ADDITIONAL SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusDECEASED NANUBHAI NARSINH RATHVA THRO HIS LEGAL HEIRS
- Disposal
- 47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH
Holding
The appeal is dismissed; the market‑value determination of Rs 300 per sq.mt by the Land Reference Court is upheld.
Summary
The State, represented by the Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer, appealed against a Reference Court award that granted an additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre for land acquired for the Kalikua Irrigation Pond Canal, over the original award of Rs 6.90 per square metre. The appeal was filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The High Court examined the matter in light of earlier group appeals (FA 3813 of 2012 and FA 1637/1641 of 2012) and a prior reference (LAR No. 52 of 2003) where a similar additional compensation of Rs 287 per square metre was upheld. The Court found that the earlier judgments were accepted by the Government and provided a comparable basis for the market‑value determination. Consequently, the Court held that the Reference Court had not erred in fixing the additional compensation and dismissed the appeal.
Issues considered
- Whether the additional compensation of Rs 300 per sq.mt awarded by the Land Reference Court is legally valid.
- Whether the appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Section 96 of the CPC is maintainable in view of prior judgments.
- Whether the market‑value determination in the present case can be guided by the earlier LAR No. 52 of 2003 and the group appeals.
Legislation cited
- Code of Civil Procedures. 96
- Land Acquisition Act, 1894s. 11, s. 18, s. 4, s. 54, s. 6
Subjects
Judgment
C/FA/3812/2012 ORDER DATED: 04/08/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 3812 of 2012
==========================================================
ADDITIONAL SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER & ORS.
Versus
DECEASED NANUBHAI NARSINH RATHVA THRO HIS LEGAL HEIRS &
ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR BHAVESH DESAI AGP for the Appellants No. 1,2,3
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI
Date : 04/08/2026
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA)
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and award passed in
group of Land Acquisition Reference Cases (LAR No. 555 of 2008
to 565 of 2008), decided by the Principal Senior Civil Judge,
Panchmahal at Godhra. The Reference Court for the acquired land
determined the market value at Rs.300/- per sq.mt as an additional
compensation, over and above the compensation awarded by the
Special Land Acquisition Officer. Being aggrieved by and
dissatisfied with the judgment and award of the Reference Court
dated 05.02.2011, the State through Additional Special Land
Acquisition Officer, preferred present appeal under Section 54 of
the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with Section 96 of the Code
of Civil Procedure.
2. Brief facts can be summarized as under:
Page 1 of 3
C/FA/3812/2012 ORDER DATED: 04/08/2026
The land of the deceased Nanubhai Narsinh Rathwa was
acquired for the purpose of Kalikua Irrigation Pond Canal work.
The notification under Section 4 of the L.A. Act was issued on
05.07.2007 followed by the Notification under Section 6 published
on 29.09.2007. The Award under Section 11 determining the
market value Rs.6.90/- per sq.mt was passed. The Reference under
Section 18 by the land owner being made to the Land Reference
Court. The Land Reference Court, vide its judgment and award
dated 05.02.2011, awarded additional amount of compensation of
Rs.300/- per sq.mt over and above the compensation awarded by
the Special Land Acquisition Officer.
3. We have heard learned AGP Mr. Bhavesh Desai for the appellant.
Though served, none appeared for and on behalf of the
respondents.
4. Mr. Desai, learned AGP while placing reliance upon the group of
Appeals (First Appeal No. 3813 of 2012 and allied matters)
decided on 30.06.2026, fairly submitted that, the matter is squarely
covered by the judgment of the Appellate Court and as the
judgment and award in another group of appeal (First Appeal No.
1637/1641 of 2012) came to be dismissed and the department has
accepted the judgment of the Reference Court and no further
appeal is filed challenging the judgment of the group of appeals.
5. We may profitably refer para-9 of the judgment and order dated
30.06.2026 passed in the group of Appeals (FA No.3813 of 2012)
which reads as under:
Page 2 of 3
C/FA/3812/2012 ORDER DATED: 04/08/2026
9. Having heard the learned advocates for the respective
parties and upon appreciating the evidence on record, it
appears that, the entire base of the fixation of market value
is the award passed in LAR No. 52 of 2003. Admittedly, in
the said Reference, for the purpose of construction of by-
pass road, the lands were acquired of the village: Vavdi
Buzarg, Tal.: Godhra, wherein, the additional compensation
of Rs.287/- per sq.mt. against the compensation of Rs.6.90/-
per sq.mt awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer,
Godhra. The Government has challenged the judgment and
award by preferring First Appeal before this Court and
accordingly, by upholding the judgment and award of the
Land Reference Court, the group of Appeals (First Appeal
Nos. 1637/1641 of 2012) came to be dismissed. The
communication dated 27.05.2025, tendered by learned
counsel Mr. Raval shows that the Government has accepted
the said judgment and award. In such circumstances, in our
view, the judgment pertaining to the acquired lands of the
adjacent village: Vavdi Buzarg can be taken as a
comparable instance and accordingly, we are fully agree
with the market value determined by the Land Reference
Court and no any error has been committed by the Land
Reference Court while taken into account the market value
of adjacent land.
6. In such circumstances, in our opinion, no further reasons are
required to be assigned as the matter is covered by the judgment
and order of this Court, as referred above.
7. Thus, we do not find any merits in the present appeal and same
stands dismissed. No order as to costs.
(ILESH J. VORA,J)
(R. T. VACHHANI, J)
P.S. JOSHI
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges.
Digitally signed by: PALLAV SUBHASHCHANDRA JOSHI(HC00177), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 04/08/2026 16:34:02
Page 3 of 3
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.