Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

BHARAT LAXMANBHAI BALAKJI PARMAR(MARVADI-BAVARI) THROUGH VAGHELA ROSHNIBEN VIJAYBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The application for further temporary bail was dismissed.

Summary

The petitioner, Bharat Laxmanbhai Balakji Parmar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail in a case pending before the High Court of Gujarat. The court noted that the petitioner had already been released on a temporary bail order dated 26 November 2025, which was to remain in force until 16 December 2025 for a period of twenty days. The petitioner offered no new or justifiable reasons to warrant an extension of bail beyond the earlier order. After reviewing the record and the jail remarks, the bench found that the applicant had not made a case for further relief. Consequently, the application for additional temporary bail was rejected.

Issues considered

  • What, if any, justification exists for granting the petitioner further temporary bail after the earlier bail order has expired?

Subjects

temporary bailcriminal procedurebail applicationHigh Court of Gujaratjail remarks

Judgment

     R/CR.MA/17739/2026                                                    ORDER DATED: 03/08/2026




               IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

 R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL) NO. 17739
                           of 2026

==========================================================
BHARAT LAXMANBHAI BALAKJI PARMAR(MARVADI-BAVARI) THROUGH
              VAGHELA ROSHNIBEN VIJAYBHAI
                           Versus
                STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
PARTY IN PERSON(5000) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR. RONAK RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                        Date : 03/08/2026

                                           ORAL ORDER

1.      This application is filed by the applicant, through his

representative for temporary bail.

2.      Having heard and perusing the papers available on

record, more particularly,                      considering the jail remarks, it

appears that the applicant was released recently by an order

dated 26.11.2025, from 26.11.2025 to 16.12.2025, for a period

of 20 days. Furthermore, no justifiable reasons have been

stated. Hence, no case is made out.                                       The application is

rejected, accordingly.



                                                                       (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
ADITYA SINGH


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: ADITYA SINGH(HC02376), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 03/08/2026 16:14:39




                                               Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "temporary bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.