Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

VIDHYASAGAR BHRUGUNATH VERMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The court held that the applicant had not made out a case to exercise its discretion for granting temporary bail and therefore rejected the application.

Summary

The applicant, Vidhyasagar Bhrugunath Verma, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for 30 days, citing the need for financial assistance to his family. The application was presented through the jail, and the respondent State of Gujarat was represented by Mr. Chintan Dave. The court examined the remarks made by the jail and the ground of financial assistance raised by the applicant. It found that the applicant had not established a sufficient case to warrant the exercise of judicial discretion in granting bail. Consequently, the court rejected the temporary bail application and directed the registry to inform the jail authority of the order.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant is entitled to temporary bail for 30 days on the ground of financial assistance to his family?

Subjects

temporary bailcriminal procedurebail discretionfinancial assistancejail remarks

Judgment

          R/CR.MA/5835/2026                                                           ORDER DATED: 12/03/2026




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD


   R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL)
                        NO. 5835 of 2026
  ================================================
              VIDHYASAGAR BHRUGUNATH VERMA
                             Versus
                  STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
  ================================================
  Appearance:
  THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
  MR CHINTAN DAVE, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
  ================================================

   CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

                                                Date : 12/03/2026

                                                 ORAL ORDER

  1.          This application, through jail, is filed by the applicant seeking
  temporary bail for 30 days on the ground of financial assistance to his
  family.


  2.          Considering the jail remarks as well as the ground mentioned,
  no case is made out for exercising discretion. The application is
  rejected, accordingly.


  3.          Registry to communicate this order to the concerned jail
  authority.


                                                                                              [ P. M. Raval, J. ]
  hiren/DB/7tss12326




Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: HIREN VIRENDRABHAI MER(HC00351), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 12/03/2026 14:01:14

                                                        Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "temporary bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.