Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

BHAVINBHAI BABUBHAI AMALIYARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

Holding

The court held that regular bail could be granted as the ingredients of abetment of suicide were not attracted in the present circumstances.

Summary

The applicant, Bhavinbhai Babubhai Amaliy ar, was in judicial custody since 8 February 2026 for an FIR (C.R. No.11821033260195) alleging offences under Section 107 of the BNS, 2023 relating to the suicide of a minor. The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, arguing that the ingredients of abetment of suicide were not present. The State opposed bail, contending that the nature of the accusation and the applicant's conduct warranted denial of bail. The court noted that the suicide was self‑inflicted, no suicide note was found, and the FIR was based solely on an oral statement by the victim’s brother, leading the judge to find no clear case of abetment. Consequently, the court granted regular bail on a personal bond of Rs.10,000 with a surety, subject to standard conditions, and ordered the applicant’s release.

Issues considered

  • Whether the facts of the case satisfy the ingredients of abetment of suicide under Section 107 of the BNS, 2023.
  • Whether regular bail can be granted after the filing of a chargesheet under Section 483 of the BNSS.
  • Whether the applicant's conduct and the nature of the accusation justify denial of bail.

Subjects

regular bailSection 107abetment of suicideSection 483judicial custodybail conditionscriminal procedure

Judgment

      R/CR.MA/12220/2026                              ORDER DATED: 02/06/2026




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
      R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                   CHARGESHEET) NO. 12220 of 2026
==========================================================
                           BHAVINBHAI BABUBHAI AMALIYAR
                                       Versus
                                 STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. MAULIK M SONI(7249) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR NIRAJ SHARMA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
     CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
                      Date : 02/06/2026
                       ORAL ORDER


1.       Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on
         behalf of the respondent – State.

2.       The applicant, by way of this application filed under Section 483
         of the BNSS, seeks regular bail in connection with the FIR being
         C.R. No.11821033260195 of 2026 registered with Limdi Police
         Station, Dahod for the offences punishable under Section 107 of
         the BNS, 2023.

3.       It is the submission of learned counsel for the applicant that the
         applicant is in judicial custody since 08.02.2026. He further
         submitted that the ingredients of abatement of suicide are not
         attracted at all. Thus, having regard to the evidence in support of
         the charge, it is a fit case to exercise the discretion in favour of
         the applicant.

4.       Learned APP has opposed the bail application contending that,
         considering the conduct of the applicant and nature of
         accusation, the discretion may not be exercised in favour of the


                                     Page 1 of 3
     R/CR.MA/12220/2026                               ORDER DATED: 02/06/2026




        applicant.

5.      Having heard learned advocates for the respective parties and
        upon perusal of material placed on record, it appears that the
        minor deceased, on account of her relation with the accused,
        ended her life by committing suicide on 27.01.2026. Admittedly,
        during the investigation, no any suicide note being found. On the
        basis of the oral discussion with her brother, the FIR came to be
        registered. After knowing the facts of the relations with the
        applicant, the brother did not have lodged the FIR. In such
        circumstances, without much discussions on merits of the case, I
        am inclined to enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

     6. Hence, the bail application is allowed and the applicant is
        ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with the FIR
        being C.R. No.11821033260195 of 2026 registered with Limdi
        Police Station, Dahod, on executing a personal bond of
        Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousands only), with one surety of the
        like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and
        subject to the conditions that he shall:


        No.                           Conditions
        (a)    not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
        (b) not act in a manner injuries to the interest of the
               prosecution;
        (c)    surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a



                                   Page 2 of 3
     R/CR.MA/12220/2026                                                           ORDER DATED: 02/06/2026




                 week;
         (d) not leave India without prior permission of the Sessions
                 Judge concerned;
         (e)     furnish latest address of residence to the Investigating
                 Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of
                 the bond and shall not change the residence without
                 prior permission of the trial Court;



7.       The authorities shall release the applicant if he is not required in
         connection with the any other offence. If breach of any above
         condition is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned shall take
         appropriate action or issue warrant against the applicant. The
         bail bond to be executed before the learned trial Court having
         jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the sessions judge
         concerned to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above
         conditions, in accordance with law. Nothing stated hereinabove,
         shall tantamount to the expression of any opinion on the merits
         of this case. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.
         Direct Service is permitted.



                                                                                        (ILESH J. VORA,J)
Rakesh



     Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
     Digitally signed by: RAKESH MAHESHKUMAR KOSHTI(HC00950), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 02/06/2026 11:11:49




                                                   Page 3 of 3


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "regular bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.