GITA GOPI

The applicant, Jay Ghanshyam Singh, filed a successive regular bail application after the filing of a chargesheet in an NDPS case originally registered in 2022. The case has been transferred multiple times and, as of the report, the charge has not yet been framed, with a discharge application of a co‑accused pending, l…

The applicant, Mohammad Zaid @ Zedu Abdul Kadar Kureshi, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking relief after his order of detention was revoked. He subsequently moved the High Court of Gujarat for permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Muzaffahmed Kadri, argued that the…

The petitioner was preventively detained on 11 July 2026 as a "bootlegger" under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the offences listed—under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and other statutes—did not affect public order as required by Section 3(4) of the A…

The petitioner, Dinesh Singh Jalamsingh Ravna Rajput, was preventively detained on 23 April 2026 as a "bootlegger" under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the offences for which he was booked under the Prohibition Act and Motor Vehicles…

The appellant, Vinodbhai Ramanbhai Valand, was convicted in a criminal case and filed Criminal Appeal No. 1451 of 2007 before the High Court of Gujarat. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died on 12 June 2025, as evidenced by a police sub‑inspector's report, a death certificate, and statements from his br…

The petitioner was preventively detained on 20 April 2026 as a “dangerous person” under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences relate only to law and order and not to public order as required by Section 3 of the Act. The State contended…

The petitioner, Zala Nirmalsinh Dashrathsinh, filed a habeas corpus petition seeking the release of a young woman (the corpus) who had been taken away by her parents after she performed a Saptapadi marriage ceremony with the petitioner. The corpus, aged 18, was identified through school and Aadhar records and testified…

The father of a 19‑year‑old son filed a special criminal application for habeas corpus, alleging that his son was being unlawfully detained. Police traced the son’s location in Haryana through call detail records and reported that he had voluntarily left home to stay with friends. The son, when questioned, expressed a …

The petitioner, a 25‑year‑old man, filed a special criminal application (habeas corpus) seeking permission for a woman, referred to as the Corpus, to join him. The Corpus, aged 25, had been in a live‑in relationship with the petitioner and was employed at Supplycopiya Private Limited. Police records and a statement fro…

The petitioner, Prahar @ Varun @ Boxer, was preventively detained on 2 May 2026 as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the legality of the detention, arguing that the alleged offences pertained only to law and order and not to public order…

The petitioner, Rakesh Chauhan, was preventively detained on 22 June 2026 as a "bootlegger" under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention order, arguing that the offences alleged under the Prohibition Act did not affect public order. The State contended that his habitual …

The petitioner was preventively detained on 21 June 2026 as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the legality of the detention, arguing that the offences cited against him pertained only to law and order, not public order. The State contend…

The petitioner, Yakub Yusufbhai, was preventively detained on 21 June 2026 as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the legality of the detention, arguing that the alleged offences relate only to law and order, not to public order as require…

The petitioner, Udesinh Mafatsinh Vaghela, filed a Special Criminal Application challenging a detention order issued under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act on 7 April 2026. The order was based on a report from the District Magistrate of Vav‑Tharad and a communication from the Additional District Mag…

The applicant, Yashpalsinh Narendrasinh Jadeja, filed a Special Criminal Application before the High Court of Gujarat. The learned counsel for the applicant informed the court that the order under challenge had been revoked. The court noted that, with the revocation, the matter had become moot. Consequently, the court …

The applicant, Ankur Patel, filed a special criminal application under the PASA Act seeking relief. The Khatodara Police Station report indicated that the applicant was already in judicial custody and that no process under the PASA Act had been initiated. The court examined whether the petition could be entertained in …

The petitioner filed a recall application seeking to set aside the High Court's order dated 17 April 2026, which had permitted the withdrawal of a criminal revision application (No. 1598 of 2025). The order had granted the petitioner liberty to approach the appellate court regarding a dispute over the repayment of Rs. …

Ronakkumar Bhogilal Patanvadiya filed a Special Criminal Application seeking an order of detention. The Additional Public Prosecutor produced the police inspector's report showing that no proposal for detention had been made against the applicant. The Court observed that without any proposal, the application was premat…

The petitioner, Suresh Tekbahadur Thapa, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking detention pending investigation. The Additional Public Prosecutor produced a police inspector's report indicating that no proposal for detention had been made against the applicant. The Court noted that without a proposal for detentio…

The petitioners, Rajan Muljibhai Patel and Narsinhbai Patel, filed a Special Criminal Application before the Gujarat High Court seeking an order of detention. The Additional Public Prosecutor produced a police inspector’s report indicating that no proposal for detention against the applicants had been made. The Court n…

The petitioner, Niteshbhai Shetansinh Minekar, filed a Special Criminal Application before the Gujarat High Court seeking relief against the State of Gujarat and others. The Court examined a police report submitted by the Inspector of Sardarnagar Police Station, which disclosed that an order under the Prevention of Ant…

The applicant, Mohammad Harun, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking relief. The Police Commissioner of Ahmedabad submitted a report indicating that criminal proceedings under the Prevention of Anti-Social Activities (PASA) Act had already been initiated against him, leading to his arrest and remand. The Court e…

The applicant, Kishor Sajanbhai Gurgutiya, filed a Special Criminal Application (R/SCR.A/7752/2026) before the Gujarat High Court. After the order in the proceeding was revoked, the applicant sought the Court's permission to withdraw the pending application. The learned counsel for the applicant argued that the revocat…

The petitioner, Mukesh, filed a Special Criminal Application (R/SCR.A/7764/2026) before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant’s counsel informed the Court that the order underlying the application had been revoked and therefore sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the pending application. The Court considered whet…

The petitioner, Bhartiben Maheshbhai Thakor, was preventively detained on 30 May 2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention, arguing that the three Prohibition Act cases cited against him did not affect public order. The State contended that his ha…

The petitioner was preventively detained as a "dangerous person" under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 by a District Magistrate on 14 May 2026. He challenged the detention, arguing that the offences for which he was booked – under various sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita – pertained onl…

The petitioner was preventively detained on 06.05.2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person" pursuant to Section 2(c). He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences relate only to law and order, not public order as required by Section 3. The State cont…

Amitbhai Vashrambhai Parmar was preventively detained on 06.05.2026 as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He filed a petition challenging the legality of the detention, arguing that the alleged offences relate only to law and order, not public order. T…

The petitioner, Rohan Karansinh, was preventively detained on 29 April 2026 as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the four criminal cases cited against him pertained only to law and order violations and did not…

The applicants Vidhi Salt Traders & Anr filed a criminal revision seeking cancellation of a non-bailable warrant issued by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Gandhidham in Criminal Appeal No.28 of 2024. They argued that the matter had been settled, with more than 20% of the fine paid and only Rs.50,000 remaining. The c…

Ms. Jalaram Agency & Anr. filed a criminal revision seeking cancellation of a non‑bailable warrant issued by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Gandhidham in Criminal Appeal No. 51 of 2024. The applicants argued that the matter had been settled, that more than 20% of the due amount had been paid and only Rs. 50,000 rem…

The petitioner, a father, filed a criminal revision application seeking regular bail for his child in the High Court of Gujarat, despite the matter involving a child and being required to be filed before the Children’s Court. The court observed that the application was inadvertently filed in the wrong forum and that pr…

The applicant sought condonation of a four‑day delay in filing a criminal revision application, citing medical treatment for kidney stones and difficulty obtaining certified copies as reasons. The respondent argued that the delay was not sufficiently explained. The court examined the principles laid down in Collector, …

The appellant, Sufrabhai @ Vinodbhai @ Bhalabhai Pratapbhai Damor, filed a criminal appeal against conviction before the High Court of Gujarat. The matter involved multiple linked applications and appeals, and the court examined an office note dated 13.03.2026 indicating that the office objections had not been removed …

The applicant, Nareshbhai Bhikhabhai Makwana, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in a maintenance order. He later informed the court that the child for whom maintenance was ordered is now staying with him, constituting a change of circumstances. On this basis, his counsel requested …

The petitioner, Rameshbhai Chamanlal Moliya, filed a criminal revision seeking relief from a conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, originally imposed by a magistrate and affirmed by a Sessions Court. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties settled the dispute amicably,…

The petitioner sought revision of a conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, originally imposed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surat and affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Surat. During the pendency of the proceedings the parties settled the dispute amicably, an…

The applicant filed a criminal revision seeking condonation of an 87‑day delay in filing a petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The delay was attributed to the accused’s financial constraints and reliance on free legal aid, which caused procedural lag. The respondent argued that the cause of delay was …

The petitioner, Minaxiben Vargilal Shah, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 45‑day delay in filing a revision under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. She alleged that her advanced age, restricted mobility and difficulty in obtaining legal assistance caused the delay. The State oppo…

The 55‑year‑old father filed a revision application seeking maintenance from his 28‑year‑old son after the Family Court rejected his earlier criminal miscellaneous application. The Family Court had noted that the father’s marriage to the mother of the son was under Muslim personal law, that the mother had obtained a ma…

The husband, Ajit Kalidas Vaghela, sought to recall a July 3, 2024 order that enhanced maintenance for his three minor children and to revive the original 2017 order. The children, represented by their mother Daxaben, had earlier applied for increased maintenance under Section 125 of the CrPC, which the Family Court ha…

The petitioner, Kunj Achal Varma, filed a criminal revision application for maintenance (No. 409 of 2026) along with a connected criminal miscellaneous application for stay (No. 1 of 2026). The respondent, Dhwani Kunj Varma, was represented by counsel. During the hearing, the parties informed the court that they had am…

The applicant filed a criminal revision seeking relief from a conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, originally imposed by a magistrate and affirmed by a Sessions Court. During the pendency of the proceedings the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the complainant consented t…

The petitioners sought condonation of a 250‑day delay in filing a prayer for restoration of Criminal Revision Application No. 15475 of 2025. The learned advocate highlighted the extensive delay. The court examined whether such a delay could be condoned under procedural law. Finding no substantive impediment, the court …

The applicant filed a criminal revision against a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which had been affirmed by the appellate court. During the pendency of the proceedings the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the complainant gave consent to compound the offence under Section 147 of…

The petitioner, Sunil Surendrakumar Kakkad, filed a criminal revision seeking suspension of condition (2)(f) of his bail order, which prohibited him from leaving Gujarat without court permission. He argued that the Sessions Judge had not considered the full purchase order, which spanned 13 months plus an additional 6 m…

The petitioner, Sunil Surendrakumar Kakkad, filed a criminal revision application seeking suspension of condition (2)(f) of his bail order, which prohibited him from leaving Gujarat without court permission. He argued that the Sessions Judge had not considered the full purchase order, which spanned 13 months plus an ad…

Sivaprasad Kanukuntla was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and a non‑bailable warrant was issued for his surrender. He filed a revision application under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking conversion of the non‑bailable warrant into a bailable warr…

The petitioner, Sagar @ Bholo Pravinbhai Jadav, filed a criminal revision application (R/CR.RA/1337/2026) before the High Court of Gujarat challenging an order of a subordinate court. The applicant later moved the court seeking permission to withdraw the revision application. The learned counsel for the applicant submi…

The applicant filed a criminal revision seeking relief from a conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, originally imposed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate on 23.11.2022 and affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge on 13.04.2026. During the pendency of the proceedings,…

The applicant filed a criminal revision seeking relief from a conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which had been affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge. During the pendency of the proceedings the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the complainant consented to compound …

Sheikh Irfanaben filed a criminal case under IPC sections 498A, 323, 294A and 506(2) alleging domestic cruelty and other offences. The trial magistrate acquitted the accused on 12‑08‑2024, a decision affirmed by the Sessions Court on appeal. Aggrieved, the complainant filed a criminal revision before the Gujarat High C…

The High Court of Gujarat reviewed a criminal revision application filed by Prashant Gajendrabhaï Chauhan challenging a Family Court order that directed issuance of a sentence warrant for maintenance arrears of Rs.2,10,000. The applicant argued that the respondent‑wife had already deposited Rs.15,50,000, of which Rs.4,…

Mansukhbhai Khimabhai Vatukiya filed a criminal revision challenging his conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which had been affirmed by the Sessions Court. The original complainant, Gulammahamad Ahmadbhai Badi, appeared before the High Court and submitted an affidavit confirming…

Vishalbhai Ashokpuri Gosai was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a bounced cheque and sentenced by the 7th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, a sentence later confirmed by the Sessions Judge. The applicant filed a criminal revision application, asserting that 20% of the cheque…

Patel Ramzani Yakub was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and a non‑bailable warrant was issued by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Vadodara. The applicant sought conversion of the non‑bailable warrant into a bailable warrant under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha S…

The petitioner, Shejaan @ Nawab, filed a criminal revision application seeking regular bail before the Gujarat High Court. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Zubin F. Bharda, subsequently applied for permission to withdraw the application. The court examined the request and, finding no objection from the respondent, allow…

The applicants, Ashoksinh @ Mama Balubha Jadeja and others, filed a criminal revision application before the High Court of Gujarat seeking relief against an order of a subordinate court. The applicants, through their counsel, later moved the court for permission to withdraw the revision application. The learned judge c…

The petitioners, Jasminbhai Balashankarbhai Madak & ors., filed a criminal revision application challenging the order of the 11th Additional Sessions Judge, Rajkot, which rejected their discharge application in a case under Section 307 of the IPC. They sought condonation of a 193‑day delay in filing this revision, citi…

The applicant, Dharmesh Shaileshbai Fatekar, had a non‑bailable warrant converted to a bailable warrant on the condition of paying 20% of a cheque amount, which he could not initially arrange due to financial constraints. The 4th Additional Sessions Judge refused to condone a 403‑day delay in filing a criminal appeal, …

The petitioner, Kamleshbhai Parshottambhai Kashtawala, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking successive regular bail after the filing of a chargesheet. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Jayesh A. Dave, later moved the court for permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was re…

The applicant sought condonation of a five‑day delay in filing a revision application, explaining that the delay was due to arranging funds to engage counsel. The issue was whether such delay could be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 on the ground of sufficient cause. The Court referred to the Supre…

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 77‑day delay in filing a revision petition. The applicant asserted that a No‑Objection Certificate had been obtained from the bank and the full amount had been deposited, justifying the delay. The court referred to the Supreme Court’s dec…

The applicant filed a criminal revision application before the Gujarat High Court seeking permission to withdraw the proceedings. The application was presented by counsel Ms. Urvashi K. Mehta on behalf of the applicant, while the State of Gujarat was represented by Mr. Niraj Sharma. The court considered the request for…

The petitioners Gajanan Garments Thro Kailashbhai Bajranglal Bajaj & Anr filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of an 89‑day delay in filing a revision under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. They asserted that financial crunch prevented them from obtaining legal assistance in time. The Sta…

The petitioners, Gajanan Garments Thro Kailashbhai Bajranglal Bajaj & Anr, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of an 89‑day delay in filing under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. They claimed financial hardship prevented timely legal assistance. The State of Gujarat argued that the dela…

The applicant filed a criminal revision application but delayed filing a condonation of delay petition by four days, citing financial hardship. The respondent argued the delay was not sufficiently explained. The court examined the principles under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and found the applicant's explana…

The applicant filed a criminal revision application seeking condonation of a 30‑day delay in filing under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, alleging financial hardship that prevented timely legal assistance. The respondent argued that the delay was not sufficiently explained. The court referred to the Supreme Cour…

The applicant, Dineshbhai Bhagwandas Thakkar, filed a criminal revision seeking direction for the passport authority to renew his passport for five years. The lower court had rejected his prayer, although it had permitted him to travel abroad. The applicant’s passport (No. AF373623) was due to expire on 30 September 20…

The applicant, who is incarcerated and facing financial hardship, filed a condonation of delay application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, 162 days after the prescribed period. The respondent State argued that the delay was not sufficiently explained. The Court examined the liberal approach endorsed in Col…

The applicant filed a criminal revision application but delayed filing a condonation of delay petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 by 41 days. The applicant argued that he was unaware of the lower court's order, was residing in Telangana, and faced a pending sentence warrant, which caused the delay. The…

The applicant sought revision of a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which had been affirmed by the appellate court. During the pendency of the proceedings the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the complainant executed an affidavit confirming receipt of the agreed amount and gave c…

The accused were acquitted by a magistrate on charges under the IPC and Motor Vehicles Act. The complainant appealed, but the Sessions Court affirmed the acquittal. The complainant then filed a criminal revision under Section 442 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to set aside the acquittal. The Hig…

The applicant, Payalben, filed a criminal revision application against the order of a subordinate court. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the revision application. The High Court considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted. The Court granted the request, allowing the application to be wit…

The petitioner, Manharbhai Bhavubhai Mer, filed a criminal revision application before the Gujarat High Court challenging an order of a subordinate court. The matter had already been settled in Criminal Appeal No. 417 of 2025 before the Sessions Judge, Gandhinagar, on 17 April 2026. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. M. Bar…

Snehalba Girirajsin​h Jadeja and another filed a criminal revision application but delayed filing it by 131 days. They pleaded that they were financially strained, responsible for school‑going children, and could not afford legal counsel, which caused the delay. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecuto…

The petition was filed by a 17‑year‑old child in conflict with law (CCL) through his mother under Section 102 read with Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, seeking regular bail in a murder case arising from a family dispute. The trial court had convicted the CCL under Section…

Balvantji Chamanji Thakor filed a criminal revision application but delayed filing a condonation of delay petition by 121 days, citing financial constraints. The State opposed, arguing the delay was not sufficiently explained. The Court examined the principles from Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji (AIR 1987 S…

The applicant, Balvantji Chamanji Thakor, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the 6th Additional Civil Judge, Mahesana, and the conviction was affirmed by the Sessions Judge. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the original complainant, …

The petitioners, Vinodkumar Maganlal Thakkar and another, filed a criminal revision application before the High Court of Gujarat. They subsequently moved the court seeking permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested that the court allow the withdrawal. The court considered …

The petitioner, Jatinbhai Dushyanbhai Shukal, filed a criminal revision application challenging his conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The revision was accompanied by temporary bail and a modification/deletion of condition applications. The High Court examined the jail records and found that the petitione…

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar @ Peter Gangaram Patel, filed a criminal revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the order dated 24‑Feb‑2026 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 9 of 2021. The High Court observed that the trial court…

The applicant, Dharmesh Shaileshbhai Fatekar, had a non‑bailable warrant converted to a bailable warrant on the condition of paying 20% of a cheque amount, which he could not arrange due to financial constraints. The 4th Additional Sessions Judge refused to condone a 403‑day delay in filing the appeal and ordered conti…

The applicant, Manshan Engineering Pvt. Ltd., was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to one year imprisonment, a conviction later affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge. The parties subsequently settled the dispute, with the complainant consenting to compound the offence unde…

The High Court of Gujarat entertained a criminal revision application filed by Manshan Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and another against their conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which had resulted in a one‑year simple imprisonment and was affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge. The parties later…

The petitioners filed a criminal revision application before the High Court of Gujarat challenging an order of a subordinate court. Subsequently, the petitioners, through their counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the revision application. The Court exercised its discretion to allow the withdrawal, noting…

The petitioner filed a criminal revision application challenging his conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which had been affirmed by the Sessions Court. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the complainant executed an affidavit con…

The applicant, Yashinhai Vazirbhai Banglawala, filed a criminal revision seeking release of his passport to attend international business engagements, arguing that the charge sheet has not been tried since 2020. He requested a one‑year suspension of Condition No.2 imposed in 2020, which restricted his travel, and offer…

The applicants, convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, were ordered a non‑bailable warrant for surrender. They filed a revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking conversion of the warrant to a bailable one so that they could file an appeal. The Co…

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of an 87‑day delay in filing a revision under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, alleging financial hardship. The respondent argued that the delay was not sufficiently explained. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s liberal approach i…

The High Court of Gujarat considered several criminal revision applications arising from convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, where the appellate court had imposed a condition that the accused pay 80% of the compensation to the complainant and deposit the remaining 20% with the government, w…

The High Court of Gujarat considered several criminal revision applications (R/CR.RA/1163‑1170 of 2026) arising from convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, where the appellate court had imposed a condition that the accused pay 80 % of the compensation to the complainant and deposit the remaini…

The High Court of Gujarat considered several criminal revision applications (R/CR.RA/1163‑1170 of 2026) arising from convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, where the appellate court had imposed a condition that the accused pay 80 % of the compensation to the complainant and deposit the remaini…

The High Court of Gujarat considered several criminal revision applications (R/CR.RA/1163‑1170 of 2026) arising from convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, where the appellate court had imposed a condition that the accused pay 80 % of the compensation to the complainant and deposit the remaini…

The High Court of Gujarat considered several criminal revision applications arising from convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, where the appellate court had imposed a condition that the accused pay 80% of the compensation to the complainant and deposit the remaining 20% with the government, w…

The High Court of Gujarat considered several criminal revision applications (R/CR.RA/1163‑1170 of 2026) arising from convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, where the appellate court had imposed a condition that the accused pay 80 % of the compensation to the complainant and deposit the remaini…

The High Court of Gujarat considered several criminal revision applications arising from convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, where the appellate court had imposed a condition that the accused pay 80% of the compensation to the complainant and deposit the remaining 20% with the government, w…

The applicant filed a criminal revision application seeking condonation of a 190‑day delay in filing under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, alleging financial hardship that prevented timely legal assistance. The respondent argued that the delay was not sufficiently explained. The Court referred to the Supreme Cou…

The applicant, Babubhai Ramabhai Solanki, filed a criminal revision application before the High Court of Gujarat seeking to challenge an order of a subordinate court. The applicant, through counsel, later moved the court for permission to withdraw the revision application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was repr…

The applicant filed a criminal revision application seeking permission to withdraw the proceeding. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Jignesh L. Hajare, requested the court’s leave to withdraw. The court considered the request and, finding no objection, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the revision application w…

Jatinbhai Vinodbhai Chauhan filed a criminal revision application seeking maintenance before the High Court of Gujarat. He later filed an affidavit expressing his desire to withdraw the application. The Court took the affidavit on record. The Court considered whether a party may withdraw a pending criminal revision app…

The applicant filed a criminal revision seeking relief from a conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, originally imposed by the 11th Additional Judicial Magistrate and affirmed by the 11th Additional Sessions Judge. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties settled the dis…

The applicant filed a criminal revision seeking relief from a conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, originally imposed by a magistrate and affirmed by a sessions judge. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the original complainant c…

Pradipkumar Rasiklal Patel was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the trial court and the conviction was affirmed by the appellate court. During the pendency of the proceedings the complainant, Mahendrakumar Ambalal Patel, executed an affidavit of settlement and consented to compound the o…

The petitioners, Salmabanu Mustaqbai Mansuri and others, filed a criminal revision application but delayed filing it by two days. They sought condonation of this delay, explaining that the mother had to care for minor children and the family was experiencing financial difficulties, which prevented timely engagement of …

Ajaysinh Ranjitsinh Chauhan, who is in jail, filed a criminal revision application but delayed filing the condonation of delay application by 32 days, citing lack of legal knowledge and inability to contact his lawyer. The State opposed the condonation, arguing the delay was not sufficiently explained. The Court referr…

The applicant filed a criminal revision application seeking condonation of a 94‑day delay in filing under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, alleging financial hardship that prevented timely legal assistance. The respondent argued that the delay was not sufficiently explained. The Court referred to the Supreme Cour…

The High Court considered a revision application challenging a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which had been affirmed by the appellate court. During the pendency of the proceedings the parties settled the dispute and the complainant gave written consent to compound the offence under Sec…

The petitioner, Dakshesh Ramnikbhai Patel, filed a criminal revision seeking relief from a conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which had been affirmed by the appellate court. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the complainant co…

The petitioners Vaibhaviben D/o Bakubhai Kadiya filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 37‑day delay in filing a revision application, citing financial hardship and responsibility for a school‑going minor. The Court examined the principle from Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji (AIR …

The accused was convicted by the 2nd Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mahesana, and the conviction was affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge for a Section 138 offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act, resulting in a one‑year simple imprisonment. The parties later settled the dispute amicably, with the complainant con…

The applicant filed a criminal revision application against an order of a subordinate court and later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the applicant moved that the application be withdrawn. The court considered whether it could grant such permission. It held that the ap…

The High Court of Gujarat disposed of a criminal revision application for maintenance filed by Renuka Chetanbhari Goswami and another applicant. The parties engaged in mediation, and the mediator’s report indicated a successful settlement. An MOU was executed and signed by the parties and their advocates on 10 April 20…

M/s Laxmi Group of Industries and others were convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and a non‑bailable warrant was issued under Section 418(2) of the CrPC. The applicants sought conversion of the non‑bailable warrant into a bailable warrant so that they could file an appeal against the convictio…

The appellant, a civil judge, was convicted under Section 13(1)(e) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for possessing immovable property worth Rs 35.7 lakh that was held to be disproportionate to his known sources of income. The prosecution alleged that a gift of Rs 7 lakh was received from NRI …

The accused, three police officers, were charged with illegally transporting 312 bottles of IMFL from Rajasthan to Gujarat. They were granted bail by the trial court, but the State moved to cancel the bail, alleging breach of bail conditions and the seriousness of the offence. The Sessions Judge cancelled the bail sole…

The petitioner sought revision of his conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which had been affirmed by the appellate court. During the pendency of the proceedings the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the complainant consented to compound the offence under Section 147 of t…

The father of a child in conflict with law (CCL) filed a revision application under Section 102 read with Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, challenging the Additional Sessions Judge's handling of a regular bail application for an offence under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2…

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 548‑day delay in filing under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, alleging financial hardship that prevented timely legal assistance. The respondent argued that the delay was not sufficiently explained. The court referred to the Suprem…

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 130‑day delay in filing under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Respondents 1 and 2 opposed, arguing the applicant had not complied with a family court order and possessed sufficient income, while the State counsel said the delay was…

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a five‑day delay in filing a revision under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, alleging financial constraints prevented timely filing. The State opposed, contending the explanation was insufficient. The Court referred to the Supreme Co…

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 14‑day delay in filing a revision under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, alleging financial constraints prevented timely filing. The respondent argued that the delay was not sufficiently explained. The court referred to the Supreme …

Nareshbhai Virabhai Vadi applied for a revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to replace the bank guarantee condition imposed by the Special Court, NDPS Act, for the interim release (Muddamal) of a seized Maruti Suzuki vehicle. The Special Court had ordered the vehi…

The applicant, who is incarcerated, filed a criminal revision application 122 days late, seeking condonation of the delay. The sole issue was whether the delay could be excused under the provisions allowing courts to condone delay for substantial justice. The court referred to the Supreme Court’s liberal approach in Co…

The applicant filed a criminal revision application for maintenance. During the hearing, the learned advocate informed the court that the cause had become infructuous and sought permission to withdraw the matter. The court, after considering the request, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the application was…

The applicant was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonour of a cheque, a conviction affirmed by the appellate court. The applicant filed a criminal revision seeking quashal of the conviction, asserting that the dispute was settled and the complainant, who was the brother of the accus…

Ketanbhai Himmatbhai Parmar filed a criminal revision application (R/CR.RA/2574/2025) before the High Court of Gujarat challenging an order of a subordinate court. The applicant, through counsel Mr. Vatsal S. Parikh, informed the Court that the cause had become infructuous and sought permission to withdraw the proceedi…

Rajiv Sureshbhai Sheth was convicted under Sections 37 and 40 of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and sentenced to one year and six months imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 1 lakh. The appellant filed a recall application after the appellate judge, who had been transferred, delivered the judgment w…

Rajiv Sureshbhai Sheth was convicted under Sections 37 and 40 of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and sentenced to one year and six months imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 1 lakh. The appellant filed a recall application after the appellate judge, who had been transferred, delivered the judgment w…

The petitioner, Johnson D. Getlor, filed a criminal revision application and sought condonation of an 836‑day delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, claiming financial hardship and being in judicial custody prevented timely filing. The State opposed, arguing the delay was not sufficiently explained. The Cou…

The petitioner, Imranbhai Musabhai Ahemadbhai Patel, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 142‑day delay in filing under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. He alleged that financial difficulties and his detention in judicial custody prevented him from obtaining legal assistance in time…

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a six‑day delay in filing under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, alleging that the parties were engaged in settlement negotiations under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The respondent argued that the delay was not…

The petitioner, while in judicial custody and facing financial difficulties, filed a criminal revision application 126 days after the prescribed period, seeking condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The respondent argued that the delay was not adequately explained. The Court referred to the …

The petitioner, Chaudhary Bhagubhai Mansangbhai, challenged the order of the Additional Sessions Judge dated 11 July 2024 that upheld a charge‑sheet under the PC&PNDT Act and Sections 313, 315 and 114 of the IPC for alleged sex‑determination and illegal abortion. The petitioner argued that, under Section 28 of the PC&P…

Bhavikbhai Yatinbhai Patel was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque of Rs.1,60,000 that later bounced. The appellant had already deposited 20% of the amount before the Appellate Court and submitted the receipt to the High Court. He applied for a revision seeking suspe…

Meet Ramjibhai Kariyavara filed a criminal revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the seizure of his Skoda vehicle and to have it released. The vehicle had been seized in connection with an NDPS case where MD‑drug was found on a co‑accused, not on the appli…

The petitioner, Gelabhai Karamshibhai Makwana, filed a criminal revision application (R/CR.RA/234/2026) before the High Court of Gujarat challenging an order of a subordinate court. The applicant's counsel, Mr. A.R. Shah, later informed the court that the matter had become infructuous and sought permission to withdraw …

The applicant, Hareshbai Lakhubhai Dakhda, filed a criminal revision application (R/CR.RA/439/2025) before the High Court of Gujarat seeking relief against an order of a subordinate court. The applicant, through counsel Mr. Maulik M. Soni, later moved the court for permission to withdraw the revision application. The r…

The applicant, Mustakim, filed a criminal revision application before the High Court of Gujarat and later sought permission to withdraw the same. The learned advocate for the applicant requested the court's leave to withdraw the application. The court considered whether such permission could be granted. It held that th…

Mahendrabhai Chimanlal Chauhan filed a criminal revision seeking to call for records, quash two orders dated 18‑Oct‑2022 and 12‑Jan‑2026, and stay proceedings in ACB cases. The High Court noted that the charges had already been framed and the accused's plea recorded, as earlier held in Revision Application No.223 of 20…

The petitioners, Pukhya Rasayan Pvt. Ltd. and its directors, challenged an order directing them to deposit 20% of a cheque amount before the appellate court while their sentence suspension was under consideration. They sought recall of the order dated 13 March 2026, arguing it caused undue delay. The respondents, the S…

The petitioners, Pukhya Technical Solutions Pvt. Ltd. and others, sought recall of the High Court's order dated 13 March 2026 which directed them to deposit 20% of a cheque amount before the appellate court while their sentence suspension was being considered. They argued that the issue required a full hearing and that…

Imran Yusufbhai Nayani filed a criminal revision against the order of the 5th Additional District and Sessions Judge which had rejected his prayer for discharge in a case involving offences under several IPC sections, the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Amendment Act, 2011 and th…

The applicant, Vasantbhai Rameshbhai Vadodariya, filed a criminal revision application challenging his conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court had earlier granted interim relief pending the deposit of a specified amount. In compliance with the Court's order dated 26.03.2025, the applicant deposi…

The petitioner, Sheetal Rana, filed a criminal revision application (No. 1150 of 2024) seeking maintenance of a prior order. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajpurohit R. Bhawarlal, later moved before the High Court of Gujarat requesting permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was re…

The petitioner, Rolfi Jashvantlal Pandav, filed a criminal revision application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenging a decision in a domestic violence matter. The application was listed before the High Court of Gujarat, Ahmedabad. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Sudhansh…

The applicant filed a criminal revision seeking to set aside a conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, originally imposed on 13 January 2023 and affirmed on appeal on 31 January 2026. The parties later reached an amicable settlement, with the complainant receiving the full cheque am…

The applicants filed a criminal revision application before the Gujarat High Court seeking relief against an order of a subordinate court. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application, stating it had become infructuous. The Court granted the request, allowing the withdraw…

The wife of the petitioner and her minor child filed a criminal revision application and sought condonation of a 146‑day delay in filing the application, citing mental and emotional trauma. The respondent State argued that the delay was not sufficiently explained. The court referred to the principles laid down in Colle…

The petitioner, Piyushbhai Chinubhai Rami, filed a criminal revision application (No. 4379/2026) after a delay of 166 days. The revision sought relief against the order dated 13.03.2026 passed by the High Court. The petitioner argued that the delay should be condoned. The Court examined the averments in the application…

The petitioner filed a criminal revision application and subsequently sought condonation of a 49‑day delay in filing the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, citing financial hardship. The State opposed, arguing the delay was not sufficiently explained. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s libe…

The High Court of Gujarat heard a criminal revision application filed by Mahemudaben challenging an order of a subordinate court in a double murder case. The applicant’s counsel argued that no case existed to even frame a charge, while the Additional Public Prosecutor contended that the matter involved a double murder.…

The petitioner, Ramesh Kumar Nanjibahi Prajapati, filed a criminal revision seeking to set aside the Sessions Judge's order that cancelled his bail and denied him the opportunity to cross‑examine the first informant. He argued that the cancellation was due to his counsel's illness, not any fault of his own, and that th…

Bhikhabhai Hirabhai Savaliya filed a criminal revision application (R/CR.RA/1025/2025) before the Gujarat High Court challenging an order of a subordinate court. The applicant, through counsel Mr. Yogeshkumar A. Ratanpara, later moved the court seeking permission to withdraw the revision. The respondent State of Gujara…

Mohamad Akrambhai filed a criminal revision application before the Gujarat High Court challenging an order dated 2 December 2025 passed by a subordinate court. The revision was heard by Justice Gita Gopi. After considering the subordinate court's order, the High Court disposed of the revision application. No substantiv…

The petitioners, Sayrabanu w/o Akrambhai Vahidbhai Shaikh and others, filed a criminal revision application (R/CR.RA/2209/2025) challenging the order dated 2 December 2025 passed by a subordinate court. The application was listed before the Hon’ble Ms. Justice Gita Gopi of the Gujarat High Court. After considering the …

The applicant was convicted by a magistrate on 25‑02‑2022 for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a conviction that was affirmed by the Sessions Court on 06‑12‑2025. The parties later settled the dispute amicably, and the complainant consented to compound the offence under Section 147 of the…

The applicant was convicted by a magistrate on 25‑02‑2022 for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a conviction that was affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge on 06‑12‑2025. The parties later settled the dispute amicably, with the complainant withdrawing the amount deposited with the appe…

The applicant, Amarshi Chaganbhai Bhanderi, was convicted by a magistrate on 25‑02‑2022 for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a conviction that was affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge on 06‑12‑2025. The parties subsequently settled the dispute amicably, with the complainant withdrawi…

The petitioner filed a criminal revision seeking relief from a conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, originally imposed in 2018 and affirmed by an appellate court in 2026. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the original complainan…

The applicant sought successive regular bail after the filing of a chargesheet. The trial report indicated that six witnesses remained to be examined, and the trial judge requested an additional 7-8 months to complete the trial. The High Court, noting the pending examination of witnesses and the anticipated delay, disp…

The petitioner filed a criminal revision application (No. 10922/2026) but delayed filing by 130 days. The petitioner sought condonation of this delay. The High Court examined the averments in the application and found no sufficient reason to reject condonation. Consequently, the Court condoned the 130‑day delay and all…

The petitioner, Pankaj Indravadan Chandak of Veena Enterprises, filed three criminal revision applications challenging convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which had been affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties settled the dispute amicab…

The petitioner, Pankaj Indravadan Chandak of Veena Enterprises, filed three criminal revision applications challenging convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surat and affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge. During the pendency of the proceedings the …

Pankaj Indravadan Chandak, proprietor of Veena Enterprises, filed criminal revision applications challenging convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in three separate cases, all of which had been affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge. During the pendency of the proceedings, the complainant s…

Kalusinh Vaktusinh Makvana was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by a Judicial Magistrate and the conviction was affirmed by the Sessions Court. During the pendency of the proceedings the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the complainant gave consent to compound the offence under Sec…

The applicant, Asalambhai Aamadbhai Gandhar, filed a criminal revision application concerning a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case but delayed filing by 35 days. He sought condonation of the delay, arguing that the cheque amount had been paid, the parties had settled, and an affidavit of the complainant confir…

Harshadray Chamanlal Vasrani was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the Trial Court and the conviction was affirmed by the Sessions Court. During the pendency of the proceedings the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the complainant executed an affidavit of settlement and consented …

Rahul Babulal Shah, proprietor of Jay Travels, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to one year simple imprisonment, a conviction later upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge. He filed a criminal revision application alleging that the dispute with the complainant had been ami…

The High Court of Gujarat heard criminal appeal No. 1442 of 2008 filed by Vinubhai Vallabhbhai against the State of Gujarat. The appellant could not be served with notice because he had died on 03-12-2013, as evidenced by a death certificate, police report, and statements of his son and cousin. The court considered the…

The appellant, Asgar Abdulhusain Abuli, died on 12 January 2026, as verified by a police report and a statement from his brother. The High Court noted the appellant's death and considered the effect on Criminal Appeal No. 214 of 2013. The court applied the principle that a criminal appeal abates upon the death of the a…

The Director of Globe Ecologistics filed a special criminal application under Section 439(2) of the CrPC seeking cancellation of bail granted to the accused in a cyber‑crime case involving offences under IPC Sections 406, 420, 120B and IT Act Sections 66(c) and 66(d). The petitioner alleged that the accused concealed t…

Kajalben, the wife of Hiteshbhai Muchadiya, sought to appeal a conviction under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, which imposed three years' simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs.40,000, already paid. The appeal was filed 13 days beyond the prescribed period because the applicant, a lady, needed time to a…

The appellants were convicted under IPC sections 323 and 504, and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and insulting a member of a Scheduled Caste. The parties later settled the dispute with community intervention, and the appellants argued…