Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

LAKHAMAN @ GOGO RAJABHAI GALCHARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

Holding

The Court exercised its discretion to grant regular bail, finding that continued detention was unnecessary.

Summary

Lakhman @ Gogo Rajabhai Galchar was arrested on 10 May 2026 for allegedly injuring a complainant with an iron rod, facing charges under Sections 103(1), 115(2), 238(a) and 3(5) of the BNSS and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. The applicant filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS before the chargesheet was filed, claiming he had not played a vital role and had already been in custody for several weeks. The State opposed bail, arguing the nature of the accusation warranted continued detention. The Court, after hearing both sides and noting that the victim had been discharged and the investigation was nearly complete, held that further custody would serve no useful purpose. Consequently, the Court granted regular bail on a personal bond of Rs.10,000 with one surety, imposing standard conditions such as surrendering the passport and not leaving India without permission.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail can be granted under Section 483 of the BNSS before the filing of a chargesheet in a case involving serious offences.
  • Whether the nature of the alleged offence and the applicant's conduct justify denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

regular bailpre‑chargesheet bailSection 483criminal procedureGujaratinjury offencebail conditions

Judgment

     R/CR.MA/12443/2026                               ORDER DATED: 04/06/2026




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
           CHARGESHEET) NO. 12443 of 2026

=========================================================
            LAKHAMAN @ GOGO RAJABHAI GALCHAR
                            Versus
                     STATE OF GUJARAT
=========================================================
Appearance:
MR. RAVI L. GARCHAR(16000) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR. NEERAJ SHARMA, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the
Respondent(s) No. 1
=========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA

                             Date : 03/06/2026

                                ORAL ORDER


1.      Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of
        respondent State.


2.      The applicant, by way of this application filed under Section
        483 of the BNSS, seeks regular bail in connection with the FIR
        being C.R. No. 11203006260055 of 2026 registered with
        Batwa Police Station, Dist. Junagadh, for the offences
        punishable under Sections 103(1), 115(2), 238(a) and 3(5) of
        BNS and Section 135 of GP Act.


3.      It is the submission of learned counsel for the applicant that he
        is   suffering    confinement    since   10.05.2026.      He    further
        submitted that the applicant has not played any vital role in the
        alleged offence. Hence, further detention of the applicant is
        unwarranted.


4.      Learned APP has opposed the bail application contending that,


                                   Page 1 of 3
     R/CR.MA/12443/2026                                      ORDER DATED: 04/06/2026




        considering the conduct of the applicant and nature of
        accusation, the discretion may not be exercised in favour of the
        applicant.


5.      Having heard the learned counsel for the respective parties and
        upon perusal of the material placed on record, it appears that
        the applicant herein caused injury upon the complainant with
        an iron rod. The victim has already been discharged from the
        hospital      and   the   investigation      is   almost   over.    In      such
        circumstances,       further    custody      of   the   applicant      is      not
        necessary. Therefore, I am inclined to exercise discretion in
        favour of the applicant, as keeping the applicant behind bars
        would not serve any useful purpose. Hence, the bail application
        is allowed.


                In such circumstances, considering the role attributable
        to present applicant herein and evidence in support of charge,
        without commenting on merits of the matter, I deemed it fit to
        release the applicant on bail. Hence, present application is
        allowed.


6.      Hence, the applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in
        connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11203006260055 of
        2026 registered with Batwa Police Station, Dist. Junagadh,
        on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
        thousands only), with one surety of the like amount to the
        satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and subject to the
        conditions that he shall:


         No.                              Conditions
         (a)    not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;


                                       Page 2 of 3
        R/CR.MA/12443/2026                                                                       ORDER DATED: 04/06/2026




              (b)       not act in a manner injuries to the interest of the
                        prosecution;

              (c)       surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a
                        week;

              (d)       not leave India without prior permission of the
                        Sessions Judge concerned;

              (e)       furnish latest address of residence to the Investigating
                        Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution
                        of the bond and shall not change the residence
                        without prior permission of the trial Court;




 7.       The authorities shall release the applicant if he is not required in
          connection with the any other offence. If breach of any above
          condition is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned shall take
          appropriate action or issue warrant against the applicant. The
          bail bond to be executed before the learned trial Court having
          jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the sessions judge
          concerned to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above
          conditions, in accordance with law. Nothing stated hereinabove,
          shall tantamount to the expression of any opinion on the merits
          of this case. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct
          service permitted.




                                                                                                    (ILESH J. VORA,J)
 Mehul Desai
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MEHULKUMAR BHIMABHAI DESAI(HCD0075), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE TWO CLASS TWO, at High Court of Gujarat on 04/06/2026 11:10:18




                                                              Page 3 of 3


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "regular bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.