VHORA SALIMBHAI @ LALA S/O UMARGANI KARIMBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH
- Bench
- VIMAL K VYAS
Holding
The FIR and the pending criminal case are quashed and set aside as their continuation would be futile and amount to abuse of process.
Summary
The accused filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash FIR No.11206044220318 (registered in 2022) and the pending criminal case No.5664, which alleged offences under Sections 143, 323, 504 and 506(2) of the IPC. The complainant, Sakeenaben Nurmohammad Vhora, appeared before the court, produced her identity proof and an affidavit stating that the dispute had been amicably resolved and she had no objection to the quashment. The court, after hearing counsel for both parties, held that proceeding with the FIR and the criminal case would be futile and constitute an abuse of process. Relying on several Supreme Court precedents, the court exercised its power under Section 528 to quash the FIR, the chargesheet and the criminal proceedings. The order was made absolute, directing direct service of the rule.
Issues considered
- Whether an FIR and pending criminal proceedings can be quashed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita when the parties have reached an amicable settlement.
- Whether continuation of the criminal process would amount to an abuse of process of law.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023s. 528
- Indian Penal Code, 1860s. 143, s. 323, s. 504, s. 506(2)
Subjects
Judgment
R/CR.MA/27083/2025 ORDER DATED: 07/01/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING & SET ASIDE
FIR/ORDER) NO. 27083 of 2025
==========================================================
VHORA SALIMBHAI @ LALA S/O UMARGANI KARIMBHAI & ORS.
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR SAGAR D VAGHASIYA(13308) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR MANAN MAHETA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL K. VYAS
Date : 07/01/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned advocate Mr.Rishabh R. Jain appears and
submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of the
respondent no.2 - complainant. Registry shall accept his
vakalatnama.
2. By way of filing the present application under Section 528
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the
applicant-accused has prayed to quash and set-aside the First
Information Report No.11206044220318 of 2022 registered
with the ‘A’ Division Police Station, Mahesana City, for the
offences punishable under Sections 143, 323, 504 and 506(2)
of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, as well as the proceedings of
Page 1 of 5
R/CR.MA/27083/2025 ORDER DATED: 07/01/2026
the Criminal Case No.5664 of 2022 pending before the learned
Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mahesana, so also all other
consequential proceedings arising pursuant thereto.
3. Today, when the matter is called out, the complainant –
Sakeenaben Nurmohammad Vhora, who is personally present
before this Court, has produced her identity proof as well as
the afÏdavit, which are ordered to be taken on record. In the
said afÏdavit, the complainant has categorically stated that
the dispute between her and the applicant-accused has been
amicably resolved and there is no ill-will or any grievance
amongst them.
4. Considering the issue involved in the present application
as well as considering the fact that the dispute has been
amicably resolved between the parties, with the consent of the
learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, the
present application is taken up for final disposal.
5. RULE returnable forthwith. Learned APP Mr.Manan
Maheta waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the
respondent no.1 – State and learned advocate Mr.Rishabh R.
Page 2 of 5
R/CR.MA/27083/2025 ORDER DATED: 07/01/2026
Jain waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the
respondent no.2 – complainant.
6. The complainant, who is personally present before this
Court, has categorically stated before this Court that the
dispute has been amicably resolved between the parties and
she has no objection if the application is allowed and the
impugned FIR is quashed and set-aside.
7. The relevant paragraph of the afÏdavit filed by the
complainant - Sakeenaben Nurmohammad Vhora, reads thus :
“5. In view of what is stated herein above and the settlement
arrived at between the parties, I state and submit that the
petition preferred by the present Petitioners be allowed and FIR
bearing no. 11206044220318 of 2022 registered with 'A' Division
Police Station, Mahesana City on 02.04.2022 under Section 143,
323, 504 & 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and the
subsequent chargesheet as well as Criminal Case No. 5664 of
2022 pending before Ld. Judicial Magistrate First Class,
Mahesana be quashed and set aside.”
8. Thus, it appears from the aforesaid that to continue
further with the proceedings pursuant to the impugned FIR
as well as the criminal case would be a futile exercise and
the same would amount to abuse of process of law.
Page 3 of 5
R/CR.MA/27083/2025 ORDER DATED: 07/01/2026
9. Having heard learned advocates appearing for the
respective parties as well as considering the facts and
circumstances arising out of the present application and taking
into consideration the decisions rendered in the cases of Gian
Singh vs. State of Punjab & Another, reported in (2012) 10
SCC 303, Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab,
reported in (2008) 4 SCC 582, Nikhil Merchant vs. Central
Bureau of Investigation & Another, reported in (2009) 1
GLH 31, Manoj Sharma vs. State & Others, reported in
(2009) 1 GLH 190, and Narinder Singh & Others vs. State
of Punjab & Another, reported in (2014) 2 Crime 67 (SC) as
well as State of Haryana vs. Bhajanlal, reported in AIR
1992 SC 604, it appears that continuing further with the
proceedings pursuant to the impugned FIR as well as the
criminal case would be a futile exercise and the same would
amount to abuse of process of law. Hence, to secure the ends
of justice, the impugned FIR and all other consequential
proceedings arising pursuant thereto are required to be
quashed and set-aside in exercise of the powers conferred
under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,
2023.
Page 4 of 5
R/CR.MA/27083/2025 ORDER DATED: 07/01/2026
10. In the result, the application is allowed. The First
Information Report No.11206044220318 of 2022 registered
with the ‘A’ Division Police Station, Mahesana City, for the
offences punishable under Sections 143, 323, 504 and 506(2)
of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, as well as the proceedings of
the Criminal Case No.5664 of 2022 pending before the learned
Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mahesana, so also all other
consequential proceedings arising pursuant thereto, are
hereby ordered to be quashed and set-aside.
11. Rule made absolute. Direct service is permitted.
(VIMAL K. VYAS, J)
DEEPAK GEHLOT
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: DEEPAK GEHLOT(HC02361), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 08/01/2026 11:16:18
Page 5 of 5
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.