Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

KISHORBHAI DHIRUBHAI GHODADARAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The court granted permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and disposed of it as withdrawn.

Summary

Kishorbhai Dhirubhai Ghodadara filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application after the investigating agency assured compliance with Section 34 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and the Supreme Court's directives in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. The learned counsel for the State opposed the withdrawal. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered whether the court could permit the withdrawal of an anticipatory bail petition under the given circumstances. Finding no impediment, the court granted the request to withdraw. The application was consequently disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn upon the applicant's request after assurances of compliance with statutory provisions
  • Whether the court must ensure adherence to Section 34 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and the Arnesh Kumar guidelines before permitting withdrawal

Legislation cited

Subjects

anticipatory bailwithdrawal of applicationSection 34Arnesh Kumar guidelinescriminal procedure

Judgment

          R/CR.MA/15524/2026                                                                  ORDER DATED: 09/07/2026




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

   R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL) NO. 15524
                              of 2026

   ==========================================================
                                  KISHORBHAI DHIRUBHAI GHODADARA
                                               Versus
                                         STATE OF GUJARAT
   ==========================================================
   Appearance:
   MR MALAVSINGH N CHAUHAN(10279) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
   MS BHAVINI N CHAUHAN(10271) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
   MR TIRTHRAJ PANDYA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
   ==========================================================

      CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                                     Date : 09/07/2026

                                                       ORAL ORDER


                          In view of the fair statement made by learned

   APP to the effect that the investigating agency shall strictly

   follow the provisions of Section 34 of the Bharatiya Nyay

   Sanhita and the direction issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court

   in the case of Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, reported in

   (2014) 8 SCC 273 would be followed in true letter and spirit,
   as now nothing survives in the matter, learned advocate for

   the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application.

   Permission                as      prayed           for       is     granted.            This         application               is

   disposed of as withdrawn.


                                                                                          (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
   SRILATHA



Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SRILATHA VENKATARAO UPADHYAYULA(HC00185), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/07/2026 15:28:37




                                                             Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "anticipatory bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.