High Court of Gujarat

VIJAYBHAI ISHWARBHAI VAGHELAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal: 37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
Bench: SANJEEV THAKER

Holding

The application for cancellation of bail is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner Vijaybhai Ishwarbhai Vaghela filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking cancellation of bail. The respondent State of Gujarat opposed the application. Both counsel failed to appear when the matter was called on the first and second dates. The court adjourned the matter on 22.06.2026 in the interest of justice. Since no party was present to prosecute the application, the court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker on 06/07/2026.

Issues considered

What is the appropriate course of action when an application for cancellation of bail is not prosecuted due to non-appearance of parties?

Subjects

bail cancellationcriminal procedureadjournmentwant of prosecutioncourt order

Judgment

                 R/CR.MA/10796/2026                                                 ORDER DATED: 06/07/2026




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

              R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CANCELLATION OF BAIL) NO.
                                     10796 of 2026

            ==========================================================
                                      VIJAYBHAI ISHWARBHAI VAGHELA
                                                   Versus
                                         STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
            ==========================================================
            Appearance:
            VIJAY H PATEL(7361) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
            MR TIRTHRAJ PANDYA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
            ==========================================================

              CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                                   Date : 06/07/2026

                                                     ORAL ORDER


                     None present when the matter is called out in the

            second call, nor any request for adjournment is made. On

            22.06.2026, also none had remained present when the matter

            was called out and in the interest of justice the matter was

            adjourned.

                     In view of the same the matter is dismissed for want

            of prosecution.


                                                                                 (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
            URIL RANA


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: RANA URIL K(HC01406), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 06/07/2026 17:38:23




                                                          Page 1 of 1

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "bail cancellation"Sign in to search