High Court of Gujarat
PATEL RASIKBHAI GANPATBHAIversusCHAUHAN GHANSHYAMSINH GOPALJI
- Disposal
- 27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
- Bench
- SANJEEV THAKER
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal. No party appeared before the court even on the second call, and no request for adjournment was made. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. No substantive issues were addressed, and no legal reasoning beyond procedural dismissal was provided. The order was signed by Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker.
Subjects
procedural lawwant of prosecutioncourt dismissal
Judgment
R/CR.MA/13582/2025 ORDER DATED: 08/01/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) NO. 13582
of 2025
In F/CRIMINAL APPEAL/24670/2025
==========================================================
PATEL RASIKBHAI GANPATBHAI
Versus
CHAUHAN GHANSHYAMSINH GOPALJI & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. KAUSHAL N DAVE(13999) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR YUVRAJ BRAHBHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
Date : 08/01/2026
ORAL ORDER
None present even in the second call, nor any
request for adjournment is made.
In view of the same, this matter is dismissed for
want of prosecution.
(SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
M.H. DAVE
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MAHESHKUMAR HASMUKHLAL DAVE(HC00193), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 08/01/2026 18:05:14
Page 1 of 1
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
Try "procedural law"Sign in to search