Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

RAYDHAN GOVINDBHAI DANGAR THRO. DANGAR KAJALBEN RAYDHANBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The petition for parole leave was rejected.

Summary

The petitioner, Raydhan Govindbhai Dangar, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The court examined the jail remarks and noted that the petitioner had already been released for a short period from 29 March 2026 to 11 April 2026. No justifiable reasons for further parole were provided in the application. Consequently, the court found that the petitioner had not made a case for parole. The application was therefore rejected.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to parole leave under the circumstances presented

Subjects

parolespecial criminal applicationreleaseHigh Court of Gujaratpetition dismissed

Judgment

                       R/SCR.A/12164/2026                                                ORDER DATED: 19/08/2026




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                   R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 12164 of
                                             2026

                 ==========================================================
                         RAYDHAN GOVINDBHAI DANGAR THRO. DANGAR KAJALBEN
                                          RAYDHANBHAI
                                              Versus
                                     STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
                 ==========================================================
                 Appearance:
                 PARTY IN PERSON(5000) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                 MR KANVA ANTANI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                 ==========================================================

                   CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                                        Date : 19/08/2026

                                                          ORAL ORDER


                 1.       This petition is filed by the petitioner, through his

                 representative, seeking parole leave.



                 2.       Having heard              and perusing the papers available on

                 record, more particularly, the jail remarks, it appears that

                 the     petitioner         was      recently        released         from       29.03.2026        to

                 11.04.2026 and no justifiable reasons have been stated in the

                 application. Considering the same, no case is made out.                                        The

                 petition is rejected, accordingly.


                                                                                      (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
                 URIL RANA



Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: RANA URIL K(HC01406), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 19/08/2026 16:03:37




                                                               Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.