Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

VAJID @ CHIYA AYUB MALEKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The application for temporary bail was rejected due to lack of credible medical grounds, procedural deficiencies, and the applicant’s conduct.

Summary

The petitioner, Vajib @ Chiya Ayub Malek, applied for temporary bail on the ground that he needed to arrange funds for his father's illness. The petitioner’s original counsel, Mr. Amit D. Shah, was absent, and a substitute counsel, Ms. J.C. Bhatt, had not filed a vakalatnama despite claiming to represent the petitioner. The court noted that the applicant had been convicted under the Bharatiya Nyas Sanhita, the Gujarat Police Act, and the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act and had been in custody since 23-07-2025. The medical documents annexed to the bail application were deemed unconvincing, and the trial court had already found no serious medical illness of the applicant’s father. Considering the lack of proper representation, the stale nature of the application, and the absence of justifiable grounds, the court rejected the temporary bail application.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant is entitled to temporary bail on the ground of his father's alleged illness
  • Whether the applicant’s counsel properly represented him and complied with procedural requirements
  • Whether the medical evidence submitted is sufficient to justify bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

temporary bailmedical groundsprocedural defaultconvictionbail rejection

Judgment

     R/CR.MA/18058/2026                                      ORDER DATED: 13/08/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

 R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL) NO. 18058
                           of 2026
==========================================================
                            VAJID @ CHIYA AYUB MALEK
                                      Versus
                             STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR AMIT D SHAH(11232) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS JIRGA JHAVERI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                     Date : 13/08/2026
                                      ORAL ORDER
1.              This is an application for temporary bail by the

applicant on the ground of arranging funds for his father’s

illness.


2.              Earlier,      i.e.     on     06.08.2026,     learned       advocate

Ms.J.C. Bhatt has submitted that she has instructions to

appear for and on behalf of the applicant and will file her

vakalatnama in place of learned advocate Mr.Amit D. Shah.
However, the cause list shows that she did not file her

vakalatnama till date.


3.              Be that as it may. However, today, when the

matter is called out in second call at 4:00 p.m., neither

learned advocate Mr.Amit D. Shah is present nor learned

advocate        Ms.Bhatt       remained          present    on    behalf      of       the

applicant       nor       learned      advocate        Ms.Bhatt   has      filed       her



                                         Page 1 of 3
     R/CR.MA/18058/2026                                               ORDER DATED: 13/08/2026




vakalatnama replacing learned advocate Mr.Amit D. Shah for

the applicant.


4.              Considering the fact that this application is filed

by     the    applicant       for     temporary           bail       on    the      ground      of

arranging funds for his father’s illness, however, the matter

could not be proceeded for one reason or the other.


5.              Today, learned APP has placed on record the jail
remarks.


6.              Considering the jail remarks, it transpires that the

applicant       has       been   convicted         under         the       Bharatiya         Nyas

Sanhita, the Gujarat Police Act and the Gujarat Control of

Terrorism and Organised Crime Act and is in jail since

23.07.2025 only.


7.              Moreover,        the      medical         papers          annexed       to   this

application        at      Annexure-‘C’         Colly.          do     not        inspire     any

confidence.


8.              Further, the learned trial Court has, by taking

into    consideration        the      affidavit         filed    by       the     Investigating

Officer,     observed       in      the   order         that     there       is    no   serious

medical illness of the applicant’s father.




                                          Page 2 of 3
      R/CR.MA/18058/2026                                                                ORDER DATED: 13/08/2026




9.                    In view of above, this application needs to be

rejected on the ground of conduct of the applicant, stale

cause and in absence of justifiable grounds/reasons and is

rejected accordingly.


                                                                                    (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
M.H. DAVE/82


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MAHESHKUMAR HASMUKHLAL DAVE(HC00193), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 13/08/2026 17:41:42




                                                        Page 3 of 3


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "temporary bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.