KETANBHAI HIMMATBHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
- Bench
- GITA GOPI
Holding
The revision application is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary
Ketanbhai Himmatbhai Parmar filed a criminal revision application (R/CR.RA/2574/2025) before the High Court of Gujarat challenging an order of a subordinate court. The applicant, through counsel Mr. Vatsal S. Parikh, informed the Court that the cause had become infructuous and sought permission to withdraw the proceedings. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Mr. Bhargav Pandya. Justice Gita Gopi considered the request and, finding no objection, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the revision application was disposed of as withdrawn, with no further adjudication on the merits.
Issues considered
- Whether the revision application may be withdrawn at the request of the applicant
Subjects
Judgment
R/CR.RA/2574/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/04/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST ORDER PASSED BY
SUBORDINATE COURT) NO. 2574 of 2025
==========================================================
KETANBHAI HIMMATBHAI PARMAR
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR VATSAL S PARIKH(7452) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR BHARGAV PANDYA APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI
Date : 09/04/2026
ORDER
Learned Advocate states that the cause has become
infructuous.
Thus, under instructions, seeks permission to withdraw
the matter.
The matter stands disposed of as withdrawn.
(GITA GOPI,J)
PARMAR KRISH/117
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: PARMAR KRISH(HC02348), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/04/2026 18:20:08
Page 1 of 1
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.