High Court of Gujarat

MAHENDRA @ DAHYABHAI BHOGILAL TADVIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal: 28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE
Bench: SANJEEV THAKER

Holding

The petition for parole leave was rejected.

Summary

Mahendra @ Dahyabhai Bhogilal Tadvi filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. No representative appeared for the petitioner when the matter was called. The court noted jail records showing the petitioner had been released from 12‑12‑2025 to 01‑01‑2026 and observed that the petition did not state any justifiable reasons for further parole. The learned counsel for the respondent was heard, and the court examined the available papers. Finding no case made out, the High Court rejected the parole application.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioner is entitled to parole leave in the absence of a justifiable reason and personal appearance

Subjects

parolespecial criminal applicationHigh CourtGujaratpetition dismissedcriminal procedure

Judgment

                  R/SCR.A/10000/2026                                                 ORDER DATED: 16/07/2026




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

               R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 10000 of
                                         2026

             ==========================================================
                                MAHENDRA @ DAHYABHAI BHOGILAL TADVI
                                               Versus
                                      STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
             ==========================================================
             Appearance:
             MS JAYSHREE C BHATT(170) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
             MR ROHAN A SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
             ==========================================================

               CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                                    Date : 16/07/2026

                                                      ORAL ORDER


             1.       This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking parole

             leave.



             2.       None present for the petitioner when the matter is

             called out. Heard the learned APP and perused the papers

             available on record.



             3.       The      jail     remarks         indicate         that     the      petitioner           was

             recently        released         on      12.12.2025          to      01.01.2026          and        no

             justifiable        reasons          have       been         stated       in      the      petition.

             Considering the same, no case is made out.                                    The petition is

             rejected, accordingly.


                                                                                  (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
             URIL RANA

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: RANA URIL K(HC01406), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 16/07/2026 16:52:25



                                                           Page 1 of 1

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search