AMBALAL SHAH AND SONS THRO MUKESHBHAI AMBALAL SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.
- Bench
- SANJEEV THAKER
Holding
A complainant in a Section 138 NI Act case has a specific right to appeal under the proviso of Section 372 CrPC, and the appeal must be transferred to the Sessions Court for adjudication.
Summary
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its own earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal Miscellaneous Application Nos. 12753/2019 & 12908/2019) and the Supreme Court judgment in Celestium Financial v. A. Gyanasekaran (2025 INSC 804), held that a complainant‑victim has a specific right to appeal under the proviso of Section 372 CrPC to the Sessions Court. Consequently, the High Court declined to consider the merits and ordered the entire record to be transferred to the appropriate Sessions Court for further hearing as an appeal under Section 372. The order clarified that the appeal would be treated as a Section 372 appeal and numbered accordingly. No substantive merits of the original charge were addressed.
Issues considered
- The applicability of the complainant’s right to appeal under the proviso of Section 372 CrPC after an acquittal under Section 138 NI Act
- Whether the High Court should entertain the appeal on merits or transfer it to the Sessions Court
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973s. 372, s. 378, s. 413
- Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881s. 138
Subjects
Judgment
R/CR.A/1758/2024 ORDER DATED: 09/02/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL APPEAL (AGAINST ACQUITTAL) NO. 1758 of 2024
==========================================================
AMBALAL SHAH AND SONS THRO MUKESHBHAI AMBALAL SHAH
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR RAXIT J DHOLAKIA(3709) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
BAILABLE WARRANT SERVED for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
K K MAGHNANI(7543) for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
MR K B MAGHNANI(9673) for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
MS JYOTI BHATT, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the
Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
Date : 09/02/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. This is an acquittal appeal filed under Section 378 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to
as `the Code’ for short) by the complainant against the
judgment and order impugned passed by the learned trial
Court, whereby the learned trial Court had acquitted the
respondent/s/accused of the charge under Section 138 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as
the `NI Act’ for short).
2. Heard learned advocates for the parties. Learned APP
has submitted that this matter is required to be transferred
in view of the recent decision of this Court passed in
Criminal Miscellaneous Application Nos. 12753 of 2019 with
Page 1 of 3
R/CR.A/1758/2024 ORDER DATED: 09/02/2026
12908 of 2019.
3. Before entering into the merits of this case, this Court
deems it proper to refer to the latest decision rendered by
this Court in the case of Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki V/s
State of Gujarat & Anr. being Criminal Miscellaneous
Application Nos. 12753 of 2019 with 12908 of 2019 on
23.12.2025, wherein, after considering the various judgments
of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, more particularly, the
judgment in the matter of M/s Celestium Financial V/s
A.Gyanasekaran etc. reported in 2025 INSC 804, has
observed and held that the Complainant, in a complaint
under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, being a Victim, has a
specific right to appeal under proviso of Section 372 of the
Code to the Court which is immediately superior in hierarchy
i.e., the Sessions Court. Therefore, the applications for leave
to appeal/appeals which are pending before this Court can be
disposed of with a direction to transfer the said
application/appeal to the concerned Sessions Court.
4. In view of the above, learned advocate for the petitioner
requested to transfer the appeal to the concerned Sessions
Court.
5. In view of the said request, this appeal is disposed of
Page 2 of 3
R/CR.A/1758/2024 ORDER DATED: 09/02/2026
with a direction to the Registry to transfer the appeal to the
concerned Sessions Court. After it is transferred to the
concerned Sessions Court, it has to be treated as an Appeal
under the proviso under Section 372 of the Code (Section 413
of BNSS) and numbered accordingly and issue notice to the
parties. The Registry is directed to transfer the entire record
of the case, including the certified copies of the order
impugned and record & proceedings, if lying with this Court,
to the concerned lower Appellate Court, forthwith.
6. It is clarified that this Court has not gone into the
merits of the matter at this stage.
(SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
Bharat
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: KOSHTI BHARATKUMAR(HC01064), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/02/2026 18:29:04
Page 3 of 3
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.