Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

VIJAYBHAI RAVUBHAI BORIYA (KATHI-DARBAR)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the applicant, subject to a personal bond and conditions.

Summary

Vijaybhai R. Boriya applied for successive regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS after a chargesheet was filed for alleged offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Section 111(3) of the BNS, 2023. He had been in custody since 7 May 2026 and claimed he played no vital role in the alleged crime, asserting that he was not present at the raid and was implicated only through a co‑accused’s statement. The State opposed bail, arguing the nature of the accusation warranted continued detention. The Court examined the material, noted the applicant’s absence at the raid, the reliance on a co‑accused’s statement, and the likely protracted trial, concluding that further detention would serve no purpose. Accordingly, the Court granted regular bail on a personal bond of Rs 10,000 with one surety, imposing standard conditions and reserving the right to modify them. The order expressly states it does not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail can be granted after the filing of a chargesheet under Section 483 of the BNSS for offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and BNS, 2023.
  • Whether the applicant’s alleged involvement, based solely on a co‑accused’s statement, justifies denial of bail.
  • Whether continued detention of the applicant serves any purpose pending trial.

Legislation cited

Subjects

regular bailsuccessive bailchargesheetGujarat Prohibition ActBNS 2023BNSS Section 483co‑accused statementdetentionpersonal bond

Judgment

     R/CR.MA/13161/2026                         ORDER DATED: 12/06/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL -
           AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 13161 of 2026

==========================================================
                VIJAYBHAI RAVUBHAI BORIYA (KATHI-DARBAR)
                                  Versus
                            STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR AMRISH S BAROT(3551) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR PAWAN A BAROT(6455) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS SWETA P BAROT(10181) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR RONAK RAVAL APP for the Respondent No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA

                            Date : 12/06/2026

                              ORAL ORDER


1.      Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of
        respondent State.


2.      The applicant,       by way of this successive bail
        application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS,
        seeks regular bail in connection with the FIR being
        C.R. No. 11184003251019 of 2025 registered
        with Jetpur Pavi Police Station, Chota-Udaipur,
        for the offences punishable under Sections 65(a),
        65(e), 81, 83 and 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act,
        1949 and under Section 111(3) of BNS, 2023.

3.      It is the submission of learned counsel for the
        applicant that he is suffering confinement since
        07.05.2026. He further submitted that the applicant


                                Page 1 of 4
     R/CR.MA/13161/2026                                     ORDER DATED: 12/06/2026




        has not played any vital role in the alleged offence.
        Hence,            further   detention        of    the    applicant           is
        unwarranted.

4.      Learned           APP    has   opposed        the    bail     application
        contending that, considering the conduct of the
        applicant and nature of accusation, the discretion
        may not be exercised in favour of the applicant.


5.      Having regard to the contentions raised by learned
        counsel for the respective parties and upon perusal
        of the material placed on record, it appears that, the
        applicant was not present at the time of raid. He has
        been arraigned in the alleged crime on the basis of
        statement           of   co-accused.         The    chargesheet           has
        already been filed. The trial would take considerable
        time. In such circumstances, keeping behind the
        applicant behind bar, would not serve any purpose.
        Hence, the bail application is allowed.


     6. Hence, the applicant is ordered to be released on
        regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R.
        No. 11184003251019 of 2025 registered with
        Jetpur Pavi Police Station, Chota-Udaipur,                                    on
        executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees
        Ten thousands only), with one surety of the like
        amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court


                                       Page 2 of 4
     R/CR.MA/13161/2026                      ORDER DATED: 12/06/2026




        and subject to the conditions that he shall:


         No.                    Conditions
         (a) not take undue advantage of liberty or
             misuse liberty;
         (b) not act in a manner injuries to the interest of
             the prosecution;
         (c) surrender passport, if any, to the lower court
             within a week;
         (d) not leave India without prior permission of
             the Sessions Judge concerned;
         (e) furnish latest address of residence to the
             Investigating Officer and also to the Court at
             the time of execution of the bond and shall
             not change the residence without prior
             permission of the trial Court;




7.    The authorities shall release the applicant if he is not
      required in connection with the any other offence. If
      breach of any above condition is committed, the
      Sessions Judge concerned shall take appropriate
      action or issue warrant against the applicant. The bail
      bond to be executed before the learned trial Court
      having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for
      the sessions judge concerned to delete, modify and/or
      relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with
      law. Nothing stated hereinabove, shall tantamount to
      the expression of any opinion on the merits of this


                              Page 3 of 4
         R/CR.MA/13161/2026                                                              ORDER DATED: 12/06/2026




           case. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.
           Direct service permitted.



                                                                                               (ILESH J. VORA,J)
   P.S. JOSHI


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: PALLAV SUBHASHCHANDRA JOSHI(HC00177), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 12/06/2026 16:57:35




                                                          Page 4 of 4


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "regular bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.