High Court of Gujarat
CBI, BSFB, MUMBAIversusSH BHARAT PRUSHOTTAM GAJJAR
- Disposal
- 38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH
- Bench
- P M RAVAL
Holding
The delay was sufficiently explained and therefore condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Summary
The CBI filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 75‑day delay in filing a restoration application for a main criminal revision that had been dismissed for default. The applicant argued that sufficient cause for the delay was shown. The court examined the memorandum and found the explanation satisfactory. Consequently, the court condoned the delay and allowed the restoration application. The order was made absolute without notice to the other respondents.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 75 days in filing a restoration application for a criminal revision can be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act
Legislation cited
- Limitation Acts. 5
Subjects
condonation of delayLimitation ActSection 5criminal revisionrestoration applicationHigh Court of Gujarat
Judgment
R/CR.MA/26749/2025 ORDER DATED: 13/02/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO.
26749 of 2025
In F/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION/50803/2025
In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/26888/2025
==========================================================
CBI, BSFB, MUMBAI
Versus
SH BHARAT PRUSHOTTAM GAJJAR & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR RC KODEKAR(1395) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 3
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Date : 13/02/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. By this application under section 5 of the Limitation Act,
the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 75 days caused in
preferring the restoration application in main Criminal Revision
Application which came to be dismissed for default for want of
prosecution, for non-removing the o&ce objection. As this is an
application for condonation of delay in restoration application,
no notice is issued to the respondent nos.1 & 2.
2. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of
Rule.
3. Heard, the learned advocate for applicant. The learned
advocate for the applicant, drawing attention of the Court to
Page 1 of 2
R/CR.MA/26749/2025 ORDER DATED: 13/02/2026
the grounds for delay narrated in the application memo, states
that su&cient cause has been made out for condonation of
delay and accordingly, it is urged that the delay that has
caused in preferring the restoration application in main
Criminal Revision Application, may be condoned.
4. Having heard and considering the averments made in the
memorandum of application, the Court is of the view that the
delay that has occasioned in preferring the restoration
application in main Criminal Revision Application has been
su&ciently explained. The application, therefore, succeeds and
is, accordingly, allowed. The delay caused in 0ling the
restoration application in main Criminal Revision Application is
hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute accordingly.
(P. M. RAVAL, J)
AMIT ITALIAN
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: AMIT DAHYABHAI ITALIAN(HCW0112), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE I, at High Court of Gujarat on 16/02/2026 17:13:42
Page 2 of 2
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
Try "condonation of delay"Sign in to search