Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

SUNIL HOMSING PALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Holding

The court exercised its discretion to grant parole leave to the petitioner for seven days upon bond.

Summary

The petitioner, Sunil Homsing Pal, filed a special criminal application for parole leave while in jail, citing the filing of an appeal as the ground. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The High Court, after considering the petition and jail remarks, exercised its discretion in favor of the petitioner. The court partially allowed the petition, granting parole for seven days upon the petitioner furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000 to the jail authority. The order directs the petitioner to surrender to the jail authority immediately after the parole period expires.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate exercise of judicial discretion in granting parole leave to a convicted person who has filed an appeal?

Subjects

parolecriminal procedurejudicial discretionappealbondhigh court

Judgment

      R/SCR.A/9956/2026                                     ORDER DATED: 16/07/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 9956 of
                               2026

==========================================================
                             SUNIL HOMSING PAL
                                    Versus
                          STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR ROHAN A SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                 Date : 16/07/2026

                                   ORAL ORDER


1.      This petition, through jail, is filed by the petitioner

seeking parole leave            on the ground of filing appeal.



2.      Rule.         Learned     Additional       Public    Prosecutor        waives

service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent – State.



3.      Considering       the     application,      more      particularly,           the

ground mentioned therein as well as the jail remarks, this

Court is inclined to exercise discretion in favour of the

present petitioner.



4.      The petition, therefore, succeeds and is partly allowed.

The petitioner is ordered to be released on parole for a

period of seven days from the date of his/her actual release



                                     Page 1 of 2
                         R/SCR.A/9956/2026                                                 ORDER DATED: 16/07/2026




                   on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

                   Thousand) to the satisfaction of the concerned jail authority

                   on usual terms and conditions, with a direction that the

                   petitioner shall surrender to the jail authority on expiry of

                   the parole leave period forthwith.                              Rule is made absolute

                   accordingly.



                   4.1      Registry to communicate this order to the concerned jail

                   authority, forthwith.


                                                                                        (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
                   URIL RANA


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: RANA URIL K(HC01406), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 16/07/2026 17:01:20




                                                                 Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.