P M RAVAL

The petitioner, Jusab @ Karochor Abbasbhai Kakal, convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, applied for a 30‑day parole leave while an appeal against his conviction is pending. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service. The Court examined the petition, noting the conviction …

The petitioner, Mahendra @ Kaliyo Amratbhai Devabhai Raval, filed a special criminal application seeking furlough leave while incarcerated. The court noted that a separate application for parole leave by the petitioner is already pending before the competent authority. Considering the pending parole application, the co…

The petitioner, Faridbhai Ismailbhai Makrani, applied for a 30‑day parole leave to repair his house and support his family. He is convicted under Section 302 read with Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code for murder. The court noted that he previously absconded for 2,798 days after being released on furlough in April 2…

Ajaybhai Vasantbhai Gamit, convicted for defaulting on maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, applied for parole leave to arrange funds for the outstanding maintenance. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and the jail authorities reported satisfactory con…

The petitioner, Rajeshbhai Rameshbhai Sarola, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave after his request was rejected by the competent authority. He was convicted on 1 October 2025 for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The State, represented by the Additional Public Pr…

The applicant, Mohammadsalim, filed a temporary bail application through his wife, seeking release for 30 days to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court noted that the applicant had been in custody since August 2025, had sa…

The applicant, Ghanchi Ashrafbhai, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the bail application with liberty to re‑file at a later date. The primary issue before the court was whether the High Court could grant such a with…

The applicant, Ramjibhai Dhanabhai Solanki, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for 15 days on the ground of financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the applicant's claim and noted that he was …

The applicant, Chhutraram (Dinesh) Kumavat Jassaram, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR No. C.R. 11210002254026 filed at Sachin GIDC Police Station, Surat. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the alleged f…

The petitioners, owners of R.D. Trading Firm, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR C.R. No.11201001260001 alleging inflated sales and a gain of about Rs.3 lakh. They asserted no prior criminal antecedents, willingness to coopera…

The applicant, Mahendrasinh Motisinh Rathod, filed an anticipatory bail application and later sought permission to withdraw it. The learned counsel for the applicant requested the court's approval for the withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice P. M. Raval granted the permission to withdraw the application. The court disposed …

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 110 and 54 of the same Act, which carry a maximum punishment of seven years. The applicant’s counsel argued that the alleged offences are not of a serious …

Hafizaben Irfan Parekh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging that she was present during an illegal abortion of a minor victim. The victim turned major and married the original accused shortly before the FIR was lodged, and th…

The petitioner, Kanabhai Asoda, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 30 days to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State of Gujarat. The court examined the petitioner's claim, noting that he had been released from jail in…

The applicant, Aashabhai Ajubhai Rudach, filed a temporary bail application seeking a 15‑day release on the ground that he and the victim intend to marry. The court granted permission to join the complainant as a respondent and accepted the complainant's advocate's vakalatnama. Both the State and the complainant waived…

The petitioner, Amit @ Vini, was arrested in January 2025 and remained incarcerated, prompting him to file a temporary bail application seeking a 30‑day release to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were heard before the H…

The petitioner, Raniyabhai Ramlabhai Rathva, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for 30 days on the ground of financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. After hearing the applicant's averments and considering the ja…

The applicant, Sadikhu... Momin, filed a temporary bail application from jail seeking a 30‑day bail on the ground that he needed to provide financial assistance to his family. The jail records showed that the applicant had already been released by the Sessions Court on 16‑12‑2025 for a five‑day period from 26‑12‑2025 t…

The applicant, Natvarsinh @ Natubha Vajubha Gohil, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for 30 days, citing the need for financial assistance to his family and medical treatment for his daughter. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court exa…

The High Court of Gujarat entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Deepak Sharma, who was implicated in an FIR for offences under IPC sections 318(4) and 54. The applicant expressed willingness to cooperate with the investigation and to appe…

The applicant, Samirkhan Salimkhan Pathan, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether it could grant such permission. It held that the applicant may withdraw the applicat…

The High Court of Gujarat heard multiple anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by five accused persons (original accused Nos. 3, 4, and 5, along with two others already on bail) in connection with FIR No. 11189003251588 alleging offences under IPC section…

The High Court of Gujarat heard multiple anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by five accused persons (original accused Nos. 3, 4, and 5, along with two others already on bail) in connection with FIR No. 11189003251588 alleging offences under IPC section…

The applicants, who are alleged co‑accused in a fraud case involving a sale deed and forgery, filed anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with FIR No. 11189003251588. They contended that the FIR was lodged belatedly…

The applicant, Inayat Kalubhai Govli, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave and later requested permission to withdraw the application. The sole issue before the court was whether it could grant such permission. The court, exercising its inherent jurisdiction, allowed the withdrawal without examinin…

The petitioner, Kishanbhai Devrajbhai Malan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail in a criminal case. The application was listed before the High Court of Gujarat, Ahmedabad. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Sajid Y. Kariyaniya, appeared but did not press the application before the bench. Conse…

The petitioner, Aakash Ramanuj Morya, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave after the competent authority rejected his request. The Additional Public Prosecutor appeared for the State. The Court examined the authority's order and exercised its discretion. It held that the petition should succeed a…

The petitioner, Naresh Jayantilal Jain, filed anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with FIRs alleging offences under IPC Sections 409, 420, 120B and 34. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, had no …

The petitioner, Naresh Jayantilal Jain, filed anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with FIRs alleging offences under IPC Sections 409, 420, 120B and 34. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, had no …

The applicant, Siddhraj @ Surya Dhirubhai Mayda, was released on a 14‑day furlough leave from 5‑Sept‑2023 to 18‑Sept‑2023 but was subsequently apprehended by police, resulting in a 235‑day delay before he sought regularisation of the furlough. An application filed on 13‑May‑2025 for regularisation was rejected on 17‑Ju…

The applicant, Nikulbhai Chotabhai Patel, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with an FIR filed in 2024 alleging forgery of a Power of Attorney and illegal sale of land belonging to a de facto complainant. The alleged offence dates back to the year 20…

The petitioner, Siddik @ Matunga Abdulla Badam, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 30 days to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were heard. The court noted that the petitioner had previously bee…

Ashishkumar Chandrakant Patel filed an anticipatory bail application (R/CR.MA/4678/2026) before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel, Mr. K. R. Chakwawala and Mr. R. M. Chakwawala, later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application, stating it had become infructuous. The State of Gujarat, repres…

Ismail @Pintu Ibrahim Khokhar applied for temporary bail, citing his daughter's upcoming engagement as a personal reason. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The Gujarat High Court, after hearing the parties and considering the petitioner's jail remarks, exercised its discretion in h…

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under IPC Sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and 114. The applicant and the de facto complainant were former partners and claimed the dispute was civil and settled, with the com…

Hiral Jagdishbhai Vaghela filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 30 days to attend his cousin's marriage ceremony. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The court examined the petitioner's request, the reasons cited, and the jail remarks, and exercised its discre…

The petitioner, Jigar @Kathiayawadi RameshbhaI, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave of 30 days to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court noted that the petitioner had previously been released on parole…

The applicant, Samir Yunushbai Kureshi, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The applicant's counsel later moved the court for permission to withdraw the petition. The respondent, State of Gujarat, was represented and opposed the withdrawal. The court considered whether it could grant such permiss…

The applicant, Arjunsinh Shatrudhansinh Chauhan, applied for a 30‑day temporary bail on the ground of his niece's marriage. The court noted that the applicant had previously been released on temporary bail on 10‑Oct‑2022 and subsequently absconded for 783 days, and that his conduct in jail was also unsatisfactory. Cons…

The applicant, Balakdas @ Munno Nagardas Nimbark Thro Vasuben Nagardas Acharya, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for 30 days on the ground of financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The court noted that the ap…

The applicant, Mohsin urfe Pita Ramzanbhai Bhikhubhai Chauhan, applied for temporary bail through his wife on the ground of her medical treatment. The Sessions Court had earlier granted temporary bail conditioned on a deposit of Rs.1 lakh, which the applicant could not afford. The wife argued that the deposit amount sh…

Dharmesh Kishanbhai Sonajibha Patni applied for a 30‑day temporary bail on the ground that he needed financial assistance for his family. The applicant had been released from custody in December 2025, as noted in the jail remarks. The court examined the application and found that the applicant had not made a sufficient…

The applicant, Vidhyasagar Bhrugunath Verma, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for 30 days, citing the need for financial assistance to his family. The application was presented through the jail, and the respondent State of Gujarat was represented by Mr. Chintan Dave. The court examined …

Ilyasbhai @ Ilu, who is in custody, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for a period of 14 days on the ground that he needs to provide financial assistance to his family. The application was presented through jail. The court examined the remarks made by the jail authorities and the sole gr…

The petitioner, Mehbub Abdulla Saburiya, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) seeking permission to appeal a conviction. The High Court, after hearing counsel Pooja D. Baswal for the petitioner and Chintan Dave for the State, directed the petitioner to approach the competent authority to obtain leave for…

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking cancellation of bail. After filing, the petitioner, through counsel, submitted a written request to withdraw the application. The learned counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw, citing the written instructions of the petitioner. The Hon'ble Ju…

The applicant, Ammar Akhtarhusen Manki, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with FIR C.R. No. 11197025251060. He contended that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, he would cooperate with the investigation, and he had no prior crimi…

The applicant, Bashirsha Bhakharsah Sandhvani Shaikh, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. Subsequently, the applicant’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether it could allow the withdrawal of an anticipatory bail petition. It …

The applicant, Chaitanyakumar ShambhuBhai Patel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with an FIR relating to a civil dispute over immigration services and a refund. The applicant asserted no prior criminal record and pled…

The applicant, a scrap broker, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11196010220014) alleging offences under IPC sections 120B, 419, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 114. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the gravity of th…

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. They contended that the maximum punishment for…

The applicant, Shivanand Vishnupasad Rampyare Pand... (Rubi Shivananand Pand...), filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for 30 days on the ground of making financial arrangements. The applicant failed to appear when called out. The Additional Public Prosecutor highlighted that the applicant …

The applicant, Nirbhaysinh Kishorsinh Rao, filed a transit bail application fearing arrest under FIR No. 0046 for offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. He sought a four‑week transit bail while he intended to apply for anticipatory bail before the appropriate territorial court. The State opposed …

The applicant, Shankar Ramjibhai Pinglasur, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for 30 days on the grounds of needing financial assistance for his family and medical treatment for his mother. The respondent State of Gujarat waived service of notice of rule. The court examined the applicant…

The applicant, Mohammad Juber Sakir Shaikh, filed a temporary bail application seeking a 30‑day release to provide financial support to his family and obtain medical treatment for his ailing mother. The State waived service of notice. The court noted that the applicant had previously been released in April 2024 and had…

Mustak Alam Parmar, through his wife, applied for a 30‑day parole leave to provide financial assistance to his family. The applicant had been released from jail in October 2025, but earlier had absconded for 534 days after a previous release. The jail remarks highlighted this prior absconding. The High Court considered…

The applicant filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave and later requested permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the applicant argued for withdrawal, and the Court considered the request. The Court granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the application w…

Parvez Ayubbhai Vahora, the original accused, filed revision applications challenging the condition imposed by the 10th Additional Sessions Judge that he deposit 20% of the cheque amount within 60 days, a condition attached to the suspension of his sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appli…

Parvez Ayubbhai Vahora, the original accused, filed revision applications challenging the condition imposed by the 10th Additional Sessions Judge that he deposit 20% of the cheque amount within 60 days, a condition attached to the suspension of his sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appli…

Rahulbhai Navinchandra Bhuriya filed a criminal revision application seeking maintenance against Mitaliben Pratapbhai Patel and another respondent. The applicant, through counsel Mr. A.S. Bhatt, requested the court's permission to withdraw the pending revision. The respondents were represented by Mr. Darshan P. Dave an…

The petitioner, Sujeetkumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay. The applicant's counsel informed the court that the charge had already been framed, and consequently requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw…

The case concerned a criminal revision application (No. 2063 of 2025) filed by Gajjar Shilpaben Maheshbhai against Patel Vashrambhai Damodarbhai and another party. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Jigneshkumar M. Nayak, sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and granted permission t…

Jagruti, wife of Manoj Trivedi, filed a criminal revision application (No. 1623 of 2019) before the Gujarat High Court seeking maintenance. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Aditya J. Pandya, moved the court for permission to withdraw the application, submitting a withdrawal petition. The respondent's counsel, Mr. Pratik Y.…

The petitioners Vidhyaben Girishbhai Solanki and another filed an application under section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 39‑day delay in filing a criminal revision application. The court noted that the respondent's counsel, Mr. Chirag Brahmbhatt, had indicated an intention to appear but was absent w…

Ankit Kishorbhai Dave filed a criminal revision application (R/CR.MA/27728/2025) seeking condonation of an 80‑day delay in filing the revision under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The respondent State of Gujarat was served but did not appear, and the original complainant (respondent No.2) also failed to appear. The a…

The applicant, Harish Jagdishchandra Jain, filed a criminal revision application seeking maintenance and later requested permission to withdraw it. The court, after hearing counsel, granted the request, ordering the revision application to stand disposed as withdrawn. Consequently, the related criminal miscellaneous ap…

The applicant, Harish Jagdishchandra Jain, filed a criminal revision application seeking maintenance and later requested permission to withdraw it. The court, after hearing counsel, granted the request, ordering the revision application to stand disposed as withdrawn. Consequently, the related criminal miscellaneous ap…

The petitioner, Sumitraben Sundarsingh @ Ashaben, filed a criminal revision application challenging an order of the I/C 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat, dated 13-12-2025 in Criminal Appeal No. 582 of 2024. While the revision was pending, the parties reached a settlement through the National Lok Adalat. The High Co…

The proprietor of Radhekishna Enterprise was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by a Special Negotiable Instrument Court and the conviction was upheld on appeal. The applicant filed a revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking to quash the judgment,…

The applicant, Bhavesh Manjibhai Andhan, filed a criminal revision application seeking maintenance. The applicant later approached the court requesting permission to withdraw the application, stating that the parties had reached an out‑of‑court settlement. The respondent counsel opposed the withdrawal. The court examin…

The applicant, Jagdishbhai Muljibhai Koradiya, filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of 111 days' delay in filing a criminal revision application. Rule was issued returnable forthwith, and the learned advocates for the respondents waived service. The applicant's advocate relied …

The applicant, Rajendrasinh Bhikhsinh Chauhan, filed a criminal revision application after a delay of 398 days, seeking condonation of the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Notice was served on the State of Gujarat, but the respondent did not appear, and the Additional Public Prosecutor waived service. The c…

The applicant, Varun Vijay Seth, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay. The applicant's counsel later submitted an additional affidavit stating that the parties had entered into a Memorandum of Understanding dated 02.01.2026 to obtain a divorce by mutual consent, and a family suit had …

Dipakbhai Bhikhubhai Hirani was convicted by the 13th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surat, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to simple imprisonment. He appealed to the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Surat, but the appeal was dismissed and the conviction upheld. Subsequently, Hira…

The petitioners were convicted for robbery under IPC sections 394 and 114 based on a trial court's findings and an appellate confirmation. They filed a criminal revision under CrPC sections 397 and 401, alleging that the identification parade was flawed, the accused's photographs were published before the parade, and t…

The applicants, Nikita Chaitanyaprasad Rana and another, filed a criminal revision application seeking maintenance. Subsequently they filed a consent divorce petition before the Family Court. They applied to withdraw the revision application, arguing that the divorce petition rendered the maintenance claim moot. The co…

The petitioner filed a criminal revision application seeking maintenance, along with a criminal miscellaneous application for vacating interim relief. The petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the revision because the parties had filed a consent divorce petition in the Family Court. The High Court allow…

Imran Ismail Kumbhar was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to imprisonment with a direction to pay compensation to the complainant, Rajesh Shamji Maheshwari. The applicant filed a criminal revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking to…

The CBI filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 75‑day delay in filing a restoration application for a main criminal revision that had been dismissed for default. The applicant argued that sufficient cause for the delay was shown. The court examined the memorandum and found t…

The applicant, Kothiya Rajubhai Manish, filed a criminal revision application against the order of a subordinate court. He later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application, stating that the matter had become infructuous. The respondent, Patel Kamleshbhai Manubhai, was represented by counsel. The Hon'ble …

Mustak, also known as Builder Fatehmammad Shaikh, filed a criminal revision application against an order of a subordinate court and subsequently sought the Court's permission to withdraw that revision while obtaining liberty to file a quashing petition. The learned counsel for the applicant requested this withdrawal, a…

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 151‑day delay in filing a revision under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The petitioner’s counsel argued that sufficient cause for the delay was shown, while the respondent’s counsel opposed, claiming no sufficient cause. The Court exam…

The petitioners Dineshbhai and others filed a criminal revision application challenging a subordinate court’s order of discharge. They later sought permission to withdraw the revision because the charges against them had been framed, rendering the discharge challenge moot. The learned counsel for the petitioners reques…

Arunaben filed a criminal revision application (R/CR.RA/212/2026) before the Gujarat High Court challenging an order of a subordinate court. The applicant later discovered inadvertent mistakes in the petition and sought the court's permission to withdraw the revision and file a fresh one. The court examined whether it …

The petitioners, Vaishakhi Pareshbhai Shah and another, filed a revision application eight days after the prescribed period and sought condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The State of Gujarat and another respondent opposed the condonation. The court examined the memorandum of application and fou…

Shaileshbhai Patel was convicted by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaso, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs.5,00,000. The conviction was upheld by the Sessions Court on appeal. Patel filed a revision under Sections 438 and 442 of…

The applicant, Dhirubha Ratanji Jadeja, filed a criminal revision application (No. 979 of 2025) against an order of a subordinate court. The applicant, through counsel Darshan M. Varandani, sought the court's permission to withdraw the pending revision application, stating that the charge had already been framed by the…

The petitioner, Poonamben, filed a criminal revision application seeking maintenance against the State of Gujarat and others. The petitioner later informed the Court that a divorce decree had been passed, rendering the maintenance claim moot. The petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the applica…

The State alleged that several officials and contractors colluded to submit false bills under the MGNREGA scheme, causing a loss of approximately Rs 7.30 crore and invoking offences under the IPC such as criminal breach of trust and forgery. The accused were initially granted bail by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, whic…

The State alleged that several officials and contractors colluded to submit false bills under the MGNREGA scheme, causing a loss of approximately Rs 7.30 crore and invoking offences under the IPC such as criminal breach of trust and forgery. The accused were initially granted bail by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, whic…

The State alleged that several officials and contractors colluded to submit false bills under the MGNREGA scheme, causing a loss of approximately Rs 7.30 crore and invoking offences under the IPC such as criminal breach of trust and forgery. The accused were initially granted bail by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, whic…

The State alleged that several officials and contractors colluded to submit false bills under the MGNREGA scheme, causing a loss of approximately Rs 7.30 crore and invoking offences under the IPC such as criminal breach of trust and forgery. The accused were initially granted bail by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, whic…

The State alleged that several officials and contractors colluded to submit false bills under the MGNREGA scheme, causing a loss of approximately Rs 7.30 crore and invoking offences under the IPC such as criminal breach of trust and forgery. The accused were initially granted bail by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, whic…

The State alleged that several officials and contractors colluded to submit false bills under the MGNREGA scheme, causing a loss of approximately Rs 7.30 crore and invoking offences under the IPC such as criminal breach of trust and forgery. The accused were initially granted bail by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, whic…

The State alleged that several officials and contractors colluded to submit false bills under the MGNREGA scheme, causing a loss of approximately Rs 7.30 crore and invoking offences under the IPC such as criminal breach of trust and forgery. The accused were initially granted bail by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, whic…

The State alleged that several officials and contractors colluded to submit false bills under the MGNREGA scheme, causing a loss of approximately Rs 7.30 crore and invoking offences under the IPC such as criminal breach of trust and forgery. The accused were initially granted bail by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, whic…

The State alleged that several officials and contractors colluded to submit false bills under the MGNREGA scheme, causing a loss of approximately Rs 7.30 crore and invoking offences under the IPC such as criminal breach of trust and forgery. The accused were initially granted bail by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, whic…

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of a revision application that had been dismissed for default due to non‑removal of office objections. The High Court examined the memorandum filed by the petitioners and considered whether the procedural default could be cured. The Court he…

The petitioners filed applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 seeking condonation of delays of 183 and 179 days in filing revision applications. The respondents, including the original complainant, appeared and indicated that the matter had been amicably settled. The petitioner’s counsel highlighted th…

The petitioners filed applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 seeking condonation of delays of 183 and 179 days in filing revision applications. The applicant’s counsel highlighted that the dispute had been amicably settled, a fact conceded by the respondent’s counsel. The court examined the explanatio…

The applicant, Mohammed Samirbhai Hussainbhai Chudgar, filed a criminal revision application 145 days after the prescribed period, seeking condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The respondent State of Gujarat did not appear, though notice was served, and the Additional Public Prosecutor waived ser…

The applicant, Afzalbhai Aamadbhai Mahida, filed a criminal revision application but delayed filing it by two days. He sought condonation of this delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The respondent State of Gujarat did not appear, and the Additional Public Prosecutor waived service. The court heard arguments fr…

The applicants filed a criminal revision application before the High Court of Gujarat challenging an order of a subordinate court. During the hearing, the applicants, through counsel Mr. D.M. Devnani, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the revision application. The Court considered the request and, without exami…

The Designated Special Judge had earlier ordered that the trial in the criminal matter be completed within six months, but the trial remained pending due to repeated delays. The applicant filed a criminal revision seeking direction to expedite the trial. The High Court examined the delay and noted that the trial had no…

The applicant, Rajubhai Trilokram Chaudhary, filed a criminal revision application under the Negotiable Instruments Act challenging his conviction. He later instructed his counsel, Mr. Daksh Solanki, to seek the court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr.…

The applicant, Satyanarayan Tarachand Jaju, filed a revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 challenging the trial court’s refusal to discharge him in a PMLA case alleging his involvement in a bank‑fraud and money‑laundering scheme. The prosecution case alleged that a senior SB…

The petitioners, Groww Invest Tech Private Limited through Sanjeet Vikram Singh, filed a criminal revision application against the State of Gujarat and others. The revision was filed ten days after the prescribed limitation period. They sought condonation of the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Notice was s…

The State of Gujarat filed a criminal revision against the order dated 07‑10‑2024 in which the Additional Special Judge, Gondal, marked a Pen Drive and an audio transcript as Mark‑A to be kept with the victim's deposition in a POCSO case. The State contended that the trial court failed to follow the procedural requirem…

The Central Bureau of Investigation, through Ashok Nana Ghuge, filed a revision application but delayed filing it by 237 days. The applicant sought condonation of this delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court examined the memorandum and noted that the applicant was not indolent, had taken steps to challen…

The applicant filed a criminal revision application seeking maintenance. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel submitted a registered divorce deed and requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether it could allow the withdrawal of the revision proceeding. Finding no impediment, the…

The petitioners filed two criminal revision applications (Nos. 335/2024 and 342/2024) before the Gujarat High Court seeking maintenance of their earlier orders. The parties subsequently reached a settlement, and the petitioners, through their counsel, requested permission to withdraw the applications. The Court examine…

The petitioners filed two criminal revision applications (Nos. 335/2024 and 342/2024) before the Gujarat High Court seeking maintenance of their earlier orders. The parties subsequently reached a settlement, and the petitioners, through their counsel, requested permission to withdraw the applications. The Court examine…

The petitioners, Dhirajbhai Kanjibhai Parmar & ors., filed criminal revision applications (Nos. 1836 and 1838 of 2024) seeking maintenance. They later moved the High Court of Gujarat for permission to withdraw these applications. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested the court’s leave to withdraw, and the c…

The petitioners, Dhirajbhai Kanjibhai Parmar & ors., filed criminal revision applications (Nos. 1836 and 1838 of 2024) seeking maintenance. They later moved the High Court of Gujarat for permission to withdraw these applications. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested the court’s leave to withdraw, and the c…

Manish Rasikbhai Patel filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking recall of an order dated 05.01.2026 that had suspended his sentence and granted bail in a revision proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant had earlier filed two separate revision applications (Nos. 1620/2024 …

Mansuri Ismailbhai Mahamadhanif filed a criminal revision application 86 days after the prescribed period and sought condonation of the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The respondent State of Gujarat did not appear. The court examined the memorandum of application, particularly the explanation for the dela…

Dineshbhai Narshibhai Malakiya filed a revision application 75 days after the prescribed period and sought condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The applicant argued that the delay was sufficiently explained in the memorandum of application. The Court heard the submissions of the parties and exami…

The applicant, Mahindra @ Mahesh Melabhai Chauhan, filed a revision application but delayed its filing. Under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant sought condonation of this delay. The respondent State of Gujarat was represented by Rohan Shah, while the original complainant’s counsel, Jignesh Lambha, appeared…

The applicant, Mahindra @ Mahesh Melabhai Chauhan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay in filing a revision application. The revision had been filed beyond the prescribed period, and the original complainant (respondent 2) was served notice and i…

Mahindra @ Mahesh Melabhai Chauhan filed a criminal revision application before the Gujarat High Court but did so after the prescribed limitation period had expired. The applicant sought condonation of the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Respondent No.2, the original complainant, appeared through counsel a…

Hareshbai Shankarlal Murjani filed a criminal revision application 193 days after the prescribed period and sought condonation of the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The respondent State of Gujarat objected, arguing that no sufficient cause was shown. The Court examined the memorandum of application and fo…

The applicant filed a criminal revision application 32 days after the prescribed period and sought condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The applicant's counsel argued that sufficient cause existed for the delay, while the respondent's counsel contended that no such cause was shown. The Court exam…

The petitioner filed a criminal revision against the order of the Principal Family Court dated 10‑Nov‑2025, which had rejected his right to file a written statement on the ground that the opponent had filed a vakalatnama after appearing and failed to file the statement within the stipulated time. The petitioner argued …

The applicant, Jaykumaar Kishanbhai Solanki, filed a criminal revision application seeking maintenance against Bhumika Jaykumaar Solanki and others. The applicant's counsel submitted that the parties had entered into a customary divorce settlement, and a photocopy of the settlement was placed on record. Consequently, t…