High Court of Gujarat
PATEL RASIKBHAI GANPATBHAIversusRAMI ATULKUMAR KARSHANDAS
- Disposal
- 37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
- Bench
- SANJEEV THAKER
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal. No party appeared before the court even on the second call, and no request for adjournment was made. Consequently, the court dismissed the matter for want of prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker. No substantive merits of the appeal were considered.
Subjects
procedural lawappealwant of prosecution
Judgment
R/CR.MA/13505/2025 ORDER DATED: 08/01/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) NO. 13505
of 2025
In F/CRIMINAL APPEAL/20969/2025
With
F/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 20969 of 2025
==========================================================
PATEL RASIKBHAI GANPATBHAI
Versus
RAMI ATULKUMAR KARSHANDAS & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR CHETAN B RAVAL(2090) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR YUVRAJ BRAHBHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
Date : 08/01/2026
ORAL ORDER
None present even in the second call, nor any
request for adjournment is made.
In view of the same, the matters are dismissed for
want of prosecution.
(SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
M.H. DAVE
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MAHESHKUMAR HASMUKHLAL DAVE(HC00193), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 08/01/2026 18:05:50
Page 1 of 1
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
Try "procedural law"Sign in to search