ILESH VORA

The Executive Engineer & Ors. appealed against Shashi Construction Co. & Anr. before the Gujarat High Court. The appellant, S.S.N.L., communicated its willingness to accept the lower court's judgment and requested a two‑month period to deposit the decretal amount. The court recorded this communication and, considering …

The appellant filed a suit for specific performance of a 2007 agreement to sell land, having paid part of the consideration. During the suit, several co‑owners (Defendants 3‑10) were deleted from the parties, and subsequent purchasers (Defendants 11‑12) were added. The trial court rejected the plaint under Order VII Ru…

The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the court that the a…

The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the Court that the applications w…

The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the court that the a…

The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the Court that the applications w…

The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the court that the a…

The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the court that the a…

The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the Court that the applications w…

The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the court that the a…

The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the court that the a…

The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the court that the a…

The husband filed a divorce petition on the ground of cruelty, and the Family Court granted a decree of divorce. The wife appealed the decree before the Gujarat High Court. While the appeal was pending, the parties reached a settlement, with the husband paying Rs.18 lakhs as permanent alimony and the wife returning the…

The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the Court that the applications w…

The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the court that the a…

The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the court that the a…

The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the court that the a…

The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the court that the a…

The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the court that the a…

The Union of India filed a first appeal (No.3151 of 2010) against Pratap Steels Rolling Mills Ltd. The appellants failed to appear before the High Court of Gujarat. The court noted the absence of counsel for the appellants and referred to its earlier order dated 20‑01‑2026. Relying on Order 41 Rule 17 of the Civil Proc…

The wife filed a family suit under the Family Courts Act and the Hindu Marriage Act seeking recovery of her streedhan, which included movable items and an open plot of land. The Family Court directed her to declare the total value of the claim and affix the appropriate court fee; she paid a nominal fee of Rs.40 but a d…

The First Appeal challenged a decree that granted the plaintiff a half share in two survey parcels and declared two registered sale deeds void. During the appeal, the original plaintiff and defendants 6‑8 executed a registered settlement agreement relinquishing the plaintiff’s rights over survey No. 36/1. The court exa…

Mahesh Govindbhai Patel filed a first appeal before the Gujarat High Court against Kantibhai @ Kantubhai Bhagubhai Patel and others. During the proceedings, the appellant's counsel submitted a withdrawal affidavit. The court recorded the withdrawal and disposed the appeal as withdrawn. Consequently, any interim relief …

The applicants filed Special Civil Suit No. 66 of 2010 which was dismissed by the Civil Court on merits without any evidence being taken, prompting a review petition that was also dismissed. They later filed a first appeal (F/FA/31316 of 2023) after a delay of 475‑484 days and sought condonation of this delay under Sec…

The appellant, a construction firm, claimed to have purchased agricultural land in 1985 and 1990 through agreements and irrevocable powers of attorney, and sought specific performance, declaration of a 2018 sale deed as void, and injunctions. The trial court dismissed the suit under Order VII Rule 11, holding it barred…

The State, represented by the Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer, appealed against a Reference Court award that granted an additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre for land acquired for the Kalikua Irrigation Pond Canal, over the original award of Rs 6.90 per square metre. The appeal was filed under …

The appellant, Chetanben, filed a first appeal (No.166 of 2026) and a civil application for a stay concerning a property dispute that is already pending before the court in Civil Suit No.75 of 2022. The defendant, Dharmeshbhai Koradiya, submitted an affidavit assuring that he would not forcibly dispossess the appellant…

The State of Gujarat acquired land in Zampodar village under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, issuing a Section 4 notification in 1991 and a Section 6 notification in 1992. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation based on rates for Bagayat and Jirayat land, but the appellants were dissatisfied and soug…

The appeal challenges a Land Acquisition Reference Court award of Rs.125 per square metre for land acquired for the Amreli‑Chittal bypass road. The original award ignored annual price appreciation since the base valuation year of 1993. The appellant argued that, following a prior decision (First Appeal No. 3175 of 2011…

The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against an award by the Principal Civil Judge that granted the land owners additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre, along with statutory solatium and interest. The acquiring body argued that the Reference Court e…

The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against an award by the Principal Civil Judge that granted the land owners additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre, along with statutory solatium and interest. The acquiring body argued that the Reference Court e…

The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against an award by the Principal Civil Judge that granted the land owners additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre, along with statutory solatium and interest. The acquiring body argued that the Reference Court e…

The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against an award by the Principal Civil Judge that granted the land owners additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre, along with statutory solatium and interest. The acquiring body argued that the Reference Court e…

The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against an award by the Principal Civil Judge that granted the land owners additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre, along with statutory solatium and interest. The acquiring body argued that the Reference Court e…

The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against an award by the Principal Civil Judge that granted the land owners additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre, along with statutory solatium and interest. The acquiring body argued that the Reference Court e…

The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against an award by the Principal Civil Judge that granted the land owners additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre, along with statutory solatium and interest. The acquiring body argued that the Reference Court e…

The appellants, Rafiquebhai Ismailbhai Galar & ors., filed a first appeal (No. 3604 of 2014) against Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd & anr. The matter was listed as a critical old matter in the Gujarat High Court. When the case was called, the learned advocates for the appellants were not present to assist the Court. T…

The appellant, Preeti, appealed against a decree of divorce granted in favour of her husband, Vijay Charansingh Prajapati. The matter was referred to the High Court Mediation Centre, where a settlement was reached and recorded in a mediation report. The settlement included a clause wherein the appellant accepted the ju…

The appellants owned non‑agricultural residential land in Motipura, Himmatnagar, which was acquired for the Idar‑Vijapur bypass road. The Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs.135 per square metre, which the Reference Court later increased by Rs.77.80 per square metre. Dissatisfied, the appellants appea…

The appellants owned non‑agricultural residential land in Motipura, Himmatnagar, which was acquired for the Idar‑Vijapur bypass road. The Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs.135 per square metre, which the Reference Court later increased by Rs.77.80 per square metre. Dissatisfied, the appellants appea…

The appellant filed a first appeal (No. 1324 of 2007) against the respondents. During the hearing, the counsel for the appellant failed to remain present to assist the Court. The Court observed that no one had appeared to pursue the appeal for a long time, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter on its mer…

Vismay Rajnikant Patel filed a Letters Patent Appeal (No. 421 of 2026) along with two civil applications for interim relief and withdrawal of the matter. While the proceedings were pending, Patel secured admission to the Mechanical Engineering program at NIT Tiruchirappalli in the general category. On this basis, his c…

The applicant, Prajapati Minaben Mohanbhai, filed an application seeking condonation of a 280‑day delay in preferring an appeal against Prajapati Mohanbhai Vajabhai. The court heard counsel for both parties and examined the reasons for the delay. It was held that the applicant had established sufficient cause for the d…

The appeal challenged an interim visitation order dated 11‑09‑2024 passed by the Family Court, Vadodara, which required the mother to meet the child in Vadodara. The mother argued that the arrangement was impractical and amounted to a paper order given the husband’s conduct. The father submitted that the pending main a…

The appellant, Amritaben Kiritkumar Chinubhai Bhasvar, filed a first appeal (No. 3098 of 2026) along with a civil application for stay. The appellant, through counsel Ms. Medha N. Pandya, indicated that she would not pursue the appeal and instead sought the Court's permission to pursue a divorce proceeding in accordanc…

The appellant, Pratham Sanjay Mahendru, filed a family suit seeking a declaration that his marriage was void under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The Family Court dismissed the suit, finding that the appellant had not produced a marriage registration, witnesses, or any proof that the marriage was not solemnised …

Lt. Col. Iqbal Bahadur Dutt, the original appellant, filed a condonation of delay application seeking to excuse a 1,655‑day lapse in filing a motion for review/recall of an order dated 30‑07‑2021 passed in First Appeal No. 694 of 2019. The Court noted that the order had already been unsuccessfully challenged in a Speci…

The appeal challenges a trial court order that struck out the appellant's counter‑claim for lack of territorial jurisdiction and dismissed his application for interim injunction, while also allowing the plaintiff's application to reject the counter‑claim. The parties are heirs disputing shares in ancestral immovable pr…

Digvijay Cement Pvt Ltd filed a first appeal (No. 3112 of 2011) against Amrock Logistics & Trading Pvt Ltd in the Gujarat High Court. The appellant failed to appear before the Court despite being represented by counsel. The Court held that the appellant's non‑appearance amounted to a default. Accordingly, the appeal wa…

The appellants, grandparents, and the respondent, the mother, filed a first appeal and a civil application for stay concerning a dispute over the welfare of a child. Both parties appeared before the court and submitted sworn affidavits along with a notarized settlement agreement dated 17 July 2026. The court examined t…

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by Raman Kantpal, a director of M/s. WLTPE, who was alleged to have orchestrated a large-scale GST fraud involving fake invoices and wrongful input tax credit claims amounting to …

The applicant, Ramakant Pal, a director of M/s WLTPE, was arrested in April 2026 for allegedly orchestrating a large-scale GST fraud by issuing fake invoices to claim input tax credit of Rs.63.21 crore, affecting 18 beneficiary companies. A complaint under Sections 32(1)(b), 31(c), 332(1)(i), 332(5) of the CGST Act, 20…

The Jetpur Navagadh Nagarpalika appealed against an order that granted a higher pay‑scale (Rs 5,000‑8,000) to Yakub Musabhai Dosani, a municipal employee, arguing that his predecessors obtained the same benefit only after approaching the Tribunal and that Dosani had not done so, and that the claim was raised with delay…

The applicant filed a condonation of delay application in a civil suit but failed to appear before the court as the advocate representing the applicant was absent. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the application. The judges reserved liberty to file a fresh application if necessary. No substantive …

The High Court of Gujarat heard a first appeal filed by Shipra Ocean Trade Pvt Ltd against Green Gold Timber Pvt Ltd. The appellant's counsel was unable to provide information regarding the status of the appellant company when questioned by the bench. In the absence of such instruction, the Court exercised its powers u…

The petitioners, legal heirs of the deceased, filed applications seeking condonation of delay—1288 days for filing the main First Appeal and 132 days for filing an application to bring legal heirs. The court noted that similar relief had previously been granted in related proceedings. After hearing counsel, the court f…

The Municipal Commissioner of Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation appealed against a Single Judge’s order directing it to incorporate yearly increments and re‑fix the pension of Sushilaben Pandya, who was appointed as Assistant Nursing Tutor on a fixed‑salary probationary basis with a pay‑protection clause. Pandya argued t…

Babul Harivadanbhai Parikh filed a divorce suit which was withdrawn and later re‑filed, but the case was re‑numbered and a notice was sent to his former address where he no longer resided. The Family Court, relying on a bailiff’s report, dismissed the suit for default and later rejected the appellant’s application for …

The husband appealed a Family Court decree that granted him a divorce and ordered him to pay Rs.8,50,000 as permanent alimony under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, despite the wife not having requested such relief. The appellant argued that the Family Court failed to frame the issue of permanent alimony and…

Bhanuben, the applicant, filed an application seeking condonation of an 11‑day delay in preferring a civil suit. The respondents opposed the condonation. The court examined the reasons provided by the applicant and found that sufficient cause was established for the delay. Consequently, the court held that the delay sh…

The marriage between Dinaben Lucasbhai Macwana and Daudbhai Benarbhai Chauhan, solemnized in 1976, produced six children. The husband filed a petition for dissolution of marriage under Sections 10(1‑7) and 10(1‑9) of the Divorce Act, 1879 on grounds of desertion; the wife did not appear and an ex‑parte decree of divorc…

Lok Prakashan Ltd filed two first appeals under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, challenging an Appellate Tribunal order that had reversed a 2009 adjudicating authority decision. The appeals were listed as old matters and the appellant’s counsel withdrew, after which no appellant or counsel a…

Lok Prakashan Ltd filed two first appeals under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, challenging an Appellate Tribunal order that had reversed a 2009 adjudicating authority decision. The appeals were listed as old matters and the appellant’s counsel withdrew, after which no appellant or counsel a…

The wife (applicant) filed a condonation of delay application seeking permission to file an appeal 308 days after the prescribed period. The husband (respondent) indicated that he would pay the permanent alimony within a month. The court heard counsel for both sides and examined the reasons for the delay. Finding that …

The appellants filed two first appeals under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code challenging orders that dismissed their plaints under Order 7 Rule 11. Both appeals were listed as old matters and the appellants, despite being served notice after their counsel retired, failed to appear before the court. The judges ob…

The appellants filed two first appeals under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code challenging orders that dismissed their plaints under Order 7 Rule 11. Both appeals were listed as old matters and the appellants, despite being served notice after their counsel retired, failed to appear before the court. The judges ob…

The appellant, Taraben Jigneshbhai Parmar, filed a first appeal (No. 5053 of 2023) against Jigneshbhai Punabhai Parmar. During the hearing, the appellant's counsel informed the Court that the parties had settled the dispute amicably and the appellant no longer wished to pursue the appeal. The appellant sought the Court…

The appellant husband appealed a Family Court order dismissing his petition for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act. He claimed the wife had left the marital home without reasonable excuse after living together for seven years and having a child. The wife contested, asserting that t…

The applicants filed a civil application seeking leave to appeal a judgment and decree dated 17‑02‑2025 passed by the 2nd Additional Senior Civil Judge, Gandhinagar, in Special Civil Suit No.9 of 2019. The judgment rejected the plaint on the ground that the original plaintiff had executed an agreement to sell in favour…

The appellant, Tarunaben Miteshbhai Desai, filed a first appeal (No. 674 of 2022) seeking to join legal heirs to the suit. The respondent parties opposed the application. The Court examined whether the legal heir could be added as a party under the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code. It held that the prayer for joi…

Ketul S Shah & ors. filed a miscellaneous civil application for contempt against Chairman (Ms Ardra Agarwal) & ors. in the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the contempt application. The court examined whether it could allow the withdrawal of such an applic…

The petitioner, Alpesh Popatbhai Navadiya, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking recall of an earlier order. The application was listed before the High Court of Gujarat, but the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Manan A. Shah, did not appear and no request for adjournment was made. The court noted the absence of r…

Parmeshbhai Havajivb... applied for successive regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under IPC Sections 394, 397 and 114. He had been in custody since 23‑April‑2026 and claimed he played no vital role in the alleged robbery, stating he was a mason from Rajasthan and the …

The plaintiff filed a Special Civil Suit seeking specific performance of a contract concerning a disputed property. During the suit one defendant died, prompting the surviving defendant to apply for abatement of the suit, while the plaintiff applied to bring the deceased's legal heirs on record. The trial court, withou…

The appellant married the respondent in 2008 and, citing a customary practice of their Maisuriya Bhatia community, executed a notarized divorce deed in 2009. In 2025 the appellant filed a divorce suit in the Surat Family Court to obtain a judicial decree required for a US visa, but the court dismissed the suit on the g…

The appellant husband filed a divorce suit under Sections 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, but the Family Court dismissed it on the ground that it was filed within one year of marriage, violating Section 14. The trial court, however, proceeded to examine merits such as cruelty and desertion, which the appe…

The appellant filed a first appeal (No. 972/2022) against a judgment dated 27 July 2021 in Special Civil Suit No. 52 of 2020, where the trial judge had dismissed the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC. The appeal was admitted on 31 March 2022, but the appellant’s counsel withdrew and the appellant did not appear w…

The Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed against a Land Reference Court award that granted claimants an additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre for land acquired for the Kali Kuva Irrigation Pond Canal project. The original award by the Special Land Acquisition Officer was Rs 69,000 per hecta…

The Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed against a Land Reference Court award that granted claimants an additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre for land acquired for the Kali Kuva Irrigation Pond Canal project. The original award by the Special Land Acquisition Officer was Rs 69,000 per hecta…

The Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed against a Land Reference Court award that granted claimants an additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre for land acquired for the Kali Kuva Irrigation Pond Canal project. The original award by the Special Land Acquisition Officer was Rs 69,000 per hecta…

The applicants, heirs of Ashok Manubhai Patel, filed a civil suit in 2020 for declaration, injunction, cancellation of a sale deed and specific performance, but the suit was dismissed because the advocate handling the case failed to pay the required court fees despite receiving full payment, leading to dismissal under …

Mas Financial Services Ltd., a non‑banking financial company, financed a vehicle that was hypothecated to it under a loan agreement with the original owner, Chandrasinh Jadeja. The vehicle was seized by police in a case under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and later released to the purchaser, Pradipgiri Goswami, after the…

The wife appealed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 against a Family Court judgment that dismissed her petition for annulment of marriage on the ground that the Hindu marriage ceremony of ‘Saptapadi’ was not performed, and directed a police complaint for alleged false statements. The High Court examined w…

The wife appealed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, challenging the Family Court's order of interim maintenance of Rs.4,000 and Rs.2,000 per month granted under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The husband had obtained a decree of divorce on 8 May 2025, and the court also ordered permanent ali…

The Suart Municipal Corporation filed a civil application for condonation of delay against New India Assurance Company Ltd. and others. The applicant, through counsel Ms Jirga Jhaveri, sought permission to withdraw the pending application and requested liberty to file a fresh application before an appropriate bench. Th…

The appellant sought to challenge an order of enhanced maintenance passed by the Family Court. The respondent objected, invoking Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act, 1984, which bars appeals against maintenance orders under Chapter IX of the Criminal Procedure Code. The appellant counter‑claimed that Section 19(3) pe…

The husband filed a suit for dissolution of his marriage before the Family Court, Nadiad, which was dismissed by the Principal Judge. The husband appealed the dismissal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984. The wife was served notice but did not appear. The appellant’s counsel requested that the matter be re…

The appellant, Goswami Bhagwangiri Punjgiri, filed First Appeal No. 248 of 2016 against the respondents, Chavda Hemuji Badarji & Ors. The appeal was listed before a division bench of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ilesh J. Vora and Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. T. Vachhani. Counsel for the appellant (Mr. MJ Parikh, Ms. Dimple M. Parikh …

The husband appealed a judgment of the Family Court, Junagadh (Family Suit No.69 of 2013), which had dismissed his suit for a declaration of dissolution of marriage. The appeal was filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 and Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Both parties subsequently reached a s…

The original plaintiff appealed the dismissal of a suit for partition of family property and accounts of joint family firms. The appeal had earlier been dismissed for non‑prosecution, was restored, but the appellants again failed to pursue it. No counsel appeared for the parties when the matter was called. The Court ob…

Krishnanben, daughter of Rambhai Jariya, filed a first appeal (No. 4304 of 2024) against Vijay Ranmalbai Garchar. The parties appeared before the Gujarat High Court, with counsel representing each side. The appellant requested that the appeal be withdrawn. The Court, per the common oral order dated 15 June 2026, dispos…

In a criminal miscellaneous application for successive regular bail before the chargesheet, Sandip Bharatbhai Berawala sought an order directing the trial court to conclude the trial within two months, as the case was at the stage of recording the investigating officer's evidence. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Ishan R. …

The applicant, Radhikkumar Jayantibhai Dhameliya, filed a successive regular bail application under Section 483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure after a charge sheet was filed for offences under Sections 61, 316(3), 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He had been in custody since 16 March 2026 and…

Vijaybhai R. Boriya applied for successive regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS after a chargesheet was filed for alleged offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Section 111(3) of the BNS, 2023. He had been in custody since 7 May 2026 and claimed he played no vital role in the alleged crime, assertin…

The applicant, Roshani @ Manisha Atulbhai Rajpur, filed an application before the Gujarat High Court seeking condonation of delay in preferring a civil suit. The court heard counsel for the parties and examined the reasons provided for the delay. Finding that the applicant had established sufficient cause for the delay…

The petitioner filed an application before the Gujarat High Court seeking condonation of delay in filing a civil suit. The court heard counsel for the parties and examined the reasons for the delay. It found that the petitioner had established sufficient cause for the lapse. Consequently, the court held that the delay …

Jamniben Lalji Dhila filed an application before the Gujarat High Court seeking condonation of delay in preferring a civil suit against Lalji Petha Dhila. The applicant argued that sufficient cause existed for the delay. The court heard counsel for the applicant and, after considering the averments, found that the appl…

The applicant filed an application before the Gujarat High Court seeking condonation of delay in filing a civil suit. The court heard counsel for both parties and examined the reasons for the delay. It was found that the applicant had established sufficient cause for the delay. Consequently, the court held that the del…

The applicant, Vishal Bhai Raju Bhai Patani (Dantimar), filed an application seeking condonation of delay in preferring a civil suit. The respondent, Divya Ben, opposed the application. Both parties were represented before a two‑judge bench of the Gujarat High Court. After hearing the counsel, the court found that the …

Lata Ben Tulsibhai Patel (GOTI) filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in preferring a civil suit against Balubhai Nathubhai Patel and others. The respondents included several parties, some of whom were deceased, raising issues of representation by heirs. The applicant argued sufficient cause for the de…

The petitioner, Ajay Anant Gaurav, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing a suit. The respondent, Jagruti, opposed the application. The court examined the reasons for the delay presented by the petitioner. Finding that the petitioner had established sufficient cause for the delay, the court he…

The petitioners filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in preferring a first appeal. The respondent highlighted that a related matter had already been granted condonation by the Coordinate Bench of the same court. After hearing both sides, the court found that the petitioners had established sufficient …

The petitioners filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in preferring a first appeal. The respondent highlighted that a related matter had already been granted condonation by the Coordinate Bench of the same court. After hearing both sides, the court found that the petitioners had established sufficient …

The appellant, Nayanaben Bhupendrabhai, filed a first appeal against Bhupendrabhai Dhanrajbhai. During the pendency of the appeal, the parties reached an amicable settlement, and a settlement agreement was presented by the appellant's counsel. The court recorded the settlement agreement and considered the appellant's r…

The husband appealed a Family Court order that rejected his suit seeking a declaration that his marriage, registered on 13 June 2022 in Junagadh, be declared null and void. Both parties, now residing abroad (the husband in Canada and the wife in Cyprus), appeared virtually and submitted affidavits confirming a mutual s…

The applicant filed an application seeking condonation of a 123‑day delay in preferring a criminal appeal. The High Court examined the application and the accompanying office note. Counsel for the applicant argued that sufficient cause existed for the delay. After hearing both sides, the Court found that the applicant …

The appellant, a wife, filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 seeking condonation of a 105‑day delay in filing an appeal against a Family Court decree of divorce dated 13‑05‑2025. The respondent argued that the delay was not due to genuine financial hardship, citing the appellant’s earlier fil…

The Family Court in Ahmedabad dismissed a suit filed by the wife seeking a declaration of marital status. The wife appealed to the Gujarat High Court under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Section 19 of the Family Court Act. During the hearing, both parties informed the Court that they had reached a …

The appellant, Natvarji @Chako Dajuji Thakor, filed a bail appeal under Section 14(A) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015, seeking regular bail and the quashing of an order dated 10.04.2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge. The appellant had been in jud…

Aarifbhai Akbarali Ravjani, accused under Sections 7, 12 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS after being in custody since 22 January 2026. The State opposed bail, arguing the nature of the offence and the applicant's conduct. The Court obse…

The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with an FIR for offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (sections 65(a), 65(e), 81, 83, 98(2) and 116‑B). The applicant was a labourer involved in loading and unloading prohibited liquor and had no prior …

The applicant, Hamir @Hamlo Arshibhai Chandravadiya, was arrested on 17‑12‑2025 in connection with FIR C.R. No. 11185004251947 alleging offences under several sections of the BNS Act and Section 135(1) of the Gujarat Police Act. He filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS, claiming he played no vi…

The applicant, sentenced to three years' imprisonment, filed a special criminal application seeking parole after the competent authority rejected his request. The rejection was based on a negative police opinion, the presence of other family members able to provide financial assistance, and concerns about breach of pea…

The petitioner, convicted to ten years' imprisonment, applied for parole leave after the competent authority rejected his earlier application. The rejection was based on adverse police opinion, poor jail conduct, the seriousness of the offence, availability of family financial support, and concerns of breach of peace. …

The petitioner, sentenced to 750 days of imprisonment, applied through the jail for parole leave after the competent authority rejected his earlier application. The rejection was based on a negative police opinion, concerns about potential breach of peace, risk of absconding, and the presence of other family members wh…

The applicant, sentenced to three years' imprisonment, applied for parole leave after the competent authority rejected his request. The authority's rejection was based on the presence of other family members who could provide financial assistance, concerns of breach of peace, risk of absconding, and non‑conformity with…

The petitioner, Mangal Manjibhai Vaghela, sentenced to five years' imprisonment, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave after the competent authority rejected his request. The rejection was based on a negative police opinion and concerns of breach of peace and possible absconding. The court noted tha…

The applicant, sentenced to three years' imprisonment, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave after the competent authority rejected his request. The authority's refusal was based on apprehensions of breach of peace and the possibility of the prisoner absconding. The court noted that parole is a priv…

The petitioner, Rasikbhai Babubhai Vaghari, sentenced to three years' imprisonment, applied for parole leave after the competent authority rejected his earlier application. He claimed entitlement to parole on grounds set out in his application, but the authority cited the presence of other family members who could prov…

The applicant, sentenced to three years' imprisonment, applied for parole leave after the competent authority rejected his request. The rejection was based on a negative police opinion, the presence of other family members who could provide financial assistance, and concerns about breach of peace and potential abscondi…

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail filed by Kuldeep under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita after a chargesheet was filed for offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) of the BNSS and Sections 66(c) and 66(d) of the Information Technology Act. The appli…

The petitioner, Bahadursinh Amarsinh Rathod, filed an application for anticipatory bail before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel. The Hon'ble Justice Il…

The applicant, Imranbhai @Bandra, filed a regular bail application before the charge-sheet was filed. After the charge-sheet was lodged, the applicant's counsel, on instructions, chose not to press the bail application and instead sought the court's permission to file a fresh bail application before the concerned court…

The petitioner, Habib @ Sufiyan Mohammadbhai Kalra, was arrested on 1 May 2026 in connection with an FIR alleging violations of the Gujarat Animal Preservation Act, 2017, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960, and the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the BNS…

The applicant, Ghanshyambhai Bhupatbhai Baraiya, was detained on 2 May 2026 in connection with an FIR registered at the Cyber Crime Police Station, Ahmedabad, alleging offences under Sections 319(2), 61(2)(a) and 54 of the B.N.S. and Sections 66(d) and 43(b) of the Information Technology Act. He claimed he had no vital…

Hemang Bhadreshbhai Pathak was arrested in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11203055250397 of 2025) for offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and the B.N.S. Act. He filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS, claiming confinement since 30‑03‑2026 and asserting that he played no vital role…

The applicant, Bhagirath Amrubahai Moya, was arrested on 13 May 2026 for allegedly receiving contraband liquor, charged under Sections 65(A), 65(e), 81 and 116(B) of the Prohibition Act. He filed an application for regular bail before the chargesheet under Section 483 of the BNSS. The State opposed bail, arguing the na…

Lakhman @ Gogo Rajabhai Galchar was arrested on 10 May 2026 for allegedly injuring a complainant with an iron rod, facing charges under Sections 103(1), 115(2), 238(a) and 3(5) of the BNSS and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. The applicant filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS before the …

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Rameshbhai Majethiya, a peon, was arrested on 9 March 2026 in connection with a case registered as C.R. No. 01 of 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 7(A), 12 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He filed an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS aft…

The petitioner, Jayeshbhai Dalabhai Chauhan, was arrested in connection with FIR C.R. No. I/170/2013 for alleged offences under IPC Sections 197, 465 and 468. He filed an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, claiming he had been in custody since 4 December 2025 and that he did not play a vital ro…

The petitioner, Rajeshnath @ Rajlo Babunath Madari, was arrested on 17 March 2026 in connection with FIR C.R. No. 11216010260119 for offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 54 of the BNSS. He applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS after the charge‑sheet had been filed, claiming he played no vital rol…

The applicant, Salim Valibhai Khilji, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the B.N.S. after a charge-sheet was filed for offences including assault with a deadly weapon and other violent crimes. He was arrested on 30‑12‑2025 and alleged to have caused injuries to the victim with an iron pipe, though th…

Shaileshbhai Maganbhai Chauhan applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS for offences alleged under Section 111(3) of the BNS and several provisions of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. He had been in custody since 2 May 2026 and argued that he played no vital role and that no material was recovered again…

The convict filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The application was presented before the High Court of Gujarat, Ahmedabad, by counsel Ms. Mayuri P. Chauhan. The State, represented by Mr. Ronak Raval, opposed the grant of parole. Justice Ilesh J. Vora examined the grounds raised by the convict and…

Jay Pradipbhai Patel was arrested in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11192050260248 of 2026) for alleged offences under Sections 8(c), 22(b) and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. He applied for regular bail after the chargesheet was filed, invoking Section 483 of the BNSS, claiming he had been in custody since 6 April 2026 an…

Vicky Manubhai Thakor was arrested on 6 April 2026 in connection with a FIR (C.R. No. 11192050260248) alleging offences under Sections 8(c), 22(b) and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. The applicant filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS, contending that he had been in custody since his arrest and had n…

Vijaybhai Jitendrabhai alias Jetabhai Sindhal, accused No.2 in FIR C.R. No.11203030260304 registered at Keshod Police Station, was alleged to have been armed with an axe and charged under multiple offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. He applied for regular bail under S…

The petitioner, Tabrez Rojuddin Ansari, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The court examined his prior history of temporary bail, parole and furlough leaves, noting that he consistently surrendered on time and maintained good conduct in jail. Relying on these factors, the judge found no reason …

The applicant, Madhuvansinh Udesinh Solanki, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The applicant’s counsel later requested permission to withdraw the pending application. The Hon’ble Justice Ilesh J. Vora granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the application was disposed of as…

The applicant, Digvijaysinh Narendrasinh Jhala, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The learned counsel for the respondent opposed the withdrawal. The court consid…

Bekakhan Pathan was arrested on 29 March 2026 in connection with a FIR (C.R. No. 11195019260384) alleging violations of Sections 65(A)(E), 116-B, 81, 83 and 98(2) of the Prohibition Act. He filed an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, claiming he had no vital role in the alleged offence and had …

Ajaybhai Hamirbhai Vala was arrested in connection with FIR C.R. No.11203008260042 registered at Bilkha Police Station, Junagadh, for offences under Sections 65(e), 116B, 81 and 98(2) of the Prohibition Act. He filed an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, claiming confinement since 13‑05‑2026 an…

The petitioner, Zebunben Jakirsha Shahamdar, was arrested on 6 March 2026 in connection with FIR C.R. No. 11203025260100 alleging offences under Sections 305(A), 331(3), 331(4), 317(4), 317(5) and 54 of the BNSS. She contended that she merely mortgaged stolen ornaments and sold them, without taking part in the underlyi…

The convict filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The application was presented through the jail, and the State was represented by Mr. Ronak Raval. Justice Ilesh J. Vora examined the grounds raised by the convict and found no sufficient cause to grant parole. The court concluded that the applicant …

The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS for offences under Sections 25(1)(a) and 25(1)(b) of the Arms Act, Section 281 of the BNS, and Sections 177 and 184 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The applicant claimed he had been in custody since 13‑04‑2026 and asserted he played no vital role in the alleged…

The petitioners filed an anticipatory bail application (Criminal Misc. Application No. 9581 of 2026) before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicants were already in police custody at the time of filing. The issue before the court was whether anticipatory bail could be granted when the applicant is already arrested. Th…

Vashrambhai Ramjibhai Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS in connection with FIR No. 11996006260457 alleging offences under Sections 140(3), 64(2)(m), 123, 351(3) and 54 of the BNS. The applicant claimed false implication, no prior record and that custodial interrogation was unnecessar…

The petitioner, Sajidmiya Mehbubmiya Malek, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) No. 6738 of 2026 before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad. The application sought permission to be released on parole from custody. The respondent, the State of Gujarat and others, opposed the application. Counsel for t…

The applicant filed an application seeking condonation of a 17‑day delay in filing a criminal appeal. The respondent opposed the application. The court heard counsel for both sides and examined the reasons for the delay. It found that the applicant had established sufficient cause for the delay. Consequently, the court…

The petitioner, Kishan Baldevbhai Ravad, a 19‑year‑old, was arrested on 26‑Nov‑2025 in connection with an FIR (CR No. 11192006250255 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 64(2)(m), 87 and 137(2) of the BNSS and Sections 4, 5(1) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The alleged facts state that the accused had a consensual relati…

The applicant, Niraj, was arrested on 25 October 2025 in connection with FIR C.R. No. 11191024251306 alleging that he and his brother inflicted a knife blow on the victim Sanjay, offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 54 of the BNS and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. He filed a regular bail applicati…

The applicant, Vijaysinh @ Baso Pandar Kalubhai Gohil, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS after a chargesheet was filed for offences under Sections 65(a), 65(e), 98(2), 81 and 116(B) of the Prohibition Act. He had been in custody since 24 March 2026 and claimed he played no vital role in the…

The Gujarat High Court considered an application for regular bail filed under Section 483 of the Bombay Narcotic Substances Act by Munavar Khalid Mamji, who had been arrested on 02‑03‑2026 in connection with FIR C.R. No.11199012250439 of 2025 alleging theft. The charges invoked Sections 331(4), 305(A) and 3(5) of the B…

The applicant, Bhavinbhai Babubhai Amaliy ar, was in judicial custody since 8 February 2026 for an FIR (C.R. No.11821033260195) alleging offences under Section 107 of the BNS, 2023 relating to the suicide of a minor. The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, arguing that the ingredients of abetme…

The applicant, Sunny, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Mohammed K. Vohra, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Niraj Sharma. The …

The applicant, Sirinbanu Mohammad Shaikh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The applicant waived service of the notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after considering the peculiar facts and circumstances, exercised its discretion and granted temporary bail for a period of ten days,…

The applicant, Afrojkhan Firojkhhan Pathan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Satyajit S. Sonagara and Ms. Nasimbanu Z. Pathan, later moved the court for permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State …

The applicant, Chunara Bharatbhai Punjabbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No.11191016260038 alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 61 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The applicant argued that a co‑…

The petitioner, Roop Narayan Meena, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave after the competent authority rejected his earlier parole request. The authority’s rejection was based on negative police opinion, poor jail conduct, the seriousness of the offence, prior absconding, and concerns of breach of …

The applicant, Karan @ D.K. Nagdanbhai Dav, was arrested on 16‑12‑2025 in connection with FIR C.R. No.11203030250977 for alleged offences under Sections 317(2), 317(4) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. He filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the …

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail filed under Section 483 of the BNSS by Mohammad Sajid, arrested on 5 May 2026 in connection with a FIR alleging offences under Section 325 of the BNSS, several provisions of the Animal Preservation Act, the Animal Cruelty Act and the BPMC Act relating…

The accused, Chirag Jitendrakumar Agrawal, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the B.N.S. in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4) and 54, relating to a commercial transaction of Rs.74,88,746. The applicant claimed false implication, no prior similar offe…

The petitioner, Irfan Gulam Nabi Belim, was arrested on 29 January 2026 in connection with an alleged cow‑slaughter offence and charged under multiple provisions of the B.N.S., Gujarat Police Act, Gujarat Animal Preservation Act and the Animal Cruelty Act. He filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the B.…

Mahesh @ Katto Rajubhai Patani, the applicant, filed a temporary bail application before the High Court of Gujarat against the State of Gujarat and another respondent. The applicant appeared in person while the prosecution was represented by Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Niraj Sharma. The court examined the grounds …

Mustakin Yasinbhai Pipadwala filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave against the State of Gujarat and others. The application was presented before the High Court of Gujarat, Ahmedabad, by counsel Mr. Aditya T. Pancholi. The principal issue was whether the applicant was entitled to be granted parole le…

The petitioner, Harshadkumar @Hasubhai Mahipatdan Mod (Gadhavi), filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The application was heard before Hon’ble Justice Ilesh J. Vora of the Gujarat High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Avanidhar M. Thakore, withdrew the petition during the hearing. The Court di…

The High Court considered a successive regular bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in a case involving alleged possession of a commercial quantity of opium under Sections 8(c), 18(b) and 29 of the NDPS Act. Earlier bail applications by the applicant were rejected, while co‑accused Budharam Vishno…

The petitioner, Sangram Rakesh Singh Sikarvar, filed a criminal application seeking permission to withdraw the petition after the bail applications were withdrawn. The petitioner requested liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action. The Court considered whether it could allow such a withdrawal and gra…

Upesh @ Kano Shantibhai Sarvaiya was preventively detained on 24-04-2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person" based on two pending IPC cases. He challenged the order, arguing that the alleged offences pertained only to law and order and did not affect public order as …

Hiren, a bootlegger, was preventively detained on 24‑04‑2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences under the Prohibition Act (sections 65(E), 116(B), 81) pertained only to law and order, not public order as required by Section 3(…

Dharmendra @ Lalo Sampatsinh Chauhan was preventively detained on 25‑04‑2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the order, arguing that his alleged offences under the Prohibition Act and BNS affect only law and order, not public order. The State contended tha…

Palkesh @ Palli Kishanchand Dhamecha was preventively detained on 25‑04‑2026 by the Police Commissioner, Vadodara, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention, arguing that his alleged offences under the Prohibition Act and the BNS Act pertained only to …

Girish @ Giri Sevakram Pahelwani was preventively detained on 25‑04‑2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences under the Prohibition Act and BNS pertained only to law and order, not to public order as required by …

Vikramsinh Diwansinh was preventively detained on 25‑04‑2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences under the Prohibition Act and BNS did not affect public order, only law and order. The State contended that his ha…

Arjunbhai Bhimabhai Bharai was preventively detained on 24‑04‑2026 by the District Magistrate, Rajkot, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences under the Prohibition Act pertained only to law and order and did not af…

The petitioner, Raish @Pandu, challenged his preventive detention order dated 13/04/2026 issued under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, on the ground that he was not a "dangerous person" as defined by the Act. The petitioner argued that the alleged offences related only to law and order and di…

Rahul Bablu was preventively detained on 15 April 2026 by the Surat Police Commissioner under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences (under IPC sections 304(2) and 54) pertained only to law and order and did not …

The petitioner was preventively detained on 20‑04‑2026 as a “dangerous person” under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences pertained only to law and order and did not affect public order. The State contended that the pe…

Subhanbhai Movar was preventively detained on 20‑04‑2026 as a “dangerous person” under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the order, arguing that the alleged offences, including bootlegging, pertained only to law and order and did not affect public order as require…

Imran GafurBhai Malani was preventively detained on 20‑04‑2026 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘dangerous person’. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences pertained only to law and order and did not affect public order as required by Section 3…

The petitioner was preventively detained on 18/04/2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences pertained only to law and order and did not affect public order as required by Section 3(4) of the Act. The Stat…

The petitioner was preventively detained on 29‑12‑2025 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences related only to law and order and did not affect public order as required by Section 3(4) of the Act. The State …

The petitioner, Sagar @ Mali, was preventively detained on 18‑04‑2026 as a “dangerous person” under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences related only to law and order and did not affect public order as required by Sect…

The petitioner was preventively detained on 18‑04‑2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘dangerous person’. He challenged the order, arguing that the alleged offences – bootlegging and a few assaults for which he had obtained bail – did not affect public order. The State contended t…

The petitioner was detained on 16‑04‑2026 as a “dangerous person” under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention order, arguing that the alleged offences relate only to law and order and not to public order as required by Section 3(4). The State contended t…

Ilaben Hiteshbhai Dineshbhai was preventively detained on 22 April 2026 as a “dangerous person” under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences pertained only to law and order and did not affect public order as required by …

Amit Dineshbhai Sudhwani was preventively detained on 28‑04‑2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention, arguing that his alleged offences pertained only to law and order, not public order, as required by Section 3(4) of the Act. The State contended…

The petitioner, a self‑identified bootlegger, was preventively detained on 11 March 2026 by the District Magistrate under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that his alleged offences pertained only to law and order and did not affect public order as required…

Ashrafkhan @ Bapu Ajijakhan Usmankhan Pathan was detained on 29‑04‑2026 as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the offences for which he was booked pertained only to law and order and did not affect public order…

Kanabhai Laxmanbhai Gami was preventively detained on 2 April 2026 by the District Magistrate under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, on the ground that his bootlegging activities threatened public order. He filed a petition challenging the legality of the detention, arguing that the alleged o…

The petitioner, a bootlegger, was preventively detained on 6 April 2026 by the District Magistrate, Botad, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He filed a petition challenging the legality of the detention, arguing that his alleged offences pertained only to law and order and did not affect…

Vijaybhai Ravubhai Boricha was preventively detained on 15 April 2026 by the District Magistrate, Botad, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention, arguing that his alleged offences relate only to law and order, not public order as required by Section …

The petitioner was preventively detained on 29 April 2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a “dangerous person”. He challenged the detention, arguing that the offences listed against him—various sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention o…

The petitioner, Darsak @ Bogho Ravindrabhai Wadkar, was preventively detained on 18‑04‑2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention, arguing that the cited offences under the Indian Penal Code pertained only to law and order and did not affec…

Vijaybhai @Faglo Pabjibhai Dantani was preventively detained on 18 April 2026 by the Ahmedabad Police Commissioner as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The detention was based on three criminal cases (Sections 303(2) and 54) for which bail had been gr…

The petitioner was preventively detained on 21‑04‑2026 under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences relate only to law and order and not to the "public order" contemplated by the Act. The S…

Mahesh was preventively detained on 29‑04‑2026 by the Surat Police Commissioner under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention, arguing that his alleged offences pertained only to law and order and did not affect public order as required by Section 3(4) of …

The petitioner was preventively detained on 30‑04‑2026 by the Vadodara Police Commissioner as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the offences for which he was booked pertained only to law and order, not public …

The petitioner, a bootlegger, was preventively detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 on 13 April 2026 (detention effected on 30 April 2026). He challenged the detention, arguing that his alleged offences relate only to law and order and do not affect public order as required by Secti…

The petitioner, Nare​sh Madanlal Ghis​haji Chauhan, was preventively detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 on the ground that he was a bootlegger whose activities allegedly threatened public order. He challenged the detention order, arguing that the alleged offences under the Prohibi…