BHURSINH @ BHURIYO @ BHULRIYA SHAITH BHAVANSINH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

    R/CR.MA/16448/2026                               ORDER DATED: 20/07/2026




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
   R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
                CHARGESHEET) NO. 16448 of 2026
==========================================================
BHURSINH @ BHURIYO @ BHULRIYA SHAIKH BHAVANSINH CHAUHAN
                         Versus
                   STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
VASIMRAJA A KURESHI(8609) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR ROHAN SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
                  Date : 20/07/2026

                                  ORDER

[1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

[2.0] The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in
connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11210001240256 OF 2024 registered
with Hajira Police Station, Surat for offences punishable under Sections
454, 457, 380, 114, 120(B) and 411 of the IPC.

[3.0] Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that
the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence.
Nothing is required to be recovered or discovered. He therefore submits
that, considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged
on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

[4.0] Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed
the present application and requested to dismiss the present application for
regular bail on the ground that the applicant is very much involved in the
present offence and considering the gravity of offence, no case is made out
to entertain present bail application. Therefore, present application does
not deserve consideration.

[5.0] While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of the
accused in the alleged offence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be


                                  Page 1 of 4
   R/CR.MA/16448/2026                                      ORDER DATED: 20/07/2026




exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the
facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be
taken into consideration while considering an application for bail: (i) the
nature of accusation and the severity of the punishment and the nature of
the materials relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable apprehension
of tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the
witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the
accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence; (iv)
character behaviour and standing of the accused and the circumstances
which are peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest of the public or the
State and similar other considerations are required to be considered.

[6.0] I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the
respective parties and perused the investigation papers. Following aspects
have been considered:
      (1)     substantial part of investigation is over;
      (2)     Applicant is behind the bar since 21.06.2026;
      (3)     There is nothing to be recovered or discovered from the
      applicant;
      (4)     case is triable by the JMFC:
      (5)     It is alleged that the co-accused stole the ornaments and
      subsequently sold them in the market. Out of the sale proceeds
      amounting to ₹6,20,000/-, the said amount was allegedly handed over
      to the present applicant. It is further alleged that, from the said
      amount, the applicant paid a sum of ₹70,000/- to the co-accused,
      namely, Karina alias Kamli;
      (6)     Obviously commencement and conclusion of trial will take its
      own time;
      (7)     Considering the aforesaid facts, no circumstances exist to
      protract the detention of the present applicant;
      (8)     Considering the fact that after issuance of warrant, he is
      arrested. Therefore, stringent condition is required to be imposed;



                                    Page 2 of 4
    R/CR.MA/16448/2026                                   ORDER DATED: 20/07/2026




[7.0] This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of
Investigation reported in [2012]1 SCC 40 as well as in the case of
Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of
Andhra Pradesh reported in (1978)1 SCC 240. Obviously, the conclusion of
trial will take time and keeping the accused behind the bars is nothing but
amounts to pre-trial conviction and therefore, considering the celebrated
principle of bail jurisprudence is that “bail is a rule and jail is exception” as
well as the concept of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the
Constitution of India, present application deserves consideration.

[8.0] In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature
of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing
the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a
fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.
Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be
released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.
11210001240256 OF 2024 registered with Hajira Police Station, Surat, on
executing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand
only) with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial
Court and subject to the conditions that he/she shall;
   (a)     not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
   (b)     not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution &
           shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not
           to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected
           by the police;
   (c)     surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;
   (d)     not leave India without prior permission of the Trial Court
           concerned;
   (e)     mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in every
           month till filing of the charge-sheet between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00
           p.m.;



                                    Page 3 of 4
       R/CR.MA/16448/2026                                                ORDER DATED: 20/07/2026




      (f)      furnish the Aadhaar card, email ID/present address of his
               residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the
               time of execution of the bond and shall not change the
               residence/contact number without prior permission of Trial Court;


  [9.0] The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in
  connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the
  above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to
  issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

  [10.0] Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to
  try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify
  and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

  [11.0] At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations
  of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court
  while enlarging the applicant on bail.

  [12.0] Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is
  permitted.




                                                                   (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J)
  KUMAR ALOK

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: ALOK KUMAR(HC01091), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 20/07/2026 18:29:34




                                               Page 4 of 4