Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

HABIB @ SUFIYAN MOHAMMADBHAI KALRAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the applicant, subject to conditions, as the evidence did not warrant further detention.

Summary

The petitioner, Habib @ Sufiyan Mohammadbhai Kalra, was arrested on 1 May 2026 in connection with an FIR alleging violations of the Gujarat Animal Preservation Act, 2017, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960, and the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS before the chargesheet was filed, claiming he played no vital role in the alleged offences. The State opposed bail, arguing the nature of the accusations warranted continued detention. The Court observed that the arrest was based solely on a co‑accused’s statement, no material had been recovered from the petitioner, the investigation concerning him was essentially complete, and he had no prior similar antecedents. Consequently, the Court granted regular bail with a personal bond of Rs.10,000 and several conditions, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted before the filing of a chargesheet for offences under the Gujarat Animal Preservation Act, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, and the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.
  • Whether the applicant's alleged role, based only on a co‑accused’s statement, justifies continued detention.

Legislation cited

Subjects

regular bailpre‑charge sheet bailanimal preservation offencescriminal procedureSection 483 BNSSco‑accused statementdetentionbail conditions

Judgment

     R/CR.MA/12278/2026                                        ORDER DATED: 04/06/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
                 CHARGESHEET) NO. 12278 of 2026
==========================================================
                  HABIB @ SUFIYAN MOHAMMADBHAI KALRA
                                  Versus
                            STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS YASHA MATHUR, ADVOCATE for
MR SR SHARMA(5686) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR NIRAJ SHARMA APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA

                                   Date : 04/06/2026

                                    ORAL ORDER

1.      Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of
        respondent State.

2.      The applicant, by way of this application filed under
        Section       483    of    the      BNSS,      seeks     regular       bail      in
        connection          with      the        FIR    being          I-C.R.         No.
        11193024260131 of 2026 registered with Jafrabad
        Police        Station,       Dist.        Amreli   for        the     offences
        punishable under Sections 5(1), 5(1)(1A), 6B, 8(1), 8(2),
        8(3) and 8(4) of the Gujarat Animal Preservation Act,
        2017, Section 11(1) of the Prevention of Cruelty to
        Animal Act, 1960 and Section 325 and 299 of the
        Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3.      It is the submission of learned counsel for the applicant
        that he is suffering confinement since 01.05.2026. He
        further submitted that the applicant has not played any
        vital role in the alleged offence. Hence, further detention



                                         Page 1 of 3
     R/CR.MA/12278/2026                                     ORDER DATED: 04/06/2026




        of the applicant is unwarranted.

4.      Learned           APP   has    opposed        the     bail     application
        contending         that,   considering        the    conduct        of        the
        applicant and nature of accusation, the discretion may
        not be exercised in favour of the applicant.

5.      Having heard the learned counsel for the respective
        parties and upon perusal of the material placed on
        record, it appears that the applicant herein has been
        arrested on the basis of the statement of co-accused. So
        far recovery is concerned, nothing has been found from
        the applicant herein. The investigation qua the present
        applicant is almost over admittedly and the further
        custody of the applicant is not necessary. The applicant
        is not involved in any past antecedent of like nature.
        Under such circumstances, having regard to the role
        attributed to the present applicant and evidence in
        support of charge, without commenting on merits of the
        matter, I deemed it fit to release the applicant on bail.
        Hence, present application is allowed.

6.      Hence, the applicant is ordered to be released on
        regular bail in connection with the FIR being I-C.R.
        No.      11193024260131              of     2026    registered           with
        Jafrabad Police Station, Dist. Amreli on executing a
        personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousands
        only), with one surety of the like amount to the
        satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and subject to the
        conditions that he shall:


                                      Page 2 of 3
       R/CR.MA/12278/2026                                                            ORDER DATED: 04/06/2026




            No.                                           Conditions
            (a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse
                liberty;

            (b) not act in a manner injuries to the interest of
                the prosecution;

            (c)      surrender passport, if any, to the lower court
                     within a week;

            (d) not leave India without prior permission of the
                Sessions Judge concerned;

            (e) furnish latest address of residence to the
                Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the
                time of execution of the bond and shall not
                change the residence without prior permission
                of the trial Court;


 7.      The authorities shall release the applicant if he is not
         required in connection with the any other offence. If
         breach of any above condition is committed, the Sessions
         Judge concerned shall take appropriate action or issue
         warrant against the applicant. The bail bond to be
         executed before the learned trial Court having jurisdiction
         to try the case. It will be open for the sessions judge
         concerned to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above
         conditions, in accordance with law. Nothing stated
         hereinabove, shall tantamount to the expression of any
         opinion on the merits of this case. Rule is made absolute
         to the aforesaid extent. Direct service permitted.



                                                                                           (ILESH J. VORA,J)
 MISHRA AMIT V.
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: AMIT VISHNUPRASAD MISHRA(HC00187), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 04/06/2026 11:14:23




                                                      Page 3 of 3


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "regular bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.