GOVINDBHAI LAKHUBHAI PATEL (GOTHI)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.
- Bench
- SANJEEV THAKER
Holding
The appeal is to be transferred to the Sessions Court as the complainant has a statutory right to appeal under the proviso of Section 372 of the CrPC.
Summary
The appellant, Govindbhai Lakhubhai Patel, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC against the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal Miscellaneous Application Nos. 12753/2019 & 12908/2019) and the Supreme Court’s ruling in M/s Celestium Financial v. A. Gyanasekaran (2025 INSC 804), held that a complainant has a specific right to appeal under the proviso of Section 372 of the CrPC to the Sessions Court. Accordingly, the High Court disposed of the appeal by directing its transfer to the appropriate Sessions Court, ordering the registry to send the complete record, and urging the lower court to dispose of the matter expeditiously. No merits of the case were examined at this stage.
Issues considered
- The complainant’s right to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 NI Act via the proviso of Section 372 CrPC to the Sessions Court
- Whether the High Court should transfer the pending appeal to the Sessions Court
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973s. 372, s. 378, s. 413
- Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881s. 138
Subjects
Judgment
R/CR.A/1570/2012 ORDER DATED: 27/01/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1570 of 2012
==========================================================
GOVINDBHAI LAKHUBHAI PATEL (GOTHI)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR JIGAR G GADHAVI(5613) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR N P CHAUDHARY(3980) for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
MR TUSHAR CHAUDHARY(5316) for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
MS MEGHA CHITALIYA, APP for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 1
RULE SERVED for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
Date : 27/01/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. This is an acquittal appeal filed under Section 378
of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred
to as `the Code’ for short) by the complainant against the
judgment and order impugned passed by the learned trial
Court, whereby the learned trial Court had acquitted the
respondent/s/accused of the charge under Section 138 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as
the `NI Act’ for short).
2. Heard learned advocates for the parties. Learned
APP has submitted that this matter is required to be
transferred in view of the recent decision of this Court
passed in Criminal Miscellaneous Application Nos. 12753 of
2019 with 12908 of 2019.
Page 1 of 3
R/CR.A/1570/2012 ORDER DATED: 27/01/2026
3. Before entering into the merits of this case, this
Court deems it proper to refer to the latest decision rendered
by this Court in the case of Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki V/s
State of Gujarat & Anr. being Criminal Miscellaneous
Application Nos. 12753 of 2019 with 12908 of 2019 on
23.12.2025, wherein, after considering the various judgments
of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, more particularly, the
judgment in the matter of M/s Celestium Financial V/s
A.Gyanasekaran etc. reported in 2025 INSC 804, has
observed and held that the Complainant, in a complaint
under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, being a Victim, has a
specific right to appeal under proviso of Section 372 of the
Code to the Court which is immediately superior in hierarchy
i.e., the Sessions Court. Therefore, the applications for leave
to appeal/appeals which are pending before this Court can be
disposed of with a direction to transfer the said
application/appeal to the concerned Sessions Court.
4. In view of the above, learned advocate for the
petitioner requested to transfer the appeal to the concerned
Sessions Court.
5. In view of the said request, this appeal is
disposed of with a direction to the Registry to transfer the
Page 2 of 3
R/CR.A/1570/2012 ORDER DATED: 27/01/2026
appeal to the concerned Sessions Court. After it is
transferred to the concerned Sessions Court, it has to be
treated as an Appeal under the proviso under Section 372 of
the Code (Section 413 of BNSS) and numbered accordingly.
The Registry is directed to transfer the entire record of the
case, including the certified copies of the order impugned and
record & proceedings, if lying with this Court, to the
concerned lower Appellate Court, forthwith.
6. Considering that the matter has been pending
since the year 2012, the learned lower Appellate Court is
required to make endeavour to dispose of the matter as
expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six
months from the date of receipt of the matter.
7. It is clarified that this Court has not gone into
the merits of the matter at this stage.
(SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
SRILATHA
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SRILATHA VENKATARAO UPADHYAYULA(HC00185), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 27/01/2026 17:35:15
Page 3 of 3
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.