alleging offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and Section 66‑D of the IT (Amendment) Act, 2008. The

PARTH JAYANTIBHAI GOHILversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Parth Jayantibhai Gohil, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.11191016260038 for offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 61 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed the bail, citin

DEEPASINH @ DEEPAKBHAI UKABHAI JADAVversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Deepasinh @ Deepakbhai Ukabhai Jadav, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted. The court granted the request, allowing the applicant to with

PANKAJKUMAR VANMALIDAS KAMLIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Pankajkumar Vanmalidas Kamli, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and Section 3 of the Gujarat Protection o

JISHAAN JISAN IMRAN SAIYEDversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Jishaan Jisan Imran Saiyed, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking anticipatory bail before the High Court of Gujarat. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the respondent, the State of Gujarat, was present.

GOVINDBHAI GIRISHBHAI ZALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Govindbhai Girishbhai Zala, a convicted prisoner, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to enable him to file an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the petition, the ground of seeking parole for filing an appeal, and the remar

ABHAYBHAI PRATAPBHAI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Abhaybhai Pratapbhai Thakor, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The jail records indicated that the petitioner had been absconded for 1,065 days in 2021 and that his conduct in jail was poor. The court examined whether these circumstances satisfied the criteria for granting parol

RAJUBHAI DAYABHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Rajubhai Dayabhai Parmar, filed a Special Criminal Application for parole leave to enable filing an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the ground for parole and the jail remarks, and exercised its discretion in favor of the petiti

DILIPBHAI ALIAS KINO MAHESHBHAI SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Dilipbhai alias Kino Maheshbhai Solanki, filed a special criminal application seeking regularization of a 19‑day period of late surrender. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of the application. The court noted that the applicant had voluntarily surrendered to the jail authorities and, consid

GOVINDBHAI BOGHABHAI KOLIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Govindbhai Boghbai Koli, an inmate, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice for the State. The court examined the applicant’s grounds and jail remarks and decided to exercise its discretion in his favour. The petition was partly allowed, grant

KARSHAN KHAMISHA KOLIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Karshan Khamisha Koli filed a Special Criminal Application for parole leave to enable filing an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Gujarat High Court considered the application, the ground cited, and jail remarks, and exercised its discretion in favor of the pe

BHARATBHAI MALDEBHAI KESHVALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Bharatbai Maldebhai Keshvala filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave to file an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court examined the grounds of the application and the jail remarks, and decided to exercise its discretion in favor of the petit

RAJUBHAI POPATBHAI @ JIVABHAI RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Rajubhai Popatbhai @ Jivabhai Rathod, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave while incarcerated. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State, removing procedural obstacle. The court considered the petitioner's request along with remarks from the

IRFAN ALAM PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Irfan Alam Parmar, filed a special criminal application from jail seeking parole leave to obtain medical treatment for his son. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State, removing a procedural obstacle. The court examined the petitioner's request, the medical neces

SANJAYBHAI NATHABHAI KHISATARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Sanjaybhai Nathabhai Khisatariya, filed a parole application seeking temporary release to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the petitioner's ground and jail remarks and exercised its discretion

AJITBHAI RAMESHBHAI KATUDIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Ajitbhai Rameshbhai Katudiya, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to file an appeal. The court noted that the petitioner had already been released on parole for ten days on the same ground of filing an appeal. Considering the grounds of the application and the jail remarks, the cou

VENUSKUMAR KIRITKUMAR PALSANAWALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Venus Kumar Kiritkumar Palsanawala, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with FIR No.11210047260013 concerning offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4), 54 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sa

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search