High Court of Gujarat

PREMSINH SHANABHAI RAJVIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal: 37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
Bench: SANJEEV THAKER

Holding

The application for cancellation of bail was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Premsinh Shanabhai Rajvi, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking cancellation of his bail. The application was listed before the High Court of Gujarat, but neither the petitioner nor the respondent appeared when the matter was called on the second and subsequent dates. No request for adjournment was made by either side. The Court observed that the parties had failed to prosecute the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker on 6 July 2026.

Issues considered

What is the appropriate consequence when parties fail to appear for a bail cancellation application without seeking adjournment?

Subjects

bail cancellationwant of prosecutioncriminal miscellaneous applicationprocedural defaulthigh court order

Judgment

                     R/CR.MA/8803/2026                                                 ORDER DATED: 06/07/2026




                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                 R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CANCELLATION OF BAIL) NO.
                                         8803 of 2026

               ==========================================================
                                             PREMSINH SHANABHAI RAJVI
                                                       Versus
                                              STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
               ==========================================================
               Appearance:
               MR ARIF QURESHI(10647) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
               MR TIRTHRAJ PANDYA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
               ==========================================================

                  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                                       Date : 06/07/2026

                                                         ORAL ORDER


                        None present when the matter is called out in the

               second call, nor any request for adjournment is made. On

               25.06.2026, also none had remained present when the matter

               was called out.

                        In view of the same the matter is dismissed for want

               of prosecution.


                                                                                    (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
               URIL RANA




Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: RANA URIL K(HC01406), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 06/07/2026 17:39:11




                                                             Page 1 of 1

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "bail cancellation"Sign in to search