Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

MUSTAK ALAM PARMAR THROUGH MIRZA SAGUFTA W/O MONISHARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The application for parole leave was rejected.

Summary

Mustak Alam Parmar, through his wife, applied for a 30‑day parole leave to provide financial assistance to his family. The applicant had been released from jail in October 2025, but earlier had absconded for 534 days after a previous release. The jail remarks highlighted this prior absconding. The High Court considered the applicant’s request in light of his history of non‑compliance with release conditions. The Court concluded that the risk of further absconding outweighed the financial assistance claim and rejected the parole application. The order directed the jail authority to be informed of the decision.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant is entitled to parole leave despite a prior history of absconding for 534 days

Subjects

parolecriminal procedureabscondingleave of absencefinancial assistance

Judgment

            R/SCR.A/3487/2026                                                                     ORDER DATED: 10/03/2026




                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

         R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 3487 of
                                   2026

    ==========================================================
      MUSTAK ALAM PARMAR THROUGH MIRZA SAGUFTA W/O MONISHAR
                               Versus
                      STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
    ==========================================================
    Appearance:
    PARTY IN PERSON(5000) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
    ROHAN SHAH APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
    ==========================================================

         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

                                                        Date : 10/03/2026

                                                           ORAL ORDER


    1.          This application is filed by the Applicant through his wife
    seeking parole leave for 30 days on the ground of financial
    assistance to his family.


    2.          The jail remarks indicate that the Applicant was recently
    released in the month of October, 2025.


    3.          The jail remarks further indicate that earlier when the
    Applicant was released, he absconded for 534 days. Considering
    the said aspect, this application is rejected.


    3.          Registry to communicate this order to the concerned jail
    authority.


                                                                                                             (P. M. RAVAL, J)
    MMP
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MAHENDRA MOHANBHAI PUROHIT(HCD0074), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE TWO CLASS TWO, at High Court of Gujarat on 10/03/2026
13:52:06




                                                                Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.