Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

SANJEEV THAKER

1,200 judgments delivered by benches including this judge — showing 601–800.

ALAMGIR MIYA HANIFKHAN PATHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Alamgir Miya Hanifkhan Pathan, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave while in jail. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court considered the petition and jail remarks and exercised its discretion in favor of the petitioner. The peti

BHAVSAR MEHUL BALVANTBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Bhavsar Mehul Balvantbhai, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave to enable him to file an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State of Gujarat. The High Court, after hearing counsel, considered the petitioner's req

HARDIK KUMAR ANILBHAI GOKLANI (THAKKAR)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Hardik Kumar Anilbhai Goklani (Thakkar), filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail after being arrested in March 2026. The court examined the jail’s remarks and the papers on record. It observed that the applicant had already been released from custody and that no justifiable reas

MAGHIBEN @ MARGHABEN BALVANTJI @ BALAJI NAGAJIJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Maghiben Balvantji, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.11195007250648 for offences under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the ch

AMIT RAMNIKBHAI KORATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Amit Ramnikbai Korat filed a criminal miscellaneous application for transit bail before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant, through counsel, later sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after hearing the counsel, granted the request and ordered the application to be disposed of as with

BHAVIN PRAVINCHANDRA MAKWANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking transit bail and later moved the court for permission to withdraw the application. The respondent opposed the withdrawal. The court considered whether it could grant such permission. No merits of the underlying bail application were examined. The court gr

RANCHHODBHAI HANKALABHAI KHOKHARIYAversusSATATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Ranchhodbhai Hankalabhai Khokhariya, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the High Court of Gujarat. During the pendency of the application, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The learned Single Judge examined the request in light of the court's i

KARTIKKUMAR RAJUBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Kartikkumar Rajubhai Patel, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. After the application was listed, the petitioner, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by co

MANDAVIYA BHAVESHBHAI PRAKASHBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Mandaviya Bhaveshbhai Prakashbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application. The investigating agency assured compliance with Section 34 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and the Supreme Court’s direction in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. Relying on this assurance, the applicant sought to withdraw the applica

KISHORBHAI DHIRUBHAI GHODADARAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Kishorbhai Dhirubhai Ghodadara filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application after the investigating agency assured compliance with Section 34 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and the Supreme Court's directives in Arnesh Kumar v.

DEVJI DAHYABHAI VALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Devji Dahyabhai Vala, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground of house renovation. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The court heard arguments from counsel for both parties and examined the petitioner's averments and jail remarks. Exe

JAYRAJBHAI DHIRUBHAI VALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Jayrajbhai Dhirubhai Vala applied for temporary bail, citing the need for financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the application and considering jail remarks, exercised its discretion in favor of the applicant. It gr

KISHORBHAI JADAVBHAI KORATversusHIMANSHUBHAI KAMLESHBHAI KORAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Kishorbhai Jadavbhai Korat, was arrested and filed an anticipatory bail application (R/CR.MA/15346/2026). The applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application, stating that the matter had become infructuous. The learned counsel for the respondent opposed the withdrawal. Hon’ble Justice

JATINBHAI RASIKBHAI SONIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Jatinbhai Rasikbhai Soni, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR C.R. No.11211009260444 alleging offences under Sections 316(5), 318(2) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The applicant argued that custo

JESA PARBATBHAI CHAVDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Jesa Parbatbhai Chavda, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave while incarcerated. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court considered the petitioner's request and the jail’s remarks, and exercised its discretion in favor of the pet

RASULBHAI NATHUBHAI DAFERversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Rasulbhai Nathubhai D afer, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground that his son’s engagement required his presence. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice of rule on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the applicant’s averments and con

SHIVRAJBHAI BHIMABHAI KHACHARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Shivrajbhai Bhimabhai Khachar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel who opposed the withdrawal. The Hon'ble J

RAHULBHAI GOVINDBHAIBHAI GOHELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Rahulbhai Govindbhai Gohel filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The applicant's counsel later moved the court for permission to withdraw the bail application. The court examined whether such a withdrawal could be permitted under procedural law. No objection was raised by the respondent. Th

SAGAR GANESHBHAI DHO.PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Sagar Ganesbhai Dho. Patel, filed a temporary bail application citing the need for financial assistance to his family and care of his father. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant's averments and considering the jail remarks, the co

HARIHAR SARJU MAHONTOversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Harihar Sarju Mahonto, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave, having been incarcerated since 18 November 2003. The State of Gujarat, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court considered the petitioner's long period of detention and exercised

MANISHKUMAR ALIAS KATYO SURESHBHAI BHALABHAI KHANTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Manishkumar alias Katyo Sureshbhai Bhalabhai Khant filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of the petition on behalf of the State. The High Court, after hearing counsel, exercised its disc

PARVEZ MUSHARRAF NAUSHAD HUSSAIN ANSARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Petitioner Parvez Musharraf Naushad Hussain Ansari filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he has filed an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the parties and considering the petition and jail remarks, exercised it

CHAUDHARY VIRABHAI RAMJIBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Chaudhary Virabhai Ramjibhai filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. After hearing the parties, the court exercised its discretion in favor of the petitioner. The petition was partly allowed, granting the petitioner a seven‑day p

RAMPRATAP GANGARAM SHAMLIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Rampratap Gangaram Shamliya filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the High Court of Gujarat seeking parole. The applicant's counsel, Mr. B.J. Priyadarshi, later requested permission to withdraw the application. The court examined the request and, finding no impediment, granted permission for withdr

FARHAN RAJAKBHAI POPATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Farhan Rajakbai Popat, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave and later requested permission to withdraw that application. The respondent State of Gujarat opposed the withdrawal. The Hon’ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequent

VALIMAHAMADBHAI HABIBBHAI JAMversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Valimahammadbhai Habibbhai Jam, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground of his need for medical treatment. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's averments, particularly the medical groun

MOHAMADHANIF MOHAMMAD SIDDIQ SAIYADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Mohamadhanif Mohammad Siddiq Saiyad, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The applicant's counsel later requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether such withdrawal required its permission. The judge held that the applicant may be allowed to

PARTH DEVKUBHAI MAKVANA THRO MAKVANA MITAL DEVKUBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Parth Devkubhai Makvana, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground that his family requires financial assistance. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court considered the applicant's claim and the jail remarks, exerci

VIPUL BHAGUBHAI KOVADIA (AAHIR)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Vipul Bhagubhai Kovadia (Ahir) filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The applicant's counsel later moved the court for permission to withdraw the bail application. The court examined whether the withdrawal could be allowed without prejudice to the proceedings. Finding no impediment, the cou

MUSTAKIM MOHAMMAD YAKUB SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Mustakim Mohammad Yakub Shaikh filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service. The High Court considered the petitioner's averments and the jail remarks, and exercised

DIPU RAMNARESH SHAKYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Dipu Ramnresh Shakya, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State of Gujarat. The High Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, exercised i

IMRANBHAI S/O FIROJBHAI @ SALIMBHAI MULTANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Imranbhai filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the High Court of Gujarat, which was pending before the concerned authority. The applicant, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the pending application. The court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted. Finding

MAHMADSAFI ABDULLABHAI AMRELIYA(GHANCHI)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, MahmadSafi Abdullabhai Amreliya (Ghanchi), applied for parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were heard. The court examined the petitioner's request, the grounds cited, and t

KAMLESH BHUPATBHAI CHARANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Kamlesh Bhupatbhai Charan, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were represented by counsel. The Court examined the petition, th

JAYANTIBHAI @ KALO ARJAN @ AJABHAI CHUNARA (VAGHARI)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Jayantibhai @ Kalo Arjan @ Ajabhai Chunara (Vaghari), filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave and subsequently requested permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel, Mr. B.J. Priyadarshi, moved the court for this withdrawal. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker granted the permissi

ARJANBHAI @ AJO KANJIBHAI @ KANO CHUNARAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Arjanbhai @ Ajo Kanjibhai @ Kano Chunara, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave and later requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the application was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive i

HARSHADKUMAR @ HASUBHAI MAHIPATDAN MOD (GADHAVI)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Harshadkumar @ Hasubhai Mahipatdan Mod (Gadhavi), filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave and subsequently requested permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel, Mr. A.M. Thakore, moved the court for withdrawal. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered the request and grant

IRFAN SIRAJ PADA THROUGH SHEHNAJBANU D/O. SIRAJ PADAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Irfan Siraj Pada, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. After hearing the parties and considering the petitioner's averments and jail remarks, the court exercised its discretion in favor of the petitioner. The p

MAHESHBHAI BHATHIBHAI @ BHATHUBHAI DINDORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Maheshbhai Bhathibhai Dindor filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the parties, exercised its discretion in favour of the petitioner and

NIRUPAM @ BHURO @ MUNNABHAI JAMNADAS KANSAGARAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Nirupam @ Bhuro @ Munnabhai Jamnadas Kansagara applied for temporary bail, citing the need for medical treatment of his mother. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after considering the applicant's averments and jail remarks, exercised its discretion in his favou

BIPINBHAI DHANSIGBHAI CHAUDHARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Bipinbhai Dhansigbhai Chaudhary filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground of financial assistance. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service for the State. The court, after hearing counsel and considering the petition and jail remarks, exercised its discretion in favour of the petiti

MEPABHAI KANUBHAI @ HANUBHAI BHARWADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mepabhai Kanubhai Bharwad, who faced charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The applicant argued that custodial interrogation was unn

SAMADHAN PRAKASH PATILversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Samadhan Prakash Patil, had earlier obtained protection in a petition to quash an earlier proceeding. Subsequently, he filed an anticipatory bail application (R/Cr.MA/5352/2026) before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant, through counsel Mr. Dipesh D. Soni and Mr. Jitendrakumar J. Savalia, sought the C

PATEL EKLAVYA ISHVARLALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Patel Eklavya Ishvarlal, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11188010260209) alleging violations of Sections 65(a), 65(e), 81 and 83 of the Prohibition Act. The State opposed the bail,

PINAKIN CHANDRAKANT PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Pinakin Chandrakant Patel, was on bail in a criminal case. He filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking cancellation of his bail. Subsequently, through his counsel, he requested permission to withdraw the application. The High Court considered the request. The Court granted permission to withdr

KRISHNABEN HEMRAJBHAI CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Krishnanben Hemrajbhai Chauhan, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court examined whether it could permit the withdrawal of an anticipatory bail petition. Relying on it

SURESHBHAI BABUBHAI RABARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Sureshbhai Babubhai Rabari, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking protection from arrest in connection with FIR No.11996001260202 for offences under Sections 87, 64(1), 64(2)(m), 308(2), 351(3) and 54 of the BNSS. The prosecution

PREMSINH SHANABHAI RAJVIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION

The petitioner, Premsinh Shanabhai Rajvi, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking cancellation of his bail. The application was listed before the High Court of Gujarat, but neither the petitioner nor the respondent appeared when the matter was called on the second and subsequent dates. No request for adjourn

MOHAMMAD JAHIR MOHAMMAD TAHIR (AS PER ORDER)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(5), 316(4), 318(4), 54 and 60 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS) arising from a commercial transaction. The State and the original complainant oppose

VIJAYBHAI ISHWARBHAI VAGHELAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION

The petitioner Vijaybhai Ishwarbhai Vaghela filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking cancellation of bail. The respondent State of Gujarat opposed the application. Both counsel failed to appear when the matter was called on the first and second dates. The court adjourned the matter on 22.06.2026 in the intere

SHYAMSUNDAR PURANMAL AGRAWALversusM/S SUMAN TEXTILES THRO SATENDAR KUMAR JAIN

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Shyamsundar Puranmal Agrawal filed a criminal miscellaneous application (recall) seeking to set aside the order dated 12 February 2026. The application alleged grounds for recalling that order and restoring the pending criminal appeal to its original file. The High Court of Gujarat, after considering the averments made

MUKESHBHAI MAFATLAL PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Mukeshbhai Mafatlal Patel filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking recall of the order dated 09 February 2026 that had affected his criminal appeal (R/Criminal Appeal/1874/2025). The respondent State of Gujarat opposed the recall. The High Court examined the contentions and the specific provision invoked, par

SURESHBHAI ODHABHAI LAKHANKIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Sureshbhai Odhabhai Lakhankiya applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) after an FIR was lodged at Amroli Police Station for offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The applicant, described as a broker who merely facilitated in

SURESHBHAI ODHABHAI LAKHANAKIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Sureshbhai Odhabhai Lakhankiya applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11210021260542) alleging offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. He is alleged to have acted merely as a broker introduc

MUKHTAR HUSSAIN @JABBAR JODIYA NOORMAMAD RAOversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Mukhtar Hussain @Jabbar Jodiya NoorMahmad Rao, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground of needing medical treatment. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's averments and the jail's remark

MONIKA HIMANSHU SAINIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Monika Himanshu Saini, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR registered for multiple offences under the BNSS and the Information Technology Act. The applicant, who is the sister of a company director, argued that she has no d

SOLANKI CHIRAGKUMAR BALDEVBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging violations of Sections 65(e) and 116(b) of the Prohibition Act. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. The Court examined the standard bail factors—nature

ANAND ASHOKBHAI OZAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Anand Ashokbhai Oza, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel Mr. Hitesh L. Gupta, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Tirthraj Pandya.

HITENDRASINH LAVJIBHAI RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Hitendrasinh Lavjibhai Rathod, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR C.R. No.11211025260168 alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 54 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. The pro

LAXMANJI @ BABLI KANAJI DHULAJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Laxmanji @ Babli Kanaji Dhulaji Thakor, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave. The applicant’s counsel later sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered the request and, without addressing the merits of the original application, granted permission

BABUBHAI DEVKARANBHAI NOGOS (RABARI)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants, Babubhai Devkaranbhai Nogos (Rabari) and an associate, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 111(2)(b), 318(4) and 54 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. They contended that they were

AJAY S/O RAMSINH PRERMSINH PANJABIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Ajay, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the application. The learned judge considered the request and exercised the court's discretion to allow withdrawal. No substantive merits of the furlou

SHAKURBHAI HUSHENBHAI KHATIKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Shakurbhai Hushenbhai Khatik and another filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. Their counsel, Mr. Rahul R. Dholakia, later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent's counsel, Mr. Tirthraj Pandya, was present. The Court examined whether the applicant co

KISHANBHAI RAMESHBHAI VADECHAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Kishanbhai Rameshbhai Vadecha filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Asit B. Joshi, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. Counsel for the State, Mr. Tirthraj Pandya, was present. The Court considered whether any legal impediment existed to

FAZIL S/O ABDUL MAJEED PROPRIETOR OF AIZAH TEXTILEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(5), 316(4), 318(4), 54 and 60 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS) arising from a commercial transaction. The State and the original complainant oppose

AFTAB ALAM S/O AHAMAD HUSSAINversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(5), 316(4), 318(4), 54 and 60 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS) arising from a commercial transaction. The State and the original complainant oppose

ZAKIYA W/O. MOHD. NAIM - PROPRIETOR OF ZARIN FATIMA DUPATTAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(5), 316(4), 318(4), 54 and 60 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS) arising from a commercial transaction. The State and the original complainant oppose

LALABHAI GALABHAI BHABHORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The matter before the Gujarat High Court was Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) No. 9161 of 2026 filed by Lalabhai Galabhai Bhabhor against the State of Gujarat and others. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Avanidhar M. Thakore, indicated that the applicant would not pursue the application and sought the Court's pe

SAMIR SULTAN SHEIKH THROUGH SHEIKH JAYDA SULTANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Samir Sultan Sheikh, filed a temporary bail application on the ground of needing financial assistance for his family. No representative appeared for the applicant, while the Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice for the State. The Court, after hearing the applicant's counsel and consideri

SOLANKI VISHWAJITSINH PRAFULBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Solanki Vishwajitsinh Prafulbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR CR No.11196002260296 alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant argued that cu

BHAGABHAI AMRABHAI MAJIRANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Bhagabhai Amrabhai Majirana filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel indicated that the applicant no longer wishes to pursue the application and requested permission to withdraw it. The Court considered whether it could allow the withdrawal of a pending paro

JAGDISH @JAGDISHBHAI @POPATBHAI GALAJI RABARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Jagdish @Jagdishbhai @Popatbhai Galaji Rabari, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Nirav K. Padhiar, later indicated that the applicant would not press the application and sought the Court's permission to withdraw it. The respondent, the

SUNNYKUMAR SURESHBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Sunnykumar Sureshbhai Patel, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail from the State of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel later moved the court for permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent's counsel opposed the withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker

DINESHBHAI VASANTBHAI ALIAS BABALAL KANANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Dineshbhai Vasantbhai alias Babalal Kanani, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were heard. The Court examined the petitioner's averments and jail

AJAY DASHRATHJI THAKOR THROUGH ASHOK DASHRATHJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Ajay Dashrathji Thakor, appearing in person, applied for parole leave on the ground of his mother's death. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice for the State. The Court considered the petitioner's humanitarian plea and the jail's remarks, and exercised its discretion in his favour. The petition was

RAJPUROHIT INDRAJIT RANCHODLALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Rajpurohit Indrajit Ranchodlal, faced an FIR (C.R. No.11191038260326 of 2026) alleging violations of Sections 4(3) and 5(Ch) of the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act and Section 314 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik S

VAJASEEBHAI RAMASEEBHAI CHAVDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Vajaseebhai Ramaseebhai Chavda applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.11185004261063 for alleged offences under Sections 108 and 116(b) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of

SANJAYBHAI DUNGARBHAI RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Sanjaybhai Dungarbhai Rathod, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The application was heard before Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker, with counsel Mr. Anil H. Rathod representing the petitioner and Mr. Ronak Raval for the State. The court noted that the petitioner had recently been releas

MITALBEN GOPALBHAI MAKWANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Mitalben Gopalbhai Makwana, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought the court’s permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented and opposed the withdrawal. The court conside

ABDULLAH @ DADO MUSABHAI SAMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Abdullah @ Dado Musabhai Sama, filed a special criminal application for parole leave through jail counsel. No party appeared in person. The court noted that the applicant had recently been released for a brief period of 21 days from 19 December 2025 to 8 January 2026 and that the application did not pro

SHREEGANESH RAMANBHAI BHALAJI THAKORversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Shreeganesh Ramanbhai Bhalaji Thakor, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The application was filed through jail representation. The court noted that the applicant had been released on 13 November 2025 and that his conduct while in jail was poor. No justifiable reasons for

BIPIN VILAS BABURAV SIRSATHversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Bipin Vilas Baburav Sirsath, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The applicant had been released from jail on 18 November 2025, and the application did not provide any justifiable reasons for granting bail. The court, after considering the jail remarks, found that no case

PRIYANK TARSANJI DABHIversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Priyank Tarsanji Dabhi applied for temporary bail after being arrested on 23 January 2025. The application was filed through jail representation by Mr. Ronak Raval. The court noted that the applicant had not provided any justifiable reasons for bail. Consequently, the court found that no case was made out for granting

SANJAY BABUJI FATAJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Sanjay Babuji Fataji Thakor, filed a temporary bail application through jail, seeking release to provide financial assistance to his family. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court considered the applicant's financial hardship and the remarks made

HAKUBHAI RAHIMBHAI RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Hakubhai Rahimbhai Rathod, who is in jail, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he has filed an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The High Court, after considering the ground of the application and the jail remarks, exercise

VIPULKUMAR SHAILESHBHAI PATELversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Vipulkumar Shaileshbhai Patel, filed a temporary bail application after being arrested on 16-12-2025. The application was made through the jail, and the respondent was represented by Mr. Ronak Raval. The court examined the jail's remarks, which indicated poor conduct and found no justifiable reasons for

SHAKIL ANVARBHAI MANSURIversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Shakil Anvarbhai Mansuri, filed a temporary bail application in the Gujarat High Court after being arrested in May 2025. The application was presented through jail representation, and the respondent's counsel was Mr. Ronak Raval. The court examined the jail remarks and found that the applicant had not p

MOHAMMAD FAIZ MHAMMADVASIM MOHAMMAD FARUK SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, who was in jail, filed a temporary bail application on the ground that his parents required medical treatment. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice, allowing the court to consider the application without procedural impediment. The court examined the humanitarian grounds and exercised

JIGAR DASHRATHBHAI SARGARAversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Jigar Dashrathbhai Sargara filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant had been released from jail on 10 June 2025 and did not provide any justifiable reasons for the bail request in the application. The court examined the jail's remarks and found that

MAHESHBHAI @ GOBAR SUKHRAMBHAI SOLANKIversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Maheshbhai @ Gobar Sukhrambhai Solanki, filed a temporary bail application after being arrested on 28-04-2025. The application was submitted through jail counsel and did not provide any justifiable reasons for bail. The court noted that the jail remarks indicated poor conduct by the applicant and found n

MOHAMMAD DILDAR PIRMOHAMMAD SAIYADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Mohammad Dildar PirMohammad Saiyad, filed a temporary bail application after being arrested on 30 June 2025. The jail submitted remarks indicating the applicant's conduct was poor and no justifiable reasons for bail were provided. The High Court examined these remarks and found no sufficient basis to gra

IKBALBHAI @ CHAKO HAKUBHAI RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, IKBALBHAI @ CHAKO HAKUBHAI RATHOD, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The conviction date was 3 April 2026, and the petitioner had already been released temporarily from 2 June 2026 to 15 June 2026. The application did not provide any justifiable reasons for further parole. The C

KALUBHAI KHODABHAI THAKORversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Kalubhai Khodabhai Thakor, who is in jail, applied for temporary bail on the ground that his family needs financial assistance. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court considered the applicant's claim and exercised its discretion in his favour. It granted temporary ba

JITUBHAI RAMJIBHAI KATARIYAversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Jitubhai Ramjibhai Katariya, while in jail, applied for temporary bail on the grounds of needing medical treatment and financial assistance for his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court considered the applicant's medical condition and the jail remarks, and e

HITEN @ HITESH @ MOTIYO JAYANTIBHAI RATHODversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Hiten @ Hitesh @ MotiYo Jayantibhai Rathod, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail after being arrested on 30 January 2025. The case was at the stage of the prosecution presenting its evidence. The applicant’s counsel, appearing through jail, failed to provide any justifiable r

MAULIK @ TIKO BHUPENDRABHAI @ BHUPAT KANSARAversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Maulik @ Tiko Bhupendrabhai @ Bhupat Kansara, filed a temporary bail application from jail, citing the need for financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court considered the applicant's grounds and jail remarks, and exercise

BHARATBHAI KARUBHA JADIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Bharatbhai Karubha Jadiya, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking regularization of the period of his late surrender. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of the application. The Court considered the applicant’s voluntary surrender before the jail authorities and the waiver by the prosec

PATHAN FIROZABANU DILAVARKHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Pathan Firozabanu Dilavarkhan, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel, after arguing, sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent's counsel opposed the withdrawal. The Court considered whether the applicant could be allowed to withd

KARSHANBHA NARANBHA GADHVIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Karshanbha Naranbha Gadhvi, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Ashish M. Dagli, later sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Ronak Rawal. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker consider

SABINA D/O MOINUDDIN MOHAMADNAZIR SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Sabina, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking cancellation of bail. The applicant was represented by Mr. Aditya T. Pancholi and Ms. Busrun M. Pathan. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Ronak Raval. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel requested permission to

IMRAN JUSAB MOKHAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Imran Jusab Mokha filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking cancellation of his bail. The trial in the underlying case had already been completed. The applicant, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the bail cancellation application. The court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitte

ANISHKUMAR KHODIDASBHAI VADODARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and the Information Technology Amendment Act. The prosecution opposed bail citing the gravity of the offences. The court examined factors

MEHULBHAI MAGANBHAI RABARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Mehulbhai Maganbhai Rabari applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.11206038260081 alleging offences under Sections 115(2), 118(2), 352, 54 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. The State o

JAVERBHAI MERUBHAI KANANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging forgery and criminal conspiracy (IPC §§ 465, 467, 468, 471, 120(B)). The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. The court examined the nature of the alleged f

VARSHABEN SAILESHBHAI JARVARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Varshaben Saileshbai Jarvariya, filed a Special Criminal Application challenging an order of externment dated 23‑04‑2026, invoking Section 60 of the Bombay Police Act. The petitioner sought to withdraw this application, arguing that the challenge should be made before the concerned authority within a mo

GIRISHBHAI JADAVJIBHAI BHANUSHALIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Girishbhai Jadavjibhai Bhanushali, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of his criminal appeal which had been dismissed on 30‑04‑2026 because he failed to appear when the matter was called and did not seek a pass‑over. The respondent State of Gujarat opposed the restoration. The

JAVERBHAI MERUBHAI KANANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioners Javerbhai Merubhai Kanani & ors. applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11192019260100 of 2026) alleging forgery and related offences under IPC sections 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B). The State opposed the bail

SAHIDKHAN SAIKHAN MALEKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Sahidkhan Saikhan Malek, filed an anticipatory bail application (R/Cr.MA/11902/2026) before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Mohddanish M. Barejia, indicated that the applicant would not pursue the bail and sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the applicatio

KAMLESH HARSUKHLAL BHAYANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Kamlesh Harsukhlal Bhayani filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. While a separate quashing petition was pending, the complaint underlying the bail application was quashed. The applicant then sought the Court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hea

ANWAR NURUDDIN PUNJANI PROPRIETOR OF TOP TOWNversusZHANZHI FASHION (PROP. FIRM)

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Anwar Nuruddin Punjani, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of his criminal appeal which had been dismissed on 05.05.2026 because he failed to appear when the matter was called and did not request a passover. The High Court had dismissed the appeal on those procedural grounds.

LAXMANBHAI PUNABHAI MANKAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Laxmanbhai Punabhai Manka, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR C.R. No.11993001260154 alleging violations of Sections 65(a), 65(e), 116‑B and 81 of the Prohibition Act. He contended that he was not present at the

MITESHKUMAR RAMESHBHAI TRAPASIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology (Amended) Act, 2008. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the alleged cyber‑crimes. The

KASHYAP MANHARBHAI VAGHELAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Kashyap Manharbhai Vaghela, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel indicated that the applicant no longer wishes to pursue the bail and sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether it c

SHIVANSHU OMPRAKASH GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Shivanshu Omprakash Goswami filed an anticipatory bail application (R/Cr.MA/14695/2026) before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Amit R. Tiwari, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Ronak Raval. The Court considered

JAKU DAUD BHUCHADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Jaku Daud Bhu Chad, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground that he needed to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State, allowing the application to proceed. The Court examined the a

GAFURBHAI DAUDBHAI VAHORAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Gafurbhai Dau... Vahora, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave while incarcerated. The State, represented by counsel, waived service of notice of the rule. The court considered the petitioner's application and the jail's remarks, and, exercising its discretion, decided in favor of

THAKOR JAGDISH S/O. CHHANAJI BABAJI THRU THAKOR LALAJI CHHANAJIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE

Thakor Jagdish, the petitioner, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. While the application was pending, the prison authority granted parole leave to the petitioner on 1 July 2026. The respondent State of Gujarat, through counsel, placed the order granting parole on record before the Court. The Cou

RAGHUVIRSINH CHHANUBHA ZALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Raghuvirsinh Chhanubha Zala, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The jail records showed that the applicant had already been released for a short period from 07‑08‑2025 to 20‑08‑2025. No additional or justifiable reasons were presented to warrant another parole. The Court examined

BACHUBHAI SEVALBHAI BHABHORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Bachubhai Sevalbhai Bhabhor, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel indicated that the application would not be pressed and sought the Court’s permission to withdraw it. The Court considered the request and, finding

ASLAM AHMED PATHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Aslam Ahmed Pathan, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the grounds of having filed an appeal and arranging funds. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. After hearing the parties and considering the petitioner's averments and jail remarks, the c

BHARATBHAI MAGANBHAI HARSODAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Bharatbai Maganbhai Harsoda, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground of a pending appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the parties, the Court considered the petitioner's request and the jail remarks, and e

SHAILESH VINODCHANDRA PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Shailesh Vinodchandra Parmar filed a special criminal application seeking parole on the grounds that a dispute had been settled and he needed to manage financial funds. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The High Court, after hearing the parties, exercised its discretion in favor of

NARESHKUAMR BHAVAJI MARVADIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Nareshkuamr Bhavaji Marvadi, filed a Special Criminal Application for parole leave but later decided not to pursue the petition and sought permission to withdraw it. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. B.J. Priyadarshi, informed the court of this intention. The court, after noting the request, granted permiss

AJAYBHAI AMBUBHAI VASAVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Ajaybhai Ambubhai Vasava filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave, citing the filing of an appeal and the need to manage funds. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were heard. The Court considered the petitioner's averments and the jail remarks, and

MERAIYA GAUTAMBHAI DINESHBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Meraiya Gautambhai Dineshbhai filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The court considered the petitioner's averments and jail remarks, and exercised its discretion in his favour. It

KIRANBHAI PARSOTTAMBHAI ROHITversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant Kiranbhai Parsottambhai Rohit sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 54 and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousne

KIRITBHAI KANTIBHAI DODIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicants, Kiritbhai Kantibhai Dodiya and another, filed an anticipatory bail application. The respondent's counsel informed the court that the applicants had already been arrested. Consequently, the applicants' counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court granted the permissi

PRATAPBHAI DHIRUBHAI ZALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Pratapbhai Dhirubhai Zala, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Pravin Gondaliya, moved the court seeking permission to withdraw the application. Counsel for the State, Mr. Ronak Raval, was also present. Justice Sanjeev

NARENDRABHAI KHODABHAI VASAVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Naren­drabhai Khodabhai Vasava, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The High Court, after hearing counsel, exercised its discretion in

BABUBHAI LAKHUBHAI SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Babubhai Lakhubhai Solanki, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave while incarcerated. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court considered the petition and jail remarks and exercised its discretion in favor of the petitioner. It ord

KALPANABEN KESHAVBHAI GORADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Kalpanaben Keshavbhai Gorad applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail, c

SAGAR KARUBHAI NANDANIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Sagar Karubhai Nandaniya, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 318(4), 336(2)(3), 338 and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State oppos

BALVANTSINH CHANDRASINH SONDIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Balvantsinh Chandrasinh Sondiya filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the applicant, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel. The court considered whether the applicant could be a

MOHAMMEDHASAN KHANUBHAI QURESHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by Mohammedhasan Khanubhai Qureshi and another in connection with FIR No.11191011260083 alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 316(5) and 54 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 202

FARUKHBHAI HISAMUDDIN VAZIFDARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioners Farukhbai Hisamuddin Vazifdar & Anr. applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 316(5) and 55 of the BNSS (corresponding to IPC 406, 409 and 34) and a related dispute under Section 13

BHARATBHAI KALYANBHAI SONAGRAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of the main matter that had been dismissed for want of prosecution on 1 May 2026. The respondent opposed the restoration. The court considered the arguments of both counsel and the content of the application. Finding no impediment, the court

JILU TOFANBHAI DAHAMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Jilu Tofanbhai Dahama, had filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the proceedings, the applicant's counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The issue before the Court was whether it could grant permission to withdraw an anticipatory bail

NABIBHAI REHMANBHAI GHANCHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Nabibhai Rehmanbhai Ghanchi, filed an anticipatory bail application and later sought the court's permission to withdraw the same. The learned counsel for the applicant argued for withdrawal. The Court, after hearing, granted the permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail

VIMAL HASMUKHBHAI HIRVANIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Vimal Hasmukhbhai Hirvaniya, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 318(4), 322, 338, 336(3), 340, 351(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita

LUCKYRAJSINH INDRASINH PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The Gujarat High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita on behalf of Luckyrajsinh Indrasinh Parmar. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 103(1), 115(2), 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 352 of the BNS and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act.

FAKHRUDDIN ABBAS MAHAMMAD SINDHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Fakhruddin Abbas Mahammad Sindhi, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Chetan B. Raval and Mr. Vijaykumar R. Takodiya, sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Tirthraj Pand

BIPINKUMAR KANUBHAI THAKKARversusHARISH PRAHLADBHAI SOLANKI

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of the main criminal matter that had been dismissed for want of prosecution. The respondent opposed the restoration. The court examined the submissions made by the petitioner's counsel. It held that the procedural lapse could be remedied and

RANJIT @KANO TIKIT ARVINDBHAI GOHELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Ranjit @Kano Tikit Arvindbhai Gohel, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The learned judge considered whether the court could allow the withdrawal of a bail application. No substan

RANJIT @ KANO TIKIT ARVINDBHAI GOHELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Ranjit @ Kano Tikit Arvindbhai Gohel, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. During the pendency of the application, the petitioner, through counsel Ms. Gayatriba B. Jadeja, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The State of G

HITESHBHAI BHARATBHAI KHAMBHALIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Hiteshbhai Bharatbai Khambhalia applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with an FIR alleging multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, Motor Vehicles Act and Gujarat Police Act. The complainant’s affidavit indicated that the matrimonial dispute h

HARIVADAN PRABHASHANKER THAKER PARTNER OF CASE PHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Harivadan Prabhashanker Thaker, a partner of Case Pharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of a main criminal appeal that had been dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal, titled R/Criminal Appeal/2146/2022, involved the State of Gujarat and other respondents. The applicant contended

HARIVANDAN PRABHASHANKER THAKERversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Harivandan Prabhashanker Thaker filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of the main criminal matter that had been dismissed for want of prosecution. The applicant argued that the dismissal was premature and that the case should be reinstated. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, opposed the rest

SANOVAR ANWARHUSEN BAKKAR (AS PER ORDER)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Sanovar Anwarhusen Bakkar filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking anticipatory bail before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the applicant, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel argued for withdrawal and the court considered whether such a withdra

AMRAT BRAHMANAND GUPTA THRO GUPTA JIGNASHA AMRATBHAIversusSATATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Amrat Brahmanand Gupta, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave to arrange funds for his son's admission to Standard 11. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The Court examined the petition, the grounds raised, and the jail remarks, and exercised its

GHANCHI IBRAHIMBHAI ISABBHAIversusSATATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Ghanchi Ibrahimbhai Isabbhai, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The respondent's counsel was present. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered the request and granted permission

REKHABEN DHARMENDRABHAI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Rekhaben Dharmendrabhai Thakor applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, he had cooperated

HARIKRUSHNA SHAMAJIBHAI CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 286, 287, 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The Court ex

YOGESH VITHAAL PATILversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Yogesh Vithal Patil, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.11191046260178 for offences under Sections 316(2), 316(4), 61(2) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed bail, citing the

ASHISH HARGOVINDBHAI RABARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Ashish Hargovindbhai Rabari filed an application for anticipatory bail before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant’s counsel did not press the application and sought the Court’s permission to withdraw it. The Court examined the request for withdrawal in the absence of any opposition. Finding no impediment, the Cour

MAHIPATSINH PADAMSINH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant filed a special criminal application seeking permission to withdraw the same. The applicant's counsel indicated that the application would not be pressed and requested the court's permission to withdraw. The court considered the request and, finding no objection, granted permission to withdraw. Consequent

PRAMESHKUMAR RAM S/O LT. SHIVSHANKAR RAM PASWANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Prameshkumar Ram, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he has filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the parties and considering the petition and jail remarks, exerci

SANTOSH RAMNARESHSINGH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Santosh Ramnareshsingh Chauhan, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the grounds of providing financial assistance to his family and for compromise and settlement purposes. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were heard. The Co

SHABBIR JUSABBHAI KHARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Shabbir Jusabbhai Khariya filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The High Court, after hearing the parties, exercised its discretion in favour of the petitioner. T

MAYANK MANSUKHBHAI SANGHANI THROUGH JAY MANSUKHBHAI SANGHANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Mayank Mansukhbhai Sanghani, filed a Special Criminal Application for parole leave. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel chose not to press the application and sought permission to withdraw it. The Court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the application was d

KARO @ JUSAB VALIMAMAD JABAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Karo @ Jusab Valimamad Jabai, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the Gujarat High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The sole issue before the Court was whether it could grant permission for withdrawal of the p

SANJAYBHAI @ BHODAL DASHRATBHAI SOMABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Sanjaybhai @ Bhodal Dashratbhai Somabhai, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he needed to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were heard. After considering the petit

JOKHIYA IMTIYAZ BASIRBHAI (NAME AS PER ORDER)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Jokhiya Imtiyaz Basirbhai, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground that he needed financial assistance for his family and to pay school fees for his children. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing

SHAKTISINH YOGENDRASINH GOHILversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Pradip Mohansinh Solanki appealed against the State of Gujarat in a criminal appeal (No. 13311 of 2026) before the High Court of Gujarat. The appellant was represented by Mr. Abhijeet J. Singh. The Registrar (Judicial) examined an office note dated 02.04.2026 and observed that the required removal of office objections

MUKESHJI ATAJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Mukeshji Ataji Thakor, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the High Court of Gujarat seeking parole. The application was already pending before the concerned authority. The petitioner, through counsel, requested permission from the Court to withdraw the application. The respondent

RAMESHBHAI MATHURBHAI AASHABHAI PRAJAPATIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Rameshbhai Mathurbhai Aashabhai Prajapati, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The jail records indicated that the petitioner had recently been released and the petition did not provide any justifiable reasons for granting parole. The Court examined the lack of substantive justifi

PARESHKUMAR GORDHANJI PARMAR(MALI)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Parshkumaar Gordhanji Parmar, a convicted prisoner, filed a parole application seeking temporary release to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The High Court considered the applicant's financial need and jail remarks, and exercis

JABABEN KAKALBHAI GOTATARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 111(2)(b), 318(4) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita relating to a dispute over the sale of immovable property. One applicant had already

RAJESH ALIAS RAJU BALABHAI SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Rajesh alias Raju Balabhai Solanki, filed a special criminal application seeking furlough leave. The jail records showed that he had previously absconded after being released on furlough in 2021 (24 days), on parole in 2021 (19 days), and on temporary bail in 2024 (24 days), and his conduct in jail was

RAMJANI YAKUBBHAI SHEKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Ramjani Yakubhai Shekh, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave to challenge a matter before the Apex Court. The jail records indicated that the petitioner’s earlier appeal (No. 1078 of 2006) had been dismissed and that he had been absconding from 2010 to 2022, amounting to 4,347 days

KAYVANA SHANTILAL SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Kayvana Shantilal Shah, filed a Special Criminal Application for parole leave, seeking temporary release to provide financial assistance to his family. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice, indicating no opposition to the application. The Court examined th

SANTOKBEN KARSHANBHAI GORADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, a 69‑year‑old woman, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Gujarat Police Act. The State opposed the bail, citing the

VISHAL GANDUBHAI BAVARAVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Vishal Gandubhai Bavarava applied for temporary bail on the ground of needing medical treatment. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's averments and the jail remarks, and exercised its discretion in favour of the applicant. It granted tempor

ROBIN AUGUSTIN CHRISTIANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Robin Augustin Christian, an inmate, filed a parole application seeking temporary release to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's grounds and jail remarks and exercised its discretion in his favor

ALPESH @ VIPUL @ VIPLO SOMJIBHAI @ SOMABHAI DABHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Alpesh (also known as Vipul, Viplo, Somjibhai, Somabhai) Dabhi filed a Special Criminal Application for parole leave before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant later approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw the application because a related application was pending before the parole authority. The Court con

RANJITKUMAR JASHUJI SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Ranjitkumar Jashuji Solanki, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. After some time, the petitioner, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented and opposed the withdrawal. The court c

AVDABHAI @ DALO BAVANBHAI VANDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Avdabhai @ Dalo Bavanbhai Vanda filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat against the State of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Shri Shriman K. Bhargaw, chose not to press the application and requested the court's permission to withdraw it. The respondent's counsel, Mr. Tirthraj Pandya, w

NADIYA MAYURKUMAR MANSUKHBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Nadiya Mayurkumar Mansukhbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application (R/Cr.MA/14583/2026) before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel, Ms. Sonali S. Shah, after arguing, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent's counsel, Mr. Tirthraj Pandya, opposed the with

PATEL DHARMENDRABHAI DHANABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The appellant, Sufrabhai @ Vinodbhai @ Bhalabhai Pratapbhai Damor, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat. The Registrar (Judicial) examined an office note dated 13.03.2026 and observed that the office objections in the matter had not been removed within the prescribed time. Consequently, the Registrar or

RAJENDRA RAMCHANDRA SHRIVASTAVversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The appellant, Maheboob S/o Hussain Desvali & Anr., filed criminal appeals against conviction before the High Court of Gujarat. The Registrar (Judicial) noted that the office objections raised in the case had not been removed within the period prescribed by law. Consequently, the Registrar ordered that the office objec

PATADIYA VIVEK SANJAYKUMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Pradip Mohansinh Solanki appealed against the State of Gujarat in a criminal appeal (No. 13311 of 2026) before the High Court of Gujarat. The appellant was represented by Mr. Abhijeet J. Singh. The Registrar (Judicial) examined an office note dated 02.04.2026 and observed that the required removal of office objections

UMEDBHAI @ VIJAY AMARSINH CHAVDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The Registrar (Judicial) of the Gujarat High Court issued an order in the criminal appeal of Nailesh B. Shah versus the State of Gujarat. The order noted that office objections noted on 27-02-2026 had not been removed within the prescribed time. Consequently, the Registrar directed that the office objections be removed

BAVCHANDBHAI ZAVERBHAI SAVALIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Bavchandbai Zaverbai Savaliya, filed an anticipatory bail application and later sought the court's permission to withdraw it. The learned counsel for the applicant requested the withdrawal, and the court considered whether such permission could be granted. The court held that the applicant may be allowed

SURESHBHAI VEJAKARANBHAI MAKWANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking cancellation of bail (R/CR.MA/7266/2026). During the pendency of the application, the trial concluded, rendering the application infructuous. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Deepak Patel, requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court ex

RAJESHBHAI @ RAJUBHAI JOGABHAI BHARVADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Rajeshbhai @ Rajubhai Jogabhai Bharvad, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking relief against an order of externment. The petitioner later requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether it could grant such permission. The learned judge granted the request, allowing

NILESH ASHOKKUMAR SONIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Nilesh Ashokkumar Soni, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel, under instructions, sought the court’s permission to withdraw the application. The court examined whether a pending anticipatory bail application could be withdra

MAHESHBHAI MAGANBHAI PADALIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Maheshbhai Maganbhai Padaliya filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave to pursue an appeal/revision and to obtain financial assistance. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service. The Court, after hearing the parties and reviewing the petition and jail remarks, exercised

YOGESHBHAI GHANSHYAMBHAI SINOJIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Yogeshbhai Ghanshyambhai Sinojiya, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to arrange financial assistance for depositing 20% of a fine. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were heard. The court examined the petitioner's claim and th

YOGESHBHAI GHANSHYAMBHAI SINOJIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Yogeshbhai G. Sinojiya, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave to enable him to arrange financial assistance for depositing 20% of a fine imposed on him. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State of Gujarat. The Court considered the petitioner's

DALPATAJI JAWANJI VALAJI THAKOR THRO. VASANTIBEN FULAJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Dalpataji Jawanji Valaji Thakor, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave while in custody. The High Court examined the petition, the jail remarks, and the grounds presented. The Court found that the petitioner did not demonstrate any justifiable reason to merit parole. Consequently, th

LAXMANBHAI SHAMBHUBHAI BARAIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Laxmanbhai Shambhuhai Baraiya, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The High Court, after hearing the parties and reviewing the jail remarks and the petitioner's grounds, found that no justifiable reason existed to grant parole. Consequently, the court rejected the application. The

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search