Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

MUKESH @RAJI CHIKNA @PANDIT CHIKNA S/O RAMDHANI TIWARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Holding

The court exercised its discretion to grant the petitioner parole for seven days subject to a bond and reporting conditions.

Summary

Mukesh Raji Chikna petitioned the Gujarat High Court for parole leave, citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. After hearing both sides, the court exercised its discretion in favor of the petitioner. The petition was partly allowed, granting a 7‑day parole on condition of furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000 and reporting to the nearest police station on the 3rd and 5th days. The petitioner must surrender to the jail authority at the end of the parole period.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to parole leave on the ground of financial assistance to his family

Subjects

parolecriminal procedurediscretionfinancial assistancebond

Judgment

      R/SCR.A/8131/2026                                    ORDER DATED: 16/06/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 8131 of
                               2026

==========================================================
     MUKESH @RAJI CHIKNA @PANDIT CHIKNA S/O RAMDHANI TIWARI
                             Versus
                    STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS KD PARMAR(589) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR VINAY VISHEN, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                Date : 16/06/2026

                                 ORAL ORDER


1.      This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking parole

leave      on the ground of financial assistance to his family.


2.      Rule.         Learned   Additional        Public    Prosecutor        waives

service on behalf of the respondent – State.



3.      Heard, the learned advocates for the parties.



4.      Having heard and considering the averments made in

the petition, more particularly, the ground mentioned therein

as well as the jail remarks, this Court is inclined to exercise

discretion in favour of the present petitioner.



5.      The petition, therefore, succeeds and is partly allowed.

The petitioner is ordered to be released on parole for a


                                    Page 1 of 2
               R/SCR.A/8131/2026                                                ORDER DATED: 16/06/2026




        period of 7 days from the date of his/her actual release on

        his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

        Thousand) to the satisfaction of the concerned jail authority

        on usual terms and conditions, with a direction that the

        petitioner shall surrender to the jail authority on expiry of

        the parole leave period forthwith with a further condition

        that the applicant shall mark presence before the nearest
        police station every 3rd and 5th day”.                            Rule is made absolute

        accordingly. Direct service is permitted.



                                                                              (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
        URIL RANA




Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: RANA URIL K(HC01406), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 16/06/2026 16:09:29




                                                      Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.