SIRAJ HASAN RANA @ SUNILSINH VIJAYSINH RANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

     R/CR.MA/12805/2026                                     ORDER DATED: 30/07/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL) NO. 12805
                           of 2026

==========================================================
             SIRAJ HASAN RANA @ SUNILSINH VIJAYSINH RANA
                                Versus
                          STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR N D NANAVATY, SENIOR ADVOCATE with MR YASH N
NANAVATY(5626) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR. RAJ A JADEJA(18318) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR. SUHAIL Z SAIYED(6690) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR RONAK RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                 Date : 30/07/2026

                                  ORAL ORDER

1.      By way of this application under Section 482 of the

Bharatiya         Nagarik       Suraksha      Sanhita,      2023       (for    short,

“BNSS”), the applicant has prayed for anticipatory bail in the

event of arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.

11199003260292 of 2026, registered with the Aamod Police

Station, Bharuch, for the offences punishable under Sections

126(2), 308(5), 308(6), 352, 351(3), 61(2)(a) of the Bharatiya

Nyay Sanhita.


2.      Rule.         Learned    Additional        Public   Prosecutor        waives

service of notice of rule for respondent – State of Gujarat.


3.      Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the

nature of allegations are such that custodial interrogation at


                                     Page 1 of 6
      R/CR.MA/12805/2026                                           ORDER DATED: 30/07/2026




this stage is not necessary. It is further submitted that the

applicant will keep himself available during the course of

investigation and trial also and will not flee from justice.


3.1      The learned advocate for the applicant further states

that the applicant shall abide by all the conditions that may

be imposed while granting anticipatory bail to the applicant.

Accordingly, it is urged that this application may be allowed

and to grant the anticipatory bail to the applicant.


4.       As against this, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing on behalf of the respondent – State has opposed

grant of anticipatory bail looking to the nature and gravity of

the offence and requested not to entertain this application.


5.       Having heard the learned advocates appearing for the
parties and perusing the papers available on record, it is

incumbent           upon         the   Court         to    exercise        its   discretion

judiciously, cautiously and strictly in compliance with the

basic principles laid down in plethora of decisions of the

Apex Court on the point. It is well settled that, among other

circumstances,             the    factors      to     be   borne      in     mind      while

considering an application for bail are (i) the nature and

gravity of the accusation; (ii) the antecedents of the applicant

including the fact as to whether he has previously undergone

imprisonment on conviction by a Court in respect of any


                                            Page 2 of 6
      R/CR.MA/12805/2026                                          ORDER DATED: 30/07/2026




cognizable offence; (iii) the possibility of the applicant to flee

from justice; and (iv) where the accusation has been made

with the object of injuring or humiliating the applicant by

having him so arrested. Though at the stage of granting bail

an elaborate examination of evidence and detailed reasons

touching the merits of the case, which may prejudice the

case of accused, should be avoided.                         However, prima facie,

following aspects have been taken into consideration:

a)       considering the role attributed to the present applicant,

the present applicant was not present on the date when the

offence took place, i.e. 30.03.2026;

b)       the role attributed to the present applicant was that

the present applicant sent accused nos. 2, 3 and 4. The

accused nos. 2, 3 and 4 came at the behest of the present

applicant;


c)       moreover, this Court has also taken into consideration

the     undertaking           given     by      the     learned    advocate       for       the

applicant that, the applicant has no connection with the land

and does not claim any ownership, possession or interest in

the disputed property,                  the said undertaking              is   taken on

record.

d)       the learned advocate for the applicant has assured that

the     applicant          will   not    flee    from      justice    and      would        be



                                          Page 3 of 6
      R/CR.MA/12805/2026                                     ORDER DATED: 30/07/2026




available during investigation as well as the trial.


6.       Considering the aforesaid aspects and the law laid down

by     the     Hon’ble      Apex    Court     in    the     case   of    Siddharam

Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and Others,

reported in (2011) 1 SCC 6941, wherein the Hon’ble Apex

Court reiterated the law laid down by the Constitution Bench

in    the     case     of   Shri   Gurubaksh        Singh    Sibbia      &    Others,

reported in (1980) 2 SCC 665 and also the decision in the

case of Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi), reported in

(2020) 5 SCC 1, the Court is inclined to allow the present

application.


7.       In the result, this application is allowed by directing

that in the event of arrest/ appearance of the applicant in

connection with the above-referred FIR, the applicant shall be

released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/-

(Rupees Ten Thousand) with one surety of like amount on

the following conditions that applicant:


(a)      shall      cooperate      with   the       investigation       and      make

available for interrogation whenever required;


(b)      shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement,

threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of

the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to



                                      Page 4 of 6
      R/CR.MA/12805/2026                                   ORDER DATED: 30/07/2026




the court or to any police officer;

(c)      shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation

and not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to

be collected by the police;


(d)      shall remain present at the concerned Police Station on

07.08.2026 between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;


(e)      shall at the time of execution of bond, furnish the

address to the investigating officer and the court concerned

and shall not change residence till the final disposal of the

case till further orders;

(f)      shall not leave India without the permission of the

Court and if having passport shall deposit the same before

the trial Court within a week;


(g)      It is open to the police or the investigating agency to

move the learned trial Court for a direction under Section

483(2) of the BNSS to arrest the accused, in the event of

violation of any term, such as absconding, non-cooperating

during investigation, evasion, intimidation or inducement to

witnesses         with     a   view     to     influence    outcome        of        the

investigation or trial, etc.



7.1      At the trial, the Trial Court shall not be influenced by



                                      Page 5 of 6
      R/CR.MA/12805/2026                                                             ORDER DATED: 30/07/2026




the      prima          facie        observations               made          by      this        Court         while

considering the bail application.


8.        It is made clear that this order of anticipatory bail does

not in any manner limit or restrict the rights or duties of

the police or investigative agency to investigate into the

charges against the applicant who is granted pre-arrest bail.



9.        Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct

service is permitted.


                                                                                  (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
PD

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: PARUL DUTTA(HCD0073), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE TWO CLASS TWO, at High Court of Gujarat on 30/07/2026 16:00:29




                                                      Page 6 of 6