SANJEEV THAKER

The appellant, Rakeshbhai Ratilal Patel, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the respondents on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. Sta…

The complainant appealed an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court noted a recent decision that a victim in a Section 138 complaint has a specific right to appeal to the Sessions Court under the proviso of Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 41…

Friends of Women World Banking India appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita before the Gujarat High Court. The Court examined whether such…

The High Court of Gujarat disposed of two acquittal appeals filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) against a trial court order acquitting the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court referred to its recent decision in Shivsinh Ga…

The petitioner, Shobnaben @ Shobhaben Vinodbhai Rajghar, applied for temporary bail on humanitarian grounds, citing an aged, frequently ill mother and an upcoming daughter’s engagement. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice of rule on behalf of the State. The court examined the applicant’s circumsta…

The applicant, Sunil Kaushik Gajanan Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for 30 days to enable him to file an appeal before the High Court. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court considered the applicant's grounds, his satisfacto…

The petitioner, Hiramabhai @ Hiralalkaka Kishanbhai Shingne, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 30 days to enable him to file an appeal before the Gujarat High Court. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice of rule. The Court examined the petitione…

The applicant, Gafurji Piraji Thakor, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for 30 days on the ground that his sister's marriage was imminent. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State, and the applicant indicated that a regular bail application was pen…

The petitioner, Firoj Kashiram Tumda, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 30 days, citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family and to arrange legal fees. The application was presented through the jail authorities, and the respondent State of Gujarat was represented by Mr. Chi…

Tarjubahai Narsinghbhai Rathva filed a special criminal application seeking a 30‑day parole leave to provide financial assistance to his family. The jail records showed that the petitioner had recently been released from custody between 18 October 2025 and 10 November 2025 and that his conduct while in jail was unsatis…

The petitioner, Dilipbhai Laxmanbhai Chavda, applied for parole leave of 30 days to attend his sister’s post‑death ceremony. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The court examined the petitioner's jail record, noting he was released in February 2026, returned on time and had satisfac…

Jashwan​tbhai Baldevbhai Parmar filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of his criminal appeal (No. 1660/2021) before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant, represented by Mr. Aamir S. Pathan, argued that sufficient cause existed for restoring the appeal. The Public Prosecutor opposed the applica…

The appellant, Patel Pratik Vijaykumar, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of Patel Chandreshkumar Vishnubhai and another. The appellant’s counsel submitted an undertaking indicating that the parties had settled the dispute and that the appellant no longer wished to pursue the matter. The counsel identified …

Pravinaben Rajendrabhai Patel filed a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat challenging an earlier acquittal. The appeal was consolidated with numerous other criminal appeals numbered 1033 of 2021 through 1660 of 2021. After hearing counsel for the appellant and the public prosecutor, the Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev…

The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittal of three accused who were charged with abetment of suicide (Sec. 306 IPC), destruction of evidence (Sec. 201 IPC) and related offences. The prosecution relied on the complainant’s testimony, several witnesses and forensic reports, but the trial court found the key witnesses t…

In Criminal Appeal No. 431 of 2020, HDFC Bank Ltd. (through Himanshu R. Kadiya) appealed against the acquittal of the State of Gujarat. The appellant informed the Court that the disputed amount had been paid and the account settled. Consequently, the appellant sought the Court's permission to withdraw the appeal. The l…

The complainant appealed an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filing the appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. Stat…

The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant later sought to withdraw the application, relying on a recent Gujarat High Court decision (Shivsinh Ganpatsi…

The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant later sought to withdraw the application, relying on a recent Gujarat High Court decision (Shivsinh Ganpatsi…

The petitioner Varshaben filed a criminal appeal and subsequently sought condonation of a 214‑day delay in filing the appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The High Court heard arguments from counsel for both the petitioner and the respondents. The court examined the reasons for the delay and found that the pet…

The State of Gujarat filed an application seeking condonation of delay in preferring a criminal appeal. The respondents did not appear before the High Court. The Public Prosecutor, Hardik A. Dave, argued that sufficient cause existed for the delay. The Court, after considering the application and an additional affidavi…

The High Court of Gujarat heard a series of criminal appeals filed by Jayeshbhai Shankarlal Patel against Tulshibhai Shivabhai Makwana and others. The court issued an oral order directing that any office objections to the appeals must be filed within four weeks from the date of the order. If no objections are filed wit…

The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittal of Ismailbhai Hasanbhai Malek and co‑accused in a murder case involving the death of Jagdishbhai. The trial court had found that the alleged extra‑judicial confession of the accused Ramilaben and the recovery of the alleged murder weapon were not proved beyond reasonable doub…

The complainant appealed an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filing the appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. Stat…

Shree Ram Transport Finance Company Ltd filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant argued that the High Court was the proper forum to entertain the appeal. The Court referred…

The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant’s counsel requested withdrawal of the application in view of a recent Gujarat High Court decision (Shivsinh Ganpatsi…

The complainant filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant later sought to withdraw the application in view of a recent Gujarat High Court decisi…

The appellant Reliance Industries Ltd., through a power of attorney, filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha San…

The High Court of Gujarat heard an appeal against the acquittal of respondents charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant, Reliance Industries Ltd., invoked Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking to challenge the trial court's order. Rel…

Girishkumar Shivandas Trikmani filed three criminal appeals (Nos. 318, 110 and 111 of 2009) against Bharatbhai Arjanbhai Faldu Proprietor and others. The appellant was represented by Mr. M.R. Bukhari, while the respondents' counsel, Mr. Ashish M. Dagli and Mr. Yuvraj Brahmbhatt, did not appear even on the second call a…

Girishkumar Shivandas Trikmani filed three criminal appeals (Nos. 318, 110 and 111 of 2009) against Bharatbhai Arjanbhai Faldu Proprietor and others. The appellant was represented by Mr. M.R. Bukhari, while the respondents' counsel, Mr. Ashish M. Dagli and Mr. Yuvraj Brahmbhatt, did not appear even on the second call a…

Girishkumar Shivandas Trikmani filed three criminal appeals (Nos. 318, 110 and 111 of 2009) against Bharatbhai Arjanbhai Faldu Proprietor and others. The appellant was represented by Mr. M.R. Bukhari, while the respondents' counsel, Mr. Ashish M. Dagli and Mr. Yuvraj Brahmbhatt, did not appear even on the second call a…

The appellant filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of G…

The appellant filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referring to its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki …

The appellant, Marwadi Shares & Finance Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant sought to have the appeal heard by the High Court, but the Court referred to its rece…

The appellant, Kamlesh B. Patel, filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court's acquittal of the respondents on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether such an appeal should …

Harshad Jivanbhai Badeja appealed against his acquittal in a criminal case before the Gujarat High Court. Along with the appeal, a criminal miscellaneous application for additional evidence was filed. The matter was listed for hearing, but neither the appellant nor the respondent appeared, and no request for adjournmen…

The appellant Mahavirsinh Omkarsinh Joddha filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 419 of the BNSS, 2023, seeking leave to appeal the trial court's acquittal order in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal challenged the judgment that had cleared the appellant of the all…

The applicant, Alpehsbai Arvindbhai Padariya, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of a case that had been dismissed on 09-12-2025 because no party appeared on the second call and no request for a passover was made. The High Court had dismissed the matter on procedural grounds. The applicant’s…

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of a criminal appeal that had been dismissed by the High Court on 16 January 2026 because no party appeared on the second call and no request for a pass‑over was made. The court had previously dismissed the appeal on procedural grounds. The ap…

Jigneshbhai Nandalal Vithalani filed a criminal appeal which was dismissed by the Gujarat High Court on 16 January 2026 because he failed to appear on the second call and did not seek a pass‑over. The appellant subsequently filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of the dismissed appeal, explaini…

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of a criminal appeal that had been dismissed on 11-02-2026 because no party appeared when the matter was called and no request for a pass‑over was made. The court had earlier dismissed the appeal for these procedural defaults. The applicant’s …

The complainant, a victim of a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused. The High Court, having already condoned the delay, referred to its recent decision in S…

The appellant, Kanaiyo @ Kanaiyalal Dipchand Dasani, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant sought to challenge the acq…

Paragbhai Dipakbhai Joshi filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant argued that, as a victim, he possessed a specific statutory right to appe…

The petitioner filed an application for restoration of a criminal appeal (R/Criminal Appeal No. 1894/2024). The High Court considered the submissions of the petitioner's counsel and the averments made in the application. Finding that the petitioner had shown sufficient cause, the Court allowed the prayer for restoratio…

Akbarbhai Sulemanbhai Patel, authorized trustee of Ekta Education Trust, filed an application seeking restoration of a criminal appeal. The respondent, Jignasha Vijaybhai Thummar, owner of Rudraksha Creation & Anr., opposed the application. The court examined the submissions of counsel for both parties and the averment…

Jagdishbhai Bhikhabai Patel filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of his criminal appeal (No. 1295 of 2024) before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant argued that sufficient cause existed for the restoration of the appeal. The respondent State of Gujarat opposed the restoration. The Court, af…

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of a criminal appeal (No. 923/2024). The High Court considered the submissions of the applicant's counsel and the averments made in the application. The Court found that the applicant had shown sufficient cause for restoration. Consequently, t…

The applicant, Shauryasingh Karansinh Sandhu, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of his matter. The High Court of Gujarat considered the submissions made by the applicant’s counsel and the averments in the application. The court found that the applicant had shown sufficient cause for restora…

Asian Tubes Ltd, represented by Anil Agrawal, filed an application for restoration of its criminal appeal against Goyal Enterprise & Ors. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Kavan K. Patel, argued that sufficient cause existed for restoration, while the respondents’ counsel, including Mr. V.V. Bhamre, were notified. The Court…

Asian Tubes Ltd., represented by Anil Agraval, filed an application for restoration of a criminal appeal (No. 59/2019) before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant argued that the matter should be reinstated on its original file. The respondents, Goyal Enterprise and others, were represented by counsel and a substituti…

Nalin Lease Finance Limited, represented by Mayur Kumar Prafulchandra Thakar, filed a criminal appeal (No. 823/2024) before the High Court of Gujarat. Subsequently, the applicant filed a restoration application (R/Cr. Misc. Application No. 4408/2026) seeking to have the matter reinstated on the original file. The Court…

In Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 4403 of 2026, arising from Criminal Appeal No. 1435 of 2024, Nalin Lease Finance Limited (through Mayurkumar Prafulchand Thakar) sought restoration of its appeal file against the State of Gujarat. The applicant contended that the appeal had been improperly closed and that suffi…

The petitioner, Pankajbhai Ramniklal Ajmera, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of his criminal appeal (R/Criminal Appeal/368/2009) which had been dismissed or otherwise closed. The respondent, Arifbhai Mahamadbhai Makwana, and a second respondent, Ms. Megha Chitaliya, opposed the restoratio…

The petitioner, Prakash Mansukhbhai Rathod, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of his criminal appeal (No. 1189/2023) before the Gujarat High Court. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, opposed the application. The petitioner’s counsel, Nimit Y. Shukla, argued that sufficient cause existed …

The appellant Jagdishbhai Bhikhabhai Patel filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on a recent decision of this Court in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki…

The appellant, Prakash Mansukhbhai Rathod, filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referencing i…

The appellant filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, invoking Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat…

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, held that a complainant (victim…

Imranbhai Ramjanbhai Sipahi appealed to the Gujarat High Court against his acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The Court referred to its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpats…

The appellant, Talod Nagrik Sahkari Bank Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant sought to have the appeal heard by the High Court. The High Court referred to its…

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined a recent decision (Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, 23.12.2025) which held that a compla…

The appellant, Amitkumar Babulal Patel, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Crimi…

The complainant appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined whether such an appeal could be entertained …

The complainant, Akbarbhai Sulemanbhai Patel, appealed the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court referred to its recent …

The complainant appealed an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court had acquitted the accused, and the appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court, referrin…

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether it had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal or whether it must be transferred to the Sessions Co…

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant sought transfer of the appeal to the Sessions Court, relying on a recent decision of this Court in Shivsinh Ganpatsin…

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal Misc. Applications Nos…

The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court, referencing…

The complainant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether it had jurisdiction to hear the appeal or whether it must be transferred to the Sessions Court…

The appellant, Anilbhai Maganlal Gatecha, filed an appeal against his acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined a recent precedent (Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat) which held that a complainant‑victim has a specific right to appeal under the prov…

The appellant filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, invoking Sections 378 of the CrPC and 419 of the BNSS. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, held that a victim's right to appe…

Icon Financial Service, through Gautambhai Revabhai Chavda, appealed against the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether it had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Sura…

The complainant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether it could entertain the appeal or had to transfer it to the Sessio…

The appellant, Shriji Finance and Leasing, filed a criminal appeal (R/CR.A/2476/2008) against Keshabhai Devjibhai Patel and another. The appeal was listed twice, but the appellant's counsel failed to appear on both occasions, and had also been absent on an earlier hearing. The court observed that the appellant had evid…

Shreyas Co‑op Credit Society Ltd., through its accountant, appealed a criminal conviction against the State of Gujarat. The appeal, filed in 2009, was heard on 28 January 2026. The appellant’s counsel did not appear, nor was any request for adjournment made. The bench noted a prior order on 6 September 2023 observing t…

The appellant, Amisha Shah, filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referencing its recent decis…

The appellant filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal Misc. App…

The applicant, Imtiyazkhan Ajamkhan Lohani, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal in Criminal Appeal No. 8485/2025. The matter was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker. No counsel or party appeared on the first or second call, and no request for adjournment was made. The cour…

The appellant, Naynaben Ambalal Patel, filed a series of criminal appeals (Nos. 776, 837, 926, etc., 2021) against the acquittal of the respondents, including Ayesha Medical Agencies and others. The parties raised office objections before the High Court of Gujarat. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker directed that these objectio…

The Krishna Credit Co‑operative Society filed a criminal appeal (No. 39113 of 2024) against the State of Gujarat. A hearing was scheduled before Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker, but neither the applicant nor the respondent appeared even on the second call. No request for adjournment was made by any party. The court, observin…

The appellant, Patel Sureshbhai, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the respondents on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The key issue was whether a complainant who is also a victim may invoke the special l…

The appellant filed a criminal appeal against an acquittal and a miscellaneous application for additional evidence. No evidence was produced by the prosecution, and no request for adjournment was made despite multiple calls. The court observed that the prosecution had failed to present its case. Consequently, the matte…

The appellant, Kiritbhai Rameshbhai Trivedi, filed a criminal appeal against his acquittal and a miscellaneous application for additional evidence. The appeal was before the High Court of Gujarat, with Mr. K S Chandrani appearing for the appellant. No parties, including the respondent State of Gujarat, were present for…

Kiritbhai Rameshbhai Trivedi, acting as power of attorney for Ansuya Ben Rameshbhai Trivedi, filed a criminal appeal against an earlier acquittal by the State of Gujarat. The appeal was heard before Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker. No request for adjournment was made by the appellant despite multiple calls. The court observe…

The appellant, Kiritbhai Rameshbhai Trivedi, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of Yogesh Rameshbhai Trivedi and also sought to introduce additional evidence. The State of Gujarat opposed the appeal. No request for adjournment was made by either party, and the matter was not called for a third time. The cour…

The complainant appealed an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filing the appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. Stat…

The appellant, Dediyasan Industrial Co. Op. Credit Society Ltd., filed an appeal against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita…

The appellant filed an acquittal appeal under CrPC Section 378 and BNSS Section 419 against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Cr. Misc. Apps. 12753/2019 & 129…

The appellant, Kanjibhai Bechrabhai Charola, filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the respondents on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High…

The appellant filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant sought to have the appeal heard by the High Court, but the learned counsel …

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant sought transfer of the appeal to the Sessions Court, invoking a recent decision of this Court that a complainant‑v…

The appellant, Brijeshbhai Pandya, filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referring to its recent decision in Shiv…

The appellant, Dhruv Sunilkumar Patel, filed an appeal against his acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, invoking Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS. The trial court had acquitted the accused. The High Court, referencing the recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. Sta…

The complainant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, before addressing the merits, referred to its recent decisi…

The appellant, Shriram Finance Ltd., filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the statutory framework governing appeals by a complainant who is also a vic…

M/s Padmavati Corporation, represented by proprietor Jashvantlal Shah, appealed to the Gujarat High Court against the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant filed the appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC (and the analogous provision in the BNSS) as a compl…

M/s Padmavati Corporation, represented by proprietor Jashvantlal Shah, appealed to the Gujarat High Court against the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant filed the appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC (and the analogous provision in the BNSS) as a compl…

The appellant, Rakeshbhai Gopaldas Sharma, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against his acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal Misc. A…

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the respondents on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant sought to have the appeal heard by the High Court, but the Court referred to its recent decision i…

The appellant, who is both the complainant and the victim under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal. The issue was whether the appeal should be filed under Section 378 of the CrPC as a complainant or under the proviso to Section 372 (Section 413 of the BNSS) as a victim. …

The trial court acquitted Maganbhai Haribhai Virani, the managing director of Shri Mota LIlYa Credit Co‑op. Society Ltd., of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed appeals against the acquittal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …

The trial court acquitted Maganbhai Haribhai Virani, the managing director of Shri Mota LIlYa Credit Co‑op. Society Ltd., of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed appeals under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, challenging t…

The trial court acquitted Maganbhai Haribhai Virani, the managing director of Shri Mota LIlYa Credit Co‑op. Society Ltd., of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed appeals against the acquittal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …

The trial court acquitted Maganbhai Haribhai Virani, the managing director of Shri Mota LIlYa Credit Co‑op. Society Ltd., of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed appeals against the acquittal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …

The trial court acquitted Maganbhai Haribhai Virani, Managing Director of Shri Mota Lilya Credit Co‑op. Society Ltd., of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed multiple appeals under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, challeng…

The trial court acquitted Maganbhai Haribhai Virani, the managing director of Shri Mota LIlYa Credit Co‑op. Society Ltd., of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed appeals against the acquittal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …

The trial court acquitted Maganbhai Haribhai Virani, the managing director of Shri Mota LIlYa Credit Co‑op. Society Ltd., of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed appeals under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, challenging t…

The trial court acquitted Maganbhai Haribhai Virani, the managing director of Shri Mota LIlYa Credit Co‑op. Society Ltd., of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed appeals under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, challenging t…

The trial court acquitted Maganbhai Haribhai Virani, the managing director of Shri Mota LIlYa Credit Co‑op. Society Ltd., of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed appeals under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, challenging t…

The appellant filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court noted a recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, which held that a complainant‑victim has a specific right to appeal to the Sessions Court under th…

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court examined the recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, which, relying on Supreme Court judgment…

The applicant, Dharmendra Dhirajlal Bhatt, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Malav Hemangbhai Gor, failed to appear even after a second call and made no request for adjournment. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. No su…

Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd appealed against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, asserting the complainant's right to challenge the acquittal. T…

The appellant, Abhaysinh Arjanbha Ker, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court referred to its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, which held that a complainant in a …

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court noted a recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, which he…

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita against a trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, whi…

Rajkot Nagarik Sahakari Bank, through Hiren Rasikbhai Jadav, appealed against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The High Court examined whether, under the proviso to Section 372 of the…

The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against his acquittal. The High Court examined the precedent set in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, which relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in…

The Gujarat State Co‑operative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Ltd appealed to the Gujarat High Court against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant argued that, as the complainant who suffered loss, they could file an appeal under Section 37…

The Gujarat State Cooperative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Ltd appealed an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, arguing that as a complainant it could file an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC (or Section 419 of the BNSS). The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsin…

Mohammed Imtiyaz Harun, partner of Venus Valves Industries, appealed to the Gujarat High Court against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant argued that, as a complainant, he could file an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC (or Section 413 of the BN…

The Gujarat State Cooperative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank appealed against the trial court's acquittal of the State of Gujarat under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant, also the complainant, sought to file the appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC as a complainant. The High Court ref…

Adnan Abbasbhai Dahodwala appealed the trial court's acquittal in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether, as a complainant who is also a victim, he could file the appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC or had to use the victim‑specific remedy under the proviso to Section 372 of …

Jenab Adnana Dahodwala appealed to the Gujarat High Court under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against an acquittal in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat and the Supreme Court judg…

The appellant, Jyoti Satyanarayan Vishvkarma, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the respondents in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the precedent set in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State …

Shriram Finance Ltd., through its power of attorney, appealed to the Gujarat High Court against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, asserting that the complainant, …

The appellant, Ambalal Kajodimal Shah, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the legal position of a complainant who is also a victim, relying on its e…

Ambalal Shah and Sons appealed to the Gujarat High Court against the trial court’s acquittal in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court examined whether the complainant, who is also a victim, could file the appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC or must use the victim‑specific remedy under t…

The appellant, Ambalal Shah & Sons, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether a complainant who is also a victim could appeal under Section 378 (as a complainant) or must …

The appellant, Ambalal Shah and Sons, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the statutory framework governing appeals by a complainant who is also a vi…

The appellant, Ambalal Shah and Sons, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the statutory position that a complainant who is also a victim has a dis…

The appellant, Sehnaz Sam... (the complainant), appealed an acquittal granted by the trial court in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether a complainant who is also a victim may file an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC or must invoke the victim‑specific remedy un…

Patel Vishnubhai Chandubhai appealed to the Gujarat High Court under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against his acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat and the Supreme Co…

Patel Vishnubhai Chandubhai appealed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against his acquittal in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat and the Supreme Court judgment in Celesti…

The appellant, Maheshbhai Punabhai Machhi, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether a complainant who is also a victim may invoke the complainant’…

Mensibhai Mulabhai Vada appealed against his acquittal in a criminal case before the Gujarat High Court. The appellant filed an affidavit stating that an amicable settlement had been reached with the State and that he no longer wished to pursue the appeal. The court examined the affidavit, verified the appellant's sign…

The appellant, Rameshbhai Ribadiya, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita challenging the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the statutory framework governing appeals b…

The appellant, Savitrtiben Sunil Biyani, proprietor of Maheshwari Jari, appealed an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court had acquitted the accused, and the appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High…

The appellant, Rameshbhai Ribadiya, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita challenging the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the statutory framework governing appeals b…

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal Misc. Applications Nos…

The appellant, Kaushik Natwarlal Vyas, filed an appeal against his acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referencing its recent decision…

Kanjibhai Becharbhai Charola appealed the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as a victim, has a statutory right to appeal under the proviso of Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which mandates that such ap…

The appellant filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal Misc. Applications Nos. 12753/2019 & 12908/2019) and the Supreme Court judgment …

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its own earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal Miscellaneous Application Nos. 12753/2019 & 1…

The Deesa Navnirman Bachat and Dhiran Sahakari Mandali Ltd appealed against the trial court's acquittal in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, asserting the right to challenge the acquittal.…

The applicant, HCLS Committee, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking special leave to appeal a decision of the 4th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamnagar dated 04‑08‑2021, which had refused notice to the accused. The State, represented by Ms. Monali Bhatt, waived service of notice of rule. The High…

Shriram Finance Ltd, through its power of attorney, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 of the BNSS, asserting the complainant's right to challenge the acquittal. The High Court referred t…

In Criminal Appeal No. 390 of 2011 before the Gujarat High Court, the appellant, Bajranglal Ramlal Sharma, was represented initially by Advocate Sanjay R. Gupta who consented to withdraw his appearance. The court recorded this withdrawal and directed that Advocate Jitendra K. Jain be allowed to appear for the appellant…

The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittal of Ashrafkhan Ajabkhan Pathan, who was alleged to have illegally entered the visitors' room of Sabarmati Central Jail and been found in possession of 33.4 grams of charas. The trial court, after hearing 18 prosecution witnesses and examining documentary evidence, held that th…

The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittal of Chhotalal S. Kshatriya and others for alleged assault, knife injury and caste‑based abuse of complainant Girishbhai Makwana on 25 August 2008. The trial court had found the prosecution’s evidence contradictory, lacking direct proof, and insufficient to establish offences u…

The applicant, Dharmendra Dhirajlal Bhatt, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal. No party appeared before the court even on the second call, and no request for adjournment was made. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justi…

The applicant, Dharmendra Dhirajlal Bhatt, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal against the judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 9799 of 2025. The applicant was represented by Mr. Malav Hemangbhai Gor, while the respondent was represented by Mr. Yuvraj Brahmbhatt. No party appeared before the c…

Pravinaben Rajendrabhai Patel filed a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat challenging an earlier acquittal. The appeal was consolidated with numerous other criminal appeals numbered 1033 of 2021 through 1660 of 2021. After hearing counsel for the appellant and the public prosecutor, the Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev…

Deepak Enterprise, through Dipinbhai Gunvantbhai Patel, filed a criminal appeal (No. 845 of 2023) against Alpes​h Steel and its partners. The matter was listed before the High Court of Gujarat, but no party appeared even on the second call and no request for adjournment was made. The court observed that there was no pr…

The appellant, Deepak Enterprise through Dipinbhai Patel, filed a criminal appeal (No. 845 of 2023) seeking leave to appeal. The respondent, Alpes h Steel through Alpeshbhai Patel and others, were served with notice. No party appeared in court even after a second call, and no request for adjournment was made. Consequen…

Pravinaben Rajendrabhai Patel filed a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat challenging an earlier acquittal. The appeal was consolidated with numerous other criminal appeals numbered 1033 of 2021 through 1660 of 2021. After hearing counsel for the appellant and the public prosecutor, the Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev…

Patel Sitaben Ramkrushnabhai, the complainant, filed an application under CrPC s.378(4) seeking leave to appeal the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under NI Act s.138. The applicant’s counsel requested withdrawal of the application in view of a recent Gujarat High Court decision (Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. S…

The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant sought to withdraw the application in view of a recent Gujarat High Court decision (Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. S…

The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant sought to withdraw the application in view of a recent Gujarat High Court decision (Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Sola…

The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant later sought to withdraw the application in light of a recent Gujarat High Court decision (Shivsinh Ganpatsi…

The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant later sought to withdraw the application, relying on a recent Gujarat High Court decision (Shivsinh Ganpatsi…

The applicant, Shree Thakorji Trading Co. through its proprietor, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 419(4) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking leave to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on a recent Gujarat High Court decision (Shiv…

The applicant, Ravi Textile Traders (through POA), filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 419(4) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking leave to appeal an acquittal of the respondents under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant later sought to withdraw the appli…

Jagdishbhai Sawabhai Patel filed a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat. The appellant was represented by Ms. N M Zaveri, while the respondent was represented by Ms. Shruti Pathak. No party appeared before the court despite two calls and no request for adjournment was made. The court noted the lack of prosecuti…

The applicant, Digeshkumar Govindbhai Solanki, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal against the order in Criminal Appeal No. 24484 of 2025. The respondent, State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel. No party appeared before the court despite two calls, and no request for adjournment was…

The petitioners, M/s. Alankar Traders through Jayesh Gopaldas Shah, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in a criminal appeal. No counsel appeared for either party despite two calls, and no request for adjournment was made. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker observed the lack of pr…

Somendu Chakraborty, CEO of Selvas and Daman branch of Katariya Automobiles Pvt. Ltd., filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal against a decision involving Bhaveshbhai Hakabhai Vaniya and another. The court issued a second call for the parties to appear, but none were present and no request f…

Gujarat Polysol Chemicals Ltd, represented by Dharmesh PravinChandra Patel, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal against a decision of the State of Gujarat and another respondent. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Ruchit J. Vyas, appeared, but no counsel for the respondents appeared, nor was an…

The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After a recent decision (Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat) clarifying a victim's right to appeal under the …

The appellant, Rajendraprasad Bhagirathbhai Rathod, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat and another respondent. The matter was listed before the High Court of Gujarat, but no party appeared for the hearing despite two calls. No request for adjournment was made by either side. The Court, noting the abse…

The applicant, Gujarat State Cooperative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Ltd., filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 419(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsha Sanhita (BNSS) Act seeking leave to appeal an order of acquittal dated 14‑10‑2025 in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrum…

The appellant, Nabros Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed a criminal appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against Finoglobal Exports Ltd. and others. The High Court had earlier issued a notice on 5 July 2025, making the appeal returnable on 4 August 2025. The notice was duly served, but the appellant failed t…

The appellant, Govindbhai Lakhubhai Patel, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC against the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal Miscellaneous Applica…

The complainant appealed an acquittal granted by the trial court in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, held that a victim…

Arvindbhai Nathubhai Udesh appealed against his acquittal in a criminal case before the Gujarat High Court. The appellant‑victim filed an affidavit seeking permission to withdraw the appeal, identifying his signature and thumb impression. The court recorded the affidavit and considered the request. No substantive issue…

Vinodchandra Ramanlal Modi appealed against Dawoodbhai Mohmadbhai Malek and another in Criminal Appeal No. 1312 of 2008 before the Gujarat High Court. The appellant's counsel informed the court that the dispute had been settled between the parties and sought permission to withdraw the appeal. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker …

The appellant filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC against the trial court's order acquitting the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referring to its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal Miscellaneous Application Nos. 1…

The complainant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal Misc. Applications Nos.…

The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant later sought to withdraw the application, relying on a recent Gujarat High Court decision (Shivsinh Ganpatsi…

The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant later sought to withdraw the application, relying on a recent Gujarat High Court decision (Shivsinh Ganpatsi…

The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant’s counsel requested to withdraw the application in view of a recent Gujarat High Court decision (Shivsinh Ganpatsinh…

The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant’s counsel requested to withdraw the application in view of a recent Gujarat High Court decision (Shivsinh Ganpatsinh…

Patel Rasikbhai Ganpatbhai filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal against respondents Vihol Amarsinh Rajuji Jivanji and another. The matter was listed before the High Court of Gujarat, but neither the petitioner nor his counsel appeared even on the second call, and no request for adjournment…

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal. No party appeared before the court even on the second call, and no request for adjournment was made. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. No substantive issues were addressed, and no legal reasoning b…

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether a victim‑complainant has the right to appeal the acquittal before a High Court or must approach the Se…

The applicant sought condonation of a 458‑day delay in filing a criminal appeal against an acquittal. The counsel requested to withdraw the application, relying on a recent Gujarat High Court decision (Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat & Anr., 23‑12‑2025) which, following Supreme Court precedents such as …

Jigishaben Jitendrabhai Patel, proprietor of Shyam Petroleum, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking leave to appeal. The applicant sought to withdraw the application and the connected appeal after learning that, per the Supreme Court’s deci…

The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittal of the accused in a murder case under Section 302 IPC, where a six‑year‑old boy, Tejas, was found dead in a well. The prosecution relied mainly on the testimony of the boy's mother, who admitted a sexual relationship with the accused, and on circumstantial evidence that the a…

The State appealed the acquittal of Chandubhai Sendabhai Patani under Section 378 of the Cr.P.C., challenging his discharge from charges of kidnapping, kidnapping for ransom, rape (IPC ss. 363, 366, 376) and offences under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The trial court had found that the prosecution failed t…

The applicant, Gauriben Damjibhai Khoraba, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal against the judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 21086 of 2025. The application was listed for hearing, but the applicant's counsel, Denish V. Mavadhiya, did not appear on the second call and no request for adjournm…

The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal against a 2022 acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant’s counsel requested to withdraw the application in view of a recent Gujarat High Court decision (Shivsinh Ganpatsinh So…

The applicant Rajeshbhai Jashbhai Kharchariya filed a criminal appeal seeking leave to appeal. No party appeared for the hearing even after a second call, and no request for adjournment was made. The court, noting the absence of prosecution, dismissed the matter for want of prosecution. The order was pronounced by Just…

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal. No counsel or party appeared for the applicant even on the second call, and no request for adjournment was made. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justice Sanjeev J. Tha…

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal. No party appeared before the court even on the second call, and no request for adjournment was made. Consequently, the court dismissed the matter for want of prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker. No substanti…

The petitioner, Sukhraj Chunilal Bhansali, filed a criminal appeal (No. 30218 of 2024) against the State of Gujarat. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Hardik H. Dave, appeared, but no respondent counsel was present despite a second call. No request for adjournment was made by either side. The presiding judge noted the absen…

Bhadiyadi Vishal Babubhai filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal against the State of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, S.B. Sutaria, failed to appear on the scheduled date of 02‑12‑2025 and again on 08‑01‑2026, the latter being the second call. No request for adjournment was made by the app…

The applicant, Scientific Remedies Pvt Ltd (through Paritosh Ashwinbhai Dave), sought permission to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous application filed under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, along with a connected appeal, because a Supreme Court decision (Asian Paint Pvt Ltd v. Ram Babu, 2025 INS…