High Court of Gujarat

RAJUBHAI TRILOKRAM CHAUDHARY OWNER/AUTHORISED OF SHIVSHAKTI TRAILER SERVICEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal: 27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
Bench: P M RAVAL

Holding

The court granted permission to withdraw the revision application and disposed of it as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicant, Rajubhai Trilokram Chaudhary, filed a criminal revision application under the Negotiable Instruments Act challenging his conviction. He later instructed his counsel, Mr. Daksh Solanki, to seek the court's permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. P. S. Datta and Mr. Rohan Raval. The Hon'ble Justice P. M. Raval considered the request for withdrawal. The court granted permission to withdraw, disposed of the application as withdrawn, and clarified that it did not examine the merits of the case. Consequently, the notice was discharged and the matter concluded without a substantive decision on the underlying conviction.

Issues considered

Whether the High Court may grant permission to withdraw a criminal revision application.

Subjects

Criminal RevisionNegotiable Instruments ActProcedural LawWithdrawal of Application

Judgment

         R/CR.RA/1694/2025                                                           ORDER DATED: 19/01/2026




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

      R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST
CONVICTION - NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT) NO. 1694 of
                             2025
=================================================
 RAJUBHAI TRILOKRAM CHAUDHARY OWNER/AUTHORISED
                OF SHIVSHAKTI TRAILER SERVICE
                             Versus
                   STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
=================================================
Appearance:
MR DAKSH SOLANKI for DENISH V MAVADHIYA(9207) for the
Applicant(s) No. 1
MR P S DATTA(11324) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
=================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

                                              Date : 19/01/2026

                                               ORAL ORDER

             Learned advocate for the applicant, upon instructions, seeks
permission to withdraw this application.


             Permission, as prayed for, is granted. This application is disposed
of as withdrawn. Notice is discharged.


             It is clarified that this Court has not gone into the merits of the
case.

                                                                                           [ P. M. Raval, J. ]
hiren/DB-II-87tss19126



Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: HIREN VIRENDRABHAI MER(HC00351), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 19/01/2026 13:46:27

                                                      Page 1 of 1

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "Criminal Revision"Sign in to search