Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

SANJEEV THAKER

1,200 judgments delivered by benches including this judge — showing 801–1,000.

SIRAJ MOHMMAD ABDUL RAHEMAN MEDA @ BALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Siraj Mohammad Abdul Raheman Meda, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) seeking parole. The applicant’s counsel later requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered the request and, after hearing, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the application was dis

JITESH RAMESHBHAI GAJERAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Jitesh Rameshbhai Gajera, filed special criminal applications seeking parole leave to enable him to file an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The court considered the petitioner's averments, the jail remarks, and its earlier orders in similar applications da

JITESH RAMESHBHAI GAJERAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Jitesh Rameshbhai Gajera, filed special criminal applications seeking parole leave to enable him to file an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The court considered the petitioner's averments, the jail remarks, and its earlier orders in similar applications da

MAYURDAN PRAVINDAN GADHAVIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Mayurdan Pravindan Gadhavi applied for temporary bail, citing the need to attend to his parents' medical treatment. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the application and considering the jail remarks, exercised its discretion in favor of the applic

PRAVINBHAI KHIMABHAI MAKWANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Pravinbhai Khimabhai Makwana, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The High Court examined the petition, the jail remarks, and the grounds presented. It found that no justifiable reason existed for granting parole, noting that the petitioner had recently been released from jail. Co

ROOP NARAYAN MEENA S/O HARNARAYAN MEENAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Roop Narayan Meena, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the application. The sole issue before the court was whether the court could grant permission to withdraw a pending parole application. The

AYUB @ POTLI MAQBULKHAN PATHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Ayub @ Potli Maqbullahkhan Pathan filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail from the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The court considered the request and, after hearing the counsel, granted permission to wi

MALEK IRFAN @ GIRI SALIMBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Malek Irfan, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. While the application was pending before the concerned authority, the petitioner’s counsel moved the High Court for permission to withdraw the application. The State opposed, stating the application was still pending. The Court held

PARTHIBHAI AMRATBHAI VEDU (CHAUHAN)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Parthibhai Amratbhai Vedu (Chauhan), filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The application was pending before the concerned authority. The petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the parole application. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker granted the request, disposi

UMANGBHAI LALITBHAI THAKKARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Umangbhai Lalitbhai Thakkar filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave after being released from jail. The petition was presented through the jail and opposed by the State of Gujarat, represented by Mr. Rohan Raval. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker examined the petition, the jail remarks, and the gr

CHETAK BHAWARLAL CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Chetak Bhalwalal Chaudhary, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented and opposed the wit

SHAIKH MOHMAD TAUFIK IQBALAHMADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Shahikh Mohmad Taufik Iqbalahmad filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether a party may withdraw an anticipatory bail petition at its discretion. No objections were raised by the respondent. Th

KURESHI AKHTARHUSEN HARUNBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Kureshi Akhtarhusen Harunbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel, after arguing, sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel. The court considered whether it could g

PUNAMBHAI CHAMPABHAI BARAIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Petitioner Punambhai Champabhai Baraiya filed special criminal applications seeking parole leave to settle a dispute with his wife. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service. The court heard arguments from counsel and examined the petitioner's grounds and jail remarks. Exercising its di

ASFAK @ASFAK KAUVA NASIR SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Asfak @ Asfak Kauva Nasir Shaikh, filed a temporary bail application seeking release to arrange medical treatment for his mother. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's claim and the jail's remarks, and exercised its discretion

PUNAMBHAI CHAMPABHAI BARAIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Petitioner Punambhai Champabhai Baraiya filed special criminal applications seeking parole leave to settle a dispute with his wife. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service. The court heard arguments from counsel and examined the petitioner's grounds and jail remarks. Exercising its di

KARABHAI RANABHAI KARAMTHAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Karabhai Ranabhai Karamtha, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The issue before the court was whether it could grant such permission to withdraw a pending parole application. The court, a

NILESH JAGUBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Nilesh Jagubhai Patel, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel who opposed t

PADHIAR HARDEEPSINH KUMARSINHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Padhiar HardeepSinh Kumarsinh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) fearing arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and the Information Technology Act. The State opposed bail, citing the serio

RIZVANSHA YASINMOHAMMAD DIVANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The husband and wife applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita after an FIR was lodged for offences under Sections 336(2), 337, 340 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. They argued that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, they would cooperate with the investigation,

MANOJKUMAR VIJAYBHAI GAYAKVADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Manojkumar Vijaybhai Gayakvad filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel, Dinesh Kumar D. Gautam, sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent's counsel, Rohan Raval, opposed the withdrawal. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered whether the court could

SAHIL @ BITTU BABUBHAI MADHYBHAI PATANI (DATALAVALA)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Sahil @ Bittu Babuhai Madhyabhai Patani (Datalavala), filed a temporary bail application seeking release to perform the post‑death rituals of his maternal uncle. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's averments, the specific gr

SHABBIRBHAI IQBALBHAI BASARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE

The petitioner, Shabbirbhai Iqbalbhai Basar, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The respondent State of Gujarat opposed the application. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the parole application was pending before the concerned authority without a decision. The court noted that the pending app

JITENDRABHAI @ MANHARBHAI DEVJIBHAI VASAVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave and later, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the application. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the application was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantiv

ANILBHAI RAMUBHAI BILWALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Anilbhai Ramubhai Bilwal filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to enable him to file an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The High Court, after hearing counsel, exercised its discretion in favour of the petitioner. The court granted parole for one week,

SUNILBHAI @LALABHAI MALABHAI KOTWALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Sunilbhai Kotwal, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to enable filing an appeal against his conviction. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court considered the petitioner's request, the grounds cited, and the jail remarks, and

CHIMANBHAI MANABHAI SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Chimanbhai Manabhai Solanki, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to enable him to file an appeal against his conviction. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court considered the petition, the grounds raised, and the jail remarks

RAJUBHAI S/O KALIDAS ROHITversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Petitioner Rajubhai applied for parole leave to enable him to file an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The court examined the petition, the specific ground of seeking parole for filing an appeal, and the jail remarks. Exercising its discretion, the c

AJAYBHAI AMBUBHAI VASAVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Ajaybhai Ambubhai Vasava, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) seeking permission to withdraw the application. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Avanidhar M. Thakore, requested the court’s permission to withdraw. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequent

HUSENKHAN BABUBHAI PATHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Husenkhan Babubhai Pathan, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) and, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent State of Gujarat opposed the withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Cons

BHAGABHAI AMRABHAI MAJIRANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Bhagabhai Amrabhai Majirana, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave while in custody. The High Court examined the jail's remarks and the record, noting that the petitioner had recently been released from custody. The Court found no justifiable reason to grant parole at this stage. Con

SUFI SULEMAN ABDUL RAJAK SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Sufi Suleman Abdul Rajak Shaikh, filed a Special Criminal Application for parole leave to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the petitioner's ground and jail remarks and decided to exercise its

ANWAR MOHMMAD MEDA @ LALA SHAIKH THRO AMINA ANWAR MEDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner Anwar Mohammad Meda applied for parole leave under Special Criminal Application No.8283 of 2026. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Dipak H. Sindhi, did not press the application before the court. Consequently, Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker disposed of the application as not pressed. No merits of the parole reques

JAYDEEPKUMAR PUNJALAL PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Jaydeepkumar Punjalal Parmar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 67, 85, 115(2), 351(3), 352, 54 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Section

SONALBEN W/O BATUK PRAGDAS RAMAVATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Sonalben, the petitioner, applied for parole leave to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The Court considered the petitioner's averments and jail remarks, and exercised its discretion in his favour. It granted parole for a period of one we

HITENDRA @ HARSHAD KANTILAL MAKWANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Hitendra @ Harshad Kantilal Makwana, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The applicant's counsel later requested permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel who opposed the withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker c

DIPAK S/O BHURUBHAI MUNSHIBHAI BADOLEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Dipak Badole, who is in jail, applied for temporary bail on the ground that he needs to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's ground and jail remarks and exercised its discretion in his favour. It

GHAMBHIRJI ISHWARJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Ghambhirji Ishwarji Thakor, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) seeking parole. The applicant’s counsel later requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after hearing the counsel, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the application was disposed of as withdrawn.

PANDEY KRUNAL SANTOSHBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Pandey Krunal Santosbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. Subsequently, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The issue before the court was whether it could grant permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The cou

VOHRA MAHAMMAD SAHID ANVARBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Vohra Mahammad Sahid Anvarbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR CR No.11204027240524 of 2024 alleging an offence under Section 316(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution opposed bail, citing t

MANISH KHALPABHAI PATEL (MANISHBHAI @PIKEN KHALPABHAI PATEL)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Manish Khalpabhai Patel filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. After some hearing, the applicant, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent's counsel opposed the withdrawal. The court considered whether it could allow the withdrawal of an anticipato

UPENBHAI DANABHAI VEGDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Upenbhai Danabhai Vegda, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 54, 85 and 108 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State opposed bail, citing the

MEENABEN UPENBHAI VEGDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Meenaben Upbhai Vegda filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 54, 85 and 108 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The Sta

SALIM HASAM PATHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Salim Hasam Pathan, was already in custody when he filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. He subsequently moved the Court seeking permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant was arrested and no longer required a

MANOJKUMAR HARISHANKAR GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Manojkumar Harishankar Goswami filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Ms. Aarti R. Mistry, later requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the appli

LAKHUBHAI AAPABHAI KHACHARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Lakhubhai Aapabhai Khachar filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave before the High Court of Gujarat. The matter was heard by Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker, and counsel for the applicant argued for a period of time. After hearing, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. Th

RAJESH @RAJE@BANTO KANTIBHAI RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Rajesh @Raje@Banto Kantibhai Rathod, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The petitioner’s counsel later moved the court for permission to withdraw the petition. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel but did not oppose the withdrawal. The Hon’ble Justice

MADHAV PARTHIBHAI VEDU (CHAUHAN)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Madhav Parthibhai Vedu (Chauhan), filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the grounds that he had filed an appeal and required financial assistance for his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, allowing the petition to proceed. After hearing

FARUK @ GOLI @ LANGDO USMANBHAI SHEIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Faruk @ Goli @ Langdo Usmanbhai Sheikh, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the Gujarat High Court seeking parole. After the application was pending, the petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the application. The respondent State of Gujarat opposed the with

MUSTAKIM MOHAMMAD YAKUB SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Mustakim Mohammad Yakub Shaikh, filed a Special Criminal Application for parole leave which was pending before the concerned authority. The applicant's counsel sought permission from the High Court to withdraw the application. The respondent's counsel opposed the withdrawal. The Court examined whether th

HANIFBHAI RASULBHAI MAKWANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Hanifbhai Rasulbhai Makwana, filed a Special Criminal Application for parole leave which was pending before the concerned authority. The applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application, stating that the matter was already before the authority. The court considered whether it could gran

HARESHBHAI JIVABHAI SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Hareshbai Jivabhai Solanki, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the Gujarat High Court, seeking parole. The application was pending before the concerned authority when the petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw it. The respondent, State of Gujarat, was repre

MAHMADMIYA S/O JAVEDMIYA KADARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Mahmadmiya, had a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) pending before the concerned authority. The applicant's counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the application, stating that the matter was already before the authority. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker granted the request, dir

ANANDKUMAR DASHRATHBHAI PATEL THROUGH RITEBEN ANANDKUMAR PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Anandkumar Dashrathbai Patel applied for temporary bail, citing the need for medical treatment of his wife and daughter. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's averments and the jail's remarks, and exercised its discretion in favor of the app

MUSTAK ABBAS PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Mustak Abbas Patel, filed a temporary bail application claiming the need to arrange funds for his children's school fees. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court, after hearing the applicant's averments and considering the jail remarks, exercised its di

MAHESH MADHUBHAI ZANZMERAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Mahesh Madhubhai Zanzmera applied for temporary bail on the ground that his children required admission. The court considered the applicant's averments, the jail remarks, and the discretion vested in it under criminal procedure. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court

KISHOR SHANTILAL PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Kishor Shantilal Patel, filed a temporary bail application seeking release to arrange medical treatment for his wife. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant's grounds and considering the jail remarks, the court exercised its discreti

RANABHAI @VADI RAMSHIBHAI JAMODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Ranabhai @Vadi Ramshibhai Jamod, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Ms. Gayatriba B. Jadeja, appeared and later, under instructions, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State

MANOHARPRASAD GANESHPRASAD ROYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Manoharprasad Ganeshprasad Roy applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging offences under Sections 7(a) and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the corrupt

KAILASHBA JASHUBHA ZALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Kailashba Jashubha Zala, filed a Special Criminal Application challenging an order of externment passed by the State of Gujarat. The respondent State of Gujarat opposed the application. The applicant later submitted that the petition had become infructuous and sought permission to withdraw the applicatio

REHAN ABDULMAJID PUTHAWALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Rehan Abdulmajid Puthawala, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The petitioner’s counsel subsequently applied for permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, without addressing the merits of the parole application, granted the withdrawal. Accordingly

DINESH @DINKO BABULAL PARIHARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Dinesh @Dinko Babulal Parihar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Ms. Gayatriba B. Jadeja, after arguing, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented

JITESH RAMESHBHAI GAJERAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Jitesh Rameshbhaï Gajera, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The High Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, considered the pet

MAHALINGAM @SHIVO @AFTAB MURUGYYAN PILLAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Mahalingam @Shivo @Aftab Murugyyan Pillai filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. After the hearing, the applicant, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent's counsel opposed the withdrawal. The court considered wh

PARESHBHAI SHANKARBHAI TAVIYADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Parshabhai Shankarbhai Taviad, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The applicant's counsel, Ms. Mayuri P. Chauhan, later requested permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Vinay Vishen. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considere

MANOJGIRI RAJU INDRAJEETGIRIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Manojgiri Raju Indrajeetgiri, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant’s counsel later moved the court for permission to withdraw the bail application. The sole issue before the court was whether it could grant such permission to wi

MUKESH @RAJI CHIKNA @PANDIT CHIKNA S/O RAMDHANI TIWARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Mukesh Raji Chikna petitioned the Gujarat High Court for parole leave, citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. After hearing both sides, the court exercised its discretion in favor of the petitioner. The petition was partly a

JAYDEEPSINH DASHRATHSINH KANAJI CHAVDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, JAYDEEPSINH DASHRATHSINH KANAJI CHAVDA, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground of financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant's averments and considering the jail

PATHAN SHOKATKHAN YAKUBKHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Pathan Shokatkhan Yakubkhan, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave to perform the death rituals of his mother who died on 17 March 2026. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were heard. The Court examined the petitioner's request, t

MADHUBEN PARTHIBHAI VEDU (CHAUHAN)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Madhuben Parthibhai Vedu (Chauhan), filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the grounds of having filed an appeal and needing financial assistance for his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were heard. The Court examined

JIGUKUMAR SHANKARBHAI SORTHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, JIGUKUMAR SHANKARBHAI SORTHI, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the Gujarat High Court seeking parole. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application and instead approach the appropriate authority for parole leave. The Court examined the re

SALIM AADHAM PADEYAR (PADHIYAR)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Salim Aadham Padeyar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground of his wife's treatment. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the applicant's averments and considering the jail remarks, exercised i

ABDUL WAZID ABDUL SAHID SHEK THRO ROSHANARA ABDUL SAHID SHEKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Abdul Wazid Abdul Sahid Shekh applied for temporary bail, citing the need for financial assistance to his family and to perform the funeral rites of his maternal grandmother. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's grounds and the jail remarks

RAHULBHAI RAJESHBHAI VALODAYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Rahulbhai Rajeshbhai Valodaya filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the High Court of Gujarat seeking parole. During the hearing, the applicant, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel. The Court considered

RAGHUVIRSINH PRATAPSINH JADEJAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Raghuvirsinh Pratapsinh Jadeja, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 61 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The prosecution o

JITESHBHAI RAMESHLAL GAJARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Jiteshbhai Rameshlal Gajariya, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The State of Gujarat, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court considered the petitioner's request, the g

NAYNABEN SOMABHAI VADIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioners Naynaben Somabhai Vadi & others filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. After hearing, the petitioners, through their counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted. It held that the peti

SANJAY KALUBHAI CHRISTIANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Sanjay Kalubhai Christian, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the Gujarat High Court seeking parole. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel argued that the applicant wished to discontinue the

DHAVAL TRIBHOVANBHAI THAKRARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Dhaval Tribhovanbhai Thakkar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground that he needed financial assistance for his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the applicant’s averments and consid

NEELAM UMASHANKAR SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant Neelam Umashankar Srivastava filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed the bai

RAMESHBHAI MEVABHAI GAMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Rameshbhai Mevabhai Gamar, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The jail records indicated that he had been arrested after 3,901 days following his release on parole in 2014 and that his conduct in jail was unsatisfactory. The court examined these remarks and found no sufficient ba

SHAILESH VINODCHANDRA PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Shailesh Vinodchandra Parmar, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that a settlement had been reached in his matrimonial proceedings. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the petition, the ground of settle

VINUBHAI JAGABHAI RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Vinubhai Jagabhai Rathod, filed a temporary bail application citing the need to arrange school fees for his daughters. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant's averments and considering the jail remarks, the court exercised its discre

GURUPURABSINH SATNAMSINH TANKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Gurupurabsinh Satnamsinh Tank, filed a temporary bail application citing the need for his mother's medical treatment and related financial arrangements. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's grounds and the jail's remarks, and

RAJENDRASINH ACHALSINH RAJPUROHITversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Rajendrasinh Achalsinh Rajpurohit, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after hearing the counsel, granted the request to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail

ASIF MOHAMMAD ALI PATHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Asif Mohammad Ali Pathan, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted. The Court granted the request, allowing the application to

FAIZANKHAN HAJRATKHAN PATHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Faizankhan Hajratkhan Pathan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the applicatio

DESURBHAI BIJALBHAI PATATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Desurbhai Bijalbhai Patat applied for anticipatory bail. While the application was pending, he was arrested, rendering the application infructuous. He sought the court’s permission to withdraw the application. The court held that an application that has become infructuous may be withdrawn with the court’s permission. A

MOHAMMAD SOHIL MOHAMMADSALIM ISMAILBHAI SHAIKH (PRISONER)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Mohammad Sohil Mohammadsalim Ismailbhai Shaikh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Mehul G. Mahavar, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented

ASHISH PRABODHBHAI SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Ashish Prabhodhbhai Shah filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The court observed that the petitioner had not previously applied for parole to the concerned authority. Consequently, the court held that the petitioner must first make an application to the authority. The court directed the authority

BHAVESHBHAI @BHAVLO GHANSHYAMBHAI UKADIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Bhaveshbhai @Bhavlo Ghanashyam... Ukadiya, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground of gynecological issues affecting his wife. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the applicant's averments and c

BHARATBHAI MERUBHAI KATHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Bharatbhai Merubhai Kathi, applied for temporary bail on the ground of needing medical treatment, submitting a medical certificate dated 09.06.2026. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice, and the State, through its counsel, acknowledged the petitioner’s prior compliance with bail con

TOSIFKHAN @ LALO AKBARKHAN MALEKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Tosifkhan @ Lalo Akbarkhan Malek, applied for temporary bail to arrange funds for his son's admission fees. He had been recently arrested and sought release on humanitarian grounds. The court examined the jail remarks and the papers on record. Finding no justifiable reason to grant bail, especially give

NISARAHMED ABDULGANI BADAMversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Nisar Ahmed Abdulgani Badam, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Makbul I. Mansuri, later moved the court for permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by

BHAVESHBHAI BAVCHANDBHAI DAFDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Bhaveshbhai Bavchandbhai DAFDA, filed a temporary bail application citing the need for financial assistance and the illness of his father. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's averments and the jail remarks, and considered it

JAYESHBHAI KARSHANBHAI SANORAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Jayeshbhai Karshanbhai Sanora applied for temporary bail, citing the need to perform his father's death rituals. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the application and considering the jail remarks, exercised its discretion in favor of the applicant

AADIL @KAALO RAHIMBHAI BAVANIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Aadil @Kaalo Rahimbhai Bavaniya, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The applicant's counsel later requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after hearing the request, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the application was disposed of as withdrawn. No

MAHESHKUMAR @VIJAY RAMSAHAY NISHADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Maheshkumar @ Vijay Ramasahay Nishad, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground of financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant's averments and considering the jail r

PUROHIT KIRITKUMAR GANESHBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Purohit Kiritkumar Ganesbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application (R/Cr.MA/6033/2026) before the High Court of Gujarat. Initially, advocates Krunal S. Mehta and Fehad A. Memon appeared for the applicant. During the hearing, advocate Karan Vyas sought to appear on behalf of the applicant and was allow

RASULBHAI TEJIYABHAI MANDOLversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Rasulbhai Tejiyabhai Mandol, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) seeking parole. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Ms. Yatri M. Trivedi, requested permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Ms. Chetna Shah. Justice Sanjeev

PATEL VIJAYBHAI ISHWARBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Patel Vijaybhai Ishwarbhai, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground of financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant's averments and considering the jail remarks, th

RAJESHBHAI SUKHLAL VASAVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Rajeshbhai Sukhlal Vasava, filed Special Criminal Application No. 6642 of 2026 seeking parole leave from the State of Gujarat. The respondent State of Gujarat opposed the application. Counsel for the petitioner later moved the court for permission to withdraw the application. The court examined the proc

ANKIT GOVINDBHAI RABARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Ankit Govindbhai Rabari, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11196003260089) alleging offences under IPC Sections 406, 420 and 114. The State opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of the alleged offences. The Co

KARIMBHAI @PINTU SHERALIABHAI RASHIYANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE

The petitioner, Karimabhai @Pintu Sheraliabhai Rashiyani, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave, which was pending before the concerned authority. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the application had not yet been decided. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Ms. C.M. Sha

DEVENDRASING MANSING SARDARSING RAJPUTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Devendrasing Mansing Sardarsing Rajput, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave from custody. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State, allowing the application to proceed. The Court considered the petitioner's averments and the remarks of the

SHYAMKUMAR R BHANDARI (KAPAD DALAL)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Shyamkumar R Bhandari, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(5), 352, 351(3) and 61(2)(a) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The prosecution opposed bail, citing t

SAHIL @JADO S/OF JUMMABHAI @JUMABHAI FAKRIRCHAND BADARANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Sahil @Jado, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground of financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were heard. After considering the petitioner's averments and jail remarks, the Court exerci

SARFARAZ NANNABHAI SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioners, Sarfaraz Nannabhai Shaikh and another, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. Their counsel, Mr. Abid R. Pathan, after arguing, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Ms. Chetna Shah. Justice San

SHRIKANT SHANKAR GAJEGIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Shri Shankhar Gajegi filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel, Prashant V. Chavda, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Ms. Chetna Shah. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered whether the Co

RAUSHANBANU MOHAMMEDYAKUB SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Raushanbanu Mohammed Yakub Shaikh, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. After the proceedings commenced, the petitioner, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel argued for withdrawal and the Court examined the re

VISHAL PREMNARAYAN CHATURVEDIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, Vishal Premnarayan Chaturvedi, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v State of G

DHARMESHBHAI HASMUKHBHAI MEHTAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, Dharmeshbhai Hasmukhbhai Mehta, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS challenging the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referring to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. St

GOPALBHAI JUMROMAL JAMATANIversusUSHA ELECTRICS THRO VISHWANATH KHAGENCHANDADE

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant Gopalbhai Jamatani filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the respondents in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the precedent set in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujara

CHANDRAKANTBHAI R. PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita against a trial court's acquittal. The High Court examined the precedent set in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Crimi

KARSAN LALJI JIVANIversusCHIRAG ARVINDKUMAR SHAH

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS challenging the trial court's acquittal of the respondents in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, wh

HAKIMSINGH CHURASINGH RAJPUTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, Hakim Singh Churasinh Rajput, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita challenging the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the recent authority in Shivsinh G

PRATIK KAMLESHBHAI DHODIYA PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The petitioner, Pratik Kamleshbhai Dhodiya Patel, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave while incarcerated. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State, indicating no objection to the application. The court noted that the petitioner was last released in October

PALAK PRAFULBHAI KOTHARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The petitioner, Palak Prafulbhai Kothari, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 21 days on the ground that he intends to file an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State of Gujarat. The court examined the petitioner's satisfactory conduct in jail and the spe

HARENDRABHAI BHOGILAL SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, challenged the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The High Court examined whether a complainant who is also a victim may file an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 BNSS or must use the victim‑specific remedy under the p

SOLANKI NARESHBHAI MADHABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, challenged the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 of the BNSS. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, which h

JIGAR JITENDRA SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, held that a complainant‑vict

MEGHJIBHAI POPATBHAI KASUNDRAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicants filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of a criminal appeal that had been dismissed on 6 April 2026 because no party appeared when the matter was called out and no request for a passover was made. The court had earlier dismissed the appeal on those grounds. The applicants, through

NARPATSINH RAJUJI SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Narpatsinh Rajuji Solanki, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the proceedings, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and, after hearing the parties, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently,

NAITIKBHAI NIRANJANBHAI GAMITversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The petitioner, Naitikbhai Niranjanbhai Gamit, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave from jail. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court considered the jail's remarks that the petitioner was last released in December 2025 and had satisfactory cond

KALUBHAI RANCHHODBHAI PARMAR (BHARVAD)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Kalubhai Ranchhodbhai Parmar filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. During the hearing, the applicant, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the application. The respondent's counsel opposed the withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker exercised the court's discretion to conside

SURESHBHAI @ SURO BHAVABHAI BIJALBHAI SAKARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The applicant, Sureshbhai Bijalbhai Sakariya, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for 30 days on the ground that he needed financial assistance for his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court considered the applicant's satisfactor

DAULATSINH @DOLU BHAVSINH SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Daulatsinh @Dolu Bhavsinh Solanki, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The applicant later moved the court for permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented and opposed the withdrawal. The court examined the procedural proprie

KIRITDAN RAJUDAN BAROTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH

The appellant Kiritdan Rajudan Barot filed a criminal appeal against an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was scheduled before the High Court of Gujarat, but the appellant failed to appear on the second call and did not seek any adjournment. The respondent’s counsel was present,

DAXABEN DINESHCHANDRA CHAPATWALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH

The appellant, Daxaben Dineshchandra Chapatwala, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal granted by the trial court in a case instituted by the State of Gujarat. The appeal was listed before the High Court of Gujarat, but the appellant's counsel did not appear on the second call and no request for adjournment was

KALABHAI MADHABHAI ZALA THROUGH BADARBHAI JUWANSINH ZALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The petitioner, Kalabhai Madhabhai Zala, applied for parole leave of 30 days to attend his daughter's marriage. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court examined the petitioner's conduct in jail, which was found satisfactory, and considered the compassionate ground

KIRITBHAI RAMESHBHAI TRIVEDI POA OF BHAVESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI TRIVEDIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC against an acquittal in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal Misc. Applications Nos. 12753/2019 & 12908/2019) and the Supreme Co

TIPU KANAIYABHAI @KANUBHAI BAMANIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Tipu Kanaiyabhai Bamaniya, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 30 days to file an appeal against his conviction, arrange legal representation, and obtain financial assistance for his family. The court noted that the petitioner had already filed Criminal Appeal No.527 of 2026, a

RAJESHKUMAR ISHWARLAL THAKKARversusVIJAYKUMAR NATWARLAL THAKKAR

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court referred to its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, which held that a complainant‑victim

SAHJANAND HARESHBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, Sahjanand Hareshbhai Patel, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, citing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki

JAY MATAJI POWER SYSTEM BHUMIT PARASBHAI JANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The complainant appealed an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referring to its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v.

MATHURIBEN THAKARSHIBHAI DALWADIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The complainant appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court referred to its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsin

BHARATSANG BHAGWANSANG JADEJAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, Bharatsang Bhagwansang Jadeja, filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referencin

KANUBHAI MOTIBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed to the High Court under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against an acquittal by the trial court. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, which held t

KANUBHAI MOTIBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS challenging the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, which held that

SUNITA KIRANBHAI THORATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The High Court of Gujarat entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sunita Kiranbhai Thorat, who was implicated in an FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 114, 120B, the Gujarat Protection of Interest of Deposito

SURESHKUMAR PRABHURAM THAKKARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, Sureshkumar Prabhuram Thakkar, filed an appeal under CrPC Section 378 and BNSS Section 419 against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined a recent precedent (Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat) which held that a co

JAVED MOHAMADBHAI IQBALBHAI KADRIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, citing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh So

UMESHKUMAR BHIKHALAL KHATRIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, challenged the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The issue was whether, as a victim, the complainant could appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 BNSS or must use the victim‑specific remedy under the proviso to Section 372

KAMLESH KANTILAL PANCHALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The complainant appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsi

KAMLESH KANTILAL PANCHALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant filed an acquittal appeal under CrPC Section 378 and BNSS Section 419 against the trial court's order acquitting the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal Misc. Applications

NARESHBHAI GUNWANTBHAI MAKWANA(DEV PATEL)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The applicant, Nare​shbai Gunwantbai Makwana, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Complaint No.2583 (2025) lodged at Kamrej Police Station, Surat. He argued that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, he would cooperate with the

AAYAR DEVAYATBHAI RAYMALBHAI BHALABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Aayar Devayathbai Raymalbai Bhalabhai, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave and later requested permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the applicant moved the Court for such permission. Justice P.M. Raval granted the request, stating that the Court would no

PATEL DIPAKKUMAR BABULALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court referred to

SAIKRUPA MAHILA CO.OP.CREDIT SOCIETY THROUGH KAILASHBEN ASHWINBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, Saikrupa Mahila Co.Op.Credit Society, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Gan

HARSHAL INDRAVADAN PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant Harshal Indravadan Patel filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant sought to have the appeal heard by the High Court. The Court referred to its recent decision

THE SANJARI CO.OPE. SOCIETY LTD THROUGH BELIM MOHMADRAFIQ YUSUFBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The Sanjari Co-operative Society Ltd filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the State under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referencing the re

RAMESHBHAI NANJIBHAI KANJARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

Pravinaben Rajendrabhai Patel filed a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat challenging an earlier acquittal. The appeal was consolidated with numerous other criminal appeals numbered 1033 of 2021 through 1660 of 2021. After hearing counsel for the appellant and the public prosecutor, the Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev

GUJARAT STATE CO-OP. AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. THRO RATANSINH CHANDANSINH VAGHELAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The Gujarat State Co‑op. Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Ltd. appealed against the trial court's acquittal of Ratansinh Chandansinh Vaghela under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The High C

BABAFARID @ BHAIJAN HASMATALI NANANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Babafrid @ Bhaijan Hasmataki Nanani, who has been in jail for 23 months, applied for temporary bail on the ground of needing financial assistance and to care for his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant’s satisfactory conduct in jail

DAXABEN W/O KARTIK PADMANABH VYASversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Daxaben, filed an anticipatory bail application (R/Cr.MA/3666/2026) before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Samir Afzal Khan, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Yuvraj Brahmbhatt

DIVAN SABBIRSHA JUMASHAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Divan Sabbirsha Jumasha filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant, represented by Mr. M. Nisar Vaidhya and Mr. Mohd Danish M. Barejia, later sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Ms. Shruti Pathak. Justice Sanjee

VIJAYKUMAR MAHENDRABHAI DAVEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Vijaykumar Mahendrabhai Dave and another filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking anticipatory bail before the Gujarat High Court. During the pendency of the application, the applicants, through their counsel, requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the appl

VIKAS @ GUDDU NUNNU KAMATIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Turab H. Govani, filed a temporary bail application in the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted. The Court granted the request, allowing the application to be withdrawn. Consequently

PRAKASHJI VINUJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioners, Prakashji Vinuji Thakor & others, filed an anticipatory bail application (R/Cr.MA/7669/2026) before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Jigneshkumar M. Nayak, chose not to press the application at the hearing. The respondent's counsel, Mr. M.B. Gohil and Mr. Yuvraj Brahmbhatt, were

SANJAY @ KALU DHARAMPAL YADAVversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Sanjay @ Kalu Dharampal Yadav, filed a special criminal application seeking regularization of his late surrender. The application for regularization was pending before the concerned authority. The petitioner approached the High Court of Gujarat for relief. The Court examined the record and noted that th

IQBALBHAI AMIRBHAI MADHARAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Iqbalbhai Amirbhai Madhara, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The applicant's counsel, Ms. Manjula R. Chauhan, later sought permission to withdraw the bail application at the stage of hearing. The learned judge considered whether the court could permit the withdrawal of a

KAMLESH RUPACHAND KUMAVATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant Kamlesh Rupachand Kumavat filed an anticipatory bail application (R/CR.MA/7819/2026). The applicant’s counsel, Mohit P. Pathak, did not press the application before the Court. Consequently, Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker disposed of the application as not pressed. No merits of the bail request were examined. T

SABANABANU W/O ANWARBEG MIRZA THRO SHIRINBANU AZRUDIN SHEIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

Sabanabanu, sister of the petitioner, filed a special criminal application seeking 30 days of parole leave for the convict to provide medical treatment to his son. The jail records showed that the convict had been released from custody on 25 January 2026 and again on 14 February 2026. The court noted that the recent re

JAYESHBHAI AJITBHAI CHAVDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioners, Jayeshbhai Ajitbhai Chavda and another, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking permission to withdraw their petition. The respondent State of Gujarat opposed. The Hon’ble Court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No s

JABIR USMANBHAI MANKANIJIAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Jabir Usmanbhai Mankania, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave and later requested permission to withdraw the petition. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. A.M. Thakore, moved the court for withdrawal. The respondent’s counsel, Ms. Shruti Pathak, was present. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker gra

KANUBHAI JAGABHAI TADVIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Kanubhai Jagabhai Tadvi, filed a special criminal application seeking regularisation of the period of his late surrender. The High Court examined the matter in light of observations made by a Division Bench in Criminal Misc. Application No. 1360 of 2014 (Criminal Appeal No. 2884 of 2008). Relying on that

KALPESHBHAI PUNAMBHAI PATANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 30 days to settle matrimonial issues. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court examined the ground and jail remarks and decided to exercise its discretion in favor of the petitioner. The petit

KISHANBHAI KALUBHAI MATHASURIYAversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Kishanbhai Kalubhai Mathasuriya, filed a special criminal application seeking regularisation of a period of late surrender. An administrative error caused the petitioner’s name to be entered as Kishanbhai Pravinbhai Vasava in the court’s computer system and in the registration number. The High Court had

AEJAZ URFE SAMIR SUPADU SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARATR

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Aeja… Shah, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking a 30‑day parole (furlough leave) to provide financial assistance to his family. The jail records showed that the petitioner had been released from custody on 10 March 2026 and remained out of jail until 24 March 2026. The court noted that because

DINAJI SAVAJI DUNDIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE

The petitioner Dinaji Savaji Dundi filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The application for parole was pending before the concerned authority. The High Court noted the pending status and, without addressing substantive merits, directed the authority to decide the parole application as expeditiousl

SURAJKUMAR GORELAL CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Surajkumar Gorelal Chauhan filed a Special Criminal Application seeking a 30‑day parole to provide financial assistance to his family. The jail records revealed that during a previous parole, the petitioner absconded for 677 days. The Court examined whether the discretion to grant parole could be exercised in view of t

AMRUTBHAI KACHRABHAI PRAJAPATIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

Amrutbhai Kachrabhai Prajapati filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave for 30 days to provide financial assistance to his family. The application was made through the jail, with Ms. Shruti Pathak representing the State of Gujarat. The jail records indicated that the petitioner had been released from c

DHRUVBHAI NANJIBHAI DAMORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Dhruvbai Nanjibhai Damor, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave of 30 days to settle matrimonial issues and arrange payment of maintenance. The State, represented by Ms. Shruti Pathak, waived service of notice. The court examined the grounds and the jail remarks and exercised its dis

RASIKBHAI BHARATBHAI BHALIYA THRO DIPALI RASIKBHAI BHALIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Rasikbhai Bharatbhai Bhalia, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The application for parole was pending before the concerned authority at the time of filing. The petitioner’s counsel, Ms. Manjula R. Chauhan, requested the High Court to intervene for a speedy decision. The Court no

DIVYESH DILIPBHAI PATHAKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Divyesh Dilipbhai Pathak, filed a special criminal application for parole leave while incarcerated, seeking a 20‑day leave to arrange maintenance funds. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State, allowing the application to be considered without procedural delay. T

LASMABHAI ASABHAI GARASIYA PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Lasmbhai Asabhai Garasiya Parmar, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) seeking parole. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. B.J. Priyadarshi, applied to withdraw the petition. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Ms. Shruti Pathak. The Court considered

THAKOR SHAILESHJI BALAJI THRO THAKOR NARENDRASINH MAFAJIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Thakor Shaileshji Balaji, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 60 days on the ground of his son’s marriage. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of the rule on behalf of the State. The Court considered the petitioner's request, the grounds presented, and the jail’s re

SEJALBEN D/O RATANSINH VAJESINH BARIAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Sejalben D/o Ratansinh Vajesinh Baria, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the Gujarat High Court seeking parole. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, applied to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request for withdrawal. The Court granted permission to withd

BHUSHANBHAI HARISHBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Bhushanbhai Harishbhai Patel, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 21 days to settle matrimonial issues. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court considered the petitioner's ground and jail remarks, and exercised its discretion

ARVINDBHAI HIPABHAI NAVADIYAversusState of Gujarat

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

Arvindbhai Hipabhai Navadiya filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 45 days to provide financial assistance to his family. The jail records showed that the petitioner had already been released for a brief period from 15 June 2025 to 21 June 2025. The court considered that the recent release negat

BHARAT KARUBHA JADIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Bharat Karubha Jadiya, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking a 30‑day parole leave to provide financial assistance to his family. The application was filed through the jail, with the State of Gujarat represented by Ms. Shruti Pathak. The court examined the jail’s remarks, which disclosed that the

KARANBHAI RAMESHBHAI CHOUHANversusState of Gujarat

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Karanbhai Rameshbhai Chouhan, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking a 30‑day parole leave to enable him to file an appeal against his conviction dated 22‑12‑2025. The jail records showed that he had been in custody for three months and eighteen days. The court examined whether the circumstances w

MAHESHBHAI MOHANBHAI DAVEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Maheshbhai Mohanbhai Dave filed a Special Criminal Application (Regularized Day of Late Surrender) before the Gujarat High Court seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Sandeep Solanki, argued that he no longer wished to pursue the criminal proceedings. The respondent State of Gu

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search