Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

JATINBHAI DUSHYANBHAI SHUKALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Holding

The revision application is dismissed because the petitioner has already undergone the sentence and the cause of action does not survive.

Summary

The petitioner, Jatinbhai Dushyanbhai Shukal, filed a criminal revision application challenging his conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The revision was accompanied by temporary bail and a modification/deletion of condition applications. The High Court examined the jail records and found that the petitioner had already completed both the original and default sentences. Since the sentence had been fully served, the court held that there was no remaining cause of action to entertain the revision. Consequently, the court disposed of the revision application and all connected applications.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal revision application can be entertained when the convicted person has already served the sentence?

Legislation cited

Subjects

criminal revisionNegotiable Instruments Actsentence servedapplication disposedhigh court order

Judgment

               R/CR.RA/2235/2025                                                         ORDER DATED: 27/04/2026




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

            R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST CONVICTION -
                  NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT) NO. 2235 of 2025
                                      With
           CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (TEMPORARY BAIL) NO. 1 of 2025
               In R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 2235 of 2025
                                      With
            CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (MODIFICATION/DELETION OF
                             CONDITION) NO. 2 of 2026
               In R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 2235 of 2025
      ==========================================================
                                     JATINBHAI DUSHYANBHAI SHUKAL
                                                 Versus
                                        STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
      ==========================================================
      Appearance:
      MR JAIMIL D DOSHI(11097) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
      DS AFF.NOT FILED (R) for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
      MR PRANAV DHAGAT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
      ==========================================================
         CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI

                                                    Date : 27/04/2026

                                                   COMMON ORDER


                 Jail remarks shows that the accused had already undergone
      the sentence as well as the default sentence and hence, the cause
      would not survive.


                 Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of.
      Consequently, all connected applications also stand disposed of.




                                                                                                       (GITA GOPI,J)
      Maulik

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MAULIK RAJESH PANDYA(HC00205), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 27/04/2026 17:11:20




                                                           Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "criminal revision"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.