Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusTAUFIKMIYA YAKUBMIYA SHEIKH

Disposal
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

Holding

The first appeals are dismissed on the ground that the awarded compensation is meager, without addressing the merits of the case.

Summary

The United India Insurance Company Ltd filed first appeals under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmedabad Rural, in two motor accident claim petitions. The appeals challenged the compensation awarded to the victims of a road accident. The High Court, noting that the amount of compensation was meager, disposed of the appeals solely on the ground of the small monetary value, without expressing any opinion on the merits or legal questions raised. The court clarified that this disposal does not affect any other pending appeals or claims arising from the same accident, and that res judicata will not apply to those proceedings. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed and the awarded amount, with any accrued interest, was ordered to be released to the claimants.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate basis for disposing of a first appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act when the awarded compensation is of a small amount?
  • Does the dismissal of the first appeal on the ground of monetary smallness preclude the application of res judicata in other proceedings arising from the same accident?

Legislation cited

Subjects

Motor Vehicles ActSection 173First AppealCompensationSmall amountRes judicataInsurance claim

Judgment

      C/FA/4738/2023                                ORDER DATED: 05/02/2026




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                       R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4738 of 2023

                                   With
                       R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4739 of 2023
==========================================================
                   UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
                                   Versus
                   TAUFIKMIYA YAKUBMIYA SHEIKH & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MASUMI V NANAVATY(9321) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR VIBHUTI NANAVATI(513) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
RULE SERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 1,2
==========================================================
 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                               Date : 05/02/2026

                           COMMON ORAL ORDER


(1)    Insurance Company is in First Appeals under section 173 of the Motor
       Vehicles Act, 1988. Challenge is made to the judgment and award
       passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Ahmedabad
       Rural, in Motor Accident Claim Petitions No.141 of 2013 and 135 of
       2013.
(2)    Perusal of the judgment and award indicates that Insurance Company
       has challenged the judgment and award made to the victim of the
       road accident.
(3)    Heard learned advocates for the respective parties.
(4)    Since the amount involved in the First Appeals is meagers, paying due
       regard to smallness of amount, this Court is of the considered view
       that the First Appeals should be disposed of as compensation
       awarded seems to be just and reasonable and no interference is
       called. It is hereby made clear that this First Appeals are disposed of
       only on the ground of award of compensation being meager and
       small. This Court has not expressed any opinion on merits and
       question of law raised in this First Appeals and are kept open to be



                                   Page 1 of 2
          C/FA/4738/2023                                                      ORDER DATED: 05/02/2026




           urged in other proceedings which may arise from the same road
           accident / same judgment and award. It is made clear that this order
           will not come in the way of adjudication of any other First Appeals
           pending against same judgment and award or adjudication of any
           other claim petition arising from same road accident. Since the First
           Appeals are disposed of only on the contention of monetary value
           being small, principle of res judicata shall not be applied to any other
           proceedings arising from the same road accident or same judgment
           and award.
  (5)      In view of above, the First Appeals are dismissed. Pending Civil
           Application, if any, stands disposed of as having become infructuous.
           No order as to costs.
  (6)      Record and Proceedings and amount, if any lying before this Court is
           ordered to be transmitted to the concerned Tribunal forthwith along
           with accrued interest, if any. The entire awarded amount be
           disbursed and released in favour of the claimants after due
           veri3cation by transferring the said amount to the account of the
           claimants either by RTGS or NEFT mode.




                                                                          (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J)
 SUCHIT



Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: PATEL SUCHIT JAYESHBHAI(HC01083), Private Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 05/02/2026 14:22:58




                                                    Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "Motor Vehicles Act"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.