Created by Fuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

MAHAVIRSINH OMKARSINH JODDHAversusJAYESHBHAI VITHHALBHAI PATEL

Decided
Disposal
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The appellant Mahavirsinh Omkarsinh Joddha filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 419 of the BNSS, 2023, seeking leave to appeal the trial court's acquittal order in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal challenged the judgment that had cleared the appellant of the alleged cheque bounce offence. No party, including the appellant or the respondents, appeared before the High Court even after a second call, and no request for adjournment was made. The Court observed that the prosecution had failed to present itself. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker on 8 January 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the effect of non-appearance of parties on a pending criminal appeal under Section 419 of the BNSS, 2023?
  • Can an acquittal order under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act be challenged without the prosecution being present?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • criminal appeal
  • Section 138 NI Act
  • Section 419 BNSS
  • want of prosecution
  • dismissal

Judgment

          R/CR.MA/22324/2024                                                                  ORDER DATED: 08/01/2026




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) NO. 22324
                               of 2024

                                    In F/CRIMINAL APPEAL/42404/2024

   ==========================================================
                                MAHAVIRSINH OMKARSINH JODDHA
                                             Versus
                              JAYESHBHAI VITHHALBHAI PATEL & ANR.
   ==========================================================
   Appearance:
   MR DEVDIP BRAHMBHATT(3490) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
   MALAY A DANGE(10127) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
   MR YUVRAJ BRAHMBHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 2
   ==========================================================

      CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                                     Date : 08/01/2026

                                                        ORAL ORDER


                          The present appeal is filed under Section 419 of

   the BNSS, 2023 challenging the judgment and order passed

   against the acquittal order for the offence under Section 138

   of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

                          None present even in the second call nor any

   request for adjournment is made.
                          In view of the same, this matter is dismissed for

   want of prosecution.


                                                                                          (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
   SRILATHA


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SRILATHA VENKATARAO UPADHYAYULA(HC00185), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 08/01/2026 17:47:53




                                                             Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.