Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

INDRAVIJAYSINH @ KHUMANSINH VINUBHAI BALAVANTSINH MAKAVANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The court held that the applicant is not entitled to temporary bail due to unsatisfactory jail conduct and lack of sufficient grounds.

Summary

The petitioner, Indravijaysinh @ Khumansinh Vinubhai Balavantsinh Makavana, filed a temporary bail application through jail. The court noted that the petitioner had been released earlier for a brief period (23-31 January 2026) and that the jail remarks indicated poor conduct. Considering these factors, the court found no sufficient ground to grant bail. Consequently, the application for temporary bail was rejected. The order was directed to be communicated to the jail authority.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to temporary bail despite prior release and poor jail conduct

Subjects

temporary bailcriminal procedurejail conductHigh Court of Gujaratbail application

Judgment

     R/CR.MA/17702/2026                                                     ORDER DATED: 03/08/2026




               IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

 R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL) NO. 17702
                           of 2026

==========================================================
        INDRAVIJAYSINH @ KHUMANSINH VINUBHAI BALAVANTSINH
                             MAKAVANA
                               Versus
                      STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR. RONAK RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                         Date : 03/08/2026

                                           ORAL ORDER

1.       This application, through jail, is filed by the applicant

seeking temporary bail.


2.       Considering            the       jail     remarks,          it    appears          that       the

applicant was released recently by an order dated 21.01.2026

from 23.01.2026 to 31.01.2026, and the jail remarks also

show that his jail conduct is not good. Hence, no case is

made out. The application is rejected, accordingly.


3.       Registry to communicate this order to the concerned jail

authority.



                                                                          (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
ADITYA SINGH/06

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: ADITYA SINGH(HC02376), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 03/08/2026 16:15:40




                                                 Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "temporary bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.