Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

SANJEEV THAKER

1,200 judgments delivered by benches including this judge — showing 201–400.

SHRAVAN @BALIYO JORAJI@JIVRAJ THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Shravan @Baliyo Joraji @Jivraj Thakor, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. Subsequently, the applicant sought the Court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Maunish T. Pathak and Mr. Sunil H. Prajapati,

SHRAVAN @BALIYO JORAJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Shravan @Baliyo Joraji Thakor, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Maunish T. Pathak and Mr. Sunil H. Prajapati, moved the court for withdrawal. T

MOHAMMADJUBER @ KALIYA MOHAMMEDUSMAN ANSARI THROUGH SHAHENAZBANUversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Mohammadjuber @ Kaliya Mohammedusman Ansari, was arrested on 26-12-2025 and filed a temporary bail application through Shahenazbanu. The application was heard before Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker, who examined the jail remarks and the grounds presented. The court noted that the petitioner failed

LALJIBHAI BHIKHABHAI CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Laljibhai Bhikhabhai Chaudhary, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. Subsequently, the applicant sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Nitinbhai M. Desai and Mr. Kirit R. Chaudhary, moved the court for wit

VIRENDRASINH RUPSINH PADHERIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Virendrasinh Rupsinh Padheriya, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. After some hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The learned counsel argued for the withdrawal. The court conside

SANJAY VASHRAM DOMADIAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Sanjay Vashram Domadia, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 411, 413 and 120B. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail, citing the gravity of the alleged crimes. The Cour

NEETABEN PANKAJKUMAR SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of the main criminal matter that had been dismissed for default. The respondent opposed the restoration. The court examined the submissions of counsel and the averments made in the application. Finding that the petitioner had shown sufficient

PINKY KAILASH AGARWALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Pinky Kailash Agarwal, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking protection from arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(5), 54 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS). The State opposed the bail,

VARIYA CO.OPE.CREDIT SOCIETY LTDversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Variya Co-operative Credit Society Ltd, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking recall and restoration of a criminal appeal (R/Criminal Appeal/120/2015) after an order of the Sessions Court. The respondent, State of Gujarat, opposed the application. The High Court considered the submissions o

NARSHIBHAI ARJANBHAI MARWADIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Narshibhai Arjanbhai Marwadi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under the Prohibition Act and the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The Court examined the na

FILIPKUMAR RAMESHBHAI VASAVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, after arguing, sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was disposed of as withdrawn. No

ANIL PRAMODBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Anil Pramodbhai Patel applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11201018250032 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 317(2), 318(4), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and Section 66(d) of the Information Technology Act. The

PRASANT VIJAY AGRAWALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Prasant Vijay Agrawal, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11200051260817) alleging offences under Section 64(2)(m) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS) for failing to marry a complainant after a consensual re

DILIPSINH RAMSINH ZALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Dilipsinh Ramsinh Zala, filed an anticipatory bail application in the Gujarat High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then moved the court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court considered whether a party may withdraw an anticipatory bail ap

SAURABH SATYENDRASINGH RAJPUTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Saurabh Satyendrasinh Rajput, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR registered under Section 69 of the same Act. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence. The Court considered factors s

SEJAL KANA BADHIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Sejal Kana Badhiya under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under multiple sections of the BNSS, the Arms Act and the Gujarat Police Act. The applicant argued that she wa

KURESHI MO. SADAB MO.ANVARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application and later sought the court's permission to withdraw the same. The learned counsel for the applicant requested that the application be withdrawn. The court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted. It granted the permission sought, thereby allowing the

SHANIRAJSINH @SHANIBAPU NARENDRASINH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Shanirajsinh @Shanibapu Narendrasinh Chauhan, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after hearing the counsel, granted the permission to withdraw. Consequentl

CHAUHAN CHANDRAPALSINH @ DIPAKSINH YASHVANTSINHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Chauhan Chandrapalsinh, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted. The court granted the request, allowing the applicant to withdraw the antic

TARUNKUMAR ASHOKBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Tarunkumar Ashokbhai Patel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11200038261166 of 2026) for offences under the Prohibition Act. The State opposed the bail, citing th

ANILBHAI BHAWARLAL BHARGAVversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Anilbhai Bhargav filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking cancellation of his bail. The applicant later moved the High Court of Gujarat for permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the applicant requested withdrawal, and the court considered whether such permission could be granted. The

LAXMANBHAI GANGJIBHAI MORIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Laxmanbhai Ganjibhai Mori, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 7, 12, 13(1) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The State opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of

VIKAS NARENDRABHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Vikas Naren­drabhai Patel filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the Gujarat High Court seeking parole. He later approached the Court requesting permission to withdraw the application because his doctor planned a surgery. The applicant, through counsel Ms. Aarti R. Mistry, sought liberty to file a f

SMIT NARANBHAI PATEL (POKAL)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Smit Naranbai Patel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 308(5), 115(2), 351(3), 352 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and Sections 5, 40, 42 of the Gujarat Money Lenders Act. The

FAIZ ALAM S/O ABDUL RAHMANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Faiz Alam, filed an anticipatory bail application and later, through his counsel, sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent's counsel opposed the withdrawal. The Court considered whether the applicant could be allowed to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court granted pe

SHRAVAN @ BALIYO JORAJI @ JIVRAJ THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Shravan @ Baliyo Joraji @ Jivraj Thakor, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. After the application was listed, the petitioner’s counsel sought the court’s permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel. The co

VISHAL @ VEER KISHORBHAI SONDARVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Vishal @ Veer Kishorbhai Sondarva, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under the Gujarat Money Lenders Act and the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the alleged mone

HAFIZUR ABDUL MAULYA @SOHELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita by Hafizur Abdul Maulya, accused of offences under Sections 8(c), 21(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act for alleged trafficking of mephedrone. The State opposed the bail, highlighting the appli

VIJAYBHAI JIVABHAI BARAIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioners Vijaybhai Baraiya and another applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR No. 11198066260061 concerning offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and the G.P. Act. The State opposed the bail, citing the seriousnes

RATHOD BHAGIRATHSINH JAKHUBHAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Rathod Bhagirathsinh Jakhubha, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with FIR No. 11198014260163 for offences under Sections 85, 108 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed

ARJANBHAI HIRABHAI HETHVADIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Arjanbhai Hirabhai Hethvadiya, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. He later sought the court's permission to withdraw that application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel opposing the withdrawal. The learned judge considered whether the cour

SAJIDMIYA MEHBUBMIYA MALEKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Sajidmiya Mehbubmiya Malek, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave from the State of Gujarat. The application for parole was pending before the concerned authority at the time of filing. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Mohmadmuzammil S. Shaikh, requested the High Court to intervene for

JAYDEEPSINH VIJAYBHAI CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Jaydeepsinh Vijaybhai Chauhan, filed a special criminal application from jail seeking furlough leave. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court considered the petitioner's application along with remarks from the jail authorities and exercised its discret

NARENDRASINH KALUBHA JADEJAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Narenrasinh Kalubha Jadeja, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Ms. Akshita Solanki, later moved that the application be withdrawn. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Ronak Rawal. The Court

AMIT @ VINI S/O PAPPU SUKHARAM MALVATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Amit @ Vini, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant’s counsel, Ms. Gayatriba B. Jadeja, after arguing, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent’s counsel, Mr. Ronak Rawal, was present. Justice Sanjeev

RAMARAM TULSARAM PRAJAPATIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Ramaram Tulsaram Prajapati, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.11996006251093 alleging violations of the Prohibition Act (sections 65(a), 65(e), 116‑B, 98(2), 81) and the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita

MUSTAK ALAM PARMAR THROUGH SAGUFTA MUSTAK PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Mustak Alam Parmar, through his advocate Sagufta Mustak Parmar, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) No. 10920 of 2026 before the High Court of Gujarat. The application sought parole leave for the petitioner. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel, on instructions, requested permission to withdraw t

GOVINDSINH NARAYANSINH SHEKHAVATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Govindsinh Narayansinh Shekhavat, filed a special criminal application seeking furlough leave while incarcerated. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court examined the petition and the jail's remarks, and exercised its discretion in favor of the petitio

SANJAYKUMAR @ LALO SENDHAJI VIHAJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Sanjaykumar @ Lalo Sendhaji VihaJi Thakor, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave while incarcerated. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court considered the petition and jail remarks, exercising its discretion in favor of the petit

KABIR JAVEDMOHAMMED IBRAHIMversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Kabir Javed Mohammed Ibrahim, filed an anticipatory bail application (R/Cr.MA/18213/2026) before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel argued that the applicant no longer required bail. The Court examined whe

SENMA ALPESHBHAI @MUKESH HIRABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Senma Alpeshbhai @Mukesh Hirabhai, filed a special criminal application and later sought the court's permission to withdraw it. The learned advocate for the applicant argued for withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker granted the permission sought. Consequently, the application was disposed of

MOHAMMAD YUNUS @ AJAD MOHD. TAHIRversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Mohammad Yunus, filed a temporary bail application seeking financial assistance for his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court considered the applicant's averments and jail remarks, exercising its discretion in his favor. The court allowed the

NARENDRABHAI LOTANBHAI PATILversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Naren­drabhai Lotan­bhai Patil, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with an FIR registered at Bardoli Town Police Station for alleged offences under Sections 75(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. While arguing the mat

RAHUL PANDITRAO AHIRRAOversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Rahul Panditrao Ahirrao, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11824004261085) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and the Prohibition Act. The prosecution opposed bail, c

ISMAILBHAI @MUNAF KASAMBHAI QURESHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Ismailbhai @ Munaf Kasambhai Qureshi, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Ms. Laxmi A. Chauhan, after arguing, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represen

PREETIBEN KEVALRAM VAGHVANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Preetiben Kevalram Vagbhani, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with FIR No. 11189003261336 alleging offences under Sections 318(4) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State oppose

DILIPJI VARSANGJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE

The petitioner, Dilipji Varsangji Thakor, filed a special criminal application seeking regularisation of the period of his late surrender. The application was heard by Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker of the Gujarat High Court. The Court referred to observations made by a Division Bench in Criminal Misc. Application No. 1360

SHAHRUKH AKA JALELI S/OF JUMMABHAI RANGREJversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Shahrukh (aka Jaleeli) filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave to enable him to file an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The Gujarat High Court, after hearing the parties and considering the petitioner's averments and jail remarks, exercised its discretio

RUHULAMIN AHMED MOHAMMADKHAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Ruhulamin Ahmed Mohammadkha, filed an anticipatory bail application (R/CR.MA/18257/2026) before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Altaf Y. Charkha, after arguing, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr.

MUKESHJI JOGAJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Mukeshji Jogaji Thakor, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel, after arguing, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted under procedural law. It held that the applicant

DILIP @ DIPAK DAHYABHAI VALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Dilip @ Dipak Dahyabhai Vala, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave while incarcerated. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court considered the petition and jail remarks and exercised its discretion in favor of the petitioner. It o

INAMHUSSAIN MOHAMMAD UMAR KATPISWALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE

The applicant, Inam Hussain Mohammad Umar Katpiswala, filed an anticipatory bail application (R/Cr.MA/15453/2026). While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the applicant argued that the arrest rendere

GORAKHBHAI JASKUBHAI BASIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Gorakhbhai Jaskubhai Basiya filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after hearing the applicant's grounds and considering the jail remarks, exercised its discretion in favor of the applicant. The appl

SUYA ABDREMAN SHIYALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The applicant's counsel later requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the application was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the parole re

AFSARHUSAIN AAFTABHUSAIN ANSARI(GANIBHAI)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Afsarhusain Aaftabhusain Ansari (Ganibhai), filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the proceedings, the applicant's counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The sole issue before the court was whether the applicant could be allowed to wit

ASLAM HAIDERMIYA SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Aslam Haidermiya Shaikh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted under procedural rules. The judge granted the request, allowing the applica

SONU SANTOSH BEIGAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Sonu Santosh Beiga, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the grounds of the application and the jail remarks, and exercised its discretion in favor of the petitioner. The petition w

VINODBHAI DEVJIBHAI PANSULversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Vinodbhai Devjibhai Pansul, a convicted prisoner, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The High Court, after considering the applicant's grounds and jail remarks, exercised its discretion in favor of the petitioner.

KESHUBHAI DUDABHAI ADADARAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Keshubhai Dudabhai Adadara filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered the request and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. Accordingly, the Court granted permissi

MOHAMADBHAI HUSHENBHAI HALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Mohammadbhai Hushenbhai Hala, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the proceedings, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The court examined whether such a withdrawal could be permitted under procedural law. Finding no legal bar to

SHELARBHAI BACHUBHAI DHAKHADAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Shelarbhai Bachubhai Dakhada applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging violations of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (sections 65(a), 65(e), 81, 83, 98(2) and 116(b)). The State opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of the of

AMIN JAMILversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Amin Jamil filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking anticipatory bail before the Gujarat High Court. During the proceedings, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel argued that the applicant no longer required the relief. The Court examin

KOTADIYA DEVAJI MOHANJIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR C.R. No.11195061260467 alleging offences under Sections 111(2)(b), 318(4) and 54 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. They contended that they are merely brokers receiving a 2% commis

JIMMY SATISHBHAI ASIJAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Jimmy Satishbhai Asija, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 409, 386, 120B and the Gujarat Money Lenders Act. The State opposed the bail,

PATEL KETANBHAI CHIBUBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Patel Ketanbhai Chibubhai applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR C.R. No. 11822004260173 alleging offences under the Prohibition Act. The State opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. The Court examined the standard bail

DINESH RAMABHAI KOLIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Dinesh Ramabhai Koli, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. While the application was pending, the applicant was arrested. The applicant's counsel then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application on the ground of the arrest. The learned c

VIJAY M. TANNAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Vijay M. Tanna, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 318(4) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The High Court examined the st

LAKHUBHAI AAPABHAI KHACHARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Lakhubhai Aapabhai Khachar, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The applicant's counsel later moved the court for permission to withdraw the application. The respondent's counsel opposed the withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker exercised his discretion and granted per

MUSRAFKHAN GOREKHAN PATHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Musrafkhan Gorekhan Pathan filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave on the ground that he has filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The court considered the petition, the grounds raised, and the jail remarks, and exercised its di

SHAHRUKHSHA HABIBSHA FAKIR(DIWAAN)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Shahrukhsha Habibsha Fakir, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered the request and, without examining the merits of the bail application, granted

KIRITSINH NARUBHA MASANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Kiritsinh Narubha Masani filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave before the Gujarat High Court. Subsequently, the applicant, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the pending application. The matter was listed before Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker, who considered the request. The court granted

AZARUDINBHAI ABDULBHAI BELIMversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Azaruddinbhai Abdulbhai Belim, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The applicant's counsel, Ms. M.R. Chauhan, later moved the court for permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Ronak Raval. Justice Sanjeev J.

KUNAL JAYANTILAL SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Kunal Jayantilal Shah, filed an anticipatory bail application and later sought the court's permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel, Mr. Jeet J. Bhatt, moved the court for withdrawal. The court considered whether a party may be allowed to withdraw an anticipatory bail application. It

ANILBHAI HIMMATBHAI MAKWANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Anilbhai Himmatbai Makwana applied for temporary bail through the jail. The court noted that the applicant had already been released for a five‑day period from 5 to 9 January 2026. The jail report indicated that his conduct while in custody was unsatisfactory. On this basis, the court found no sufficient ground to gran

VIJAYBHAI DHIRUBHAI RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Vijaybhai Dhirubhai Rathod, filed a temporary bail application through jail after his recent arrest. The respondent State of Gujarat was represented by Mr. Ronak Raval. The court examined the jail’s remarks and noted that the arrest was recent and no substantive case was presented to justify bail. Conseq

NITESH @ TABHO BHARATBHAI PATELIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Nitesh @ Tabho Bharatbhai Pateliya, filed a temporary bail application from jail, citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court considered the applicant's grounds and jail remarks, and exercised i

AYANBHAI FARUKBHAI SHAIKH/ZAKARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Ayanbhai Farukbhai Shaikh/Zakariya, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The application was presented through the jail authorities. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Ronak Raval. The court examined the application and found that no justifiable rea

SAHIL SULEMAN DHOKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Sahil Suleman Dhoki, filed a temporary bail application from jail, citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court considered the applicant's grounds and jail remarks, and exercised its discretion i

SADAM @KHAJUR IMTIAZ ANSARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, represented by Mr. M.A. Saiyed, sought the court’s permission to withdraw his temporary bail application. The Hon’ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the temporary bail application was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive issues on ba

LAXMANSANG S/OF PRABHATSANG SOLANKI (THAKOR)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Laxmansang Solanki, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he is filing an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The High Court, after hearing the parties and considering the petition and jail remarks,

HARESH @ BABO AMRATJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Haresha @ Babo Amratji Thakor, filed a special criminal application seeking regularisation of a one‑day delay in surrendering to the jail authorities. He claimed the delay was due to arranging financial resources for his mother’s medical treatment. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the request. Th

SURESHBHAI VAGTABHAI RAGABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Sureshbhai Vagtabhai Ragabhai, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he has filed an appeal against his conviction. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court heard arguments from both sides and considered the pe

MAULIK @ MOLIKKUMAR S/O KIRTIBHAI HARISHANKAR VYASversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Maulik @ Molikkumar, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave on the ground that he has filed an appeal against his conviction. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The Court, after hearing the parties and considering the petition and jai

BHAVESHBHAI PURANSING RAJPUTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Bhaveshbhai Puransing Rajput, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave. The applicant's counsel later moved the court for permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and, after hearing the counsel, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the applicat

BHAVESHBHAI DHIRUBHAI HIRPARAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Bhaveshbhai Dhirubhai Hirpara, filed a temporary bail application and later sought the court's permission to withdraw it. The applicant's counsel, Mr. N.F. Yusufzai, requested that the application be withdrawn. The court, after hearing the request, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the tempor

MEETKUMAR DINESHBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Meetkumar Dineshbhai Patel applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11210015250139 of 2025) alleging violations of Sections 65(a), 65(e) and 98(2) of the Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that custodial interrogation was unne

IMRAN GULAM PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Imran Gulam Patel filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the application. The sole issue before the court was whether it could grant such permission. The court exercised its inherent jurisdiction to allow the withdraw

VIJAY BABULAL MEGHVALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Vijay Babulal Meghval applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11191002260193) alleging offences under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail, citing the gravity of

MUKESH DILIPBHAI JOSHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Mukesh Dilipbhai Joshi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11210003260707) alleging offences under Sections 74, 75 and 78(1)(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita for sending obscene messages. The State opposed bail, citing the gr

ASHOKBHAI JOITABHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Ashokbhai Joitabhai Patel filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Maunish T. Pathak, sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent's counsel, Mr. Ronak Raval, was present for the hearing. The court, after hearing the counsel, gran

MANOJKUMAR SHANKARLAL PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner filed an application for recall of the order dated 11 February 2026, which had been passed in the main criminal matter. The order under challenge was originally issued by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mehsana, on 21 January 2023, in Criminal Appeal No. 477 of 2023. The High Court, after hearing the subm

SURESHBHAI SHAMBHUBHAI DHOLIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Sureshbhai Shambhuhai Dholiya, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Nitinkumar V. Patel, later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Suraj A. Shukla and Mr.

BHARATBHAI S/O JIVABHAI RABARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Bharatbhai S/o Jivabhai Rabari, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking anticipatory bail. During the pendency of the application, the FIR underlying the case was quashed in Special Criminal Application No. 3687 of 2026. Consequently, the petitioner moved the court to withdraw his anticipator

DHIRUBHAI GORDHANBHAI RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Dhirubhai Gordhanbhai Rathod, filed an anticipatory bail application (R/Cr.MA/15826/2026) before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Ashcharya H. Sanghavi, after arguing the matter, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was r

JAGDISH @ JAGO TAPUBHAI VAJAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Jagdish @ Jago Tapubhai Vaja, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The High Court, after hearing the parties, exercised its discretion

RAGHUVIRSINH @ RAGHUSINHVIJAYSINH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Raghuvirsinh @ Raghusinhvijaysinh Chauhan, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were represented by counsel. The High Court, aft

GAUTAM NATHU MENAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave and later moved the court for permission to withdraw the application. The respondent opposed the withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered the request and granted the applicant's prayer to withdraw. Consequently, the application

KANTI @ RUDO MANGABHAI MUCHHADIAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Kanti @ Rudo Mangabhai Muchhadia, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground of financial assistance. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court examined the applicant's averments, particularly the financial assistance

SAILESHBHAI JAYANTIBHAI RATHODIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave on the ground that he intends to file an appeal. The State, through the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of the petition. After hearing the parties, the court considered the petitioner's averments and the jail remarks and exercised its

MOHD. SADIK @ BABU MOHD. SHARIF ANSARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Mohd. Sadik @ Babu Mohd. Sharif Ansari applied for temporary bail, citing financial assistance as the ground. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant and considering the jail remarks, the Court exercised its discretion in favor of the applicant. The

SURESH @ LANGDO RAJANBHAI PATNI (BHAGATVALA)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Suresh @ Langdo Rajanbhai Patni (Bhagatvala), filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The court noted that the petitioner had recently been released on a 14‑day temporary release from 16 October 2025 to 29 October 2025. No justifiable reasons were provided to support a further parole.

REKHABEN DILIPBHAI VANZARAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Rekhaben Dilipbhai Vanzara filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The applicant argued that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, he would cooperate wi

DILIPBHAI BHARATBHAI RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Dilipbhai Bharatbhai Rathod, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground that he is suffering from cancer and wishes to obtain a second medical opinion. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant'

DEEPAK NITINBHAI BUDHBHATTIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Deepak Nitinbhai Budhbhatti, filed an anticipatory bail application and later sought the court's permission to withdraw it. The applicant's counsel, Mr. D.M. Varandani, requested that the application be withdrawn. The respondent's counsel, Mr. Ronak Raval, was present. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considere

INDRAVIJAYSINH @ KHUMANSINH VINUBHAI BALAVANTSINH MAKAVANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Indravijaysinh @ Khumansinh Vinubhai Balavantsinh Makavana, filed a temporary bail application through jail. The court noted that the petitioner had been released earlier for a brief period (23-31 January 2026) and that the jail remarks indicated poor conduct. Considering these factors, the court found

CHINUBHAI ALIAS CHINO MANILAL SHRIMALIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Chinubhai alias Chino Manilal Shrimali, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave before the Gujarat High Court. The jail records showed that the petitioner had already been released on temporary leave from 7 October 2025 to 30 October 2025. The jail authorities submitted that no justifi

PREMCHAND BHABUTAJI KALALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Premchand Bhabutaji Kalal applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) after an FIR was lodged against him for offences under Sections 65(a), 65(e), 81, 83, 98(2) and 116(B) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed the bail, citing the nature and gravity of th

AYUSH LALABHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Ayush Lalabhai Patel, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Viraj Hargovind Desai, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The court considered whether such a withdrawal required

RATHOD CHANDRIKABEN GOVAJIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Rathod Chandrikaben Govaji, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented and opposed the withdrawal. The Court considered

VASAVA SHIVJIBHAI GOMABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Vasava Shivjibhai Gomabhai, filed an anticipatory bail application (R/CR.MA/17785/2026) before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Faijan H. Memon, sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent's counsel, Mr. Ronak Rawal, opposed the withdrawal. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker

SHAITANRAM S/O PRAHLADRAM KHOKHARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Shaitanram, filed an anticipatory bail application (R/Cr.MA/17793/2026) before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted under criminal procedure law. After hearing the

JANABHAI BHODARBHAI ALIAS BHUDARBHAI RATHVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Janabhai Bhodarbhai Rathva, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground of financial assistance. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice for the State, allowing the application to be considered. The Court examined the petitioner's request and the jail remark

NARESH KHIMJIBHAI BHANUSHALIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(2) and 338 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS). The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the alleged offences. The Court examined the

DHARMESH CHANDUBHAI SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Dharmesh Chandubhai Sharma filed a criminal appeal (No. 1431/2022) against the State of Gujarat. The appeal had been dismissed or otherwise not proceeded, prompting Sharma to file an application for restoration (R/Cr. Misc. Application No. 16092/2026). The applicant, through counsel Aafrin Saiyed, argued that sufficien

GOVINDBHAI PURUSHOTTAMBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Govindbhai Purushottambhai Patel, filed an application for restoration of his criminal appeal (No. 113/2019) before the High Court of Gujarat. The application sought to have the appeal reinstated on its original file after it had been dismissed or otherwise discontinued. The learned counsel for the peti

SIRAJ HASAN RANA @ SUNILSINH VIJAYSINH RANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Siraj Hasan Rana, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging serious offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The applicant argued that he was not present at the alleged crime, would cooperate with the investigation, an

BHANUMATIBEN @KOKILABEN MAVJIBHAI RESIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Bhanumatiben @Kokilaben Mavjibhai Resiya and co‑accused filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and Section 135 of the Guja

AJAYBHAI DINESHBHAI BHATTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bhatt, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 108, 351(2), 352, 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and Sections 40 and 42 of the Gujarat Money Lenders Act. The

DINESH BHAI PATEL S/O CHIBU BHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Dinesh Bhoi Patel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, the Gujarat Protection Interest of Depositors Act and the Prize Chi

JAYDEV DASRATHBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Jaydev Dasrathbhai Patel, filed an anticipatory bail application (R/CR.MA/16557/2026) before the Gujarat High Court. While the application was pending, the applicant was arrested, rendering the anticipatory bail relief ineffective. The applicant’s counsel then sought the court’s permission to withdraw th

POPATBHAI DEVABHAI BOLIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 115(2), 109(1), 351(2) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the alleged offences. The Court exami

RAJNISH DHIRUBHAI SODHA THRO. TRUPTIBEN RAJNISHBHAI SODHAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Rajnish Dhirubhai Sodha, filed Special Criminal Application (Furlough Leave) No. 10390 of 2026 before the High Court of Gujarat seeking permission for furlough leave while in custody. The application was presented by counsel Ms. Manjula R. Chauhan. The State of Gujarat, represented by Mr. Ronak Raval, o

JITENDRASINH LAXMANJI CHAVDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, father‑in‑law of two accused, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 318(2), 316(2) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 relating to a visa fraud guarantee. The prosecution opposed bail,

RAVIKUMAR PAPPURAM BERVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Ravikumar Pappuram Berva, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave, which was pending before the appropriate authority. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. V.M. Asarsa, subsequently requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court examined whether a pending parole application

IKBALBHAI MUSTUFABHAI SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, IKBALBHAI MUSTUFABHAI SHAIKH, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay. Subsequently, the applicant’s counsel, Mr. G.P. Baghel, requested permission to withdraw the application, stating it had become infructuous. The respondent’s counsel, Mr. Ronak Raval, opposed the withdr

BHIMANI SUNNY KARSANBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Bhiman i Sunny Karsanbhai filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant, through counsel, later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent State of Gujarat opposed the withdrawal. The court considered whether it could grant such permission. It held th

NILESH SARDARSING @ SARDARJI SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Nilesh Sardarsing @ Sardarji Solanki, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counse

HASAN HASAMBHAI LINGADIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Hasan Hasambhai Lingadiya filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant, through counsel Mr. Ashish M. Dagli, later sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, represented by Mr. Ronak Raval, opposed the withdrawal. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered the reques

ABUSUFIYAN REHMANBHAI KURESHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Abusufiyan Rehmanbhai Kureshi, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking cancellation of bail, alleging that the trial had commenced and witnesses had been examined. The petitioner’s counsel subsequently requested permission to withdraw the application, citing the ongoing trial and the possibil

NASIB TEXTILES THRO ZUBERAHMAD MOHMAD YASIN SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Nasib Textiles Thro Zuberahmad Mohmad Yasin Shaikh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of a matter to its original file. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, opposed the application. The court considered the submissions of the applicant's counsel and the averments made in the

ABU TEXTILES THRO ZUNEDAHMAD ZUBERAHMAD SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of a pending criminal appeal. The respondent opposed the application. The court examined the submissions of counsel for both parties and the averments made in the application. After consideration, the court allowed the prayer for restoration.

KAMLESHKUMARI PANCHAMSINGH THAKUR(THAKORE)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a nine‑day delay in filing a restoration application. The respondent opposed the condonation. The petitioner’s counsel explained the reasons for the delay in the memorandum of application. After considering the submissions of both sides, t

KAMLESHKUMARI PANCHAMSINGH THAKUR(THAKORE)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of a criminal appeal that had been dismissed on 30.04.2026 because the appellant failed to appear on the second call. The High Court had dismissed the appeal on procedural grounds. The applicant’s counsel explained the reasons for the non‑appe

AMITBHAI SOMABHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Amitbhai Somabhai Patel applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging violations of Sections 3 and 4 of the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020. The parties had amicably settled the land dispute, with the applicant handing o

ILIYASHUSSAIN FAKIRMOHAMMAD SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The Court examined the standard

KANHAIYALAL BHAVARLAL KALALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Kanhaiyalal Bhavarlal Kalal, the owner of Ramdev Gas Agency, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 287 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The Add

RAJKUMAR BADRILAL JATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant Rajkumar Badrilal Jat filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11187001240244, 2024) for alleged violations of Sections 65(A), 65(E), 98(2), 81 and 116‑B of the Prohibition

BALVANTBHAI AMBALAL PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat dismissed a criminal appeal because the applicant’s counsel was absent. The applicant then filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 119‑day delay in filing a restoration application, arguing that the appeal, which challenges a Judicial Magistrate’s order under the NI

BALVANTBHAI AMBALAL PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat dismissed a criminal appeal because the applicant’s counsel was absent. The applicant then filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 119‑day delay in filing a restoration application, arguing that the appeal, which challenges a Judicial Magistrate’s order under the NI

SHAKTIBHAI KALUBHAI @ BHIKHABHAI VANANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Shaktibhai Kalubhai @ Bhikhabhai Vanani, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail to appear for an examination. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant's grounds and considering the jail remarks, the court exer

SURESHBHAI PARSOTTAMDAS NAYAKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants, a retired Circle Officer and a former E‑Dhara Officer, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several IPC sections including cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy. The State opposed t

KULDEEPSINH ANIRUDDHSINH CHAVDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Kuldeepsinh Aniruddhsinh Chavda, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR No. 11211057251910 alleging offences under Sections 318(4), 317(2) and 317(4) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed t

ABDULBHAI @RAHEMAN IBRAHIMBHAI SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Abdulbhai @Raheman Ibrahimbhai Shaikh, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking regularisation of a late surrender, which was pending before the concerned authority. The applicant, through counsel R.S. Zeena, requested permission to withdraw the application at this stage. The Court examined whether s

PREMJI HARJI BHILversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner Premji Harji Bhil filed an anticipatory bail application (R/Cr.MA/15240/2026) before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and, after hearing the parties, granted permission to withdraw. Consequ

KARANPALSINH @ KRISHNAPALSINH @ KP JITENDRASINH RAJPUT (SOLANKI)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging violations of Sections 65(a), 65(e), 116-B and 98(2) of the Prohibition Act. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. The Court examined the standard bail f

PRAHLADBHAI MANGAJI GHANCHI @ MODIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Prahladbhai Mangaji Ghanchi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR alleging violations of Sections 4(3) and 5(E) of the Gujarat Land Grabbing Prohibition Act and Section 314 of

KAMAL GANPAT RAV GOKHALEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Kamal Ganpat Rav Gokhale, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11199016260426) alleging offences under Sections 286, 287, 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State

ARJUNBHAI MOHANLAL @MANCHHAJI RAJPUROHITversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Arjunbhai Mohanlal applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging violations of Sections 4(3) and 5(E) of the Gujarat Land Grabbing Prohibition Act and Section 314 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed the bail on the ground

LAKHA S/O PARBATBHAI KODIYATARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Lakha, son of Parbatbhai Kodiyatar, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat against the State of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Bhavin S. Raiyani, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The State's counsel, Mr. Yuvraj Brahmbhatt, was present for the respondent.

DILIPBHAI KABHAIBHAI NAYAKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Dilipbhai Kabhaibhai Nayak, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he had filed an appeal against his conviction. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of the application on behalf of the State. After hearing both parties, the Court exercised its discretio

TOFIKBHAI AHEMADBHAI MANSURI THRO. RESHMA TOFIKBHAI MANSURIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Tofikbai Ahmadbai Mansuri, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant, through counsel Ms. Manjula R. Chauhan, sought permission to withdraw the pending application. The respondent State of Gujarat, represented by Mr. Yuvraj Brahmbhatt, opposed th

AMRATBHAI BHAVANBHAI CHAUDHARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Amratbhai Bhavanhbai Chaudhary, filed a temporary bail application seeking release to attend to the medical treatment of his parents. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the application and considering the jail remarks, the court exercised its

SHAILESHBHAI MADHUBHAI BHANDERIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Shaileshbhai Madhubhai Bhanderi filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole on the ground of settlement, stating he intends to sell a property to pay maintenance arrears ordered under Section 125 of the Sessions Court. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The Court considered

DILIPBHAI NATUBHAI RAJPUTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Dilipbhai Natubhai Rajput, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11200019251315 of 2025) alleging offences under IPC sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 406, 420 and 120B. T

HARDIK DAMAJIBHAI BADARUKIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Hardik DamaJibhai Badarukiya, filed an anticipatory bail application and later sought the court's permission to withdraw it. The applicant's counsel, Mr. R. D. Jadhav, requested that the application be withdrawn. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Rohan Raval. Justice Sanjeev J.

MANISH D. VERMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Manish D. Verma, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with FIR No.11191011260159 alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 361(5) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed the

VARSHABEN VIJAYKUMAR SHELKEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Varshaben Vijaykumar Shelke, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel. The court considered whether it could allow th

VIJAYKUMAR SHANKARRAO SHELKEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioners, Vijaykumar Shankarrao Shelke and another, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Hriday Buch, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Rohan

NIRUPAM @ BHURO @ MUNNABHAI JAMNADAS KANSAGARAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Nirupam Jamnadas Kansagara, filed a temporary bail application after his mother died, seeking release to perform post‑death rituals. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the humanitarian ground and the jail remarks, and exercised its discret

RAJESHBHAI MOHANBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Rajeshbhai Mohanbhai Patel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with FIR C.R. No.11210001260009 alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. He argued that custodial interrogation was unnecessar

TEJASHKUMAR LALJIBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Tejashkumar Laljibhai Patel under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The applicant argued that custodial interrogati

JEMISHBHAI NAVINBHAI KHALASHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Jemishbai Navinbhai Khalashi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) after an FIR was lodged against him for offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The applicant argued that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, he would cooperate with

AJITBHAI CHANDUBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The Court examined the nature and gravity of the alle

KEYUR RASIKLAL ANANDKATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 308(2), 316(2), 336(2), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the same Act. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The Court examined the stand

MAHENDRSINH SARDARSINH RAJPUTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Mahendrasingh Sardarsinh Rajput applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11192050260458) alleging offences under the Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, he would remain available f

MUKESHBHAI AGRABHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Mukeshbhai Agrabhai Patel filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR charging him with numerous offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and the Gujarat Police Act. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, had no pri

SANDIPGAR GHANSHYAMGAR GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Sandipgar Ghanshyamag Goswami, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Dilip P. Joshi, requested permission to withdraw the application. The respondent’s counsel, Mr. Ronak Raval, was present. The Court, after considering the r

HARESH KANAYALAL @ KANUBHAI VAGHELAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Haresha Kanayalal @ Kanubhai Vaghela, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The applicant's counsel later requested permission to withdraw the application. The respondent's counsel opposed the withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker considered whether the court cou

INDRAJITSINH @ MUNNABHAI S/O MAHIPATSINH AJITSINH VAGHELAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Indrajitsinh @ Munnabhai Vaghela, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground of his need for medical treatment. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant's averments and considering the jail remarks,

ARUN ALIAS KANCHO DINESHBHAI PRAJAPATIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Arun alias Kancho Dineshbhai Prajapati, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The jail records revealed that the applicant had previously been released on temporary bail but subsequently absconded for 755 days before being re‑apprehended, and his conduct in jail was reported

DILIPBHAI SOMABHAI PARAMARversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Dilipbhai Somabhai Paramar applied for temporary bail before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant had been released from jail in February 2026, and the court noted that no justifiable reason was presented for granting bail. Considering the jail's remarks and the lack of sufficient grounds, the court rejected the bail

PRATAP ALKABHAI DHIRABHAI BAGORA (BHAGORA)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Pratap Alkabhai Dhirabhai Bagora was arrested in September 2025 and filed a temporary bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The application was made through jail representation. The court examined the jail’s remarks and noted the recent nature of the arrest and the lack of a justifiable reason for bail. Conse

SHIVSHANKAR RAMAVTAR KEVATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Shivshankar Ramavtar Kevat applied for temporary bail, citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant’s grounds and, exercising its discretion, decided in his favour. It granted temporary b

JAYNEESH DEVENDRAKUMAR GANDHIversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Jayneesh Devendrakumar Gandhi, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The court examined the jail's remarks, noting that the applicant had already been released in September 2025. No justifiable reason for granting temporary bail was presented. Consequently, the court found no

MAYURSINH BATUKSINH GOHILversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Mayursinh Batuksinh Gohil applied for temporary bail, citing the need to perform agricultural work and provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after considering the applicant's averments and jail remarks, exercised its disc

RASUL NATHUBHAI DAFERversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Rasul Nathubhai D afer, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground of his son's engagement. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant's averments and considering the jail remarks, the Court exercised

SOHAM ODHAVJIBHAI GABANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Soham Odhavjibhai Gabani, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request for withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, th

HIRENBHAI RAMESHBHAI POPATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Hirenbhai Rameshbhai Popat, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No.11210067260216 alleging offences under Sections 316(5), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed ba

ASHIFBHAI @ MAMADASHIF KASAMBHAI LAKHANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Ashifbhai @ Mamadashif Kasambhai Lakhana, filed an anticipatory bail application in response to FIR No.11189007260336 against Shabbirhusain Mohammadbhai Kasmani. The applicant later sought the court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the applicant argued f

AASHISH JAYSUKHKUMAR KUNDARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the same Act. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The court examined the standard bail

KOMAL ARVIND TIWARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Komal Arvind Tiwari filed an anticipatory bail application (R/Cr.MA/16880/2026) before the High Court of Gujarat. The Sessions Court had issued notices under Section 35 of the BNSS. The applicant's counsel, after arguing, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. Justice Sanjeev J. Th

BAHELIM SADIKKHAN RASIDKHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Bahelim Sadikhan Rasidkhan, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking protection from arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 352, 351(3) and 54 of the BNSS. The prosecution opposed the bail,

RAHULPURI @ RAHUL SURESHPURI GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging violations of Sections 65(e), 116‑B and 81 of the Prohibition Act. The State opposed bail, citing the nature and gravity of the offences. The court examined the standard bail fact

VIPULBHAI MANSUKHBHAI BHADANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Vipulbhai Mansukhbhai Bhadani filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. During the proceedings, the applicant's counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The issue before the Court was whether it could permit the withdrawal of an anticipatory bail application. The Co

SAHIL JAYANTIBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Sahil Jayantibhai Patel applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) after an FIR (C.R. No.11191022260542) was lodged against him for an alleged offence under Section 69 of the BNSS. The applicant argued that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, he would cooperate

SACHIN SHAMJIBHAI DAUversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Sachin Shamjibhai Dau, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. He later moved the court seeking permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel opposing the withdrawal. The court considered whether it could grant th

GANGARAMBHAI KHIMABHAI VALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, GangaramBhai Khimabhai Vala, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.11211010260161 for several serious offences under the BNS and the Gujarat Police Act. The prosecution opposed the bail, citing th

DHRUTI RAXIT AZADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Dhruti Raxit Azad, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking anticipatory bail. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the respondent opposed the withdrawal. The Court examined whether the

JOSEPH SAMUELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Joseph Samuel filed two criminal miscellaneous applications seeking anticipatory bail before the High Court of Gujarat. While these applications were pending, the applicant was arrested, rendering the applications moot. The applicant's counsel informed the Court of the arrest and the consequent futility of the bail app

JOSEPH SAMUELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Joseph Samuel filed two criminal miscellaneous applications seeking anticipatory bail before the High Court of Gujarat. While these applications were pending, the applicant was arrested, rendering the applications moot. The applicant's counsel informed the Court of the arrest and the consequent futility of the bail app

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search