Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

SHAILESHBHAI MAGANBHAI CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

Holding

The Court allowed the bail application, granting regular bail with conditions.

Summary

Shaileshbhai Maganbhai Chauhan applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS for offences alleged under Section 111(3) of the BNS and several provisions of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. He had been in custody since 2 May 2026 and argued that he played no vital role and that no material was recovered against him. The State opposed bail, citing the nature of the accusations and the applicant's past antecedents. The Court observed that the investigation was complete, the charge was based mainly on a co‑accused’s statement, and that continued detention would serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the Court exercised its discretion to grant bail, imposing a personal bond of Rs.10,000 with a surety and a set of conditions, without commenting on the merits of the case.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail may be granted under Section 483 of the BNSS before the filing of a chargesheet for the offences alleged.
  • Whether the applicant's past antecedents and the nature of the offences preclude the exercise of judicial discretion in favour of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

regular bailpre‑chargesheet bailGujarat Prohibition ActSection 483bail conditionscriminal procedure

Judgment

     R/CR.MA/12235/2026                                      ORDER DATED: 03/06/2026




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
           CHARGESHEET) NO. 12235 of 2026

=========================================================
              SHAILESHBHAI MAGANBHAI CHAUHAN
                             Versus
                      STATE OF GUJARAT
=========================================================
Appearance:
ANAND R PATEL(7352) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR. RONAK RAVAL. ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the
Respondent(s) No. 1
=========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA

                                   Date : 03/06/2026

                                     ORAL ORDER


1.      Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of
        respondent State.


2.      The applicant, by way of this application filed under Section
        483 of the BNSS, seeks regular bail in connection with the FIR
        being C.R. No. 11184009260131 of 2026 registered with
        Sankheda          Police    Station,    Dist.    Chhotaudepur,        for the
        offences punishable under Sections 111(3) of BNS and 65(a),
        65(e), 98(2), 81, 83 and 116-B of the Gujarat Prohibition Act,
        1949.


3.      It is the submission of learned counsel for the applicant that he
        is   suffering      confinement        since    02.05.2026.      He    further
        submitted that the applicant has not played any vital role in the
        alleged offence. Hence, further detention of the applicant is
        unwarranted.


                                        Page 1 of 3
     R/CR.MA/12235/2026                                  ORDER DATED: 03/06/2026




4.      Learned APP has opposed the bail application contending that,
        considering the conduct of the applicant and nature of
        accusation, the discretion may not be exercised in favour of the
        applicant.


5.      Having heard the learned counsel for the respective parties and
        upon perusal of the material placed on record, it appears that
        the investigation is already over. The present applicant has been
        arraigned mainly on the basis of the statement of the co-
        accused. Nothing has been recovered at the instance of the
        applicant.        In   such   circumstances,   considering      the    past
        antecedents, by imposing stringent conditions, I am inclined to
        exercise discretion in favour of the applicant, as keeping the
        applicant behind bars would not serve any useful purpose.
        Hence, the bail application is allowed.


                In such circumstances, considering the role attributable
        to present applicant herein and evidence in support of charge,
        without commenting on merits of the matter, I deemed it fit to
        release the applicant on bail. Hence, present application is
        allowed.


6.      Hence, the applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in
        connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11184009260131 of
        2026 of registered with Sankheda Police Station, Dist.
        Chhotaudepur,           on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/-
        (Rupees Ten thousands only), with one surety of the like
        amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and
        subject to the conditions that he shall:




                                       Page 2 of 3
      R/CR.MA/12235/2026                                                                        ORDER DATED: 03/06/2026




            No.                                                  Conditions
            (a)        not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

            (b)        not act in a manner injuries to the interest of the
                       prosecution;

            (c)        surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a
                       week;

            (d)        not leave India without prior permission of the
                       Sessions Judge concerned;

            (e)        furnish latest address of residence to the Investigating
                       Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution
                       of the bond and shall not change the residence
                       without prior permission of the trial Court;

            (f)        Shall not enter in jurisdiction area of Savli and
                       Sankheda Police Station for a period of 1 years except
                       for mark his presence before the concerned Court as
                       well as Police Station, if any.




7.       The authorities shall release the applicant if he is not required in
         connection with the any other offence. If breach of any above
         condition is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned shall take
         appropriate action or issue warrant against the applicant. The
         bail bond to be executed before the learned trial Court having
         jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the sessions judge
         concerned to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above
         conditions, in accordance with law. Nothing stated hereinabove,
         shall tantamount to the expression of any opinion on the merits
         of this case. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct
         service permitted.




                                                                                                   (ILESH J. VORA,J)
Mehul Desai
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MEHULKUMAR BHIMABHAI DESAI(HCD0075), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE TWO CLASS TWO, at High Court of Gujarat on 03/06/2026 11:32:14




                                                             Page 3 of 3


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "regular bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.