Created byFuzzy Cloud| Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
324 judgments delivered by benches including this judge — showing 1–200.
The applicant, Ashish @ Aashubhai Rameshbhai Agrawal, filed a series of criminal miscellaneous applications seeking quashing and setting aside of FIR/order and other reliefs. The High Court of Gujarat, after hearing counsel for the applicant and noting the presence of the Public Prosecutor for the State, issued a commo…
Petitioner Sanjay Ambalal Patel filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quash of an FIR. During proceedings, a death certificate was submitted showing the petitioner had died on 31 May 2026. The court considered the effect of the petitioner's death on the pending application. It held that the death of the pe…
The applicants, represented by Mr. Hriday Buch, failed to remove office objections concerning insufficiency of court fees and other procedural matters in a series of criminal miscellaneous applications. The High Court directed the applicants to clear the fee objection within one week and all other objections within two…
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashing of an FIR/Order. Applicant No.1's petition was dismissed as not pressed, while Applicants No.2 and No.3, through counsel, requested to withdraw the application. The Court considered the request for withdrawal, granted permission, and disposed o…
The applicant, Kartikeya Venod Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash FIR No. I-45/2019 registered for offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. The de facto complainant filed an affidavit stating that the dispute had been amicably settled and he had no objectio…
The petitioners, Akashbhai Patel and others, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash FIR CR‑I‑125‑2015, which alleged kidnapping and abduction of a 17‑year‑8‑month‑old girl under IPC Sections 363 and 366 read with POCSO Sections 7 and 8. The FIR was based on a complaint…
The petitioner, Deendayal, filed a criminal miscellaneous application in 2016 seeking quashment of an FIR. The second respondent had not been served with the petition. The Court, upon the petitioner's request, granted an extension until 19‑06‑2025 for the petitioner to take necessary steps, warning that failure to do s…
The applicants, Bhaveshbhai Mehta and another, sought to quash FIR No. I‑247 of 2017 alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 465, 468, 471, 120B and 114 of the IPC relating to alleged forgery, cheating and criminal breach of trust in a lease of land for a petrol‑pump. The de‑facto complainant claimed the applicants …
The petitioners, Vyankatesh Shantilal Pandya (deceased) and relatives, filed criminal miscellaneous applications under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashment of FIR C.R.No.I‑86 of 2017 which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 34, 120‑B and 114 IPC for a purported fraudulent marriage aimed at immigration benef…
The petitioners, Pravin Karshan Bhut (Koli) and others, filed a series of criminal miscellaneous applications—including applications for quashing the FIR, setting aside orders, and seeking stays—against the State of Gujarat and another respondent. The High Court noted that several of these applications were still subje…
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in a revision proceeding dated 2025. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner during the hearing, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. The court observed that the application remained pending for an extended p…
Sanat Pratapray Mehta filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashment of an FIR and set‑aside of an order. During the hearing, his counsel produced a true copy of his death certificate, which showed that the applicant had died on 01‑01‑2026. The court examined the death certificate and concluded that the d…
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash FIR No. I‑3/16 registered for offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 114 IPC, Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Sections 3(1) & 10 of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Both parties had settled th…
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash FIR No. I‑3/16 registered for offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 114 IPC, Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Sections 3(1) & 10 of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Both parties had settled th…
The applicants filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashing of an FIR/order and obtained interim relief. The applicants later approached the court requesting permission to withdraw the application. The learned advocate for the applicants, Ms. Ankita Goswami, sought such permission. The court examined the…
The applicants, represented by Siddhant R. Shah, filed a series of special and criminal miscellaneous applications against the respondent, the Public Prosecutor, in the High Court of Gujarat. The court noted that the applicants had raised office objections that needed to be removed. The issue before the court was wheth…
The petitioner, Upendrabhai Tikamlal Kapadia, had filed several criminal miscellaneous applications seeking quashing of FIR, setting aside orders, and other reliefs. During the pendency of these applications, the petitioner died on 19 April 2026, and a photocopy of his death certificate was placed on record by his coun…
The applicant, Vikram alias Pintu, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashal of FIR No. I-11216025230265 registered for offences under the IPC and Gujarat Police Act. The FIR arose from a business dispute which the parties have now sett…
The High Court of Gujarat heard a criminal miscellaneous application filed by Ashish @ Aashubhai Rameshbhai Agrawal seeking quashing of FIR and related orders. The applicants were represented by Mr. Vishvajitsinh D. Chauhan and Mr. Kishan Prajapati. The court directed that any office objections raised must be withdrawn…
Ramkesh Sohanlal Meena filed a series of criminal applications against the State of Gujarat. The High Court, after hearing the parties, directed the applicants to have the office objections removed by 21 July 2025. The Court warned that failure to remove the objections would result in dismissal of the proceedings witho…
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash FIR/Order No. 14877 of 2020. Charges had already been framed and the trial had commenced. The petitioners then requested permission to withdraw the application, and the respondent (State) raised no objection. The Hon'ble Justice P.M. Raval gran…
The applicant, Jagdishbhai Vallabhbhai Gabani, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashing of an FIR. The applicant later moved the High Court of Gujarat for permission to withdraw the petition. The sole issue before the court was whether it could grant such permission. Justice P. M. Raval, after hearin…
The applicants, represented by Siddhant R. Shah, filed a series of special and criminal miscellaneous applications against the respondent, the Public Prosecutor, in the High Court of Gujarat. The court noted that the applicants had raised office objections that needed to be removed. The issue before the court was wheth…
The petitioner, Vaghela Parth Babulal, resigned from the partnership firm Parth Enterprise on 28 February 2019. After his resignation, the remaining partner, Mayur Dineshbhai Mistri, issued a cheque on 18 December 2021 to repay a friendly loan of Rs. 8,00,000 taken from the original complainant, which later bounced, le…
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash FIR/Order No.14668 of 2022. The Additional Public Prosecutor produced a photocopy of the judgment dated 05‑03‑2026 in Criminal Case No.96001/2022, wherein the same petitioners were acquitted. The Court observed that the acquittal rendered the p…
The petitioners Bhabhlubhai Nagbhai Varu and others sought to quash FIR No. 11193027200953 and the accompanying charge‑sheet alleging extortion, criminal intimidation and violations of the Gujarat Money‑Lending Act arising from two Agreements to Sell executed in 2018 as security for loans. The complainant alleged that …
Sunilbhai Somabhai Desai filed a series of criminal miscellaneous applications against the State of Gujarat. The High Court set a deadline of 10 July 2025 for removal of office objections, failing which the matters would be dismissed for non‑prosecution. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the special criminal…
The petitioners, Prafulbhai Devjibhai Vasava and others, filed a series of Special Criminal Applications and Criminal Miscellaneous Applications seeking quash of proceedings against them by the State of Gujarat. The High Court observed that the petitioners had failed to comply with the Court’s earlier directions to rem…
The petitioner, Deepakbhai Dahyabhai Shah, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashing of FIR/Order No. 2934 of 2021. The High Court observed that the petitioner had failed to remove the office objections, particularly the objection regarding insufficiency of court fees, as directed by the Registry. The…
The petitioners, Vishal Enterprise (proprietor Anilbhai Gopalji Umarigar & Anr), filed a series of special criminal applications seeking quashing of proceedings and interim relief against the State of Gujarat. The Court noted that the primary issue was the existence of office objections that the petitioners were requir…
The petitioners, owners of glass and steel businesses, were charged in an FIR for allegedly facilitating the migration of 18 of their workers in an Eicher container to Uttar Pradesh during the COVID‑19 lockdown, violating Sections 269, 308, 188 and 417 of the IPC and Section 51(b) of the Disaster Management Act. They c…
The applicant, Devendra Himmatbhai Tidabhai Chudasama, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashing of an FIR and related orders. While appearing before the court, the applicant, through his counsel, requested permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel submitted that the client was prese…
The applicants, represented by Siddhant R. Shah, filed a series of special and criminal miscellaneous applications against the respondent, the Public Prosecutor, in the High Court of Gujarat. The court noted that the applicants had raised office objections that needed to be removed. The issue before the court was wheth…
The petitioner, Sayra Ashrafkhan Pathan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 36‑day delay in filing a restoration application. The application alleged that the delay was sufficiently explained in the accompanying memorandum. The Hon'ble Justice P. M.…
Ramkesh Sohanlal Meena filed a series of criminal applications against the State of Gujarat. The High Court, after hearing the parties, directed the applicants to have the office objections removed by 21 July 2025. The Court warned that failure to remove the objections would result in dismissal of the proceedings witho…
The applicants, Alkeshbhai Thavariyabhai Rathva & Anr., filed multiple criminal miscellaneous applications seeking quashment, stay, and amendment of FIRs and orders. The Court observed that the applicants had failed to remove the office objections raised against their applications as per earlier remarks. Consequently, …
The petitioners filed criminal miscellaneous applications seeking to quash an FIR and obtain interim relief against coercive steps. They later instructed their counsel to withdraw the petitions but requested that the existing interim relief continue for an additional 15 days to enable them to seek anticipatory bail. Th…
The petitioners filed criminal miscellaneous applications seeking to quash an FIR and obtain interim relief against coercive steps. They later instructed their counsel to withdraw the petitions but requested that the existing interim relief continue for an additional 15 days to enable them to seek anticipatory bail. Th…
The applicant, Wasimbhai Mohammad Yunus Kabbabhai Saiyed, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashing of an FIR and related orders. He later instructed his counsel, Mr. Riddhesh Trivedi, to seek the court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by …
The applicant, Lalsinh Arjansinh Parmar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashing of FIR/Order No. 19305 of 2024. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Premal R. Joshi, submitted a letter from Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Limited along with a photocopy of the applicant's death certificate. The court was informed…
Meenakshi Distributors & Anr. filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash and set aside an FIR/order. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Apurva A. Dave, failed to appear for the second hearing, indicating a lack of intention to pursue the matter. The Court held that such non‑appearance amounted to a want of p…
The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 11198001201657, alleging that the deceased’s suicide was caused by harassment, financial disputes, and alleged occult practices by the respondents. The FIR listed offences under Sections 306, 406, 120B, 323, 504, 506(2) and 114 of the IPC. The Court examined whether the allega…
On 8 November 2023, the coordinate Bench noted the applicant's counsel was absent and ordered the report of the Principal District and Sessions Judge to be placed on record. The report showed that the magistrate had issued a notice on 4 November 2023 requiring the complainant to appear on 6 November 2023 with relevant …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No. 1 of 2014, which alleged offences under various IPC sections relating to alleged forgery and fraud in the partition of ancestral joint family property. The dispute originated from a parti…
The petitioner, Nisar Ahmed Abdulrahim Momin, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under the Domestic Violence Act. Subsequently, the petitioner’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether it could allow the withdrawal without examining the merits. It held tha…
The petitioners, Piyush Bipinchandra Parikh and others, filed a series of special criminal applications seeking to quash proceedings and to join parties. The State of Gujarat, represented by the Public Prosecutor, opposed the applications. The Court examined whether the pending office objections should be removed befor…
The High Court of Gujarat considered applications under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No. I‑68 of 2012, which alleged offences of forgery, cheating, criminal breach of trust and criminal conspiracy relating to a disputed piece of land claimed by the Ramji Mandir Trust and a de facto co…
The High Court of Gujarat considered applications under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No. I‑68 of 2012, which alleged offences of forgery, cheating, criminal breach of trust and criminal conspiracy relating to a disputed piece of land claimed by the Ramji Mandir Trust and a de facto co…
The petitioners, Prafulbhai Devjibhai Vasava, filed a series of Special Criminal Applications seeking quash of proceedings against them. The High Court observed that the petitioners had failed to remove the office objections raised by the court despite earlier directions. The court directed the petitioners to clear tho…
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quash of FIR and set aside of an order, along with interim relief restraining coercive steps. During the hearing, the petitioners, through counsel, expressed that they no longer wished to pursue the application. The court, noting the withdrawal, dispose…
The de facto complainant filed an FIR alleging that his wife's death resulted from a pothole on a National Highway, invoking Sections 304 and 304A IPC against officials of the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI). The respondents sought to quash the FIR, arguing that the NHAI officials are protected by Section 2…
The petitioner, Manishbhai Maheshbhai Chaudhary, sought quashment of an FIR registered under Sections 306 (abetment of suicide) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the IPC, alleging that he had no role in the suicide of the complainant’s son. The FIR arose from a land‑dispute involving a restricted‑tenure plot (Section …
The de facto complainant filed an FIR alleging that his wife's death resulted from a pothole on a National Highway, invoking Sections 304 and 304A IPC against officials of the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI). The respondents sought to quash the FIR, arguing that the NHAI officials are protected by Section 2…
The petition sought quashing of FIR No. 11203040240019 and the related criminal case (No. 3184/2024) filed under Sections 498A, 323, 504 and 114 IPC, arising from a matrimonial dispute between Vishalbhai Pokar and his wife Rinkal Bhimani. The marriage had been dissolved by a Family Court order under Section 13B of the …
The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash and set aside the FIR and order in Criminal Case No. 176/2019. While the application was pending, the substantive case was concluded on 30 October 2025, resulting in the applicant's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, …
The petitioners, accused Nos. 7 and 8, filed a special criminal application under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashment of FIR No. 11208037260349 registered at Kuvadva Road Police Station for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 an…
Mr. Ankit Pandya filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashing and setting aside of FIR/Order No. 1902 of 2021. During the proceedings, the applicant, through counsel Mr. Vishrut Bhandari, requested permission to withdraw the application on the ground that it had become infructuous. The Hon'ble Justice P.…
The petitioners, senior engineers, sought to quash FIR No. I-96 of 2019 and related charge sheet under Sections 306 and 34 IPC, alleging that the deceased's suicide note did not constitute abetment under Section 107 IPC. They invoked the inherent jurisdiction of Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20…
The applicants filed a miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of Criminal Cases Nos. 6307 of 2017 and 9971 of 2018 arising from FIR I‑144 of 2016 and charge‑sheets for offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 201 and 114 of the IPC. The parties…
The applicant, Jayeshbhai Vinubhai Chaudhary, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash FIR No. 11213010240399 registered for offences under Section 351(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Both parties had settled the dispute amica…
The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashing and setting aside of FIR/Order No. 20276 of 2024. Subsequently, the applicant, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the application. The Hon'ble Court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the appli…
The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No.11213016200424 dated 30‑04‑2020, which alleged offences under IPC sections 448, 323, 504, 114 and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(v). They claimed the FIR was filed out of vengeance after the complainant was removed from the post of Sarpanch and that they were not …
Rajubhai Sankabhai Rabari was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, a decision affirmed by the Principal Sessions Judge. He filed a miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the judgment,…
Ashok Kumar, who had been acquitted after trial, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash and set aside the FIR and related order. He later requested permission to withdraw this application, arguing that the acquittal rendered the petition unnecessary. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted …
The applicant, Arunkumar Devnarayansinh Rajput, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash and set aside an FIR and order. The applicant later sought the court's permission to withdraw that application in order to file a discharge application before the appropriate court. The learned advocate for the a…
Yanki Sizzler Firm and others filed a revision application under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a conviction dated 18‑02‑2026 in Criminal Case No.3275 of 2023. The original complainant, Shailesh Ambalal Patel, affirmed that…
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash an FIR registered for offences under Sections 316(4), 61(2) and 3(5) of the same Act. Both the applicants and the de facto complainant, Harish Khimji Maheshwari, appeared before the court and affirmed…
The petitioners filed a Special Criminal Application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash FIR No.11210064260585 registered for multiple offences, including non‑compoundable ones under the BNS and the Information Technology Act. Both the de facto complainant and the victim a…
The petitioner, Hiten Rameshbhai Vasant, was granted anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, with a condition that he not leave India without court permission and that his passport be deposited with the trial court. He now seeks …
The applicant, Tipendra Chimanbhai Piyaja, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 108, 115(2), 351(2) and 54 of the same Act relating to the alleged suicide of his partner. The prosecution alleged that the ap…
The applicant, Bhagirathbai Barot, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for 30 days on grounds of needing funds for his daughter's education and his wife's medical treatment. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court considered the applicant…
The petitioner, Ganesbhai Valjibhai Olakiya, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave for 30 days on the ground that he had filed an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The court examined the petitioner's claim that he had previously been released in May 2025…
The petitioner, Rafik Kasam, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The application for parole was pending before the competent authority, having been forwarded to it on 14 March 2026. The petitioner approached the High Court of Gujarat for directions to expedite the decision. The Court noted the pe…
The petitioner, Thakor Gadaji Jawanji, applied for parole leave of 21 days to attend his niece's marriage, submitting an invitation card as evidence. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The court noted that the petitioner had been released in February 2026, returned on time, and main…
The petitioner, Dilipji Varsangji Thakor (Chauhan), filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 21 days to attend his niece's marriage, supported by an invitation card. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and the application had been pending before the competent aut…
Darshan Sureshbhai Joisar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant argued that the maximum punishment for the alleged offences is se…
The petitioner, represented through his mother, applied for parole leave of 30 days to attend to his brother's cancer treatment. The State, through the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court noted that the petitioner is serving a sentence for default of maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr…
The petitioner, represented through his mother, applied for parole leave of 30 days to attend to his brother's cancer treatment. The State, through the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court noted that the petitioner is serving a sentence for default of maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr…
The petitioner, represented through his mother, applied for parole leave of 30 days to attend to his brother's cancer treatment. The State, through the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court noted that the petitioner is serving a sentence for default of maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr…
The petitioner, represented through his mother, applied for parole leave of 30 days to attend to his brother's cancer treatment. The State, through the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court noted that the petitioner is serving a sentence for default of maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr…
The petitioner, represented through his mother, applied for parole leave of 30 days to attend to his brother's cancer treatment. The State, through the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court noted that the petitioner is serving a sentence for default of maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr…
The petitioner, represented through his mother, applied for parole leave of 30 days to attend to his brother's cancer treatment. The State, through the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court noted that the petitioner is serving a sentence for default of maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr…
The petitioner, represented through his mother, applied for parole leave of 30 days to attend to his brother's cancer treatment. The State, through the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court noted that the petitioner is serving a sentence for default of maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr…
The applicant, Mohammad Aasif Abdul Rasid Shikh, an under‑trial prisoner, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for 20 days to attend the marriage of his niece in Mumbai. He is charged under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for allegedly possessing 352.07 grams of me…
Bhanumatiben Jagdishchandra Parmar, a 62‑year‑old widowed woman convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed a petition seeking parole for 30 days on medical grounds and to file an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The Court examined the petition, me…
The applicant, Kapil Amrutbhai Desai, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Dhruv H. Chaudhary, requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether it could grant such permission. No substantive discussion on merits…
The High Court of Gujarat entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rajuben Rameshbhai Vadher (Mayatra) in connection with FIR No. 11198002260141 alleging offences under Sections 108, 80(2), 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 …
The applicant, Priyanshikumari Pradipbhai Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging kidnapping, forced apology, and the subsequent suicide of Jenil. The prosecution alleged that the applicant facilitated the kidnapping, dele…
The applicant, Gambhirbhai Bhikhubhai Padhiyar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail in a case pending before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Ms. Gayatriba B. Jadeja, informed the court that the applicant wished to withdraw the bail application. The r…
The applicant, Dineshbhai Sukhbai Sabariya, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for 30 days on the ground of financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court noted that the applicant had been in custody since No…
The applicant, represented by his mother who appeared in person, filed a temporary bail application seeking a 30‑day release to obtain medical treatment for his mother's eyes. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court noted that the applicant had been released in Januar…
Mesariya @Parmar Ushaben Ganpatbhai, the sister‑in‑law of a deceased, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR C.R. No. 11191045260203 alleging offences under Sections 108 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Additional Public Pr…
Kishor Rajesh Parde applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2) and 316(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from a commercial dispute over a turmeric transaction. The applicant argued that…
The applicant, Harpalsinh Vaghela, a Talati-cum-Mantri of Dhamtavan Gram Panchayat, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with an FIR alleging misappropriation of approximately Rs. 1.55 crore of Panchayat funds. The FIR alleged that the …
The applicant, Rushabh Dharmshi Gada, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR C.R. No. I-11191011260065/2026. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the alleged offences. The court examined factors s…
The applicant, Vikram Sinh Hari Sinh, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. Subsequently, through his counsel, he sought to withdraw the application on the ground that it had become infructuous. The court considered whether it could grant permission for such withdrawal. Finding no imp…
The applicant, Ajay @ Katu Bharatbhai Nadiya (Rathod), applied for temporary bail through his mother, citing the need for financial assistance to his family and medical treatment for his mother. The State, represented by counsel Mr. Bhargav Pandya, waived service of notice. The court examined the applicant's grounds an…
The High Court considered two anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, arising from an FIR alleging a large mob protest against an inter‑caste marriage that resulted in unlawful assembly, assault on police, and property damage. The male applicant claimed he…
The High Court considered two anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, arising from an FIR alleging a large mob protest against an inter‑caste marriage that resulted in unlawful assembly, assault on police, and property damage. The male applicant claimed he…
The applicant, Rubina, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for two weeks, citing the need for financial assistance to her family. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court examined the applicant's claim and noted that jail records show …
The applicant, Ambarmbai Mafabhai Solanki, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking cancellation of bail. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Mohddanish M. Barejia, later requested permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel Dhwani Tripathi. Justice P. M. …
The petitioner, Umedbhai Parshottambhai Talpada, applied for parole leave of 30 days to arrange finances and attend a family marriage. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service. The court noted that the petitioner had previously been released on furlough in October‑November 2025 and had…
The applicant, Neha Jaspritsinh Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Faijan H. Memon, requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and, without examining the merits of the bail application, grant…
The petitioner, Nitin Rameshbhai Makvana, applied for temporary bail before the Gujarat High Court. The court noted that he had already been released on temporary bail for six days (24‑12‑2025 to 31‑12‑2025) by the Additional Sessions Court, Jetpur. Since the applicant was already on temporary bail, the court found no …
The applicant, Mansukhbhai Lakhani, filed a temporary bail application in the Gujarat High Court. The applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered the request and, without examining the merits of the bail application, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the temporary…
Sankarlal applied for temporary bail for 15 days, citing his daughter's marriage as the reason. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court, after hearing counsel and noting jail remarks that the applicant had not been released earlier, exercised its discretion in favor o…
The petitioner, Rajubhai Kavabhai Ko Patel, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for seven days to attend his son's marriage scheduled for 25 April 2026. He had been convicted on 22 April 2026 but did not first apply to the competent authority for parole. The Public Prosecutor waived service on beh…
The petitioner, Allarkha @Kalu Khvajuddin Saiyed, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Maulik P. Baseri and Mr. Piyushkumar K. Baseri, requested the court’s leave to withdraw. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented …
The applicant, S.K. Sajid Ali, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11210061260065/2026) alleging offences under Sections 318(4) and 54 of the same Act. He argued that the maximum punishment for the alleged offences …
Navinbhai GangaramBhai Rahani applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR that alleged offences under multiple sections of the same Act and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. The FIR did not name the applicant, mentioning only three unkn…
The applicant, Rakesh Udaypal, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging violations of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. The court examined factors such as the nature of …
The applicant, Parikh Sandeepkumar Navinchandra, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2) and 54 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He argued that the maximum punishment was seven years a…
The High Court of Gujarat heard two anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, arising from the same FIR (C.R. No. 11824005260237) alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 467 and 120B. The applicants argued that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, they …
The High Court of Gujarat heard two anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, arising from the same FIR (C.R. No. 11824005260237) alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 467 and 120B. The applicants argued that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, they …
The petitioner, Chintankumar Nagarbhai Mandaliya, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether a party may be allowed to withdraw an anticipatory bail petition. It held that, subje…
The petitioner, Jaydip Singh Anup Singh Makwana, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel opposing the withdrawal. The Court cons…
The petitioner, Mohsin Mahamadbhai Himam, filed a temporary bail application claiming he required orthopedic surgery that needed an Endobutton loop. The medical report indicated that the surgery was not an emergency. The court directed that the jail authority should take the applicant for surgery once the Endobutton lo…
The applicant, Jayesh Kishanlal Prajapati, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after hearing the request, granted permission to withdraw without examining the merits. Consequently, the application was dis…
The petitioner, Sanjiv Kumar Ramkishan Goel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with an FIR alleging an offence under Section 420 of the IPC. The petitioner expressed willingness to cooperate with the investigation and a…
The petitioner, Pooja, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 317(4), 318(4) and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhinta, 2023 involving alleged financial fraud of Rs. 11,50,000. The applicant argued that c…
The applicant, Yogeshwar Haribhau Sodagar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with FIR No. 11213094250908 alleging offences under Sections 317(4), 318(4) and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhinta, 2023.…
The petitioner, Rajeshbhai Haridas Patel, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground that he intends to file an appeal against his conviction. The application for parole is pending before the District Magistrate, Vadodara, following a communication from the jail authority dated 03.03.2026. …
The petitioner filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave for 21 days to solemnise his marriage. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The petitioner argued that he had previously been released on the same ground in December 2025 but had to surrender when the marriage co…
In Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 8898 of 2026, the petitioner Mitesh Ishwarbhai Jivrambhai Bhanu sought temporary bail from the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant, through counsel, later requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent State of Gujarat opposed the withdrawal. The court e…
The applicant, a 20‑year‑old second‑year B.A. student, was arrested in October 2025 for alleged cyber offences under Sections 108, 351(2) and 54 of the BNSS, 2023, read with Section 66(d) of the Information Technology Act, involving threats, extortion and impersonation that led to the deceased's suicide. He sought temp…
The petitioner, Pratikbhai Pravinbhai Panvekar, directly approached the Gujarat High Court seeking temporary bail without first filing an application in the trial court. The respondent State of Gujarat was represented by counsel Krutik Parikh. The High Court observed that the petitioner had not complied with the proced…
The petitioner, Pratikbhai Pravinbhai Panvekar, directly approached the Gujarat High Court seeking temporary bail without first filing an application in the trial court. The respondent State of Gujarat was represented by counsel Krutik Parikh. The High Court observed that the petitioner had not complied with the proced…
The petitioner, Pratikbhai Pravinbhai Panvekar, directly approached the Gujarat High Court seeking temporary bail without first filing an application in the trial court. The court examined whether it had jurisdiction to entertain such an application filed ex parte before the lower court. It observed that procedural rul…
The petitioners, Vijaybhai Kalabhai Rudatala and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the Gujarat High Court. Subsequently, they instructed their counsel to withdraw the application in order to approach the concerned Session Court. The respondent State of Gujarat, through it…
The petitioner, Pratikbhai Pravinbhai Panvekar, filed multiple criminal miscellaneous applications for temporary bail directly before the Gujarat High Court. The High Court noted that the petitioner had not first approached the trial court where the criminal proceedings are pending. The issue before the court was wheth…
The petitioner, Pratikbhai Pravinbhai Panvekar, directly approached the Gujarat High Court seeking temporary bail without first filing an application in the trial court. The respondent State of Gujarat was represented by counsel Krutik Parikh. The High Court observed that the petitioner had not complied with the proced…
The petitioner, Pratikbhai Pravinbhai Panvekar, directly approached the Gujarat High Court seeking temporary bail without first filing an application in the trial court. The respondent State of Gujarat was represented by counsel Krutik Parikh. The High Court observed that the petitioner had not complied with the proced…
The applicant, Mahalingam Murugyyan Pillai, filed a temporary bail application seeking a 30‑day release to provide financial assistance to his family. The court noted that he was apprehended with a large commercial quantity of ganja and has 27 prior criminal antecedents for similar and other offences. Considering the s…
The petitioner, Prashant Urfe Bhullu Prafulla Nayak, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave for 30 days on the ground that he had filed an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The jail authorities reported that the petitioner’s conduct in prison wa…
The petitioner, Yuvrajsinh Jasvantsinh Padhiar, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave while incarcerated. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice of rule on behalf of the State. The jail authorities reported that the petitioner’s conduct in jail was satisfactory. Exercising its d…
The petitioner, Vipul Madhubhai Patel, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 30 days to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court considered the petitioner's request and noted satisfactory conduct while…
The applicant, Rathod Mehul Kumar Vijay Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR C.R. No. 11199006260087/2026 alleging offences under Sections 316(2) and 3(5) of the same Act. He submitted that the maximum puni…
Shivbhadrasinh Kanaksinh Zala applied for a 30‑day temporary bail, claiming he needed to provide financial assistance to his family. The applicant is alleged to be facing two separate criminal offences, one in Meerut and another in Maharashtra, and his father is a retired caretaker of the family. The High Court examine…
The petitioner, Savan @ Sanu @ Shravanhbai Rameshbhai Kathudiya, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave while incarcerated. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court considered the jail’s remarks that the petitioner was last released in August 2025 …
Mahendra Radheshyam Kanojiya applied for a temporary bail of 30 days, claiming he needed to provide financial assistance to his family. The trial was already underway and he faced multiple serious charges under Sections 103(1), 140(1), 189(4), 189(2), 191(1), 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 238(a) and 3(5) of the BNS, read wit…
Sushant Ramchandra Gauda applied for temporary bail for 30 days, citing the need to arrange funds for his family. Charges were framed against him under Sections 8(c), 20(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985. The Court examined the seriousness of the offences and the stage of the …
The applicant, Aartiben Vashrambhai Makwana, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether it could grant such permission. It held that the court has the authority to allow withdr…
The applicant, Dilipbhai, approached the Gujarat High Court directly for temporary bail on the ground that his 16‑year‑old son required medical treatment. No prior application for bail had been filed in the trial court where the criminal case is pending. The High Court noted that the applicant had not complied with the…
JESANGBHAI @ GOKABHAI RAMABHAI KATARIYA obtained a three‑day temporary bail from the Sessions Court with a condition to deposit police‑escort charges. He challenged that order before the Gujarat High Court, arguing it was improper. The State, represented by the original complainant’s counsel, opposed the challenge, con…
The petitioner, Kirankumar Hiralal Patel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 409, 420, 506(2), 504 and 120‑B. The applicant argued that custodial interroga…
In the High Court of Gujarat, an anticipatory bail application (R/CR.MA/9019/2026) was filed by Chaudhri Sunil Jitaram against the State of Gujarat. The applicant, through counsel O I Pathan, later sought permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, represented by Mr. Krutik Parikh, opposed the withdrawal. T…
The applicant, Manish @Bali Prakashbhai Sonjibhai Patni (Rohlivada), filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent's counsel was present. The Hon'ble Justice P. M. Raval considered the …
The petitioners, directors of two companies, sought transit bail after receiving a Section 91 CrPC notice in connection with a 2016 CBI FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 120‑B, 415, 420 and the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978 sections 3 and 6. They argued that they could not obtain a…
Priyankaben, wife of Brijeshbhai Patel, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(2), 336(3), 340(2) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant asserted that the matter was …
The petitioner, JALAJ BHARATBHAI DAVE, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Jay M. Sumara and Ms. Yukta M. Sumara, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered the request and, without examining the merits of the bail pe…
The petitioner, Vashim Abbasbhai Valsadiya, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. Counsel for the petitioner submitted a sick note, but the court noted jail remarks indicating the petitioner had already been released on regular bail. The issue before the court was whether the parole leave applicati…
The petitioner, Abhishek @ Vishal Pramodkumar Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. Subsequently, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether it could allow the withdrawal without examining the merits. The judge granted the…
Allarkha @ Addu, the applicant, filed a temporary bail application in the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant, through counsel, later sought permission to withdraw the application, stating that the matter had become infructuous. The court considered whether it could grant such permission. It held that the court may al…
The applicant, Sunil @ Shiva, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for 30 days on the ground of financial arrangement. The case involves a serious offence under the Indian Penal Code, and the trial has already commenced. The court examined whether bail could be granted despite the seriousne…
Shalin UmeshKumar Patel applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11191042250376/2025) alleging offences punishable up to seven years. The applicant argued he would cooperate with the investigation and was ready to appear before …
The petitioner, Hariram @ Harish @ Dinesh, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after hearing the counsel, granted permission to withdraw. No merits of the anticipatory bail request were examined. Conse…
The applicant, Jagdish Narsinhbhai Vanzara, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for 30 days on the ground that he needed financial assistance for his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court examined the applicant's claim, his cond…
The applicant, Yuvrajsinh Vajubhai Jadeja, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the proceedings, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The court considered whether it could grant such permission. No substantive arguments on bail merits were a…
The applicant, Sajid Salimbhai Kureshi, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the Gujarat High Court. After the application was listed, the applicant’s counsel, Ms. R.C. Chavda, moved the court for permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was …
The petitioner, Baburam Videshbhai, convicted of murder under IPC sections 302 and 294(b) and of an offence under Section 135(1) of the Gujarat Police Act, applied for a 21‑day parole leave to withdraw money from his General Provident Fund. He has been absconding for 4,109 days between January 2013 and April 2024, and …
The applicant, Gurudevkumar Pramod Sharma, filed a temporary bail application through the jail after being arrested on 8 June 2025 for a serious offence under the Indian Penal Code. The High Court considered the facts of the arrest and the order of the learned Sessions Judge. Noting the seriousness of the alleged offen…
The petitioner, Nirav Mansurbhai Kheraj, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, State of Gujarat, opposed the withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice P. M. Raval considered whether t…
The applicant, an under‑trial prisoner charged with a serious offence under the Indian Penal Code, applied for temporary bail through jail. The court noted that the applicant had previously been released on temporary bail but had absconded for 287 days before being recaptured by police. The learned Sessions Judge had a…
The applicant, Mannu Gantai Swai, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The applicant's counsel later requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether such a withdrawal required its permission. The judge granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequentl…
The petitioner, Kundan Sunil Bhola Chaudhary, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The court considered the request and, without elaborating on substantive grounds, granted permission to wit…
The petitioner, Shailesh @ Guddusing Ranjitsing Kishansing Rajput, filed a temporary bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The court noted that the petitioner is charged with a serious offence under the Indian Penal Code and that trial proceedings have already commenced. It was further observed that the petit…
The applicant, Rupeshkumar @ Raju Rameshbhai Nat (Marwadi), filed a temporary bail application through jail. The jail records indicated that he had been released in July 2025, is implicated in a serious offence, and his conduct while in custody was unsatisfactory. The court examined whether these circumstances warrante…
The applicant, Maheshbhai Mohanbhai Punabhai Baraiya, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail after being arrested on 7 March 2025. The jail records indicated that the applicant is accused of a serious offence under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and the Indian Pen…
The applicant, Amin Rafikbhai Meman, filed a temporary bail application through jail after being arrested on 10 January 2026 for a serious offence. The jail’s remarks indicated the seriousness of the charge and referenced an order by the learned Sessions Judge. The High Court examined whether the applicant had made a c…
The petitioners, Ureshkumar Desai and others, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, fearing arrest in connection with LA Application No. 44 of 2026 filed at Saroli Police Station, although no FIR had yet been lodged. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed th…
Patel Krishal Vikrambhai filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court against the State of Gujarat. The applicant was represented by advocates Mr. Yash V. Gupta and Mr. Vishal K. Anandjiwala. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court con…
The applicant, Dhaval Jivanbhai Punjab... Rathod, applied for temporary bail while his criminal trial under the Indian Penal Code was nearing completion, with only two witnesses and the investigating officer yet to be examined. The de facto complainant, Daxaben, opposed the bail. The court noted that the applicant had …
Mahavir Shankarlal Shah was arrested on 26 February 2025 in connection with a serious offence. He had been granted temporary bail in October 2025, which subsequently expired. On 9 April 2026, he filed a criminal miscellaneous application through jail seeking fresh temporary bail. The court noted that the applicant had …
The applicant, convicted of a life sentence in Sessions Case No. 10/2024, applied for furlough leave while in jail. The court noted that the applicant had previously been released on parole from 21.10.2025 to 27.10.2025 and failed to surrender on time, returning a day late. Considering this breach of parole conditions,…
Muekshbai Gorchanndbai Chamka filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave of 30 days to attend his son’s marriage. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The court examined the petitioner’s conduct in jail, noting satisfactory behavior and that he had been released in Sept…
The applicant, Mohammad Azharuddin, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. He later approached the Court requesting permission to withdraw the present application and to be allowed to file a fresh application for parole before the competent authority. The learned advocate for the applicant sought th…
The petitioner, Pareshbhaï Shankarbhaï Taviyad, applied for parole leave of 30 days to attend a marriage function, arguing that his code of conduct would prevent release on ordinary furlough. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service. The court examined the petitioner's request, the ja…
Ankit Ishwarbhai Pal, who is already on trial for offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, applied for temporary bail through jail. The High Court examined the application and noted that the trial is ongoing for serious charges under both statutes. The Court found that no suffi…
The applicant, Mustakim @ Bhu... Shaikh, filed a temporary bail application while in custody. He is charged under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act and his trial has already commenced. The High Court examined whether the circumstances warranted the grant of bail. Noting that the trial was underw…
The petitioner, Hamid Ibrahimbhai Mathiya, a life‑imprisoned convict under Sessions Case No. 72/2009, filed a special criminal application for parole leave through jail. The High Court noted that the petitioner had already been granted a 21‑day parole from 5 December 2025 to 25 December 2025. Considering the seriousnes…
Kasam Mamad Notiyar applied for parole leave through his jail counsel. He had already been released on parole from 4 February 2026 to 24 February 2026 for financial assistance, a period of 21 days granted by the Court. The applicant subsequently filed another parole application seeking a further 30‑day leave on the sam…
The petitioner, Govind @ Peklo Jignesh Jayantibhai Patani, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The applicant had already been released on parole by the same court for a period of 21 days from 13 January 2026 to 20 February 2026. The court examined whether there was any justification for granting …
The applicant, Mahendra Ashokbhai Dantani, filed a temporary bail application through jail after being arrested on 18 March 2025 for a serious offence. The jail records indicated the seriousness of the charge and the recent nature of the arrest. The court examined whether the applicant had made a case for bail under th…
The petitioner, Sandipkumar Sureshbhai Patel, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave from the State of Gujarat. The applicant argued that the competent authority could not decide the application because a Code of Conduct was in force and would remain so until after 30 April 2026. The Court noted the …
The applicant, Gopalbhai Chhetabhai Tadvi, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The applicant’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court, without examining the merits, granted the request for withdrawal. Consequently, the application was disposed of as withdrawn. No subs…
The applicant, Dipenkumar Damor, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 409, 465, 468, 471, 406, 420 and 114, including forging thumb impressions to withdraw cash. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the…
Vachika Chirag Shelat filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. During the proceedings, the applicant, through counsel, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the respondent opposed the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing the parties, granted per…
The petitioner filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The application for parole was pending before the concerned authority, with a communication dated 25.03.2026 indicating the pending decision. The High Court noted the pendency and, rather than granting or denying parole, directed the authority to…
The applicant, Virsinh Kasubha Solanki, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with an FIR alleging violations of Sections 65(a), 65(e), 81, 98(2) and 116B of the Prohibition Act, 1949. The applicant argued t…
The applicant, Nikhil M. Savaliya, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with a FIR registered for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66(d) of the IT Act. He argued that custodial i…
Manoj Kailashnath Giri filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel, Ms. Mayuri R. Savaliya, sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent's counsel, Mr. Chintan Dave, was present. Justice P. M. Raval granted the request to withdraw, stating t…
The applicant, Mishram Chimarum Vishnoi, filed an anticipatory bail application (R/Cr.MA/7751/2026) before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel, Mr. N R Desai, subsequently sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Chintan Dave. Ju…
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging violations of Sections 65(a), 65(e), 81 and 83 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. The Court examined the standar…
Hareshbai Punabhai Bodar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. Subsequently, he instructed his counsel to seek permission to withdraw the application and re‑file it afresh. The State of Gujarat, as respondent, was given an opportunity to oppose the withdrawal. The Court examined whether …
The petitioner, Kanubhai @ Takalo Dhulabhai Somabhai Machhi (Kharva), filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. After the application was filed, the petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by couns…
The applicant, Gopal Ghelabhai Gohel, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for four weeks on the ground that he needed to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court examined the applicant's claim, n…
The applicant, Atmanbhai Akshaybhai Patel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 35(3) of the BNSS Act, 2023. Senior Advocate N.D. Nanavaty, on behalf of the applicant, informed the court that the applicant would appear before the police station and investigating agency on 07.04.2026. In view of this und…
The applicant, Mukesh Radhelal Nimavat, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking transit bail. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted at that stage. The Court granted the request, allowing …
The petitioner, Harshad S/o Girishbhai Solanki, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the bail application. The Court examined whether a bail application could be withdrawn at that stage of the proceeding…
The applicant, Naresh Rameshbhai Sangtani, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for 20 days on the ground that he needed financial assistance for his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's claim, noting th…
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
